← pool

📈 Private capital concentrates in a few mega-GPs that take themselves public

Private-market capital is concentrating into three or four mega-firms (Andreessen, Tiger, SoftBank) that will deploy ~80% of it within two years, and at that scale the rational move is to take the GP public the way private equity already did. The listed read-through is the scaled alternative-asset managers whose AUM-based GP valuation is the template Chamath prices the trade off.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 58.6 WATCH
EMBER
band · contested
▲ LONG BX
expression · bullish equities
RIGHT
result · return +15.6% · vs SPY +10.4%
2024-01-08
born 2022-01-08 (E62) → window closed
⚠ CONFLICTING IDEAS ON THE SAME TICKER — the board is arguing with itself; net it out (ticker view →)
BX · Endowment liquidity crunch forces discounted private-equity secondaries SHORT DORMANT 12.0
KKR · Endowment liquidity crunch forces discounted private-equity secondaries SHORT DORMANT 12.0
APO · Endowment liquidity crunch forces discounted private-equity secondaries SHORT DORMANT 12.0

⚖ Why this result

fully deterministic — computed from daily closes on the scoring date; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2022-01-08 → 2024-01-08 — first mention + 24-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▲ LONG BX (primary play). BX rose 15.6% over the window → return (sign flipped for a SHORT) = +15.6% (the call made money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +5.2% → vs SPY = +15.6 − (+5.2) = +10.4% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the result uses.
  4. Rule fired:
    ▶ RIGHT — return ≥ +10% AND beat SPY by 5+ ✓ (return 15.6, vs SPY 10.4)
    · HALF — return ≥ +5% OR beat SPY at all
    · WRONG — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a RIGHT earn 1.0 each, opposers the opposite — this feeds the scoreboard. supported: Bill Gurley, Brad Gerstner, Friedberg, Jason | opposed: Chamath, Sacks

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2022-01-08)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▲ LONG BXstock PRIMARY the listed GP Chamath explicitly values off AUM ('terminal valuation of Blackstone as indexed to AUM'); the template a public a16z/Tiger would be priced against
▲ LONG APOstock adjacent same cohort; GP-of-scale economics Friedberg says venture is now replicating
▲ LONG KKRstock adjacent same listed-alt-manager cohort benefiting from private capital concentrating in mega-firms

Mention log newest first

Jason
Jason equities 49% · n=105 · E146 (2023-09-22) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 49:27 SUPPORT
“They're cutting two funds out of their 20, and then they're cutting their commitments to the weaker ones of the other 18”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) equities 48% · n=22 · E141 (2023-08-11) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 46:00 SUPPORT
“But now they have a lot of mouths to feed. So when you put money to work, you pull down more fee. And so, you know, these funds now, I mean, if you're Tiger or some of these big funds, you have giant cost bases that you've created because of the size of the firm that you created.”
Bill Gurley
Bill Gurley (regular guest ×1.0) equities 56% · n=9 · E141 (2023-08-11) · sentiment · strength 3 ▶ 25:19 SUPPORT
“I think a lot of people realize that if you can get 2.5% or 3% management fee investing $300 million at a pop, that's an easier lifestyle than actually taking board seats and doing work. And so I think a lot of money and activity got pulled into the late stage market. Nearly every firm started doing that.”
Chamath
Chamath equities 42% · n=163 · E139 (2023-07-27) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 30:11 OPPOSE
“The risk adjusted returns on ventures, and this is not to throw shade at even all of those people that you mentioned are fucking terrible.”
Sacks
Sacks equities 44% · n=96 · E135 (2023-07-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:22:20 OPPOSE
“So Insight was trying to raise a $10 billion fund and they've only been able to raise two, according to this article.”
Chamath
Chamath equities 42% · n=163 · E135 (2023-07-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:20:35 OPPOSE
“And all of a sudden, the profits don't matter, which means the outcomes don't matter, which means the diligence is perfunctory.”
Sacks
Sacks equities 44% · n=96 · E132 (2023-06-10) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 39:14 OPPOSE
“Yeah, but I actually think retrenching is good because it simplifies things.”
Chamath
Chamath equities 42% · n=163 · E132 (2023-06-10) · sentiment · strength 3 ▶ 28:03 OPPOSE
“Then they tried this like very convoluted evergreen structure right before the market fell apart, where you could basically become a permanent capital vehicle. And as far as I can tell from the outside looking in, it just seems like a tax, a tax play for the GPs to not have to sell and realize capital gains.”
Chamath
Chamath equities 42% · n=163 · E120 (2023-03-17) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 54:58 OPPOSE
“All roads lead to, it says we're in for a slog. And so trying to put a $2 billion fund to work doesn't seem to make a lot of economic sense to some of the smartest people in the room.”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) equities 48% · n=22 · E118 (2023-03-03) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 28:10 SUPPORT
“I think subscale small funds with no DPI, they're going to find a really, really tough time to Chamath's point about DPI raising capital. And you're going to see the scale player scale.”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) equities 48% · n=22 · E101 (2022-10-22) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 59:54 OPPOSE
“I think the other thing it does, this idea of the industrialization of venture, the SoftBank, the Tigers, it's a myth. You can't industrialize. You can build an index fund of the public market because you can buy every company. You might even be able to build an index like fund in private equity because everybody can go bid for every company. But in venture, the founder chooses you.”
Sacks
Sacks equities 44% · n=96 · E92 (2022-08-20) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 17:58 SUPPORT
“Well, I mean, I think Chamath's right that their stated goal is to build like a larger institutional VC type investor. I mean, doesn't Andreessen have a portrait of JP Morgan hanging on his wall or something? I mean, they want to turn VC from being like a little craft business to something larger and more institutional.”
Chamath
Chamath equities 42% · n=163 · E92 (2022-08-20) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 16:57 SUPPORT
“You can make the argument that technology is as important as those three categories. And so, you know, if I think it's pretty obvious that Andreessen is trying to build a publicly ownable security that represents all things in technology. So again, I don't think that they're necessarily out to generate massive returns for LPs.”
Chamath
Chamath equities 42% · n=163 · E91 (2022-08-13) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 12:26 OPPOSE
“It is scalable. It's just that if you try to scale it, your returns will go to zero.”
Sacks
Sacks equities 44% · n=96 · E91 (2022-08-13) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 11:42 OPPOSE
“And fundamentally, you know, VC is not that scalable. There was an attempt to make it scalable. There's an attempt to push more money into VC.”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) equities 48% · n=22 · E81 (2022-05-23) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 18:37 SUPPORT · horizon 36mo
“Over the next three years, of the quarter trillion, I think you're probably counting 50% of that is private equity or more. Maybe 70% is traditional private equity. ... Leveraged buyout firms are gonna have a field day. ... I mean, so Toma Bravo and all these guys, they will spend all of that.”
Sacks
Sacks equities 44% · n=96 · E80 (2022-05-13) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 40:26 OPPOSE
“I agree at that point that these mega funds are very hard to repay because they require you to have multiple winners, not just winners, but mega winners. So, you know, we've always kept our funds in that five to $600 million range where you really only need one winner per fund to basically return the fund.”
Chamath
Chamath equities 42% · n=163 · E80 (2022-05-13) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 38:28 REVERSAL
“And what the data says is that in the last 30 years, the minute you get over your ski tips at a billion dollars, very few people know what they're doing. Very few.”
Sacks
Sacks equities 44% · n=96 · E78 (2022-04-30) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 26:02 OPPOSE
“it's gotten a lot harder, I think, especially at the growth rounds. We actually have signed to growth term sheets recently, and it was much harder for us to do growth rounds last year, just because you had these huge mega funds come in at crazy valuations. But now they're kind of licking their wounds, and we're starting to see some really attractive growth opportunities. Everyone else is backed off.”
Chamath
Chamath equities 42% · n=163 · E75 (2022-04-09) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 23:35 SUPPORT
“if you're seeking out AUM, you're going to hire a very different kind of person than if you're helping trying to help build companies. And the difference is that when you're trying to raise AUM, your customer is not the company, the customer is the LP.”
Friedberg
Friedberg equities 43% · n=123 · E75 (2022-04-09) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 20:56 SUPPORT
“the incentive for a traditional venture capitalist that maybe isn't motivated by improving their craft, but they're motivated and incentivized primarily by making money is to raise more capital and get more deals. ... It used to be maybe a VC would sit on a handful of boards, and now it's like you're the board representative for 12 companies. ... the VCs are more incentivized to raise more money, to make more investments and then pay less attention and just go raise the next fund.”
Chamath
Chamath equities 42% · n=163 · E68 (2022-02-19) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 48:39 SUPPORT
“Can I take the other side of this? ... I think it's going to work, but not for the right reasons. ... if these large late-stage crossover firms really step into the early stage, I think they could really build a big book of business.”
Sacks
Sacks equities 44% · n=96 · E68 (2022-02-19) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 47:44 OPPOSE
“I don't know if this reporting is actually true, but if the goal is all of a sudden for Tiger to become a Series A investor that competes with Kraft or Sequoia or these other firms that are very hands-on, that doesn't seem like a great strategy to me.”
Chamath
Chamath equities 42% · n=163 · E62 (2022-01-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:00:37 SUPPORT
“The problem is if you're running that much money, you're insane to not take your GP public because it's the only way. ... when you're sitting on 20, 30, 40 billion of imputed wealth by being the owner of the GP of Tiger or Andreessen, you'd be insane to not go public.”
Friedberg
Friedberg equities 43% · n=123 · E62 (2022-01-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:00:08 SUPPORT · horizon 24mo
“Silicon Valley in terms of capital is seeing power returns itself. There's going to be a few firms that are going to control 80% of the capital. ... if you look at the aggregate capital that's being deployed into private markets right now, in probably two years, 80% of it's going to come from three firms or four firms.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total push on the score, in conviction points across every mention — supports and opposes · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Chamath
Chamath 42%
10 scoring events · 34% of moves
+52.0 / -56.8 → net -4.8
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner 48% regular guest ×1.0
4 scoring events · 19% of moves
+46.0 / -14.4 → net +31.6
Sacks
Sacks 44%
7 scoring events · 19% of moves
+12.3 / -48.0 → net -35.7
Friedberg
Friedberg 43%
2 scoring events · 14% of moves
+45.7 → net +45.7
Bill Gurley
Bill Gurley 56% regular guest ×1.0
1 scoring event · 9% of moves
+27.0 → net +27.0
Jason
Jason 49%
1 scoring event · 5% of moves
+14.5 → net +14.5

⏳ decay drained -38.1 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E62 2022-01-08 init +35.0 35.0 E62 born by Friedberg (explicit_prediction x2)
E62 2022-01-08 reinforce +14.6 49.6 E62 Chamath support x2 (new voice)
E63 2022-01-15 decay -1.0 48.6 E63 silent
E64 2022-01-22 decay -1.0 47.7 E64 silent
E65 2022-01-29 decay -1.0 46.7 E65 silent
E66 2022-02-05 decay -0.9 45.8 E66 silent
E67 2022-02-12 decay -0.9 44.9 E67 silent
E68 2022-02-19 oppose -12.0 32.9 E68 Sacks opposes x2
E68 2022-02-19 reinforce +12.1 44.9 E68 Chamath support x3
E70 2022-02-24 decay -0.9 44.0 E70 silent
E71 2022-03-05 decay -0.9 43.2 E71 silent
E72 2022-03-19 decay -0.9 42.3 E72 silent
E73 2022-03-26 decay -0.8 41.5 E73 silent
E74 2022-04-01 decay -0.8 40.6 E74 silent
E75 2022-04-09 reinforce +10.7 51.3 E75 Friedberg support x3
E75 2022-04-09 reinforce +7.3 58.6 E75 Chamath support x2
E76 2022-04-16 decay -1.2 57.4 E76 silent
E77 2022-04-23 decay -1.1 56.3 E77 silent
E78 2022-04-30 oppose -12.0 44.3 E78 Sacks opposes x2
E79 2022-05-07 decay -0.9 43.4 E79 silent
E80 2022-05-13 reversal -26.0 17.4 E80 Chamath flips
E80 2022-05-13 oppose -12.0 5.4 E80 Sacks opposes x2
E81 2022-05-23 reinforce +21.3 26.7 E81 Brad Gerstner support x2 (new voice)
E82 2022-05-24 decay -0.5 26.1 E82 silent
E84 2022-06-24 decay -0.5 25.6 E84 silent
E85 2022-06-30 decay -0.5 25.1 E85 silent
E86 2022-07-08 decay -0.5 24.6 E86 silent
E87 2022-07-14 decay -0.5 24.1 E87 silent
E88 2022-07-22 decay -0.5 23.6 E88 silent
E89 2022-07-29 decay -0.5 23.1 E89 silent
E90 2022-08-05 decay -0.5 22.7 E90 silent
E91 2022-08-13 oppose -12.0 10.7 E91 Sacks opposes x2
E91 2022-08-13 oppose -10.7 0.0 E91 Chamath opposes x3
E92 2022-08-20 reinforce +18.0 18.0 E92 Chamath support x3 (flipped from oppose)
E92 2022-08-20 reinforce +12.3 30.3 E92 Sacks support x2 (flipped from oppose)
E93 2022-08-26 decay -0.6 29.7 E93 silent
E94 2022-09-01 decay -0.6 29.1 E94 silent
E95 2022-09-10 decay -0.6 28.5 E95 silent
E96 2022-09-17 decay -0.6 27.9 E96 silent
E97 2022-09-23 decay -0.6 27.4 E97 silent
E98 2022-10-01 decay -0.5 26.8 E98 silent
E99 2022-10-07 decay -0.5 26.3 E99 silent
E100 2022-10-14 decay -0.5 25.8 E100 silent
E101 2022-10-22 oppose -14.4 11.4 E101 Brad Gerstner opposes x3
E102 2022-10-29 decay -0.2 11.2 E102 silent
E103 2022-11-05 decay -0.2 10.9 E103 silent
E105 2022-11-19 decay -0.2 10.7 E105 silent
E106 2022-12-03 decay -0.2 10.5 E106 silent
E107 2022-12-10 decay -0.2 10.3 E107 silent
E108 2022-12-16 decay -0.2 10.1 E108 silent
E109 2022-12-24 decay -0.2 9.9 E109 silent
E110 2023-01-06 decay -0.2 9.7 E110 silent
E111 2023-01-13 decay -0.2 9.5 E111 silent
E112 2023-01-20 decay -0.2 9.3 E112 silent
E113 2023-01-27 decay -0.2 9.1 E113 silent
E114 2023-02-04 decay -0.2 8.9 E114 silent
E115 2023-02-11 decay -0.2 8.8 E115 silent
E116 2023-02-17 decay -0.2 8.6 E116 silent
E118 2023-03-03 reinforce +13.7 22.3 E118 Brad Gerstner support x2 (flipped from oppose)
E119 2023-03-11 decay -0.4 21.8 E119 silent
E120 2023-03-17 oppose -12.0 9.8 E120 Chamath opposes x2
E121 2023-03-24 decay -0.2 9.6 E121 silent
E122 2023-03-31 decay -0.2 9.5 E122 silent
E123 2023-04-07 decay -0.2 9.3 E123 silent
E124 2023-04-14 decay -0.2 9.1 E124 silent
E125 2023-04-21 decay -0.2 8.9 E125 silent
E126 2023-04-28 decay -0.2 8.7 E126 silent
E128 2023-05-12 decay -0.2 8.5 E128 silent
E129 2023-05-19 decay -0.2 8.4 E129 silent
E130 2023-05-26 decay -0.2 8.2 E130 silent
E131 2023-06-02 decay -0.2 8.0 E131 silent
E132 2023-06-10 oppose -8.0 0.0 E132 Chamath opposes x3
E132 2023-06-10 oppose · 0.0 E132 Sacks opposes x2
E133 2023-06-16 decay · 0.0 E133 silent
E134 2023-06-24 decay · 0.0 E134 silent
E135 2023-07-01 oppose · 0.0 E135 Chamath opposes x2
E135 2023-07-01 oppose · 0.0 E135 Sacks opposes x3
E136 2023-07-09 decay · 0.0 E136 silent
E137 2023-07-14 decay · 0.0 E137 silent
E139 2023-07-27 oppose · 0.0 E139 Chamath opposes x3
E140 2023-08-04 decay · 0.0 E140 silent
E141 2023-08-11 reinforce +27.0 27.0 E141 Bill Gurley support x3 (new voice)
E141 2023-08-11 reinforce +10.9 38.0 E141 Brad Gerstner support x2
E142 2023-08-18 decay -0.8 37.2 E142 silent
E143 2023-08-25 decay -0.7 36.4 E143 silent
E144 2023-09-01 decay -0.7 35.7 E144 silent
E146 2023-09-22 reinforce +14.5 50.2 E146 Jason support x2 (new voice)
E147 2023-09-29 decay -1.0 49.2 E147 silent
E148 2023-10-07 decay -1.0 48.2 E148 silent
E149 2023-10-13 decay -1.0 47.2 E149 silent
E150 2023-10-20 decay -0.9 46.3 E150 silent
E151 2023-10-27 decay -0.9 45.4 E151 silent
E152 2023-11-03 decay -0.9 44.5 E152 silent
E156 2023-12-08 decay -0.9 43.6 E156 silent
E157 2023-12-16 decay -0.9 42.7 E157 silent
E158 2023-12-23 decay -0.9 41.8 E158 silent
E159 2023-12-29 decay -0.8 41.0 E159 silent
E160 2024-01-06 decay -0.8 40.2 E160 silent