E119

E119: Silicon Valley Bank implodes: startup extinction event, contagion risk, culpability, and more

2023-03-11 spoken.md · speaker-labeled ▶ watch ← E118 all episodes E120 →

4
ideas born
8
ideas moved
20
captures · 4 voices
1
dissenting
+267.3
conviction added
-135.7
decay · 118 silent

Every number here is replayed from score_events — the same ledger the pool ranks on. Decay is what the 118 ideas nobody mentioned gave up this week; it applies only when an episode is processed.

Tier crossings

conviction thresholds crossed by this episode — 65 / 45 / 15 · ideas born here show where they landed. why 65 isn't always green

▲ +69.4 📈 SVB failure triggers deposit flight out of the regional banks born at green threshold 69.4 still ember — green gate not met
▲ +69.0 📈 SVB collapse is an extinction-level event that freezes startup funding born at green threshold 69.0 still watch — green gate not met
▲ +67.0 🏛️ Regulators backstop all uninsured deposits within days born at green threshold 67.0 still watch — green gate not met
▲ +39.7 🪙 Crypto fails its bank-run test — liquidity is all correlated born at ember 39.7

Kill dates that landed since E118

1 hit · 1 partial · 0 miss — windows that closed after 2023-03-03 and up to 2023-03-11, auto-scored against price data and never hand-set. verdict · R · α

ideaverdictRαclosed
🤖 CRISPR patent chaos gets routed around by open source HIT +31.0% +33.0 2023-03-05
🌍 Holding the sanctions line pushes the pain onto emerging markets PARTIAL +5.7% +7.8 2023-03-05

Who moved the board

each voice's force on conviction this episodesupports and opposes, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of this episode's movement

Jason
Jason
4 captures · 35% of movement · 2 ideas born
+103.3 → net +103.3
Sacks
Sacks
6 captures · 33% of movement · 2 ideas born
+95.2 → net +95.2
Chamath
Chamath
7 captures · 20% of movement
+59.7 → net +59.7
Friedberg
Friedberg
3 captures · 12% of movement
+21.6 / -12.5 → net +9.1

What got argued (8 ideas)

ordered by how hard each idea moved · quotes are verbatim from the transcript, timestamps deep-link into the episode

NEW KRE 📈 SVB failure triggers deposit flight out of the regional banks closed 30 ▲ +69.4 0.0 → 69.4

SVB's seizure destroys confidence in uninsured business deposits, so depositors rationally pull cash out of every regional bank and park it at JP Morgan or another of the top four. Because held-to-maturity bonds are carried at book value (the WSJ puts system-wide unrealized treasury losses at $620B), nobody can assess a regional bank's solvency, so the run is self-fulfilling. Sacks' call: without a federal backstop the regional banking system gets decimated and the US is left with four too-big-to-fail banks. Chamath reads the contagion straight off the regional-bank ETF's equity tier falling off a cliff and asks 'what's to prevent bank number 35?'

plays KRE ·primary JPM KBE XLF evals 2024-03-11
Friedberg
Friedberg support ×2 explicit_prediction ▶ 43:54
Because then you will see a lot of people trying to move money away from any institution that stores their money in some sort of security that's not 100% liquid like cash. And that's going to cause a massive run.
Sacks
Sacks support ×3 explicit_prediction ▶ 53:23
So I think there's a chance that if the federal government doesn't step in here, the whole regional banking system could be decimated, and you're just going to be left with four too big to fail banks.
Jason
Jason support ×2 sentiment ▶ 1:20:38
And I think what we know and what we're seeing is the next dominoes are already falling.
Chamath
Chamath support ×3 explicit_prediction ▶ 1:23:14
Folks, when you look at the equity tier of these regional banks, people are liquidating the equity tier because they know that that is the first domino to fall if banks go into receivership. Please act accordingly. You can see it in the ETFs. You can see it in the trade flows. This is not a Silicon Valley problem anymore.
NEW IPO 📈 SVB collapse is an extinction-level event that freezes startup funding closed 57 ▲ +69.0 0.0 → 69.0

Thousands of venture-backed companies have deposits trapped at SVB and cannot make payroll, and the shock freezes deal-making for roughly 60 days: term sheets pulled, capital calls dragged forward, maybe half as many financings, distressed companies left to die, and some funds unable to pay their own staff. Sacks sizes it as 'a Lehman sized event for Silicon Valley' and 'the meteor hitting the dinosaur'; the spillover runs through payroll processors and payment infrastructure into the non-tech economy.

plays IPO ·primary ARKK KRE evals 2023-05-11
Chamath
Chamath support ×2 sentiment ▶ 41:28
But it shouldn't fail because we can't get money that is in a deposit. That should not be why we torch hundreds of startups and what they're working on. Maybe thousands.
Friedberg
Friedberg support ×2 explicit_prediction ▶ 43:54
And so if they start to go down and then payroll doesn't hit the air conditioning company that's using the tool in Arizona, and then the Stripe service isn't able to process e-commerce payments for a small business owner that runs a website, you can start to see how there can be very significant trickling effects.
Jason
Jason support ×3 explicit_prediction ▶ 1:00:39
I think private markets in BC could seize. I think you're going to see people pull term sheets. Maybe half as many fundings are going to occur as people try to do triage.
Sacks
Sacks support ×2 explicit_prediction 2mo horizon ▶ 1:03:01
Jay, how you tweeted that you think this is going to cause a 60-day freeze in deal-making activity. I think that's more or less right.
NEW SPY 🏛️ Regulators backstop all uninsured deposits within days closed 58 ▲ +67.0 0.0 → 67.0

The besties' unanimous call and demand going into the weekend of 2023-03-11: the Fed/Treasury/FDIC either hand SVB to a large balance sheet Bear-Stearns/WaMu style, or stand up a TARP-style facility guaranteeing 100% of deposits system-wide — wiping SVB's equity holders and management but making every depositor whole. Jason's mechanism claim is that merely announcing a big enough facility ($500B) stops the run without the money ever being drawn. Framed explicitly as a this-weekend / by-Monday event; the payoff is that a 2008-style systemic cascade is averted.

plays SPY ·primary KRE XLF evals 2023-04-11
Sacks
Sacks support ×3 explicit_prediction 1mo horizon ▶ 34:22
They either do that this weekend or this thing keeps cascading next week.
Chamath
Chamath support ×2 explicit_prediction 1mo horizon ▶ 41:28
And so that then takes you to path two, which is then the only other real solution is for the Fed to warehouse them and guarantee them.
Jason
Jason support ×3 explicit_prediction 1mo horizon ▶ 1:18:26
If a federal agency comes in, if the Fed comes in and says, you know what, we are going to backstop all of these banks and we are going to put $500 billion behind it and we're going to guarantee that all these deposits are going to be made whole.
NEW BTC-USD 🪙 Crypto fails its bank-run test — liquidity is all correlated closed 20 CONTESTED ▲ +39.7 0.0 → 39.7

In the exact scenario Bitcoin was supposed to be built for — a run on the banking system — crypto sold off about 10% instead of rallying. Chamath's read is that nothing revives the crypto market, not even this. Sacks supplies the mechanism: liquidity is all correlated, so when people scramble for cash the most liquid asset is the first thing they dump.

plays BTC-USD ·primary COIN ETH-USD evals 2024-03-11
Chamath
Chamath support ×2 sentiment ▶ 1:20:08
Nothing can revive the crypto market as we're seeing today. Even in a run on the bank, which is exactly what everybody was afraid of in a Bitcoin world, that thing is down 10%.
Sacks
Sacks support ×2 sentiment ▶ 1:20:20
this is the reason for that, Chamath, is just that what we've seen is that liquidity is all correlated. So when people are panicking about the state of their finances and worried about getting access to their cash, the first thing they dump is crypto because it is very liquid.
SPY 🌍 Rate hikes bite with a lag - back in recession next year closed 18 CONTESTED ▲ +8.9 70.5 → 79.4
Chamath
Chamath support ×2 positioning ▶ 17:33
we, the four of us, have been talking for the last 18 months about the impact of rising rates. And, you know, we talked a lot about, for example, like in our portfolio, my partners and I walked into every company and made them have at least enough money to get through mid-2025.
Sacks
Sacks support ×2 explicit_prediction ▶ 33:08
Two days ago, two days ago, Powell was testifying in front of the banking committee. And they asked him, do you see any systemic risks in the banking system because of the rapid rise in interest rates? He said, no, no systemic risk.
ARKK 🤖 A decade of zero rates under-trained a generation of operators closed 62 ▲ +5.7 58.0 → 63.7
Chamath
Chamath support ×2 sentiment ▶ 1:04:18
And I think that venture has always romantically been described as like buying lottery tickets. And so it doesn't matter if you lose. But when you have that kind of attitude, you just become super complacent and you don't think about left tail risk.
HTGC 📈 Venture debt's loss models break - deferred defaults land on the lenders closed 10 CONTESTED ▲ +5.7 47.9 → 53.6
Friedberg
Friedberg oppose ×3 sentiment ▶ 25:06
I get it, but the asset as an asset class, we can make fun of it all we want. It's actually performed pretty well. These guys have generated typically 18% as an industry kind of returns.
Jason
Jason support ×2 sentiment ▶ 31:06
And this is exactly what happened in 2008, when people started giving those no recourse or no background check mortgages. Remember those? Where like you didn't have to do a background check to get a mortgage? That's what happened in venture. They just gave these, I saw it firsthand, willy-nilly.
Sacks
Sacks support ×3 positioning ▶ 1:14:16
So after the conversation we had on the show about venture debt, I'm like, I don't really like that SVB is in this business. So I told my guys, set up an account somewhere else.
IPO 📈 Late-stage private marks reset 30-60% — down-round IPOs become the norm closed 85 ▲ +1.9 85.2 → 87.1
Chamath
Chamath support ×2 explicit_prediction ▶ 1:04:18
And now what little cash they had left may also be gone, which means those valuations are even more impaired, which means that the LPs that gave them the money are even more underwater.

Episode digest

written during extraction and stored in data/extractions/ep119.json — the auditable source of truth, including everything market-adjacent that did not earn a capture

DIARIZATION DEFECT: Friedberg has ZERO labelled turns yet is named in the cold open ('David Friedberg, the Sultan of Science'), addressed by name a dozen times and thanked in the outro — he is MERGED INTO JASON'S LABEL, the sixth confirmed instance of that exact shape (E025/E064/E084/E099/E100). Every Friedberg capture here was split out of a 'Jason Calacanis' turn by content (he owns the SVB balance-sheet slides Sacks calls 'your chart', the laddering/duration argument, and the second-and-third-order-effects walkthrough); the four splits I'd most want audio-checked are 7:47, 29:23, 43:54 and 1:00:39. Also note 23:54 is REPLAYED audio of Sacks from an earlier episode, not a live E119 statement — nothing was captured from it. Substance: an emergency taping ~36 hours after the FDIC seized SVB, and it produced five new ideas — deposit flight out of the regional banks into the top four (Sacks table-pounding that without a backstop 'you're just going to be left with four too big to fail banks', Chamath reading it off the KRE chart live on screen), a 60-day extinction-level freeze in startup funding, a this-weekend TARP-style guarantee of 100% of uninsured deposits that all four demanded and expected (it arrived the next day), the venture-debt asset class breaking, and crypto failing its own bank-run test with BTC down 10% on the day. The venture-debt fight is the sharpest disagreement in the episode: Sacks says the whole asset class was underwritten on VCs funding up rounds forever and discloses he pulled Craft's accounts out of SVB months ago because of it, while Friedberg defends it on ~18% industry returns and no realised losses. Sacks also disclosed, uncaptured for want of a second mention slot, that they are already pulling deposits from 'the next set of banks' — the highest-signal positioning statement in the episode. Reinforced: Sacks' own rate-hike-lag call (his receipt is Powell testifying to no systemic risk two days earlier), Friedberg's peak-venture-AUM thesis, and Chamath's late-stage-marks and zero-rate-complacency ideas.