E141: State of Series A's, VC dry powder, IPO window opens + more with Bill Gurley & Brad Gerstner
2023-08-11 spoken.md · speaker-labeled ▶ watch ← E140 all episodes E142 →
Every number here is replayed from score_events — the same ledger the pool ranks on. Decay is what the 113 ideas nobody mentioned gave up this week; it applies only when an episode is processed.
Tier crossings
conviction thresholds crossed by this episode — 65 / 45 / 15 · ideas born here show where they landed. why 65 isn't always green
Who moved the board
each voice's force on conviction this episode — supports and opposes, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of this episode's movement
What got argued (18 ideas)
ordered by how hard each idea moved · quotes are verbatim from the transcript, timestamps deep-link into the episode
Gurley's mechanism inside the reopening IPO window: hyper-competition in 2019-2021 stripped out the term that let investors protect their liquidation preference on an IPO, so when these unicorns list at a discount the late-stage preferred converts to common and the preference is simply washed. Brad sizes it at 50-70% down for the last Instacart round. Founders and early holders are the beneficiaries; the last private round is the loser, and going public becomes the cheapest way to clean an unfinanceable cap table.
because of hyper competition and investing in 99, 2020, 2021, there was a term removed from most term sheets that gave investors the right to protect their LICPREF on an IPO. That's gone in most of these cases. So you could convert LICPREF under, which for a founder or an early stage angel investor would be a huge win.
if you were a investor in that last round of Instacart and you were buying preferred shares and thought you were protected, that preference is washed, right? So you're going to be down 50, 60, 70% on those preferred shares because you're going to be converted into common in that IPO.
Gurley's structural claim: GPs assess their own portfolio marks (a conflict), and many LPs are bonused on those same paper marks, so neither side has an incentive to push them down. Private venture marks therefore sit far above reality — public growth down ~50% while private books are down 5-10% — until a financing, a secondary, a recap or a down-round IPO forces the reset. The listed read-through is the alt managers and holding companies whose reported NAV is a book of self-assessed private marks.
The other thing is many LPs are actually bonus on the paper mark. And this is something that a lot of people don't realize. And so they don't have an incentive to dial around to the GPs and say, get your marks right, because it's actually going to reflect poorly on them if they were to roll those up.
Brad Gerstner's call after the 2023 melt-up: internet and software multiples went from ~70% above normal to ~30% below normal and are now back at the trailing ten-year average, so the positive arbitrage of 2022 has been squeezed out and public markets are close to fair value. The global-macro beta trade has largely played out; from here returns come from picking individual winners against individual losers rather than from index exposure.
But I would say a lot of the positive arbitrage that we saw in 22 has been squeezed out of the public markets, and we're close to fair value. So now if you want to generate alpha, this is going to be about picking individual winners versus individual losers.
I think a lot of people realize that if you can get 2.5% or 3% management fee investing $300 million at a pop, that's an easier lifestyle than actually taking board seats and doing work. And so I think a lot of money and activity got pulled into the late stage market. Nearly every firm started doing that.
But now they have a lot of mouths to feed. So when you put money to work, you pull down more fee. And so, you know, these funds now, I mean, if you're Tiger or some of these big funds, you have giant cost bases that you've created because of the size of the firm that you created.
Brad Gerstner on the August 2023 prints: China posted an actual CPI decline of three-tenths of a percent on the month, over -3.5% annualised, which he calls a major problem for China and a yellow flag for everyone else. One of the global engines of growth exporting disinflation hits global demand and global pricing, and reinforces the case that policy is already over-tightened.
And China just saw CPI down three-tenths of one percent in the month this week. Annualized, that's over three and a half percent. That is a major problem for China. So I think you have some yellow flags here, right? That say, do we have too much tightening? If one of the global engines of growth is experiencing this level of disinflation, that's going to impact the global economy, global demand, et cetera.
So, we have record household debt, 17.1 trillion, record mortgage debt, 12 trillion, record auto loans, 1.6 trillion, record student loans, 1.6 trillion, which, as Druckenmiller points out, have to start being repaid, I think, as of September because Supreme Court overturned Biden's unconstitutional debt forgiveness. Record 1 trillion in credit card debt, that I think should be pretty worrying because credit card rates are now around 25%.
There's two things. I think that cleaning up complexity is a great reason for the public market. And Brad already said, we've seen a massive recovery in software stocks. Like, the marks are better than they were two years ago.
I don't think it'll look like a light switch, but it will be. I think we're going to see five, six, seven IPOs, good size IPOs in Q4. We'll probably see closer to 10 in Q1, and then it will start opening up in the back half of next year
I would say the market's actually betting here that the Fed is overdoing it because of what you see in that blue line and that the economy is going to slow. The lag effects of this tightening have not yet been felt.
Remember, we're seeing inflation roll over huge, and we have a chips act and an infrastructure. We have massive government spending going on, and we still see inflation rolling over. So I just find it interesting that within six months, we've gone from worrying about hyperinflation to Bloomberg running a headline summer of disinflation.
In 2022, we had this massive correction in the public markets. We believed that they overshot. In part, we believed that because we didn't think we were going to have hyperinflation forever, et cetera. And so you and I invested in, you know, Metta and a lot of other things that were on their ass.
the AI deals, one thing that might be interesting is if you pulled the AI deals out, I bet those numbers would be more akin to what they were two or three years ago
We're seeing four, five, six hundred million dollar deals get done on zero revenue, two, three million dollars in revenue.
The last piece of it is government debt. So at the rate that the government is racking up deficits, the Treasury is going to have to float something like $3 trillion of new T-bills by the end of the year. And we're rolling something like $9 trillion of old government debt over the next 18 months at new higher interest rates.
we've seen Lina Khan, we've discussed it many times, seems to be saying, all business equals bad. Any merger equals bad. She's going to, you know, attempt to throw cold water on any merger that's happening. So M&A seems to be being taken off the plate by not just Lina Khan, but also the EU seems to be turning the screws. So if we don't have an M&A market, then that means there's only an IPO market.
they lived and grew up in a day and age where they were told growth at all costs. And it's super hard culturally to go from that type of execution to the principal type execution you guys have been promoting over the past several months. It's just hard. It's not impossible, but it's very, very hard.
And while this might happen, while this might happen, I'm going to take the other side. I don't think that's what the lived experiences of most VCs in Silicon Valley today on Series A, Series B, Series C, is certainly not in the area we're competing.
I think there's going to be a one to two year period of distress for all these companies that raised in the peak, 2020, 2021, and are now running out of money and they don't have enough revenue, they're not growing fast enough, and or their burn is too high, and all those companies are going to be facing down rounds or restructurings or they're not going to be able to raise.
Remember, we had 1,000 unicorns at the end of 2021 And I've said 100% of those are going to do a down round. And we're still in the early stages of that reset to occur.
Episode digest
written during extraction and stored in data/extractions/ep141.json — the auditable source of truth, including everything market-adjacent that did not earn a capture
Dedicated venture episode with Bill Gurley and Brad Gerstner in the chairs; Chamath was absent (lost in the Mediterranean) apart from a one-minute Zoom cameo with zero market content. DIARIZATION DEFECT: Brad Gerstner has no label in this file — all of his turns are merged into `Jason Calacanis` (191 turns vs his usual 70-135). Receipts: the label addresses itself ("J Cal, to answer your question", "So it won't be a light switch, Jason", "Cal, where are you running off to?"), Sacks and Gurley both cue "Brad" immediately before a Jason-labelled answer, and the 55:47 turn says "Altimeter will compete for those IPOs". Every Brad capture here was attributed from content, not labels; SPEAKER_7/SPEAKER_8 at 1:04:57 are a played Margin Call clip and nothing was attributed to them. Substance: the venture cluster got hammered from four directions — Friedberg, Gurley and Sacks all reinforced peak-venture-AUM (LP commitments cut 50-100%, the denominator effect, venture only pays inside tiny liquidity windows), while Brad took the other side for the second time, arguing sovereign wealth and pension LPs keep the money flowing and AI rounds are printing $400-600M on zero revenue. Gurley delivered the sharpest new alpha: private marks are stale by design because LPs are bonused on the paper marks, and the IPO-protection term was stripped from 2019-21 term sheets so late-stage preference gets washed on conversion — Brad put the last Instacart round at down 50-70%. Brad also reinforced his own E133 IPO-window call with dates (5-7 IPOs in Q4, ~10 in Q1, opening in H2 2024) and, on macro, opposed sticky-inflation with the disinflation print while supporting rate-hike-lag-recession; Sacks called the worst software recession since the dot-com crash on per-seat contraction.