E141

E141: State of Series A's, VC dry powder, IPO window opens + more with Bill Gurley & Brad Gerstner

2023-08-11 spoken.md · speaker-labeled ▶ watch ← E140 all episodes E142 →

4
ideas born
18
ideas moved
29
captures · 5 voices
3
dissenting
+334.3
conviction added
-113.1
decay · 113 silent

Every number here is replayed from score_events — the same ledger the pool ranks on. Decay is what the 113 ideas nobody mentioned gave up this week; it applies only when an episode is processed.

Tier crossings

conviction thresholds crossed by this episode — 65 / 45 / 15 · ideas born here show where they landed. why 65 isn't always green

▲ +5.8 🏛️ US antitrust is punitive politics, not competition policy - hot-button platforms carry the overhang watch green threshold 61.1 → 66.9 still watch — green gate not met
▲ +22.6 📈 The IPO window reopens - but only at a real discount to 2021 marks ember watch 40.2 → 62.9
▲ +60.4 📈 Down-round IPOs wipe out the late-stage preference stack born at watch 60.4
▼ -14.4 🏦 Inflation stays sticky in 2023 — the wage chapter green threshold watch 74.1 → 59.7
▲ +54.1 📈 Private venture marks are stale by design — nobody is paid to fix them born at watch 54.1
▲ +27.2 🌍 The US consumer taps out in 2023 — recession unavoidable ember watch 23.1 → 50.3
▲ +40.1 📈 The equity beta trade is done — software back at fair value, alpha only from selection born at ember 40.1
▲ +40.0 📈 Private capital concentrates in a few mega-GPs that take themselves public dormant ember 0.0 → 40.0
▲ +35.0 🌍 China tips into outright deflation and drags global demand born at ember 35.0
▲ +18.0 🌍 Rate hikes bite with a lag - back in recession next year dormant ember 0.0 → 18.0

Who moved the board

each voice's force on conviction this episodesupports and opposes, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of this episode's movement

Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner regular guest ×1.0
11 captures · 41% of movement · 2 ideas born
+140.6 / -28.1 → net +112.5
BI
Bill Gurley regular guest ×1.0
6 captures · 31% of movement · 2 ideas born
+128.2 → net +128.2
Sacks
Sacks
7 captures · 14% of movement
+47.5 / -9.3 → net +38.3
Jason
Jason
4 captures · 11% of movement
+44.9 → net +44.9
Friedberg
Friedberg
1 capture · 3% of movement
+10.5 → net +10.5

What got argued (18 ideas)

ordered by how hard each idea moved · quotes are verbatim from the transcript, timestamps deep-link into the episode

NEW SFTBY 📈 Down-round IPOs wipe out the late-stage preference stack closed 15 ▲ +60.4 -0.0 → 60.4

Gurley's mechanism inside the reopening IPO window: hyper-competition in 2019-2021 stripped out the term that let investors protect their liquidation preference on an IPO, so when these unicorns list at a discount the late-stage preferred converts to common and the preference is simply washed. Brad sizes it at 50-70% down for the last Instacart round. Founders and early holders are the beneficiaries; the last private round is the loser, and going public becomes the cheapest way to clean an unfinanceable cap table.

plays SFTBY ·primary BX IPO evals 2024-08-11
BI
Bill Gurley support ×3 explicit_prediction guest ×1.0 ▶ 52:32
because of hyper competition and investing in 99, 2020, 2021, there was a term removed from most term sheets that gave investors the right to protect their LICPREF on an IPO. That's gone in most of these cases. So you could convert LICPREF under, which for a founder or an early stage angel investor would be a huge win.
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner support ×3 explicit_prediction guest ×1.0 ▶ 55:47
if you were a investor in that last round of Instacart and you were buying preferred shares and thought you were protected, that preference is washed, right? So you're going to be down 50, 60, 70% on those preferred shares because you're going to be converted into common in that IPO.
NEW BX 📈 Private venture marks are stale by design — nobody is paid to fix them closed 40 ▲ +54.1 0.0 → 54.1

Gurley's structural claim: GPs assess their own portfolio marks (a conflict), and many LPs are bonused on those same paper marks, so neither side has an incentive to push them down. Private venture marks therefore sit far above reality — public growth down ~50% while private books are down 5-10% — until a financing, a secondary, a recap or a down-round IPO forces the reset. The listed read-through is the alt managers and holding companies whose reported NAV is a book of self-assessed private marks.

plays BX ·primary IPO SFTBY evals 2024-08-11
BI
Bill Gurley support ×3 sentiment guest ×1.0 ▶ 36:24
The other thing is many LPs are actually bonus on the paper mark. And this is something that a lot of people don't realize. And so they don't have an incentive to dial around to the GPs and say, get your marks right, because it's actually going to reflect poorly on them if they were to roll those up.
Jason
Jason support ×2 sentiment ▶ 36:51
Both of the LP and the GP are in a dance there. Hey, we know that Stripe is not worth $100 billion right now. It's worth $50 billion.
Sacks
Sacks support ×2 sentiment ▶ 1:20:48
Think about what that means. If a lot of those unicorns are fake, what does that say about innovation in the American economy?
NEW IGV 📈 The equity beta trade is done — software back at fair value, alpha only from selection closed 28 ▲ +40.1 0.0 → 40.1

Brad Gerstner's call after the 2023 melt-up: internet and software multiples went from ~70% above normal to ~30% below normal and are now back at the trailing ten-year average, so the positive arbitrage of 2022 has been squeezed out and public markets are close to fair value. The global-macro beta trade has largely played out; from here returns come from picking individual winners against individual losers rather than from index exposure.

plays IGV ·primary QQQ SPY evals 2024-08-11
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner support ×3 explicit_prediction guest ×1.0 ▶ 1:11:07
But I would say a lot of the positive arbitrage that we saw in 22 has been squeezed out of the public markets, and we're close to fair value. So now if you want to generate alpha, this is going to be about picking individual winners versus individual losers.
BX 📈 Private capital concentrates in a few mega-GPs that take themselves public closed 41 CONTESTED ▲ +40.0 0.0 → 40.0
BI
Bill Gurley support ×3 sentiment guest ×1.0 ▶ 25:19
I think a lot of people realize that if you can get 2.5% or 3% management fee investing $300 million at a pop, that's an easier lifestyle than actually taking board seats and doing work. And so I think a lot of money and activity got pulled into the late stage market. Nearly every firm started doing that.
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner support ×2 sentiment guest ×1.0 ▶ 46:00
But now they have a lot of mouths to feed. So when you put money to work, you pull down more fee. And so, you know, these funds now, I mean, if you're Tiger or some of these big funds, you have giant cost bases that you've created because of the size of the firm that you created.
NEW FXI 🌍 China tips into outright deflation and drags global demand closed 18 ▲ +35.0 0.0 → 35.0

Brad Gerstner on the August 2023 prints: China posted an actual CPI decline of three-tenths of a percent on the month, over -3.5% annualised, which he calls a major problem for China and a yellow flag for everyone else. One of the global engines of growth exporting disinflation hits global demand and global pricing, and reinforces the case that policy is already over-tightened.

plays FXI ·primary DBC MCHI evals 2024-08-11
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner support ×2 explicit_prediction guest ×1.0 ▶ 1:30:21
And China just saw CPI down three-tenths of one percent in the month this week. Annualized, that's over three and a half percent. That is a major problem for China. So I think you have some yellow flags here, right? That say, do we have too much tightening? If one of the global engines of growth is experiencing this level of disinflation, that's going to impact the global economy, global demand, et cetera.
XLY 🌍 The US consumer taps out in 2023 — recession unavoidable closed 4 CONTESTED ▲ +27.2 23.1 → 50.3
Jason
Jason support ×2 sentiment ▶ 1:31:17
Yeah, consumer debt is high, this real estate, commercial real estate is high. We've got debt everywhere. And people are going to have to belt tighten and maybe austerity and stop spending on some YOLO trips.
Sacks
Sacks support ×3 sentiment ▶ 1:31:49
So, we have record household debt, 17.1 trillion, record mortgage debt, 12 trillion, record auto loans, 1.6 trillion, record student loans, 1.6 trillion, which, as Druckenmiller points out, have to start being repaid, I think, as of September because Supreme Court overturned Biden's unconstitutional debt forgiveness. Record 1 trillion in credit card debt, that I think should be pretty worrying because credit card rates are now around 25%.
IPO 📈 The IPO window reopens - but only at a real discount to 2021 marks closed 34 CONTESTED ▲ +22.6 40.2 → 62.9
BI
Bill Gurley support ×2 sentiment guest ×1.0 ▶ 53:58
There's two things. I think that cleaning up complexity is a great reason for the public market. And Brad already said, we've seen a massive recovery in software stocks. Like, the marks are better than they were two years ago.
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner support ×3 explicit_prediction guest ×1.0 12mo horizon ▶ 58:06
I don't think it'll look like a light switch, but it will be. I think we're going to see five, six, seven IPOs, good size IPOs in Q4. We'll probably see closer to 10 in Q1, and then it will start opening up in the back half of next year
SPY 🌍 Rate hikes bite with a lag - back in recession next year closed 18 CONTESTED ▲ +18.0 0.0 → 18.0
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner support ×3 explicit_prediction guest ×1.0 ▶ 1:28:59
I would say the market's actually betting here that the Fed is overdoing it because of what you see in that blue line and that the economy is going to slow. The lag effects of this tightening have not yet been felt.
TLT 🏦 Inflation stays sticky in 2023 — the wage chapter closed 8 CONTESTED ▼ -14.4 74.1 → 59.7
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner oppose ×3 explicit_prediction guest ×1.0 ▶ 1:32:29
Remember, we're seeing inflation roll over huge, and we have a chips act and an infrastructure. We have massive government spending going on, and we still see inflation rolling over. So I just find it interesting that within six months, we've gone from worrying about hyperinflation to Bloomberg running a headline summer of disinflation.
SPY 🌍 Markets are bottoming now - the Fed breaks something and the Fed put returns closed 51 CONTESTED ▲ +10.8 51.8 → 62.7
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner support ×2 positioning guest ×1.0 ▶ 1:09:47
In 2022, we had this massive correction in the public markets. We believed that they overshot. In part, we believed that because we didn't think we were going to have hyperinflation forever, et cetera. And so you and I invested in, you know, Metta and a lot of other things that were on their ass.
NVDA 🤖 Generative AI is the next Silicon Valley bubble cycle closed 24 CONTESTED ▲ +10.1 80.0 → 90.0
BI
Bill Gurley support ×2 sentiment guest ×1.0 ▶ 24:00
the AI deals, one thing that might be interesting is if you pulled the AI deals out, I bet those numbers would be more akin to what they were two or three years ago
Sacks
Sacks support ×3 positioning ▶ 29:38
I think there's a mania going on with AI, both in terms of the size of these rounds and the valuations. It's like 2021 for a lot of AI companies. We're not participating in that craziness.
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner support ×3 sentiment guest ×1.0 ▶ 46:00
We're seeing four, five, six hundred million dollar deals get done on zero revenue, two, three million dollars in revenue.
CRM 🤖 SaaS seat contraction — net revenue retention goes below 100% closed 47 ▲ +9.9 28.9 → 38.8
Sacks
Sacks support ×3 sentiment ▶ 1:02:00
But this is the worst software recession we've been in. I think since the dot-com crash. I mean, the buyers have been laying off employees by the thousands. And since software has bought on a per-seat basis, the market has really condensed.
TLT 🏦 Phase three of the 2023 crisis is a US government debt crisis closed 87 ▲ +9.4 51.8 → 61.2
Sacks
Sacks support ×3 explicit_prediction 18mo horizon ▶ 1:32:49
The last piece of it is government debt. So at the rate that the government is racking up deficits, the Treasury is going to have to float something like $3 trillion of new T-bills by the end of the year. And we're rolling something like $9 trillion of old government debt over the next 18 months at new higher interest rates.
META 🏛️ US antitrust is punitive politics, not competition policy - hot-button platforms carry the overhang closed 78 ▲ +5.8 61.1 → 66.9
Jason
Jason support ×2 sentiment ▶ 54:15
we've seen Lina Khan, we've discussed it many times, seems to be saying, all business equals bad. Any merger equals bad. She's going to, you know, attempt to throw cold water on any merger that's happening. So M&A seems to be being taken off the plate by not just Lina Khan, but also the EU seems to be turning the screws. So if we don't have an M&A market, then that means there's only an IPO market.
ARKK 🤖 A decade of zero rates under-trained a generation of operators closed 62 ▲ +5.4 79.9 → 85.3
BI
Bill Gurley support ×3 sentiment guest ×1.0 ▶ 1:20:10
they lived and grew up in a day and age where they were told growth at all costs. And it's super hard culturally to go from that type of execution to the principal type execution you guys have been promoting over the past several months. It's just hard. It's not impossible, but it's very, very hard.
IPO 📈 This drawdown is the best vintage in a decade to build and deploy closed 36 CONTESTED ▼ -5.3 42.4 → 37.0
Jason
Jason support ×2 sentiment ▶ 45:26
this seems like the greatest setup ever. Feels like the setup last year of buying equities when everybody was scared. If everybody is tightening their belts, if VC funds are not going to deploy, this feels like the time to be deploying.
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner oppose ×3 explicit_prediction guest ×1.0 ▶ 46:00
And while this might happen, while this might happen, I'm going to take the other side. I don't think that's what the lived experiences of most VCs in Silicon Valley today on Series A, Series B, Series C, is certainly not in the area we're competing.
IPO 📈 Startup mass extinction event in late 2023 and 2024 closed 35 ▲ +3.9 87.2 → 91.1
Sacks
Sacks support ×3 explicit_prediction 24mo horizon ▶ 30:41
I think there's going to be a one to two year period of distress for all these companies that raised in the peak, 2020, 2021, and are now running out of money and they don't have enough revenue, they're not growing fast enough, and or their burn is too high, and all those companies are going to be facing down rounds or restructurings or they're not going to be able to raise.
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner support ×3 explicit_prediction guest ×1.0 ▶ 32:56
Remember, we had 1,000 unicorns at the end of 2021 And I've said 100% of those are going to do a down round. And we're still in the early stages of that reset to occur.
QQQ 🤖 Own the top 30% of global tech and hold it five to ten years closed 6 CONTESTED ▲ +1.2 46.1 → 47.3
Friedberg
Friedberg support ×3 sentiment ▶ 1:14:28
over a 20-year investment period, if you basically just buy the top 10 public tech stocks and at the end of each year rebalance to the top 10 at the end of the year, your multiple over that period of time is 24X.
Sacks
Sacks oppose ×2 sentiment ▶ 1:15:33
Why not top 20? Why not top 100? I mean, are you willing to say that for the next 10 years that you should only buy the top 10? What if over the next 10 years it's more of the field versus the next 20?

Episode digest

written during extraction and stored in data/extractions/ep141.json — the auditable source of truth, including everything market-adjacent that did not earn a capture

Dedicated venture episode with Bill Gurley and Brad Gerstner in the chairs; Chamath was absent (lost in the Mediterranean) apart from a one-minute Zoom cameo with zero market content. DIARIZATION DEFECT: Brad Gerstner has no label in this file — all of his turns are merged into `Jason Calacanis` (191 turns vs his usual 70-135). Receipts: the label addresses itself ("J Cal, to answer your question", "So it won't be a light switch, Jason", "Cal, where are you running off to?"), Sacks and Gurley both cue "Brad" immediately before a Jason-labelled answer, and the 55:47 turn says "Altimeter will compete for those IPOs". Every Brad capture here was attributed from content, not labels; SPEAKER_7/SPEAKER_8 at 1:04:57 are a played Margin Call clip and nothing was attributed to them. Substance: the venture cluster got hammered from four directions — Friedberg, Gurley and Sacks all reinforced peak-venture-AUM (LP commitments cut 50-100%, the denominator effect, venture only pays inside tiny liquidity windows), while Brad took the other side for the second time, arguing sovereign wealth and pension LPs keep the money flowing and AI rounds are printing $400-600M on zero revenue. Gurley delivered the sharpest new alpha: private marks are stale by design because LPs are bonused on the paper marks, and the IPO-protection term was stripped from 2019-21 term sheets so late-stage preference gets washed on conversion — Brad put the last Instacart round at down 50-70%. Brad also reinforced his own E133 IPO-window call with dates (5-7 IPOs in Q4, ~10 in Q1, opening in H2 2024) and, on macro, opposed sticky-inflation with the disinflation print while supporting rate-hike-lag-recession; Sacks called the worst software recession since the dot-com crash on per-seat contraction.