-13.1
net board stance
what this means
107.09
-0.6% · close 2026-09-08
+4% / +12% / -22%
1m / 3m / 12m
-45%
vs SPY since 2025-05-17
36%
of 52w range · -27.8% off high
—
hit rate as primary
Where we stand — 2 live ideas
| idea | call | play | conviction | contributes | flag | eval in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 📈 Private equity model is broken | ▼ SHORT | adjacent ×0.5 | 14.5 | -7.2 | — | 23d |
| 📈 Endowment liquidity crunch forces discounted private-equity secondaries | ▼ SHORT | adjacent ×0.5 | 11.8 | -5.9 | — | 116d |
Where the winds are blowing
NET BOARD STANCE, LAST 60 EPISODES —
rising = the besties are building this position, falling = abandoning it. Replayed from
score_events; an idea counts from birth until its window closes.
PRICE VS SPY OVER THE SAME WINDOW, % — did the
talk lead the tape or follow it?
Who's pushing which way
each voice's net push ON THIS TICKER — their most recent stance per idea × the idea's direction × strength, so supporting a bearish idea pushes down. Not conviction (that lives on the idea); this is direction of travel per person. what w= means
What resolves next
kill dates for the live ideas holding this ticker — each one turns into a scored verdict on that date, whether we like it or not
Track record on KKR
No closed window has used this ticker as its primary play, so there is no scored record here yet. Adjacent plays are listed but never scored.
| idea | call | play | verdict | R | α | closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 📈 Venture's alpha does not clear liquid alternatives — LP money leaves the asset class | ▼ SHORT | adjacent | MISS | -46.4% | -80.2 | 2024-09-22 |
| 📈 Private capital concentrates in a few mega-GPs that take themselves public | ▲ LONG | adjacent | HIT | +15.6% | +10.4 | 2024-01-08 |
| 📈 Venture has to shrink to clear public-market alpha - fund sizes and GP count come down | ▼ SHORT | adjacent | MISS | -3.2% | -17.2 | 2025-10-11 |
| 🏛️ Atkins SEC loosens accredited-investor gating and retail money reaches private markets | ▲ LONG | adjacent | MISS | -15.4% | -30.1 | 2025-12-07 |
| 📈 You cannot build durable public equity value on a bet-making business | ▼ SHORT | adjacent | MISS | -30.8% | -48.9 | 2025-08-02 |
| 🏛️ Carried interest loophole gets closed in the Trump tax bill | ▼ SHORT | adjacent | HIT | +21.5% | +5.2 | 2026-02-07 |
The tape — what was actually said
every capture on any idea holding KKR, newest first · quotes verbatim, timestamps deep-link into the episode
the equity got fully impaired. And then the debt is clearly impaired because you can see how the debt and the CLOs are trading, ... the sales team is just not hitting their targets.
I think private equity is totally screwed... private equity in general is totally owned... What you find in most private equity portfolios are B and C companies run by C and D folks... The money's already leaked into private credit, which is the next big bubble that's building.
What they will have to do in order to finance their budget in probably 18 months is start to actively sell their private equity portfolio, which by the way, from 2019 to this year, almost doubled from 20 to 40%. So an insane asset allocation, frankly, an asset misallocation at the top of the market to the most illiquid asset class. And when people sniff this out, what they're going to do is, Harvard was able to sell a billion dollars recently of private equity stuff and managers that they didn't want to support anymore at a 7% discount. There is no smart money on the street that's going to look at any private equity portfolio from Harvard without asking for 20, 25, 30, 35, 40% discount, because your back will be totally against the wall.
PH
Philippe Laffont
support ×2
▼ on
📈 You cannot build durable public equity value on a bet-making business
E227 · 2025-05-09
▶ 1:21:34
If I can compound capital at 12.5% incentive fee for a very long time, it's better than 20% for a short period of time.
The optimal basket of the companies you'd want to own for the future, because of these rules and regulatory burdens, are partially public, partially private, and so you need a vehicle that can straddle both if you want to own it.
Yeah, it's retail investors and sovereign wealth funds outside the US seem to be the answer to that question.
PH
Philippe Laffont
support ×3
▲ on
🏛️ Atkins SEC loosens accredited-investor gating and retail money reaches private markets
E227 · 2025-05-09
▶ 1:17:55
these interval funds are really interesting because I think the minimum investment is like $50,000 or something like that. And the conditions to qualify for such a fund are much smaller. So there's many more investors that can come. And I look at it a little bit of like, this is the democratization of tech investing.
At the end of the day, it is what it is, and you're going to see a reduction in venture dollars. And that's just the market normalizing.
at current course and speed, with the lack of IPOs and with the lack of M&A, you can't justify that asset class on its own, in my opinion, unless you think about it as like something that you're doing almost philanthropically
As you guys know, we looked at the data, even the best venture capital firms in Silicon Valley, with the smartest, most sophisticated people investing in private assets, were not able to beat the NASDAQ over the last few years.
I think what's gonna happen is not much of anything. I think the rules are gonna stay exactly where they are.
I would want to invest in everything. I'm not disagreeing with the notion. I'm pointing out what will happen, which is predatory a*****s will show up and they'll rip people off. That's what happens in every one of these f*****g markets.
So all I'm arguing for is more education and a path for those people who want to do it, to show five hours of education, 50 questions, that they have an above average knowledge of how private companies work, just so they have the choice to do that.
I mean, who's going to stand up and lay on the railroad tracks for being able to amortize a multi-billion dollar sports team purchase or that when you make a fund investment, you should get long-term cap gains treatment? Who is going to be that person in this? Nobody's going to stand up for these things.
And I do think if you were to allow ordinary Americans to buy private companies that are held to a lower standard of disclosure and reporting to public companies, like something would have to change
In fact, I think it's more likely than not that people are going to go market bullsh** securities and private markets and rip poor people off even worse
JO
Joe Lonsdale
support ×2
▲ on
🏛️ Atkins SEC loosens accredited-investor gating and retail money reaches private markets
E206 · 2024-12-07
▶ 36:55
Imagine if Elon could raise for SpaceX from regular Americans. I'm sure he would have loved to do that if it wasn't crazy risky with the SEC
I mean, there's such an easy solution to this. You just do a sophistication test. People take a five-hour course and they answer 50 questions. The end, like a driver's license
The data that I think LPs look at shows that smaller venture funds tend to perform better for this reason.
In a market where there is excess venture capital, where valuations are at a premium and where you don't see the exit path, the M&A or the IPO events that makes sense, that you can actually realize that model, you should take less capital and make fewer surer investments.
That just seems like it's really hard to do. Where is all of that value getting created? So I think that venture needs to go through a phase where it re-rationalizes.
Instead of a Series A getting you 20% of a company, it got you 10 Instead of a C-check getting you 5%, it got you 1 There's no DPI possible.
For example, the average venture fund is like a 2X return. But if the entry prices were artificially double, then there goes your return right there. You get 2X becomes 1X.
I do think that we are in a situation where the average returns are going to decay by 50 to 100 percent because of what Sacks said and because of what you said.
But I think it just goes to show you that in finance, these entities that try to sell a piece of the quote unquote general partner as a company, I just think that it's frankly that it doesn't work. And this is just an example, yet another example that there's not a lot of equity value in these businesses.