E90: Twitter subpoenas, market overview, Pelosi's Taiwan visit & more
2022-08-05 spoken.md · speaker-labeled ▶ watch ← E89 all episodes E91 →
Every number here is replayed from score_events — the same ledger the pool ranks on. Decay is what the 78 ideas nobody mentioned gave up this week; it applies only when an episode is processed.
Tier crossings
conviction thresholds crossed by this episode — 65 / 45 / 15 · ideas born here show where they landed. why 65 isn't always green
Kill dates that landed since E89
3 hit · 0 partial · 2 miss — windows that closed after 2022-07-29 and up to 2022-08-05, auto-scored against price data and never hand-set. verdict · R · α
| idea | verdict | R | α | closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 📈 Boosters + oral antivirals become the standard COVID stack | HIT | +21.8% | +26.6 | 2022-07-30 |
| 🛢️ Carbon permits and carbon tariffs put a real price on emissions | HIT | +24.8% | +29.5 | 2022-07-30 |
| 🌍 China's crackdown spirals its own economy down | HIT | +23.9% | +28.6 | 2022-07-30 |
| 🤖 In-vivo CRISPR proof point starts programmable biology | MISS | -54.4% | -49.6 | 2022-07-30 |
| 📈 Robinhood compounds hard off its $30B IPO | MISS | -74.2% | -69.5 | 2022-07-30 |
Who moved the board
each voice's force on conviction this episode — supports and opposes, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of this episode's movement
What got argued (11 ideas)
ordered by how hard each idea moved · quotes are verbatim from the transcript, timestamps deep-link into the episode
Jobs, and we've talked about this every month as we watch it, finally dipped under 11 million, as Sacks predicted. You know, we're going to shed three or four hundred thousand jobs, it seems, every month, which should take this, you know, 10, 11 million number over the next year down to maybe five or six, which would still be an unbelievable number, still put us at very robust, full employment, which has been a big question.
The thing about that is though that I think what the PAL and what the Fed says today about rates is way less important than what the inflation data will actually show in a few months. If we still have 9% inflation three months from now, then I don't think the rate increases are done.
I'll say it again. I've said it now five pods in a row. We've never seen a moment in history, in American history, where when CPI has printed successively above 5%, that it got under 5% without Fed funds getting to that same number. So we should all hope that this is the exception that proves the rule, but there's an enormous amount of data that would tell you that we have to take rates to double what the equilibrium rate is thought to be right now.
No, but so six months from now, when all the fruits and vegetables that have been embargoed and not sent to Taiwan and then the sand that allows them to make chips continues to now flow, do you think that they'll still be positive about the trip?
And if that happens, then you could see massive civil unrest. He's been encouraging the population in Brazil to go to the streets and fight back. And there are a number of these flashpoints. And by the way, that's a massive food supplier, as well as a massive holding in EM credit portfolios around the world.
So if you play all of that out, you start to see an issue where by, you know, October, November of this year, we're back into the same complexity where energy is the tip of the spear around which everybody starts to debate all of the national security issues that we have to deal with, the Ukraine war, et cetera, et cetera.
What it basically shows is that during protracted bear markets, you can still get substantial bear market rallies. And so during the 20002001.com crash, you had these plus 32%, plus 41%, plus 45% rallies, but even while the market as a whole was going down. And so they ended up being sort of sucker rallies. Now, I don't know if that is what's happening here, but it is a possibility.
Episode digest
written during extraction and stored in data/extractions/ep090.json — the auditable source of truth, including everything market-adjacent that did not earn a capture
Diarization CLEAN — counts (Jason 60 / Sacks 48 / Chamath 39 / Friedberg 24), addressed-by-name and fingerprint tests all pass. New idea: Friedberg's deglobalization-is-structurally-inflationary-for-a-decade thesis, co-signed by Chamath ('that era of cheaper, faster, better is over'), coined fresh because the 2021 deglobalization-reflation and reshoring ideas both closed earlier in 2022. Chamath again reverses his own eighth-inning bottom call ('things still have to get a lot worse to flush everything through the system') while table-pounding the rates thesis for a fifth straight pod — CPI above 5% has never come down without Fed funds meeting it, so rates have to double; Sacks backs the bearish side with the sucker-rally chart and says the rate hikes are not done if inflation is still 9% in three months. Jason took the other side with real money, disclosing he started trading three weeks ago on the bouncing-along-the-bottom thesis, and stayed bullish on jobs. Pelosi's Taiwan trip lit up the China chokepoint idea: Sacks put a 'very high probability' on an actual war with China plus explicit Cold War II framing, Chamath pointed at the embargo and chip-sand flows six months out, Jason argued for a negotiated settlement instead. Not captured: the Twitter subpoena segment (personal legal grievance) and Friedberg's relayed Delaware-court read that the judge fines Musk rather than forcing the merger — the only faithful instrument is TWTR, delisted Oct 2022, which would leave the idea permanently unscoreable.