E103: Tech layoffs surge, big tech freezes hiring, optimizing for profits, election preview & more
2022-11-05 spoken.md · speaker-labeled ▶ watch ← E102 all episodes E105 →
Every number here is replayed from score_events — the same ledger the pool ranks on. Decay is what the 87 ideas nobody mentioned gave up this week; it applies only when an episode is processed.
Tier crossings
conviction thresholds crossed by this episode — 65 / 45 / 15 · ideas born here show where they landed. why 65 isn't always green
Kill dates that landed since E102
2 hit · 0 partial · 1 miss — windows that closed after 2022-10-29 and up to 2022-11-05, auto-scored against price data and never hand-set. verdict · R · α
| idea | verdict | R | α | closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 📈 The SPAC boom's back end breaks into the 2022 shot clock | HIT | +55.9% | +57.8 | 2022-11-01 |
| 📈 Asset-light mega-cap software is the inflation hedge | MISS | -32.9% | -18.7 | 2022-10-30 |
| 🪙 Meme coins are a blow-off top — take chips off the table | HIT | +81.5% | +95.7 | 2022-10-30 |
Who moved the board
each voice's force on conviction this episode — supports and opposes, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of this episode's movement
What got argued (18 ideas)
ordered by how hard each idea moved · quotes are verbatim from the transcript, timestamps deep-link into the episode
Friedberg's read on the falling participation rate: a growing share of Americans earn outside payroll employment - Etsy and Shopify storefronts, YouTube/Instagram/TikTok monetization, gig driving and delivery - so the labor-force numbers understate real income and the labor market is less broken than the print implies. The platforms that let individuals run their own business keep taking share of how people work and earn.
People are making more money on YouTube, on Instagram, on TikTok than ever before. There's a whole new class of work that revolves around the individual creating their own business, creating their own income stream that's simply taken off and has taken off.
This is something important you're bringing up here. Gig workers are about 9% of the workforce and Uber and Dara had, they grew over 70% this year, but I think the big number that I watched for was drivers are making $36 an hour in the United States working for Uber. So you're exactly right. People are finding other options, whether it's DoorDash, Uber, Etsy.
A Republican Congress against a Democratic White House produces gridlock, and gridlock is the trade: Sacks argues the orgy of deficit spending and money printing stops, and the new majority swaps legislation for investigations. Chamath is paying for the same outcome ($1M to tip the Senate) because he wants stasis through 2024 - his fear case is Germany sidelining its central bank and nationalizing energy assets, which he does not think is impossible in America. Less fiscal impulse and no intervention is a disinflationary, long-duration bet.
The Republicans will control Congress. The Democrats will control the presidency. And so as a result, you're going to be largely in a gridlock situation. But gridlock may be a lot better than what we've had over the last couple of years. So, you know, you've had basically this orgy of spending and money printing, and I think that's going to stop, obviously.
Look, I still believe in the Democrats. You know, I am hoping I gave a million bucks to the Senate pack trying to sort of tip the Senate. I really think it's important that we have a split government because I gave up on the House. I think it's clear that the Republicans are going to win, but the Senate is still up for grabs. And the reason is because I think that we need to sort of have stasis so that nothing bad happens between now and 2024 because I think the economic conditions on the ground are going to be bad in and of themselves.
So like, you know, for me, I'm like, wow, I thought that we could get through the worst of this by mid 23 But now you have to plan for the worst, which means, OK, now I'm thinking that, man, rates could be higher for much longer, which means, you know, we could be in this market till early 25
And so, you know, the 10, 13 percent cuts don't really pass muster. As a public market investor kind of looks at the management across these different companies to turn a profit, they're going to say the folks that are making the deepest cuts the fastest are the ones that are going to get valued.
let's say you're a unicorn company, okay, and you raised at the peak, let's say second half of 2021, you raised $100 million at a billion-dollar valuation. And let's say you've got $50 million left in the bank, right, so you've burned $50 million. A lot of these founders are thinking that $50 million they've got left is only 5% dilution, but that's what it was historically. If you were to raise a new round today, you might only be valued at $250.
And I think like the next shoe to drop has to be these founders and these boards just saying, OK, let's just take the hard medicine. What's the real, you know, market clearing price and valuation? Let's get a third party to price it. And let's get new fresh equity and then move forward.
One is that the marginal cost of energy goes to zero, and the second is that the marginal cost of compute goes to zero. And the second one is really about shifting compute to more parallelism on GPUs and ASICs and FPGAs. But that's why all of this stuff is possible.
Well, I think that we had, if you take a very balanced view of what happened this week, you have to start, I think, with the Federal Reserve. And really, what they said is rates will probably be higher than all of you think, and they'll be higher for longer than all of you want.
It's just alarming statistics because if most people have most of their personal net worth tied up in their home asset and their home values are declining or going to decline, and we're seeing this dramatic spike in consumer credit in the US, it paints a really ugly picture for the next two years.
I mean, look at Airbnb as an example. I mean, they did this ginormous riff during COVID because they had no choice. I mean, their revenue went essentially to zero. And now the business is incredibly strong. It's throwing off massive amounts of free cash flow. And the stock market seems to really love what Airbnb has done.
But the reality is, if you look at this, we have now depleted our strategic oil reserve by almost 50%. Yeah. So we are running out of oil that we can introduce into the market at effectively zero cost to bring the price down. And because we've lost our relationships with folks like Saudi Arabia, there's no way to influence them in order to produce more. In fact, they're going to cut supply so that they can control the prices that they have, that they can sell into the market.
But now I think we're headed into the second part of it, which is the real recession, a recession characterized by joblessness. And you're starting to see economists say we're going to go from 3 something percent unemployment rate to say 5 or 6 percent unemployment next year.
I think the larger point is just that it feels to me like the economy is headed off a cliff right now. I mean, I can tell you within our larger portfolio of companies, like I can see the trajectory. So after Q1 board meetings, I would say about two-thirds of portfolio companies were hitting their numbers and one-third were missing.
And this was the Fed's goal, right? They wanted to take away this free capital. They want to slow the economy down. And it seems like they're making progress. They did the 75 basis point hike this week. But we're adding jobs to the economy. We have more job openings and we had 2.6% GDP growth.
And there's a lot of these distressed mid cap and small cap software companies out there that private equity firms now realize, wow, you don't actually need 50% of the workforce in order to keep the product running and to drive to profitability. And you could see a bit of a flurry of buyout activity as more folks come in and maybe try and mimic the Elon playbook.
So I think about two-thirds of these companies really have no line of sight to profitability in the next two to three years. And again, if you layer in this cost of capital argument, all of those companies, David, will have to raise money at very egregious terms in order to keep themselves going as a public business, in which case their alternative is to go private in a PE transaction.
Episode digest
written during extraction and stored in data/extractions/ep103.json — the auditable source of truth, including everything market-adjacent that did not earn a capture
The efficiency turn was the tradeable spine: Friedberg's call that Elon cutting 30-50% at Twitter sets a new standard - public-market investors will pay for the managements that cut deepest and fastest - is the episode's main new idea (4 voices), with Chamath adding that a cost-cutting Google 'would go bonkers'. Chamath's 11% hurdle-rate math heavily reinforced the PE-take-private wave (he'd do ~100 deals; at least half of ~500 sub-scale software cos) and the late-stage markdown thesis, while Sacks brushed off the specific PE question and pivoted to his own jobless-recession call - Craft's portfolio went from two-thirds hitting to a full re-forecast, unemployment to 5-6% next year. The biggest capture is another Chamath REVERSAL on his own eighth-inning bottom call: he now plans for being 'in this market till early 25' instead of clearing by mid-23. Two more new ideas: Friedberg's creator/gig-income thesis that participation stats understate earning power (Shopify/Etsy/YouTube), and split government as a trade - Sacks says the spending-and-printing orgy stops, Chamath put $1M behind tipping the Senate to foreclose a Germany-style nationalization response. Reinforced with receipts: SPR down ~50% with no Saudi lever, stimulant scripts at 2x contraceptives+asthma in kids, marginal-cost-of-compute-to-zero on GPUs/ASICs, metagenome protein mining. Diarization CLEAN (addressed-by-name x10 plus fingerprints all consistent); the bare 'Friedberg' label was canonicalized, and midterm horse-race talk was skipped per spec.