E126

E126: Big Tech blow-out, Powell’s recession warning, lab-grown meat, RFK Jr shakes up race & more

2023-04-28 spoken.md · speaker-labeled ▶ watch ← E125 all episodes E128 →

2
ideas born
17
ideas moved
27
captures · 4 voices
5
dissenting
+179.9
conviction added
-119.0
decay · 111 silent

Every number here is replayed from score_events — the same ledger the pool ranks on. Decay is what the 111 ideas nobody mentioned gave up this week; it applies only when an episode is processed.

Tier crossings

conviction thresholds crossed by this episode — 65 / 45 / 15 · ideas born here show where they landed. why 65 isn't always green

▲ +13.3 📈 Office commercial real estate reckoning — SF towers go to the banks watch green threshold 61.2 → 74.5 still watch — green gate not met
▲ +59.7 📈 Cellular meat is uneconomic this cycle - alternative protein is a value trap born at watch 59.7
▲ +8.7 📈 Code-for-hire outsourcers displace white-collar labor first ember watch 42.6 → 51.3
▲ +7.7 📈 COVID vaccine reckoning collapses trust in vaccination ember watch 42.2 → 49.9
▲ +18.7 🤖 Big tech's growth era ends - cash-cow multiples and cost discipline ember watch 28.0 → 46.7
▲ +10.3 🤖 Only foundation models can disrupt search - and Google is too far ahead ember watch 36.2 → 46.5
▲ +30.1 🤖 AI collapses the cost of knowledge work to ten cents on the dollar born at ember 30.1
▼ -32.7 🤖 Natural-language chat disrupts Google's search box watch ember 54.6 → 21.8
▲ +12.2 📈 The health halo on processed 'better-for-you' food is a scam dormant ember 6.5 → 18.6

Kill dates that landed since E125

0 hit · 1 partial · 1 miss — windows that closed after 2023-04-21 and up to 2023-04-28, auto-scored against price data and never hand-set. verdict · R · α

ideaverdictRαclosed
📈 Coinbase's regulated-first franchise makes it a great business MISS -56.3% -54.1 2023-04-23
🪙 Decentralized collateral-backed stablecoins have proven peg-resilient PARTIAL +0.1% +2.3 2023-04-23

Who moved the board

each voice's force on conviction this episodesupports and opposes, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of this episode's movement

Friedberg
Friedberg
8 captures · 40% of movement · 1 idea born
+67.7 / -53.9 → net +13.8
Jason
Jason
5 captures · 22% of movement · 1 idea born
+67.7 → net +67.7
Chamath
Chamath
7 captures · 22% of movement
+67.5 → net +67.5
Sacks
Sacks
7 captures · 16% of movement
+40.1 / -9.3 → net +30.8

What got argued (17 ideas)

ordered by how hard each idea moved · quotes are verbatim from the transcript, timestamps deep-link into the episode

NEW BYND 📈 Cellular meat is uneconomic this cycle - alternative protein is a value trap closed 27 ▲ +59.7 -0.0 → 59.7

Friedberg's cost-curve verdict on the WSJ lab-grown-meat post-mortem, from inside the sector. Leg one: plant-protein substitutes (Beyond, Impossible) lose because they cost more, taste worse and use saturated fat for mouthfeel that the American Heart Association has flagged - the category never wins unless it is both cheaper AND better. Leg two: cultivated/cellular meat is many orders of magnitude away from cost parity, gated by strain engineering, ~60 tunable process variables and a hard capacity ceiling (of ~100m litres of biomanufacturing capacity worldwide only ~1m is rentable, against ~200 synbio startups, so capacity cost is up ~4x); a Merck executive's read is that fetal-bovine-serum demand sells a billion dollars and then zero because nobody can make money at $500 a burger. Near-term the money is in the high-value recombinant proteins already falling (insulin, pepsin, rennet), not in meat, so the listed alt-protein cohort de-rates further before the technology arrives.

plays BYND ·primary DNA evals 2024-04-28
Chamath
Chamath support ×2 sentiment ▶ 1:01:42
I think it's just a very complicated, long drawn out process. And I just wonder if the people that are in these businesses, if they actually love food or not.
Friedberg
Friedberg support ×3 explicit_prediction ▶ 1:03:37
So I want to just get back to the unit economics. The cost per kilogram or the cost per gram of the protein, we are still many orders of magnitude away on cellular meat. So the problems you're laying out are really down-the-road problems of optimization. Right now, we've got more fundamental problems on how do you actually get this stuff to be cost competitive.
Jason
Jason support ×2 sentiment ▶ 1:06:33
They're like... It's like eating something mushy that's 60% of an average hamburger. It's not worth paying double for, certainly, for somebody who's a hamburger eater.
GOOGL 🤖 Natural-language chat disrupts Google's search box closed 0 CONTESTED ▼ -32.7 54.6 → 21.8
Friedberg
Friedberg reversal ×2 sentiment ▶ 3:23
One final thing I'll say, it's extraordinarily important to note that I think Google has such an incredible AI advantage over Microsoft.
NEW MSFT 🤖 AI collapses the cost of knowledge work to ten cents on the dollar closed 28 CONTESTED ▲ +30.1 0.0 → 30.1

Jason's call off hands-on GPT-4 / OpenAI-plugin deployment inside his own firms: roughly 30% of what knowledge workers do is already automatable today, and the cost of knowledge work ends up at about 10 cents on the dollar - a 90% collapse, not a 10% trim - on a five-to-ten-quarter timeline, with remote-work salary normalisation across countries stacked on top. Chamath's version is the Harvey.ai case: legal knowledge work gets bid down (the n+1 firm charges $600 instead of $800 and still pays the tool), so knowledge work is massively deflationary while physical labour gets more expensive. Sacks and Friedberg take the other side - Sacks says the same 30% shows up as productivity and therefore wage growth rather than displacement, and Friedberg calls the cost-savings frame the Luddite argument that misses the new product categories the leverage unlocks.

plays MSFT ·primary GOOGL NVDA evals 2024-04-28
Chamath
Chamath support ×2 explicit_prediction ▶ 23:21
So I just don't see a world where, on the one hand, physical labor will continue to be more expensive, they'll demand more and more money to do the job that they're asked to do, and the knowledge work will become increasingly more deflationary because so much of it will be automated by AI that those folks will charge less and less.
Sacks
Sacks oppose ×2 sentiment ▶ 28:33
I think a different way to put it would be every knowledge worker can get 30% more work done.
Jason
Jason support ×3 explicit_prediction ▶ 31:18
I don't think it's 10% less Chamath or that, you know, I think it's like 90%, 10 cents on the dollar to do knowledge work.
Friedberg
Friedberg brush_off ×2 sentiment ▶ 34:57
So the Luddite argument of, oh, this is going to destroy jobs and destroy the economy and drop costs by 90 percent, lawyers are going to get cheaper, etc. etc. I think that doesn't even matter. It's the tip of the iceberg.
META 🤖 Big tech's growth era ends - cash-cow multiples and cost discipline closed 22 ▲ +18.7 28.0 → 46.7
Chamath
Chamath support ×3 explicit_prediction ▶ 6:33
Their valuations may still go up because they generate such an enormous amount of cash flow. But these are exactly those kinds of businesses now. They are ex-growth, large cash flow businesses.
Sacks
Sacks support ×2 sentiment ▶ 12:37
Yes, maybe this is the flip side of what Chamath is saying is they're not growing very fast, but they are profitable machines generating a lot of earnings.
META 🤖 Twitter's riff proves big tech is overstaffed - lean-opex reset ahead closed 52 CONTESTED ▲ +16.0 66.7 → 82.7
Friedberg
Friedberg support ×3 explicit_prediction ▶ 3:23
in contrast to Metta being up 11, 12 percent after hours with their cost cutting model and demonstrating that they're going to start pulling cash out of this business.
Chamath
Chamath support ×2 explicit_prediction ▶ 6:33
Like it doesn't take a CEO change for a board of directors to have the emotional wherewithal to authorize a 15 or 20% reduction in force for a company that is so profitable, that clearly is not yet humming on all cylinders.
Jason
Jason support ×2 sentiment ▶ 14:31
People are just saying, you know what? We're going to cut our way to and do stock buybacks. And that's another way of financial engineering to route around the Fed, right?
Sacks
Sacks support ×2 sentiment ▶ 15:08
They've got a large cushion in terms of their ability to continue generating earnings because of all the bloat that actually gives them like a margin of error where they can just keep cutting to prop up earnings.
BXP 📈 Office commercial real estate reckoning — SF towers go to the banks closed 62 ▲ +13.3 61.2 → 74.5
Jason
Jason support ×2 sentiment ▶ 36:48
It's going up for sale. And they believe, according to the Wall Street Journal, that bids will come in at $60 million, an 80% decline. And we talked about this commercial real estate would have this moment. A lot of the banks, the smaller regional banks, own this debt.
Sacks
Sacks support ×3 explicit_prediction 60mo horizon ▶ 38:56
So you're going to be sitting on that property for five years, ten years before the market comes back the way that you needed to.
EWW 🌍 Nearshoring to Mexico as China's cheap-labour edge disappears closed 31 ▲ +12.5 21.4 → 33.9
Chamath
Chamath support ×2 explicit_prediction ▶ 20:25
So we're going to nearshore or onshore all kinds of things that used to be done by the Chinese. They'll sit in Mexico or they'll sit in Central America.
OTLY 📈 The health halo on processed 'better-for-you' food is a scam closed 10 ▲ +12.2 6.5 → 18.6
Friedberg
Friedberg support ×2 sentiment ▶ 50:49
So the way that Beyond and Impossible and others have tried to make it taste good for people is they've added a lot of, you know, saturated fats, which is a way to drive the mouth feel and make it taste good.
SPY 🏛️ Ukraine endgame is an organized negotiated detente, not a Ukrainian win closed 18 CONTESTED ▲ +12.0 16.9 → 29.0
Sacks
Sacks support ×2 sentiment ▶ 1:08:58
It looks like Russia is certainly not losing the way they used to be. They've captured 90% of Bakhmut, which has been the most violent, bloody battle of the war. And Biden at this point has no strategy to bring that to an end. In fact, he's rejected multiple attempts at a peace deal. And so now it looks like it's the Chinese who are in the driver's seat, potentially putting together some sort of diplomatic settlement.
GOOGL 🤖 Only foundation models can disrupt search - and Google is too far ahead closed 39 CONTESTED ▲ +10.3 36.2 → 46.5
Friedberg
Friedberg support ×2 explicit_prediction ▶ 3:23
But Google certainly has an incredible set of tools and capabilities that is leap years ahead of Microsoft. They're in a position to really compete. They just have to have the will and the leadership to do it.
ACN 📈 Code-for-hire outsourcers displace white-collar labor first closed 7 CONTESTED ▲ +8.7 42.6 → 51.3
Chamath
Chamath support ×3 explicit_prediction ▶ 32:50
By the way, we said that the first organizations to use this, like the Canary and the Coal Mine would be the consulting organizations. And today when Harvey got announced, one of the things that right on the heels of that, PricewaterhouseCoopers announced like a billion dollar investment into AI.
PFE 📈 COVID vaccine reckoning collapses trust in vaccination closed 33 ▲ +7.7 42.2 → 49.9
Sacks
Sacks support ×2 sentiment ▶ 1:13:16
Now, I don't know if he was right about those vaccines, but I do know that he's right in the case of COVID. They had an incentive to push this dubious mRNA shot on us so that we get boosted a zillion times.
TLT 🏦 Inflation stays sticky in 2023 — the wage chapter closed 8 CONTESTED ▲ +7.6 51.5 → 59.1
Chamath
Chamath support ×3 explicit_prediction ▶ 20:25
But when you show that chart, Jason, what it means is it's just really hard to find people. And so the only way you're going to get people off their butt to go into work, to sit in a chair, to do a job that you need them to do is to pay them more. And in finding that, wages will have to go up.
SPY 🌍 Rate hikes bite with a lag - back in recession next year closed 18 CONTESTED ▲ +6.3 68.8 → 75.2
Sacks
Sacks support ×3 explicit_prediction ▶ 1:07:07
I'm sticking by it. I think we're still going to have a recession.
ARKG 🤖 Synthetic biology's Netscape moment closed 0 CONTESTED ▼ -4.9 4.9 → 0.0
Friedberg
Friedberg reversal ×2 sentiment ▶ 1:03:37
Hundreds of millions of dollars, and in several cases, billions of dollars have gone into these systems, and it's very likely that these companies may need several more years and several billion dollars. We are going to get there. The technology is progressing. The rate of progress is a little slower, and it's a little more challenged, I think, than the first round of investors had hoped.
IPO 📈 Startup mass extinction event in late 2023 and 2024 closed 35 ▲ +2.4 81.8 → 84.1
Friedberg
Friedberg support ×2 explicit_prediction ▶ 40:11
And we've talked a lot about the statistic that I've shared a bunch publicly on how 70 percent of publicly traded companies that have gone public since 2020 are trading below their total cash invested since founding, which should translate to an estimate that call it somewhere in the order of 70 percent of private companies are probably worth less than their preference stack.
MSFT 🤖 ChatGPT plugins make OpenAI the next great computing platform closed 25 CONTESTED ▼ +0.0 0.0 → 0.0
Jason
Jason oppose ×2 sentiment ▶ 24:35
Or should I even bother, so should I bother building, you know, a verticalized app? And it turns out, like, I think you should do the verticalized app.

Episode digest

written during extraction and stored in data/extractions/ep126.json — the auditable source of truth, including everything market-adjacent that did not earn a capture

Big-tech Q1 blow-out week (MSFT +9%, META +12%, AMZN +10% after hours, GOOGL a mixed beat) split the besties across the two opposed big-tech ideas rather than resolving them: Friedberg, Chamath, Sacks and Jason all reinforced the lean-opex/cost-cut thesis with META as the proof, while Chamath simultaneously table-pounded his own bearish call that we are 'well past peak big tech' and these are now ex-growth cash cows valued on financial engineering. Two reversals, both Friedberg's: he now says Google is 'leap years ahead of Microsoft' on models and could be a quick turnaround story, against his own E106 chat-disrupts-search call, and fifteen days before its kill date he walked back the E032 synbio Netscape moment ('slower and more challenged than the first round of investors had hoped'). Sacks refused to revise his recession forecast against the earnings beat ('I'm sticking by it'), leaning on Powell's own sub-1%-or-recession framing, and put SF office at 30%+ vacancy with a five-to-ten-year absorption; Chamath reinforced the deglobalization/wage-inflation chain (ex-China world order, nearshoring, terminal inflation 'just roughly higher'). Two new ideas: Jason's 90%-knowledge-work-cost-collapse call (opposed by Sacks on productivity grounds and brushed off by Friedberg as 'the Luddite argument'), and Friedberg's bearish alt-protein cost-curve verdict - cellular meat many orders of magnitude from parity, plant protein dead on price and taste, the money is in recombinant high-value proteins. Diarization CLEAN: Jason top talker, all four addressed-by-name tests resolved to the right next speaker, no time gaps; the bare 'Friedberg' label (no first name) is the normal diarization variant and was canonicalized.