← pool

📈 Wall Street earnings estimates are wrong - the E resets, not just the multiple

Consensus EPS is the part of the market that has not repriced yet: Wall Street still models record earnings this year and higher next year, which is impossible when 80-90% cost increases in energy and COGS cannot be passed through. Chamath's tell is Facebook dropping ~400bp on a day the S&P was up 2.5% - smart money re-underwrote the E, not the P/E - and he argues every other stock goes through the same earnings revision, so the entire equity complex reprices lower through 2022 and into 2023, hitting cash-burning unprofitable tech hardest. Jason takes the other side: layoffs, hiring freezes and ad-spend cuts mean the E could actually go up.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 57.1 WATCH
EMBER
band · contested
▼ SHORT SPY
expression · bearish equities
MISS
outcome · R -24.3% · α -48.7%
2023-12-24
window closed
⚠ CONFLICTING IDEAS ON THE SAME TICKER — the board is arguing with itself; net it before trading (ticker view →)
QQQ · It's 1997-98, not 1999 — the melt-up has years left LONG GREEN 67.3 ← stronger than this idea (23.0)
QQQ · The 2026 US boom — 5-6% GDP prints LONG WATCH 54.6 ← stronger than this idea (23.0)
META · Meta becomes America's open-source AI champion LONG EMBER 26.7 ← stronger than this idea (23.0)
META · Independent frontier-model labs lose to hyperscaler capital LONG DORMANT 14.0
META · Meta's AI assistant takes ten points of search share from Google LONG DORMANT 7.4

also touching these tickers, same direction: Tort floodgates open on social media 15 (META) · Narrow Section 230 carve-out unleashes a tort wave on social platforms 4 (META)

⚖ Why this verdict

fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2022-06-24 → 2023-12-24 — first mention + 18-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▼ SHORT SPY (primary play). SPY rose 24.3% over the window → direction-adjusted R = -24.3% (the call lost money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +24.3%α = -24.3 − (+24.3) = -48.7% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
    Stock-selection read: +0.0% — did SPY move the predicted way relative to the market. The two only differ on a SHORT: this call was right about direction relative to the index but still cost money versus holding it.
    (SPY is itself the primary here — scored on R alone.)
  4. Rule fired:
    · HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5
    · PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0
    ▶ MISS — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a MISS earn 0 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Chamath, Jason, Sacks | opposed: Brad Gerstner | benchmark-primary: scored on R alone

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2022-06-24)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▼ SHORT SPYetf PRIMARY the broad equity complex being repriced on earnings revisions
▼ SHORT METAstock adjacent Chamath's worked example - the stock smart money already re-underwrote
▼ SHORT QQQetf adjacent big tech carries the index earnings and is where the revisions bite

Mention log

Chamath
Chamath equities w=0.84 · n=160 · E84 (2022-06-24) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 32:17 SUPPORT · horizon 18mo
“what they actually re-underwrote was that actually it's not that the price to earnings was cheap. It's that the E in PE was just wrong. ... I think Wall Street's wrong. And I think that earnings are going to go down this year and will definitely go down in 23 ... I think what probably happens is the entire world of equities needs to get repriced at a lower price.”
Jason
Jason equities w=0.97 · n=105 · E84 (2022-06-24) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 35:08 OPPOSE
“I think what people would say is maybe they're going to lower their costs. And so with layoffs and lowering salaries and lowering spend on advertising, you know, the E could go up.”
Chamath
Chamath equities w=0.84 · n=160 · E87 (2022-07-14) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 48:38 SUPPORT
“And I'm going to still maintain that the E is wrong. The earnings are wrong for most of these companies. So why? Well, one is that when these companies start to report their quarterly earnings starting in the next few days, the year-over-year comparison is going to be to the numbers that they posted in Q2 of 2021, which by all accounts was a blowout number.”
Jason
Jason equities w=0.97 · n=105 · E87 (2022-07-14) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 50:52 SUPPORT
“Currently, and this is for the S&P 500, we're currently at 20 or so, and we have twice in our lifetime kind of hit that 13, 14, 15 level, so we could have a 25% correction from here in the stock market.”
Chamath
Chamath equities w=0.84 · n=160 · E89 (2022-07-29) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 21:24 SUPPORT
“The root awakening is going to be for all these people who made all these bets, assuming that it's permanent. And specifically, I mean, you know, especially around real estate and work from home and all of this stuff, benefits, and it's all going to change now. And the reason I say that is the combination of reversion to the mean will impact a company's bottom line.”
Chamath
Chamath equities w=0.84 · n=160 · E97 (2022-09-23) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 25:30 SUPPORT
“Unemployment will go back up. Inflation will be sticky. Real earnings will shrink. Consumption will ebb. And earnings will not be that great.”
Chamath
Chamath equities w=0.84 · n=160 · E100 (2022-10-14) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:16:18 SUPPORT
“Well, those four companies are now being identified for what they may be, which in capitalism is called over earning.”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) equities w=0.95 · n=22 · E101 (2022-10-22) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 33:33 OPPOSE
“On earnings, there's kind of a conventional wisdom emerging from many folks that $3,200 at the bottom or maybe $2,700 at the bottom, that we're going to go from $225 in S&P earnings back to $200. That seems to me to be, you know, again, a lot of people making that bet. I don't see any evidence in Q3 earnings.”
Chamath
Chamath equities w=0.84 · n=160 · E102 (2022-10-29) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:03:13 REVERSAL
“because if this stuff could not bring the market down, it's hard to see something other than an exogenous event, probably some Russia-Ukraine event, really having a negative impact. So to me, I'm kind of like, I don't know, it seems like pretty bullish for me.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E106 (2022-12-03) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:26:36 SUPPORT
“But I think the point here is that what you're seeing is the whole SaaS industry is really slowing down here. In the first half of the year, you saw SaaS valuations correct. Now we're actually seeing SaaS top line correct.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E109 (2022-12-24) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:43:51 SUPPORT
“It's not getting better. I mean, the stock market today should be a wake up call. I mean, this is one of the worst days in the market the whole year.”
Chamath
Chamath equities w=0.84 · n=160 · E118 (2023-03-03) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 43:28 SUPPORT
“once we all realize that these earnings are fake and you reset down 15%, that's where you get to the mid-3000 in the S&P 500”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Chamath
Chamath w=0.84
7 scoring events · 62% of moves
+77.7 / -26.0 → net +51.7
Sacks
Sacks w=0.89
2 scoring events · 17% of moves
+28.5 → net +28.5
Jason
Jason w=0.97
2 scoring events · 13% of moves
+9.6 / -11.7 → net -2.1
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner w=0.95 regular guest ×1.0
1 scoring event · 8% of moves
+0.0 / -13.7 → net -13.7

⏳ decay drained -41.4 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E84 2022-06-24 init +35.2 35.2 E84 born by Chamath (explicit_prediction x3) [w=0.84]
E84 2022-06-24 oppose -11.7 23.5 E84 Jason opposes x2 [w=0.97]
E85 2022-06-30 decay -0.5 23.0 E85 silent
E86 2022-07-08 decay -0.5 22.6 E86 silent
E87 2022-07-14 reinforce +11.7 34.3 E87 Chamath support x3 [w=0.84]
E87 2022-07-14 reinforce +9.6 43.8 E87 Jason support x2 (flipped from oppose) [w=0.97]
E88 2022-07-22 decay -0.9 43.0 E88 silent
E89 2022-07-29 reinforce +8.6 51.6 E89 Chamath support x3 [w=0.84]
E90 2022-08-05 decay -1.0 50.5 E90 silent
E91 2022-08-13 decay -1.0 49.5 E91 silent
E92 2022-08-20 decay -1.0 48.5 E92 silent
E93 2022-08-26 decay -1.0 47.6 E93 silent
E94 2022-09-01 decay -1.0 46.6 E94 silent
E95 2022-09-10 decay -0.9 45.7 E95 silent
E96 2022-09-17 decay -0.9 44.8 E96 silent
E97 2022-09-23 reinforce +8.3 53.1 E97 Chamath support x3 [w=0.84]
E98 2022-10-01 decay -1.1 52.0 E98 silent
E99 2022-10-07 decay -1.0 51.0 E99 silent
E100 2022-10-14 reinforce +6.2 57.1 E100 Chamath support x2 [w=0.84]
E101 2022-10-22 oppose -13.7 43.4 E101 Brad Gerstner opposes x3 [w=0.95]
E102 2022-10-29 reversal -26.0 17.4 E102 Chamath flips
E103 2022-11-05 decay -0.3 17.0 E103 silent
E105 2022-11-19 decay -0.3 16.7 E105 silent
E106 2022-12-03 reinforce +19.9 36.6 E106 Sacks support x3 (new voice) [w=0.89]
E107 2022-12-10 decay -0.7 35.9 E107 silent
E108 2022-12-16 decay -0.7 35.1 E108 silent
E109 2022-12-24 reinforce +8.6 43.8 E109 Sacks support x2 [w=0.89]
E110 2023-01-06 decay -0.9 42.9 E110 silent
E111 2023-01-13 decay -0.9 42.0 E111 silent
E112 2023-01-20 decay -0.8 41.2 E112 silent
E113 2023-01-27 decay -0.8 40.4 E113 silent
E114 2023-02-04 decay -0.8 39.6 E114 silent
E115 2023-02-11 decay -0.8 38.8 E115 silent
E116 2023-02-17 decay -0.8 38.0 E116 silent
E118 2023-03-03 reinforce +7.8 45.8 E118 Chamath support x2 (flipped from reversal) [w=0.84]
E119 2023-03-11 decay -0.9 44.9 E119 silent
E120 2023-03-17 decay -0.9 44.0 E120 silent
E121 2023-03-24 decay -0.9 43.1 E121 silent
E122 2023-03-31 decay -0.9 42.2 E122 silent
E123 2023-04-07 decay -0.8 41.4 E123 silent
E124 2023-04-14 decay -0.8 40.6 E124 silent
E125 2023-04-21 decay -0.8 39.7 E125 silent
E126 2023-04-28 decay -0.8 38.9 E126 silent
E128 2023-05-12 decay -0.8 38.2 E128 silent
E129 2023-05-19 decay -0.8 37.4 E129 silent
E130 2023-05-26 decay -0.7 36.7 E130 silent
E131 2023-06-02 decay -0.7 35.9 E131 silent
E132 2023-06-10 decay -0.7 35.2 E132 silent
E133 2023-06-16 decay -0.7 34.5 E133 silent
E134 2023-06-24 decay -0.7 33.8 E134 silent
E135 2023-07-01 decay -0.7 33.1 E135 silent
E136 2023-07-09 decay -0.7 32.5 E136 silent
E137 2023-07-14 decay -0.6 31.8 E137 silent
E139 2023-07-27 decay -0.6 31.2 E139 silent
E140 2023-08-04 decay -0.6 30.6 E140 silent
E141 2023-08-11 decay -0.6 29.9 E141 silent
E142 2023-08-18 decay -0.6 29.4 E142 silent
E143 2023-08-25 decay -0.6 28.8 E143 silent
E144 2023-09-01 decay -0.6 28.2 E144 silent
E146 2023-09-22 decay -0.6 27.6 E146 silent
E147 2023-09-29 decay -0.6 27.1 E147 silent
E148 2023-10-07 decay -0.5 26.5 E148 silent
E149 2023-10-13 decay -0.5 26.0 E149 silent
E150 2023-10-20 decay -0.5 25.5 E150 silent
E151 2023-10-27 decay -0.5 25.0 E151 silent
E152 2023-11-03 decay -0.5 24.5 E152 silent
E156 2023-12-08 decay -0.5 24.0 E156 silent
E157 2023-12-16 decay -0.5 23.5 E157 silent
E158 2023-12-23 decay -0.5 23.0 E158 silent