+0.0
net board stance
what this means
766.95
-0.4% · close 2026-09-08
-1% / +4% / +20%
1m / 3m / 12m
93%
of 52w range · -1.4% off high
11/26
hit rate as primary · α -15
Where we stand — 0 live ideas
No active idea holds this ticker. Anything below is history.
Where the winds are blowing
NET BOARD STANCE, LAST 60 EPISODES —
rising = the besties are building this position, falling = abandoning it. Replayed from
score_events; an idea counts from birth until its window closes.
PRICE VS SPY OVER THE SAME WINDOW, % — did the
talk lead the tape or follow it?
Who's pushing which way
each voice's net push ON THIS TICKER — their most recent stance per idea × the idea's direction × strength, so supporting a bearish idea pushes down. Not conviction (that lives on the idea); this is direction of travel per person. what w= means
Track record on SPY
As a PRIMARY play the besties are 11 hit / 3 partial / 12 miss over 26 closed windows — credit 0.48, average α -14.8. Adjacent plays are listed but never scored.
The tape — what was actually said
every capture on any idea holding SPY, newest first · quotes verbatim, timestamps deep-link into the episode
My gosh, this short Bitcoin thing has been a bonanza... Is it below 90? It is, right? It's like 87?... Watch out below.
Early in the year... Altimeter was positioned small... By May... we went to kind of extra large positioning and we've been there most of the year. And so now we're back to kind of medium, medium small positioning in the market... There's a pause as we head in over the course of the next couple months.
To be clear, we are very much getting into a phase of risk-off... We will be back firmly in risk-on mode in February, is my suspicion... Bitcoin is about to break through 100,000 to the downside, which I think is a psychological barrier that probably has another 5% or 10% more to run.
PH
Phil Deutch
oppose ×2
▼ on
🏛️ Socialism goes national in the US and ratchets taxes and spending higher
E238 · 2025-08-09
▶ 54:57
I don't see that, but if you want to see that, you can, but it will swing back. This country is incredibly resilient, and I have complete faith in that resilience.
So they won't work. And I think that'll be a quick, that'll be like a quick end to socialism.
BE
Ben Shapiro
support ×2
▼ on
🏛️ Socialism goes national in the US and ratchets taxes and spending higher
E238 · 2025-08-09
▶ 1:03:06
If things take a downturn, then the backlash is going to be a lot stronger than anything that any of us can say about the failures of Zoran Mamdani, because what it's going to be is, look, the rich got richer and we got poorer, and it's going to be a redox of 2007, 2008, but with a much, even further to the left than Obama ever was, and that I'm deeply afraid of.
My prediction will ring fruer than any of us hope. Socialism will sweep over this nation, I fear. And I think it's a cancer.
BE
Ben Shapiro
support ×2
▲ on
🏛️ Trump's tariff threats are negotiating leverage and get settled down
E238 · 2025-08-09
▶ 31:06
Otherwise, China is able to sort of climb out the window, which is, I think, what they've done on everything from Nvidia chips to TikTok to their actual tariff rate, which I believe is now lower than the tariff rate we have against Canada.
I would just say he showed his hand in April. He looked into the abyss and if it is clearly not working, he showed that he will change it.
the shock and bore playbook is basically, Trump says something completely outrageous, shocking, everybody goes crazy, the media loses their mind, business leaders lose their mind. ... Trump comes in, sees all the stuff, and then he starts making these micro tweaks. So it's on the finish line, it's in the red zone, five-yard line, Trump comes in, and then he sticks it to them again with three or four extra asks, and then they wrap it up, and that this is becoming really effective.
we said at the time that all of that was happening and Larry Summers was on the pod preaching doom, is that all of that was an opening bid. It was all the start to a negotiation. And we had to see where it ended up and that the administration still had to stick the landing. But I got to say based on EU, Japan and South Korea, this is looking really good right now.
It's about $2 trillion. It's effectively $2 trillion of stimulus into the US, but without money printing.
obviously the 3% number is way ahead of expectations. It's a fantastic number. It just feels like everything is humming on all cylinders here.
BI
Bill Hagerty
support ×1
▲ on
🏛️ Trump's tariff threats are negotiating leverage and get settled down
E236 · 2025-07-19
▶ 1:10:40
Jameson is back now as the US Trade Representative and I'm very optimistic that we're going to see more trade flourish. President Trump knows how to do this. I've been with him in the trade negotiations. He knows exactly how to navigate this.
There's a lot of spending in there, as we've talked about here, putting that aside, it feels like the economy is in really great shape.
I would say for everyone but China. You know, it is, and you know, we're, we've clearly reached some sort of deal with China, you know, rare earths for H20s and MI308Xs.
And ultimately, don't we look at the tariff situation and say, despite the shock and awe of the opening salvo, it's quite a boring position now. It just seems to be reciprocity and reasonable reciprocity at that.
And so as long as that's the case, I think you're going to continue to have a bid for equities. If all of a sudden the MAG 7 decided to delist and not be American companies, and all of a sudden showed up in the CAC 50 in France, yeah, we'd be in big trouble. But I don't think that's going to happen. And so as long as there's American ingenuity and American supremacy, again, which goes back to the other thing, which is we can't kill these golden geese, nor should we kill the emerging and growing golden goose, which is AI. And as long as those things are the same, there will be a constant bid for American assets.
In the last 10 years, US treasuries held by foreign holders has declined from 34%. This is a good thing, not a bad thing. I mean, it's good in one context. But my point is people, foreign countries and foreign businesses and foreign investors aren't holding US treasuries as much as they used to.
So, I don't know, I think that it's part of the fact that until we run surpluses and or completely eliminate the debt, there will always be a reason to be somewhat short the dollar. But the reality is that a lot of people still want to own these assets more than what they want to own any other asset. And those assets are dollar denominated. And so as long as that continues to hold in the push and pull, it will be a slow bleed, but it's probably manageable.
He starts with a bang and then he falls back to a reasonable position that the markets can digest. So you just have to take a 90 day view of everything he's doing and then you'll be fine.
any time that the media tries to sow doom or spread panic about the Trump administration's policies, that's a good time to buy.
I think that if Powell starts an aggressive cutting program, either because he has to, or because he's trying to keep his job, I mean, man, you could see the S&P at 7,000.
So one argument here might be that we're actually not necessarily seeing an improvement in the fundamental business environment. We're not seeing record revenue across the board.
I think it's the first time you could probably argue that you could go short the S&P and pick a couple of winners. ... I do think that this is such a transformative moment that if you really have a sense for what's possible, you could start to see category killers emerge out of the S&P, and it's an opportunity to short the S&P and pick a couple of winners.