← pool

🏦 Phase three of the 2023 crisis is a US government debt crisis

Sacks' three-phase framing of the 2023 financial crisis: phase one was bank unrealized losses on long-dated bonds, phase two is the CRE credit crunch, and phase three is a government debt crisis - a spike in federal borrowing costs, sovereign debt stress internationally, and budget deficits at states and cities - which Washington tries to solve by inflating and monetizing the debt. Explicitly framed as playing out over the next couple of years rather than in 90 days.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 96.5 GREEN
WATCH
band
▼ SHORT TLT
expression · bearish rates
PARTIAL
outcome · R +9.3% · α -39.7%
2025-03-24
window closed
⚠ CONFLICTING IDEA ON THE SAME TICKER — the board is arguing with itself; net it before trading (ticker view →)
TLT · Fed easing + disinflation into 2026 LONG DORMANT 10.5

also touching these tickers, same direction: US fiscal spiral keeps long-end yields grinding higher 67 (TLT) · State-government financing stress surfaces in 2026 36 (MUB)

⚖ Why this verdict

fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2023-03-24 → 2025-03-24 — first mention + 24-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▼ SHORT TLT (primary play). TLT fell 9.3% over the window → direction-adjusted R = +9.3% (the call made money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +49.0%α = +9.3 − (+49.0) = -39.7% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
    Stock-selection read: +58.4% — did TLT move the predicted way relative to the market. The two only differ on a SHORT: this call was right about direction relative to the index but still cost money versus holding it.
  4. Rule fired:
    · HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5
    ▶ PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0
    · MISS — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a PARTIAL earn 0.5 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Chamath, Friedberg, Jason, Sacks, Travis Kalanick | proxy-sensitive: EMB→MISS (-18.2%); MUB→MISS (-4.1%)

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2023-03-24)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▼ SHORT TLTetf PRIMARY a spike in federal borrowing costs reprices long-duration Treasuries most directly
▼ SHORT EMBetf adjacent Sacks' 'sovereign debt issues internationally' leg - EM hard-currency sovereigns
▼ SHORT MUBetf adjacent the state-and-city budget-deficit leg of the call shows up in municipal credit

Mention log

Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E121 (2023-03-24) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 36:45 SUPPORT · horizon 24mo
“I think that the government debt crisis, assuming the government wants to inflate and monetize the debt as a way to solve that problem, that will be highly inflationary. But when these things play out, we can't know. I think that's what makes this really hard. I think jumping all the way to the sort of finish line and saying we're going to have a million dollar Bitcoin in 90 days because the US dollar is worthless, I think that's premature. I think this could play out over the next couple of years.”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E130 (2023-05-26) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 34:34 SUPPORT
“And it does beg the question, you know, would you want to buy bonds from an entity that's generating $4 trillion in revenue and spending $6 trillion and has a plan to do that for the foreseeable future?”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E130 (2023-05-26) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 36:09 SUPPORT
“I mean, the inflation is here and the crowding out of private investment and private borrowing is now occurring because the government borrowing is so big.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E130 (2023-05-26) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 41:49 OPPOSE · horizon 60mo
“But if you flip them around, I'm just telling you, it's not like I want any of this to happen, but I'm telling you, nothing will change and you guys will still be crying wolf in five years. It'll still be the same. It'll just be a different debt-to-GDP number that gives you anxiety.”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E131 (2023-06-02) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 40:33 SUPPORT
“The debt is getting bigger and bigger at the same time that foreign governments and investors in general don't want to fund our debt. So therefore, interest rates will rise. Our interest costs will keep going up.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E131 (2023-06-02) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 40:43 OPPOSE
“That's not why interest rates are going up.”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E137 (2023-07-14) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 58:55 SUPPORT
“At the end of the day, the market's probably going to impose discipline on us.”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E140 (2023-08-04) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 57:39 SUPPORT
“So if I can get my 5% to 7% from a risk-free US government bond, of course I'm going to do that. So the discount rate on equities will go up.”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E140 (2023-08-04) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 48:45 SUPPORT
“there were two prominent economists who shared that they think we're going to be facing long-term rates in the 5 to 7% range, very long-term rates for a very long period of time, that it is a new fiscal regime.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E140 (2023-08-04) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:05:31 OPPOSE
“These 2 trillion of bonds that these guys will issue between the strip will trade from 5% all the way down to 3%. There'll be a line out the door, I guarantee you.”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E141 (2023-08-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:32:49 SUPPORT · horizon 18mo
“The last piece of it is government debt. So at the rate that the government is racking up deficits, the Treasury is going to have to float something like $3 trillion of new T-bills by the end of the year. And we're rolling something like $9 trillion of old government debt over the next 18 months at new higher interest rates.”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E142 (2023-08-18) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:08:53 SUPPORT · horizon 12mo
“The 10-year rate is, what is it now, at like 4.5 percent, something like that? And that rate may not come down. A lot of economists are worrying about this. Some are worried about this because the federal government has such huge financing needs... just because short rates come down, there's no guarantee that the long rates are going to come down. And so, there may not be this relief that real estate developers are looking for next year. And again, there's this wall of debt that has to be refinanced.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E146 (2023-09-22) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 10:45 SUPPORT · horizon 12mo
“the forcing function will be the debt service costs, which has just crossed a trillion dollars a year just to pay the interest and it's mounting. 30% of our debt, I think, is coming up for refinancing in the next 12 months. And it's going to refinance at a 5% rate”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E146 (2023-09-22) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:19:00 SUPPORT
“we're running almost $2 trillion deficits in peacetime ... Do long-term rates keep going up based on the debt financing needs of the federal government?”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E146 (2023-09-22) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 11:10 SUPPORT
“The federal budget will get naturally constrained at some point here.”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E148 (2023-10-07) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 24:15 SUPPORT
“Now, we're seeing a separate problem, which is long rates are going up, and the long rates are going up because of this concern that the federal government has too much debt. Bondholders are starting to demand a higher long-term premium to hold that debt. ... Unless the political system gets serious about reducing deficits, even if inflation comes down, and even if the Fed cuts short-term rates, you're going to have a problem with long-term rates remaining high, and that is going to keep the cost of capital high”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E148 (2023-10-07) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 12:55 SUPPORT
“National debt reported by the Treasury Department increased by $275 billion in a one-day report yesterday, $275 billion in a day. The entire TARP program during 2008 was $400 billion. That's how out of control our fiscal condition is. ... there's an arithmetic to this that at some point it becomes ever-escalating until you step in and do something dramatic about it.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E148 (2023-10-07) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 9:08 SUPPORT
“You balloon the deficit, you balloon the debt, you have all kinds of pork barrel spending, there's zero accountability, the bullets cost $6,000, the umbrella holders cost $15,000. All of this nonsense that just brings us closer and closer to some sort of default or economic contagion.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E149 (2023-10-13) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:02:41 SUPPORT
“And unfortunately, the few things that if he could have just pushed through, would have really saved America. The biggest one being these 100-year bonds. It would have kept America from getting to the precipice of fiscal ruin. And we'd be in a highly different situation.”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E151 (2023-10-27) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:08:00 SUPPORT
“Eventually, the Fed monetizes all this stuff. It's the only path, which, by the way, will inflate a lot of financial assets”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E152 (2023-11-03) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 31:49 SUPPORT
“There's gonna be a huge budget shortfall over the next year and next couple of years, because there's no activity. I mean, a third of the economic activity of the city has just dried up.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E152 (2023-11-03) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 40:23 OPPOSE
“counties and municipalities and cities that are in much worse fiscal shape than San Francisco was able to stay incompetent for a lot longer. And so that delta T of incompetence tends to be about five to ten years. I would say the midpoint is eight.”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E159 (2023-12-29) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:02:40 SUPPORT
“I think you guys will like my worst trend. It is the metastasizing national debt. ... And it is a bipartisan problem. It's been going on for really 20-plus years. ... But it is getting worse and worse under Biden.”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E159 (2023-12-29) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:05:41 SUPPORT
“I'm going to go with the normalization of spending. I think it's probably the worst trend. ... It's like we've normalized spending and COVID just made it worse. ... And suddenly it becomes normal. And this normalization catches up to us.”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E163 (2024-01-26) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 7:39 SUPPORT
“every day that interest rates are off, are 1% higher, based on the current federal debt level, we're paying an incremental billion dollars in interest payments per day”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E163 (2024-01-26) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 9:38 SUPPORT
“So there's still room for that number to move up, even with rate cuts on the front end of the curve.”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E172 (2024-03-29) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 44:58 SUPPORT
“I remain steadfast in my commitment to there being only one major issue facing this country, and that is the federal debt and the deficit. We are increasing the federal debt by a trillion dollars every hundred days. That number is not slowing down. ... I think that the necessity of raising tax rates, the necessity ultimately of cutting entitlement programs, the necessary inflation that will arise because of the condition of the federal government's debt level, because we're going to have to keep printing money.”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E172 (2024-03-29) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:06:58 SUPPORT
“The hard part is that our interest expense keeps growing because as our debt rolls onto more expensive, higher interest bonds, then our interest expenses increasing. Just a few years ago, our interest expense was only 300 billion a year. Now it's over a trillion a year. ... And that's just going to keep growing and growing. And then the other thing that's going to grow is all the entitlements related to demographics.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E172 (2024-03-29) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:03:42 OPPOSE
“The first is that our debt to GDP either historically, but also in relation to other countries is still relatively reasonable. And what that basically shows is we have a lot more debt that we can issue, which means that there's a lot more deficits to run. ... the problem is politicians will use this as a reason to continue spending, because they won't be forced to. And that's not a great thing, but this is probably why the status quo will go on for a very long time.”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E173 (2024-04-05) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:16:44 SUPPORT
“he points out that the era of prosperity that over the last 500 years, we've seen six major empires go through is followed by a debt bubble, which drives a wealth gap, which ultimately leads to economic challenges, which means printing more money, which is the cycle we are going through right now with a, as you guys know, $2 to $3 trillion annual deficit and explosion in federal debt levels. And that ultimately leads inevitably to external conflict, to war.”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E173 (2024-04-05) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 59:24 SUPPORT
“What's going to allow us to pay off this enormous national debt that seems to be so large that it's unrepayable? We need the productivity gains that AI is going to unlock. Without them, we're definitely toast.”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E174 (2024-04-12) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 38:12 SUPPORT
“We're basically in a classic debt spiral where we're borrowing... We're not even paying back the interest on the debt. We're borrowing money to pay off all the interest and then some on top of that”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E174 (2024-04-12) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 37:25 SUPPORT · horizon 12mo
“7.6 is sitting around 2% and now it's going to get bumped up to close to 5%, which adds an incremental $210 billion a year of debt service expense just on the debt that's getting refinanced in the next 12 months”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E175 (2024-04-19) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:10:31 SUPPORT
“the Trump tax cut that he put in place in 2017 added one and a half trillion dollars to the federal deficit... it does highlight just how much we are spending at the federal level and the demand for tax revenue... which is now we're going to eat into innovation, which is supposed to drive, get us out of the problem, the spiral that results from this debt.”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E176 (2024-04-26) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:33:42 SUPPORT
“people like this see the $160 trillion of private wealth as being on the balance sheet of the federal government and being used to offset the $175 trillion of liabilities. In other words, all it takes is all you got. That's the trajectory we're on.”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E179 (2024-05-17) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:05:12 SUPPORT
“So we've been able to accumulate more and more debt, but it's reaching a point where it's unsustainable. And what we've already seen is that the feds had to jack up interest rates from very low, practically nothing to 5.5%.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E179 (2024-05-17) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:03:21 SUPPORT
“And so the thing we need to take away is if we don't get our together, that's probably what we're gonna have to do.”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E179 (2024-05-17) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 1:08:39 SUPPORT
“it should limit the approval or action of certain programs that you might otherwise wanna do in a normal environment, but in an inflationary environment, you don't have the flexibility to do them.”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E180 (2024-05-24) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 48:53 SUPPORT
“But the truth is, we're funding that growth with leverage at the national level, the federal level and at the household and domestic level. We are borrowing money to inflate the revenue numbers. And so the GDP goes up, but the debt is going up higher. And so the ability for folks to support themselves and buy things that they want to buy and continue to improve their condition in life has declined. Things are getting worse.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E181 (2024-05-31) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 30:02 SUPPORT
“So there are subsidies, there are kickbacks, there are government programs that now number in the trillions of dollars a year, incremental to what we were going to spend if things were the status quo.”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E183 (2024-06-14) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:09:09 SUPPORT
“That is true for consumers, that is true for enterprises, and it is true for the federal government.”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E183 (2024-06-14) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:22:38 SUPPORT
“You had 1.3% GDP growth rate with a 6% of GDP deficit by the government.”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E184 (2024-06-20) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 54:15 SUPPORT
“it took us 200 years as a country to add a trillion dollars to our federal debt, to go from zero to a trillion. And now we're adding a trillion every hundred days.”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E185 (2024-06-29) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 33:31 SUPPORT
“The cost to service the interest alone on our federal debt is now greater than a trillion dollars per year. This already exceeds the discretionary defense budget.”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E190 (2024-08-02) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 36:11 SUPPORT
“So the only reason why we're in positive GDP growth territory is because of massive government spending that we know is not sustainable. And at some point, the bill is going to come due for that.”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E190 (2024-08-02) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 37:58 SUPPORT
“And unfortunately, the action that will be taken to resolve this isn't necessarily a free market action. It's going to end up being some sort of government intervention, which furthers the government's involvement in the economy and furthers the tentacles that make it much harder to ultimately pull out of this spiral and this problem.”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E191 (2024-08-09) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 22:32 SUPPORT
“As all of the low interest bonds mature and we issue new debt at a higher interest rate, our debt service cost is going to continue to climb. It's already higher than discretionary military spending at over a trillion a year.”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E191 (2024-08-09) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 21:30 SUPPORT
“I tend to agree with Friedberg here that when you have massive amounts of debt, it definitely limits your flexibility.”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E193 (2024-08-23) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 13:59 SUPPORT
“We're running unsustainably high levels of deficit and debt. We're running, what, $2 trillion a year deficits right now. And what are we getting for that? We're not getting a super robust economy. We're getting an economy that's narrowly staying out of recession.”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E198 (2024-10-03) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:09:08 SUPPORT · horizon 15mo
“On the first day of the new fiscal year, federal debt jumped by $204 billion in one day. Federal debt now stands at $35.7 trillion. And the biggest challenge we have in the year ahead is that $10 trillion of the outstanding debt comes up for refinance. It's going to refinance at around 4%. So we're going to be adding another $300 billion in new interest expense next fiscal year, plus the Biden administration has proposed a $7.2 trillion budget for next year, which will inevitably lead to another $2 trillion of deficit spending, which means that by the end of 2025, we could be staring at $40 trillion of federal debt. And if you do the math on that at 4% interest, it's $1.6 trillion a year of interest expense a year just on interest expense on the outstanding debt, which effectively begins to eclipse the entire federal budget very quickly”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E201 (2024-10-25) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 46:55 SUPPORT
“we normalized emergency conditions and consequence-free spending by the US government”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E201 (2024-10-25) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 21:55 SUPPORT
“I think it is inevitable that the federal reserve in the United States is going to need to buy the debt”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E201 (2024-10-25) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 44:18 SUPPORT
“How can you get 4.25% when you have all of these risks looming over the next 10 years?”
Jason
Jason rates w=0.86 · n=7 · E201 (2024-10-25) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 18:40 SUPPORT
“a little bit of austerity measures coming at some point”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E202 (2024-11-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 13:13 SUPPORT
“we have this real issue where as the Fed is cutting short rates, long rates are not going down. And I think that is because of the government deficit and the government debt”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E202 (2024-11-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 22:29 SUPPORT
“this becomes the compounding problem when your debt to GDP reaches a certain level and you don't reduce federal spending fast enough, it becomes a compounding problem you cannot get away from”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E202 (2024-11-01) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 16:08 SUPPORT
“You cannot have a nonprofit entity representing the plurality of the economic activity of a country and expect the capital markets to function properly.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E204 (2024-11-16) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 18:59 SUPPORT · horizon 60mo
“if you're going to run 8% of GDP level deficits for the next four or five or six years, you're going to have the 10 year at 7 to 8%. That's just mathematical.”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E205 (2024-11-23) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 26:28 SUPPORT
“Right now, we're unsustainable. The bond markets know it. Inflation remains persistently high, around 3%.”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E205 (2024-11-23) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 4:25 SUPPORT
“If it doesn't get fixed, as I've said countless times before, we are in an arithmetic debt-depth spiral.”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E206 (2024-12-07) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 11:03 SUPPORT
“And that leads to excessive spending, and that leads to the debt problem. And the debt problem creates this kind of arithmetic debt, debt spiral, which is something you don't want to find yourself in”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E213 (2025-01-31) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:39:29 SUPPORT
“Watch the D'Aulio interview because this is exactly the topic he covers. As we end up needing to refinance this debt, the rates climb, the appetite isn't there, and it becomes a spiral. That's why we have to cut fast in terms of the deficit to basically attract the market.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E213 (2025-01-31) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:40:59 SUPPORT
“So we don't have a lot of room here where you can walk rates up to 5.5%, 6% without a lot of things starting to break.”
TR
Travis Kalanick (regular guest ×1.0) rates: 1 resolved, unproven · E213 (2025-01-31) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:21:57 SUPPORT
“There's two deflationary things that we need. One is DOGE, and two is where AI is going to take us if it really does its thing, and that will keep us in an okay spot economically. But this spend has to go or we're in Greek territory, if that makes sense.”
Jason
Jason rates w=0.86 · n=7 · E216 (2025-02-21) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 59:44 SUPPORT
“And we plundered and we wasted them by adding 16 trillion to the debt during a good time. Like, what's going to happen during a bad time? Just absolutely brutal.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E220 (2025-03-22) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:01:21 SUPPORT · horizon 9mo
“One of the biggest mistakes that I think Janet Yellen affected was this continued issuance of money on the short end of the curve to finance these deficits, which gives you, you inherit, an incredibly difficult challenge, I think, over the next nine months. I think there's like nine or 10 trillion that has to get refinanced.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Sacks
Sacks w=1.08
24 scoring events · 51% of moves
+145.2 → net +145.2
Chamath
Chamath w=0.88
15 scoring events · 27% of moves
+19.8 / -56.7 → net -36.9
Friedberg
Friedberg w=0.79
24 scoring events · 20% of moves
+56.8 → net +56.8
Jason
Jason w=0.86
2 scoring events · 2% of moves
+4.5 → net +4.5
TR
Travis Kalanick regular guest ×1.0
1 scoring event · 1% of moves
+3.3 → net +3.3

⏳ decay drained -86.3 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E121 2023-03-24 init +45.5 45.5 E121 born by Sacks (explicit_prediction x3) [w=1.08]
E122 2023-03-31 decay -0.9 44.6 E122 silent
E123 2023-04-07 decay -0.9 43.7 E123 silent
E124 2023-04-14 decay -0.9 42.8 E124 silent
E125 2023-04-21 decay -0.9 42.0 E125 silent
E126 2023-04-28 decay -0.8 41.1 E126 silent
E128 2023-05-12 decay -0.8 40.3 E128 silent
E129 2023-05-19 decay -0.8 39.5 E129 silent
E130 2023-05-26 reinforce +10.7 50.2 E130 Friedberg support x2 (new voice) [w=0.79]
E130 2023-05-26 reinforce +8.1 58.3 E130 Sacks support x2 [w=1.08]
E130 2023-05-26 oppose -12.6 45.7 E130 Chamath opposes x3 [w=0.88]
E131 2023-06-02 reinforce +10.6 56.3 E131 Sacks support x3 [w=1.08]
E131 2023-06-02 oppose -10.5 45.8 E131 Chamath opposes x2 [w=0.88]
E132 2023-06-10 decay -0.9 44.9 E132 silent
E133 2023-06-16 decay -0.9 44.0 E133 silent
E134 2023-06-24 decay -0.9 43.1 E134 silent
E135 2023-07-01 decay -0.9 42.2 E135 silent
E136 2023-07-09 decay -0.8 41.4 E136 silent
E137 2023-07-14 reinforce +9.5 50.9 E137 Sacks support x2 [w=1.08]
E139 2023-07-27 decay -1.0 49.9 E139 silent
E140 2023-08-04 reinforce +5.9 55.8 E140 Friedberg support x2 [w=0.79]
E140 2023-08-04 reinforce +8.6 64.4 E140 Sacks support x3 [w=1.08]
E140 2023-08-04 oppose -12.6 51.8 E140 Chamath opposes x3 [w=0.88]
E141 2023-08-11 reinforce +9.4 61.2 E141 Sacks support x3 [w=1.08]
E142 2023-08-18 reinforce +6.3 67.5 E142 Sacks support x2 [w=1.08]
E143 2023-08-25 decay -1.4 66.2 E143 silent
E144 2023-09-01 decay -1.3 64.8 E144 silent
E146 2023-09-22 reinforce +4.6 69.5 E146 Chamath support x2 (flipped from oppose) [w=0.88]
E146 2023-09-22 reinforce +2.9 72.3 E146 Friedberg support x1 [w=0.79]
E146 2023-09-22 reinforce +4.5 76.8 E146 Sacks support x2 [w=1.08]
E147 2023-09-29 decay -1.5 75.3 E147 silent
E148 2023-10-07 reinforce +3.2 78.5 E148 Chamath support x2 [w=0.88]
E148 2023-10-07 reinforce +3.0 81.6 E148 Friedberg support x3 [w=0.79]
E148 2023-10-07 reinforce +3.6 85.2 E148 Sacks support x3 [w=1.08]
E149 2023-10-13 reinforce +1.9 87.1 E149 Chamath support x2 [w=0.88]
E150 2023-10-20 decay -1.7 85.4 E150 silent
E151 2023-10-27 reinforce +1.7 87.1 E151 Friedberg support x2 [w=0.79]
E152 2023-11-03 reinforce +2.1 89.2 E152 Sacks support x2 [w=1.08]
E152 2023-11-03 oppose -10.5 78.7 E152 Chamath opposes x2 [w=0.88]
E156 2023-12-08 decay -1.6 77.1 E156 silent
E157 2023-12-16 decay -1.5 75.6 E157 silent
E158 2023-12-23 decay -1.5 74.1 E158 silent
E159 2023-12-29 reinforce +4.2 78.3 E159 Sacks support x2 [w=1.08]
E159 2023-12-29 reinforce +2.6 80.8 E159 Friedberg support x2 [w=0.79]
E160 2024-01-06 decay -1.6 79.2 E160 silent
E161 2024-01-13 decay -1.6 77.6 E161 silent
E162 2024-01-19 decay -1.6 76.1 E162 silent
E163 2024-01-26 reinforce +3.4 79.5 E163 Friedberg support x3 [w=0.79]
E163 2024-01-26 reinforce +3.3 82.8 E163 Sacks support x2 [w=1.08]
E164 2024-02-02 decay -1.7 81.1 E164 silent
E165 2024-02-09 decay -1.6 79.5 E165 silent
E166 2024-02-16 decay -1.6 77.9 E166 silent
E167 2024-02-23 decay -1.6 76.4 E167 silent
E168 2024-03-01 decay -1.5 74.8 E168 silent
E169 2024-03-08 decay -1.5 73.4 E169 silent
E170 2024-03-15 decay -1.5 71.9 E170 silent
E171 2024-03-22 decay -1.4 70.4 E171 silent
E172 2024-03-29 reinforce +4.2 74.6 E172 Friedberg support x3 [w=0.79]
E172 2024-03-29 oppose -10.5 64.1 E172 Chamath opposes x2 [w=0.88]
E172 2024-03-29 reinforce +7.0 71.1 E172 Sacks support x3 [w=1.08]
E173 2024-04-05 reinforce +3.8 74.9 E173 Sacks support x1 [w=1.08]
E173 2024-04-05 reinforce +3.6 78.4 E173 Friedberg support x3 [w=0.79]
E174 2024-04-12 reinforce +2.5 81.0 E174 Friedberg support x2 [w=0.79]
E174 2024-04-12 reinforce +3.7 84.7 E174 Sacks support x3 [w=1.08]
E175 2024-04-19 reinforce +1.8 86.5 E175 Friedberg support x2 [w=0.79]
E176 2024-04-26 reinforce +2.6 89.1 E176 Sacks support x3 [w=1.08]
E177 2024-05-03 decay -1.8 87.3 E177 silent
E178 2024-05-10 decay -1.7 85.6 E178 silent
E179 2024-05-17 reinforce +1.9 87.5 E179 Chamath support x2 (flipped from oppose) [w=0.88]
E179 2024-05-17 reinforce +2.4 89.9 E179 Sacks support x3 [w=1.08]
E179 2024-05-17 reinforce +0.9 90.9 E179 Friedberg support x1 [w=0.79]
E180 2024-05-24 reinforce +1.3 92.2 E180 Friedberg support x3 [w=0.79]
E181 2024-05-31 reinforce +1.0 93.2 E181 Chamath support x2 [w=0.88]
E182 2024-06-07 decay -1.9 91.3 E182 silent
E183 2024-06-14 reinforce +1.2 92.6 E183 Friedberg support x3 [w=0.79]
E183 2024-06-14 reinforce +1.2 93.8 E183 Sacks support x2 [w=1.08]
E184 2024-06-20 reinforce +0.9 94.6 E184 Friedberg support x3 [w=0.79]
E185 2024-06-29 reinforce +0.8 95.4 E185 Friedberg support x3 [w=0.79]
E186 2024-07-04 decay -1.9 93.5 E186 silent
E187 2024-07-12 decay -1.9 91.6 E187 silent
E188 2024-07-19 decay -1.8 89.8 E188 silent
E189 2024-07-26 decay -1.8 88.0 E189 silent
E190 2024-08-02 reinforce +2.3 90.3 E190 Sacks support x3 [w=1.08]
E190 2024-08-02 reinforce +1.4 91.7 E190 Friedberg support x3 [w=0.79]
E191 2024-08-09 reinforce +1.1 92.8 E191 Sacks support x1 [w=1.08]
E191 2024-08-09 reinforce +0.9 93.6 E191 Friedberg support x2 [w=0.79]
E192 2024-08-16 decay -1.9 91.8 E192 silent
E193 2024-08-23 reinforce +1.3 93.1 E193 Sacks support x2 [w=1.08]
E194 2024-08-30 decay -1.9 91.2 E194 silent
E195 2024-09-06 decay -1.8 89.4 E195 silent
E196 2024-09-20 decay -1.8 87.6 E196 silent
E197 2024-09-27 decay -1.8 85.9 E197 silent
E198 2024-10-03 reinforce +2.0 87.9 E198 Friedberg support x3 [w=0.79]
E199 2024-10-11 decay -1.8 86.1 E199 silent
E200 2024-10-18 decay -1.7 84.4 E200 silent
E201 2024-10-25 reinforce +3.0 87.4 E201 Jason support x2 (new voice) [w=0.86]
E201 2024-10-25 reinforce +1.8 89.2 E201 Friedberg support x3 [w=0.79]
E201 2024-10-25 reinforce +1.7 90.9 E201 Chamath support x3 [w=0.88]
E201 2024-10-25 reinforce +1.8 92.7 E201 Sacks support x3 [w=1.08]
E202 2024-11-01 reinforce +1.4 94.1 E202 Sacks support x3 [w=1.08]
E202 2024-11-01 reinforce +0.8 94.9 E202 Chamath support x2 [w=0.88]
E202 2024-11-01 reinforce +0.7 95.6 E202 Friedberg support x3 [w=0.79]
E203 2024-11-08 decay -1.9 93.7 E203 silent
E204 2024-11-16 reinforce +1.0 94.7 E204 Chamath support x3 [w=0.88]
E205 2024-11-23 reinforce +0.6 95.3 E205 Friedberg support x2 [w=0.79]
E205 2024-11-23 reinforce +0.8 96.1 E205 Sacks support x2 [w=1.08]
E206 2024-12-07 reinforce +0.5 96.5 E206 Friedberg support x2 [w=0.79]
E207 2024-12-13 decay -1.9 94.6 E207 silent
E208 2024-12-20 decay -1.9 92.7 E208 silent
E209 2025-01-04 decay -1.9 90.9 E209 silent
E210 2025-01-11 decay -1.8 89.0 E210 silent
E211 2025-01-18 decay -1.8 87.3 E211 silent
E212 2025-01-25 decay -1.7 85.5 E212 silent
E213 2025-01-31 reinforce +3.3 88.8 E213 Travis Kalanick support x2 (new voice)
E213 2025-01-31 reinforce +1.6 90.4 E213 Friedberg support x3 [w=0.79]
E213 2025-01-31 reinforce +1.5 91.9 E213 Chamath support x3 [w=0.88]
E214 2025-02-07 decay -1.8 90.0 E214 silent
E215 2025-02-15 decay -1.8 88.2 E215 silent
E216 2025-02-21 reinforce +1.5 89.8 E216 Jason support x2 [w=0.86]
E217 2025-03-01 decay -1.8 88.0 E217 silent
E218 2025-03-08 decay -1.8 86.2 E218 silent
E219 2025-03-15 decay -1.7 84.5 E219 silent
E220 2025-03-22 reinforce +2.0 86.5 E220 Chamath support x2 [w=0.88]