Massive jobs revision, Kamala wealth tax, polls vs prediction markets, end of race-based admissions
2024-08-23 spoken.md · speaker-labeled ▶ watch ← E192 all episodes E194 →
Every number here is replayed from score_events — the same ledger the pool ranks on. Decay is what the 139 ideas nobody mentioned gave up this week; it applies only when an episode is processed.
Tier crossings
conviction thresholds crossed by this episode — 65 / 45 / 15 · ideas born here show where they landed. why 65 isn't always green
Kill dates that landed since E192
0 hit · 0 partial · 2 miss — windows that closed after 2024-08-16 and up to 2024-08-23, auto-scored against price data and never hand-set. verdict · R · α
| idea | verdict | R | α | closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 📈 Payment processors are middlemen with no pricing power | MISS | -14.4% | -43.1 | 2024-08-18 |
| 🌍 Soft-landing rally underprices the lag risk | MISS | -28.8% | -57.5 | 2024-08-18 |
Who moved the board
each voice's force on conviction this episode — supports and opposes, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of this episode's movement
What got argued (9 ideas)
ordered by how hard each idea moved · quotes are verbatim from the transcript, timestamps deep-link into the episode
The BLS revision that erased 818,000 jobs from the 12 months to March 2024 (roughly 1.2 million across all restatements) confirms that official payroll data has been systematically overstated and that revisions only ever go one direction. The real economy is a lot slower than the prints implied, narrowly staying out of recession and propped up by roughly $2 trillion of annual deficit spending, so US growth-sensitive risk assets are carrying too little risk premium and the data itself is too unreliable to price off.
I predicted this would happen, and I didn't know exactly how we would get the correction, but now it's come out. By the way, it's not just this 818,000 jobs. If you look at the last 12 months and out of all the restatements, it's been something like 1.2 million.
And at the end of the day, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case, and they did not overturn on the position that the government actually did not overstep their authority to be able to tax unrealized capital gains. So there is some Supreme Court case precedents here that indicates that this will not get thrown out on an unconstitutional ground basis. So there is a lot of conversation that this might actually become a real case.
On the liquidity part, you're being taxed a huge amount without having the cash to pay the tax bill. And, yes, they've tried to mitigate that by creating this installment plan, but you're still going to need to go out and sell large chunks of your company every time you get an upround in order to pay the tax bill. And that means that you're losing ownership of your company. All these assets are going to be dumped on the market. And you're basically starving the market of capital, actually, right?
I think what will happen is funds, governments, etc. for the right entrepreneurs with the right assets will help you pay the exit tax so that you can just leave the United States. And that's going to be an investment class that's going to emerge, in my opinion, which is these organizations that will pool capital, sovereign wealth funds specifically.
I think that Elizabeth Warren and Bernie sanders are now the thought leaders and really the beating heart of the Democrat Party. I think what's happened is the Republican Party has moved to right-wing populism, and the Democrats in response to that have concluded that they need to basically move to left-wing populism in order to compete with that. So both parties are becoming fairly populist. Now, what does left-wing populism mean? It basically means soak the rich, right?
And I was looking at the total GDP of the United States is $25 trillion. The federal budget for next year is proposed to be $7.2 trillion. And state and local budgets combined is about $4 trillion. So if you look at government spending, it's about half of GDP now
the issue with the Chibs Act is that there's a lot of good reasons to believe that even if we incentivize this, we're still hopelessly behind. And the chip fabs that we're building are just, they're still years behind what they have in Taiwan, for example. So it's not clear it's going to work, is my point.
I think the more the public learns, the more we learn about what she would do as president, the worse she does. And they've now got to run out the clock for another 70, 80 days in terms of running a campaign that's substance free, that's just completely on vibes, that's about joy, without answering any questions, without doing any press interviews.
We're running unsustainably high levels of deficit and debt. We're running, what, $2 trillion a year deficits right now. And what are we getting for that? We're not getting a super robust economy. We're getting an economy that's narrowly staying out of recession.
Episode digest
written during extraction and stored in data/extractions/ep193.json — the auditable source of truth, including everything market-adjacent that did not earn a capture
The 818k BLS payroll revision (~1.2m across all restatements) is the market news: Sacks claims the call and argues revisions only ever go one way, so the economy is shakier than reported and only narrowly out of recession on ~$2T of deficit spending; Chamath agrees the economy is 'a lot slower than what people thought', wants the September cut sized at 50bp, and pivots into a table-pounding rant that the underlying BLS data is simply unreliable and should be crowdsourced to Stripe/Gusto. The long block on Harris's endorsement of Biden's FY2025 revenue package (25% unrealized-gains tax >$100m, 28% corporate rate, 4x buyback tax) reinforces the existing wealth-tax idea from four voices: Sacks calls it confiscation that forces founders to dump stock and starves the market of capital; Friedberg walks the mechanics and lands the most consequential new fact - Moore v. United States means the 16th-Amendment defence probably fails, so 'this might actually become a real case' - while minimising its reach; Chamath, who said in E176 these proposals would never pass, now says this may be the moment the US explores 40s/50s-style extremes and predicts a new asset class of sovereign wealth funds financing entrepreneurs' exit taxes. Friedberg extends his socialism thread with a fresh mechanism (government spending ~50% of GDP, so ~half the population is directly or indirectly government-paid) and Sacks concurs via Romney's 47%. Two smaller reads: Sacks takes the counter-side on fab onshoring - the US CHIPS fabs are 'hopelessly behind' Taiwan and it is not clear it works, which cuts against the TSMC-criticality-decays thesis - and someone in the merged Chamath/Friedberg label drops an unattributable 'Intel is imploding, they can't manufacture' aside. The prediction-markets-vs-polls segment is mostly methodology with no tradeable edge; Chamath's only directional take is that they are good gambling businesses but poor forecasting tools. ATTRIBUTION WARNING: Friedberg has zero labelled turns in this transcript - every Friedberg capture above was re-attributed from content out of the Chamath label (see report), and the 1:22:36 tariff line is the least certain of them.