← pool

🏦 Fed easing + disinflation into 2026

Three to four rate cuts arrive, inflation rolls back under 3% by November 2026, and GDP re-accelerates — the affordability squeeze eases and the rally broadens beyond mega-cap.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 58.7 WATCH
DORMANT
band · contested
▲ LONG TLT
expression · bullish rates
WRONG
result · return -4.6% · vs SPY -15.4%
2026-11-07
born 2025-11-07 (E250) → window closed
⚠ CONFLICTING IDEA ON THE SAME TICKER — the board is arguing with itself; net it out (ticker view →)
TLT · US fiscal spiral keeps long-end yields grinding higher SHORT WATCH 84.8 ← stronger than this idea (4.4)

other ideas on the same ticker, same direction: The 2026 US boom — 5-6% GDP prints 65 (RSP)

⚖ Why this result

fully deterministic — computed from daily closes on the scoring date; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2025-11-07 → 2026-11-07 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▲ LONG TLT (primary play). TLT fell 4.6% over the window → return (sign flipped for a SHORT) = -4.6% (the call lost money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +10.8% → vs SPY = -4.6 − (+10.8) = -15.4% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the result uses.
  4. Rule fired:
    · RIGHT — return ≥ +10% AND beat SPY by 5+
    · HALF — return ≥ +5% OR beat SPY at all
    ▶ WRONG — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a WRONG earn 0 each, opposers the opposite — this feeds the scoreboard. supported: Brad Gerstner, Chamath, Sacks | opposed: Friedberg, Jason | proxy-sensitive: RSP→HIT (+17.0%)

⚔ Rivals

competing claims on the same profit pool: a support there is a headwind here expand ▾
US fiscal spiral keeps long-end yields grinding higher WATCH 85 ▼ BEARISH Easing plus disinflation versus long yields grinding higher: the rates debate in two ideas.
The 2026 US boom — 5-6% GDP prints WATCH 65 ▲ BULLISH A 5-6% GDP boom is the argument against the Fed easing into 2026.
Rate spike impairs bank equity: the October 30 call reports land as a shock EMBER 34 ▼ BEARISH A short-rate jump impairing bank equity is the opposite of an easing cycle.

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2025-11-07)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▲ LONG TLTetf PRIMARY duration rally on cuts plus disinflation
▲ LONG RSPetf adjacent equal-weight S&P broadens out on lower rates and GDP re-acceleration

Mention log newest first

Jason
Jason rates 50% · n=8 · E291 (2026-10-02) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 58:00 OPPOSE
“If you look at unemployment hasn't changed, it's about the same. And then if you look at inflation, it's still sustained at that high threes, sometimes dipping into four, sometimes as low as 3.2, but never into the twos. And GDP is something that the American people just don't feel.”
Sacks
Sacks rates 50% · n=13 · E291 (2026-10-02) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 53:14 SUPPORT POLICY-ADJACENT
“I think actually right now, no one's pricing in the potential for rate cuts here. It's all rate increases. So if we could get some relief there, get rate cuts, I mean, again, the economy is going to rock it even more.”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates 43% · n=15 · E291 (2026-10-02) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 49:27 OPPOSE
“We've seen short-term rates on treasuries climb by 60 basis points. That's a pretty consequential climb. I think we haven't seen a short-term yield this high since going back to 2002”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates 43% · n=15 · E287 (2026-08-29) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 49:05 OPPOSE
“the inflation problem is fundamentally rooted in government spending. So deficit spending is correlated very nicely with the cost of housing, with the cost of healthcare, with the cost of education, and with the cost of everything else... And so inflation is persistent because what we thought were temporary emergency stimulus measures during COVID very quickly got normalized and became persistent spending cycles... So if the inflation remains high, people's affordability continues to go low.”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates 43% · n=15 · E276 (2026-06-13) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:06:51 OPPOSE
“there's also the macro point, which is government spending out of control. Inflation out of control. And fundamentally, as things unravel, you have rising rates. So I think we should kind of expect, especially with the Kevin Warsh Fed, I think we could see north of five and a half, six percent overnight rates. It's not unforeseeable.”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates 43% · n=15 · E270 (2026-04-24) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 23:20 SUPPORT
“[Warsh at his Fed-chair hearing] spoke a lot about the deflationary evolution promised by AI... he expects it will drive productivity growth like we've never seen before... the deflationary forces ultimately lead to economic expansion... he does think the overall economic picture is one of deflationary pressure.”
Sacks
Sacks rates 50% · n=13 · E260 (2026-02-07) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 53:15 SUPPORT POLICY-ADJACENT · horizon 12mo
“Warsh has been consistent for the last year, saying the Fed was taking too long to realize that inflation is falling and that they should be cutting more. So I do think that over the next, say, six months to a year, he's going to want to cut rates.”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) rates: 3 resolved, unproven · E260 (2026-02-07) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 50:45 SUPPORT · horizon 12mo
“thinks AI will be very deflationary. And so he's more likely to let the economy run ... inflation has come in below all consensus estimates for two years, ... I happen to think that I would take the over on the number of rate cuts that Warsh is going to give us this year.”
Chamath
Chamath rates 41% · n=17 · E255 (2025-12-19) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 38:54 SUPPORT · horizon 12mo
“The other thing in 26 is you get a bunch of tax cuts that kick in. No tax on tips, no tax on overtime. ... Accelerated depreciation. You have big stimulative actions for the United States economy.”
Sacks
Sacks rates 50% · n=13 · E255 (2025-12-19) · explicit_prediction · strength 1 ▶ 34:27 SUPPORT POLICY-ADJACENT · horizon 12mo
“It looks to me like inflation is rolling over, and that's just about a solved problem... it implies that interest rates are coming down... it seems to me like we're on the cusp of a golden age here... I think we're headed for a gangbusters 2026 — rates are coming down, inflation is coming down, and you're also getting tax cuts going into effect next year.”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) rates: 3 resolved, unproven · E250 (2025-11-07) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 53:18 SUPPORT · horizon 12mo
“I actually think you are going to get three to four rate cuts. I actually think you are going to see a re-acceleration of GDP. I ... happen to think that inflation is going to continue rolling over. ... I'll take the under, Jason, with you. And you can have a little side wager.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total push on the score, in conviction points across every mention — supports and opposes · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner regular guest ×1.0
2 scoring events · 31% of moves
+43.3 → net +43.3
Friedberg
Friedberg 43%
4 scoring events · 30% of moves
+10.7 / -30.9 → net -20.3
Sacks
Sacks 50%
3 scoring events · 24% of moves
+33.3 → net +33.3
Chamath
Chamath 41%
1 scoring event · 8% of moves
+10.4 → net +10.4
Jason
Jason 50%
1 scoring event · 7% of moves
+0.0 / -9.6 → net -9.6

⏳ decay drained -52.7 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E250 2025-11-07 init +35.0 35.0 E250 born by Brad Gerstner (explicit_prediction x2)
E251 2025-11-14 decay -1.4 33.6 E251 silent
E252 2025-11-22 decay -1.3 32.3 E252 silent
E253 2025-12-06 decay -1.3 31.0 E253 silent
E254 2025-12-13 decay -1.2 29.7 E254 silent
E255 2025-12-19 reinforce +12.6 42.4 E255 Sacks support x1 (new voice)
E255 2025-12-19 reinforce +10.4 52.7 E255 Chamath support x1 (new voice)
E256 2025-12-31 decay -2.1 50.6 E256 silent
E257 2026-01-10 decay -2.0 48.6 E257 silent
E258 2026-01-17 decay -1.9 46.7 E258 silent
E259 2026-01-30 decay -1.9 44.8 E259 silent
E260 2026-02-07 reinforce +8.3 53.1 E260 Brad Gerstner support x2
E260 2026-02-07 reinforce +5.6 58.7 E260 Sacks support x1
E261 2026-02-13 decay -2.3 56.4 E261 silent
E262 2026-02-28 decay -2.3 54.1 E262 silent
E263 2026-03-06 decay -2.2 51.9 E263 silent
E264 2026-03-13 decay -2.1 49.9 E264 silent
E265 2026-03-19 decay -2.0 47.9 E265 silent
E266 2026-03-27 decay -1.9 46.0 E266 silent
E267 2026-04-03 decay -1.8 44.1 E267 silent
E268 2026-04-10 decay -1.8 42.4 E268 silent
E269 2026-04-17 decay -1.7 40.7 E269 silent
E270 2026-04-24 reinforce +10.7 51.3 E270 Friedberg support x1 (new voice)
E271 2026-05-01 decay -2.1 49.3 E271 silent
E272 2026-05-08 decay -2.0 47.3 E272 silent
E273 2026-05-15 decay -1.9 45.4 E273 silent
E274 2026-05-22 decay -1.8 43.6 E274 silent
E275 2026-05-29 decay -1.7 41.9 E275 silent
E276 2026-06-13 oppose -12.0 29.9 E276 Friedberg opposes x2
E277 2026-06-19 decay -1.2 28.7 E277 silent
E278 2026-06-26 decay -1.1 27.5 E278 silent
E279 2026-07-03 decay -1.1 26.4 E279 silent
E280 2026-07-11 decay -1.1 25.4 E280 silent
E281 2026-07-18 decay -1.0 24.3 E281 silent
E282 2026-07-24 decay -1.0 23.4 E282 silent
E283 2026-07-31 decay -0.9 22.4 E283 silent
E284 2026-08-08 decay -0.9 21.5 E284 silent
E285 2026-08-14 decay -0.9 20.7 E285 silent
E286 2026-08-21 decay -0.8 19.9 E286 silent
E287 2026-08-29 oppose -12.0 7.9 E287 Friedberg opposes x2
E288 2026-09-04 decay -0.3 7.5 E288 silent
E289 2026-09-11 decay -0.3 7.2 E289 silent
E290 2026-09-26 decay -0.3 6.9 E290 silent
E291 2026-10-02 oppose -6.9 0.0 E291 Friedberg opposes x2
E291 2026-10-02 reinforce +15.0 15.0 E291 Sacks support x2
E291 2026-10-02 oppose -9.6 5.4 E291 Jason opposes x1
E292 2026-10-10 decay -0.2 5.2 E292 silent
E293 2026-10-17 decay -0.2 5.0 E293 silent
E294 2026-10-23 decay -0.2 4.8 E294 silent
E295 2026-10-30 decay -0.2 4.6 E295 silent
E296 2026-11-07 decay -0.2 4.4 E296 silent