🏦 Fed easing + disinflation into 2026
Three to four rate cuts arrive, inflation rolls back under 3% by November 2026, and GDP re-accelerates — the affordability squeeze eases and the rally broadens beyond mega-cap.
0
CONVICTION
peaked 58.7 WATCH
DORMANT
band · contested
▲ LONG TLT
expression · bullish rates
WRONG
result · return -4.6% · vs SPY -15.4%
2026-11-07
born 2025-11-07 (E250) → window closed
⚠ CONFLICTING IDEA ON THE SAME TICKER
— the board is arguing with itself; net it out (ticker view →)
TLT ·
US fiscal spiral keeps long-end yields grinding higher
SHORT
WATCH 84.8
← stronger than this idea (4.4)
other ideas on the same ticker, same direction: The 2026 US boom — 5-6% GDP prints 65 (RSP)
⚖ Why this result
fully deterministic — computed from daily closes on the scoring date; nothing below is editable or hand-set
- Window: 2025-11-07 → 2026-11-07 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
- The call: ▲ LONG TLT (primary play). TLT fell 4.6% over the window → return (sign flipped for a SHORT) = -4.6% (the call lost money).
- Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +10.8% → vs SPY = -4.6 − (+10.8) = -15.4% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the result uses.
- Rule fired:
· RIGHT — return ≥ +10% AND beat SPY by 5+· HALF — return ≥ +5% OR beat SPY at all▶ WRONG — everything else
- Credit: supporters of a WRONG earn 0 each, opposers the opposite — this feeds the scoreboard. supported: Brad Gerstner, Chamath, Sacks | opposed: Friedberg, Jason | proxy-sensitive: RSP→HIT (+17.0%)
⚔ Rivals
competing claims on the same profit pool: a support there is a headwind here
expand ▾
US fiscal spiral keeps long-end yields grinding higher
WATCH 85
▼ BEARISH
Easing plus disinflation versus long yields grinding higher: the rates debate in two ideas.
The 2026 US boom — 5-6% GDP prints
WATCH 65
▲ BULLISH
A 5-6% GDP boom is the argument against the Fed easing into 2026.
Rate spike impairs bank equity: the October 30 call reports land as a shock
EMBER 34
▼ BEARISH
A short-rate jump impairing bank equity is the opposite of an easing cycle.
Conviction timeline
bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15
Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2025-11-07)
Plays
Mention log newest first
Jason
rates 50% · n=8
· E291 (2026-10-02) · sentiment · strength 1
▶ 58:00
OPPOSE
“If you look at unemployment hasn't changed, it's about the same. And then if you look at inflation, it's still sustained at that high threes, sometimes dipping into four, sometimes as low as 3.2, but never into the twos. And GDP is something that the American people just don't feel.”
Sacks
rates 50% · n=13
· E291 (2026-10-02) · explicit_prediction · strength 2
▶ 53:14
SUPPORT
POLICY-ADJACENT
“I think actually right now, no one's pricing in the potential for rate cuts here. It's all rate increases. So if we could get some relief there, get rate cuts, I mean, again, the economy is going to rock it even more.”
Friedberg
rates 43% · n=15
· E287 (2026-08-29) · explicit_prediction · strength 2
▶ 49:05
OPPOSE
“the inflation problem is fundamentally rooted in government spending. So deficit spending is correlated very nicely with the cost of housing, with the cost of healthcare, with the cost of education, and with the cost of everything else... And so inflation is persistent because what we thought were temporary emergency stimulus measures during COVID very quickly got normalized and became persistent spending cycles... So if the inflation remains high, people's affordability continues to go low.”
Friedberg
rates 43% · n=15
· E276 (2026-06-13) · explicit_prediction · strength 2
▶ 1:06:51
OPPOSE
“there's also the macro point, which is government spending out of control. Inflation out of control. And fundamentally, as things unravel, you have rising rates. So I think we should kind of expect, especially with the Kevin Warsh Fed, I think we could see north of five and a half, six percent overnight rates. It's not unforeseeable.”
Friedberg
rates 43% · n=15
· E270 (2026-04-24) · sentiment · strength 1
▶ 23:20
SUPPORT
“[Warsh at his Fed-chair hearing] spoke a lot about the deflationary evolution promised by AI... he expects it will drive productivity growth like we've never seen before... the deflationary forces ultimately lead to economic expansion... he does think the overall economic picture is one of deflationary pressure.”
Sacks
rates 50% · n=13
· E260 (2026-02-07) · sentiment · strength 1
▶ 53:15
SUPPORT
POLICY-ADJACENT
· horizon 12mo
“Warsh has been consistent for the last year, saying the Fed was taking too long to realize that inflation is falling and that they should be cutting more. So I do think that over the next, say, six months to a year, he's going to want to cut rates.”
Brad Gerstner
(regular guest ×1.0)
rates: 3 resolved, unproven
· E260 (2026-02-07) · explicit_prediction · strength 2
▶ 50:45
SUPPORT
· horizon 12mo
“thinks AI will be very deflationary. And so he's more likely to let the economy run ... inflation has come in below all consensus estimates for two years, ... I happen to think that I would take the over on the number of rate cuts that Warsh is going to give us this year.”
Sacks
rates 50% · n=13
· E255 (2025-12-19) · explicit_prediction · strength 1
▶ 34:27
SUPPORT
POLICY-ADJACENT
· horizon 12mo
“It looks to me like inflation is rolling over, and that's just about a solved problem... it implies that interest rates are coming down... it seems to me like we're on the cusp of a golden age here... I think we're headed for a gangbusters 2026 — rates are coming down, inflation is coming down, and you're also getting tax cuts going into effect next year.”
Brad Gerstner
(regular guest ×1.0)
rates: 3 resolved, unproven
· E250 (2025-11-07) · explicit_prediction · strength 2
▶ 53:18
SUPPORT
· horizon 12mo
“I actually think you are going to get three to four rate cuts. I actually think you are going to see a re-acceleration of GDP. I ... happen to think that inflation is going to continue rolling over. ... I'll take the under, Jason, with you. And you can have a little side wager.”
Who built this conviction
each voice's total push on the score, in conviction points across every mention — supports and opposes · share = % of all mention-driven movement
⏳ decay drained -52.7 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one
Score events
| episode | kind | Δ | after | note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E250 2025-11-07 | init | +35.0 | 35.0 | E250 born by Brad Gerstner (explicit_prediction x2) |
| E251 2025-11-14 | decay | -1.4 | 33.6 | E251 silent |
| E252 2025-11-22 | decay | -1.3 | 32.3 | E252 silent |
| E253 2025-12-06 | decay | -1.3 | 31.0 | E253 silent |
| E254 2025-12-13 | decay | -1.2 | 29.7 | E254 silent |
| E255 2025-12-19 | reinforce | +12.6 | 42.4 | E255 Sacks support x1 (new voice) |
| E255 2025-12-19 | reinforce | +10.4 | 52.7 | E255 Chamath support x1 (new voice) |
| E256 2025-12-31 | decay | -2.1 | 50.6 | E256 silent |
| E257 2026-01-10 | decay | -2.0 | 48.6 | E257 silent |
| E258 2026-01-17 | decay | -1.9 | 46.7 | E258 silent |
| E259 2026-01-30 | decay | -1.9 | 44.8 | E259 silent |
| E260 2026-02-07 | reinforce | +8.3 | 53.1 | E260 Brad Gerstner support x2 |
| E260 2026-02-07 | reinforce | +5.6 | 58.7 | E260 Sacks support x1 |
| E261 2026-02-13 | decay | -2.3 | 56.4 | E261 silent |
| E262 2026-02-28 | decay | -2.3 | 54.1 | E262 silent |
| E263 2026-03-06 | decay | -2.2 | 51.9 | E263 silent |
| E264 2026-03-13 | decay | -2.1 | 49.9 | E264 silent |
| E265 2026-03-19 | decay | -2.0 | 47.9 | E265 silent |
| E266 2026-03-27 | decay | -1.9 | 46.0 | E266 silent |
| E267 2026-04-03 | decay | -1.8 | 44.1 | E267 silent |
| E268 2026-04-10 | decay | -1.8 | 42.4 | E268 silent |
| E269 2026-04-17 | decay | -1.7 | 40.7 | E269 silent |
| E270 2026-04-24 | reinforce | +10.7 | 51.3 | E270 Friedberg support x1 (new voice) |
| E271 2026-05-01 | decay | -2.1 | 49.3 | E271 silent |
| E272 2026-05-08 | decay | -2.0 | 47.3 | E272 silent |
| E273 2026-05-15 | decay | -1.9 | 45.4 | E273 silent |
| E274 2026-05-22 | decay | -1.8 | 43.6 | E274 silent |
| E275 2026-05-29 | decay | -1.7 | 41.9 | E275 silent |
| E276 2026-06-13 | oppose | -12.0 | 29.9 | E276 Friedberg opposes x2 |
| E277 2026-06-19 | decay | -1.2 | 28.7 | E277 silent |
| E278 2026-06-26 | decay | -1.1 | 27.5 | E278 silent |
| E279 2026-07-03 | decay | -1.1 | 26.4 | E279 silent |
| E280 2026-07-11 | decay | -1.1 | 25.4 | E280 silent |
| E281 2026-07-18 | decay | -1.0 | 24.3 | E281 silent |
| E282 2026-07-24 | decay | -1.0 | 23.4 | E282 silent |
| E283 2026-07-31 | decay | -0.9 | 22.4 | E283 silent |
| E284 2026-08-08 | decay | -0.9 | 21.5 | E284 silent |
| E285 2026-08-14 | decay | -0.9 | 20.7 | E285 silent |
| E286 2026-08-21 | decay | -0.8 | 19.9 | E286 silent |
| E287 2026-08-29 | oppose | -12.0 | 7.9 | E287 Friedberg opposes x2 |
| E288 2026-09-04 | decay | -0.3 | 7.5 | E288 silent |
| E289 2026-09-11 | decay | -0.3 | 7.2 | E289 silent |
| E290 2026-09-26 | decay | -0.3 | 6.9 | E290 silent |
| E291 2026-10-02 | oppose | -6.9 | 0.0 | E291 Friedberg opposes x2 |
| E291 2026-10-02 | reinforce | +15.0 | 15.0 | E291 Sacks support x2 |
| E291 2026-10-02 | oppose | -9.6 | 5.4 | E291 Jason opposes x1 |
| E292 2026-10-10 | decay | -0.2 | 5.2 | E292 silent |
| E293 2026-10-17 | decay | -0.2 | 5.0 | E293 silent |
| E294 2026-10-23 | decay | -0.2 | 4.8 | E294 silent |
| E295 2026-10-30 | decay | -0.2 | 4.6 | E295 silent |
| E296 2026-11-07 | decay | -0.2 | 4.4 | E296 silent |