← pool

🌍 Tariff receipts plus cut savings re-rate the US and pull in global capital

Chamath's arithmetic off the May deficit Sankey: tariffs are run-rating $300-400bn a year above forecast on the receipts side, and a 100bp cut would save roughly another $300bn of interest on the debt, so inside 60 days the American balance sheet has to be re-forecast about $600bn better than the current snapshot implies. With the deficit trajectory improving rather than deteriorating there is nowhere else for global risk capital to go - Japan and Europe lose the flow and every marginal risk dollar rotates into US assets.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 61.0 WATCH
EMBER
band · contested
▲ LONG SPY
expression · bullish macro
HIT
outcome · R +14.8% · α +0.0%
2025-12-13
window closed
⚠ CONFLICTING IDEA ON THE SAME TICKER — the board is arguing with itself; net it before trading (ticker view →)
UUP · The debasement trade: USD is 2026's worst asset SHORT EMBER 17.0

⚖ Why this verdict

fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2025-06-13 → 2025-12-13 — first mention + 6-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▲ LONG SPY (primary play). SPY rose 14.8% over the window → direction-adjusted R = +14.8% (the call made money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +14.8%α = +14.8 − (+14.8) = +0.0% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses. (SPY is itself the primary here — scored on R alone.)
  4. Rule fired:
    ▶ HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5 ✓ (R 14.8, α 0.0)
    · PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0
    · MISS — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a HIT earn 1.0 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Chamath, Sacks | opposed: Friedberg | benchmark-primary: scored on R alone | proxy-sensitive: UUP→MISS (+2.9%)

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2025-06-13)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▲ LONG SPYetf PRIMARY US equities are where the rotating global risk dollar lands
▲ LONG UUPetf adjacent dollar bid from the inflow and the improved fiscal trajectory

Mention log

Chamath
Chamath macro w=1.06 · n=47 · E231 (2025-06-13) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 59:25 SUPPORT · horizon 2mo
“So if you add these two things together, we are in the next 60 days going to have to re-forecast the American balance sheet where this is, or we're actually going to be able to positively forecast an extra 600 billion, 300 billion of incremental revenue, and 300 billion of savings. Jason, if that happens, watch out. What does that mean, watch out? It means that every single risk dollar is going to run to America. Every single one.”
Friedberg
Friedberg macro w=0.93 · n=40 · E233 (2025-06-28) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:19:51 OPPOSE
“So one argument here might be that we're actually not necessarily seeing an improvement in the fundamental business environment. We're not seeing record revenue across the board.”
Chamath
Chamath macro w=1.06 · n=47 · E233 (2025-06-28) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:21:36 SUPPORT
“I think that if Powell starts an aggressive cutting program, either because he has to, or because he's trying to keep his job, I mean, man, you could see the S&P at 7,000.”
Chamath
Chamath macro w=1.06 · n=47 · E234 (2025-07-04) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 48:45 SUPPORT
“And so as long as that's the case, I think you're going to continue to have a bid for equities. If all of a sudden the MAG 7 decided to delist and not be American companies, and all of a sudden showed up in the CAC 50 in France, yeah, we'd be in big trouble. But I don't think that's going to happen. And so as long as there's American ingenuity and American supremacy, again, which goes back to the other thing, which is we can't kill these golden geese, nor should we kill the emerging and growing golden goose, which is AI. And as long as those things are the same, there will be a constant bid for American assets.”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E237 (2025-08-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 1 ▶ 1:07:02 SUPPORT POLICY-ADJACENT
“It's about $2 trillion. It's effectively $2 trillion of stimulus into the US, but without money printing.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Chamath
Chamath w=1.06
3 scoring events · 76% of moves
+68.3 → net +68.3
Friedberg
Friedberg w=0.93
1 scoring event · 12% of moves
+0.0 / -11.1 → net -11.1
Sacks
Sacks w=1.12
1 scoring event · 11% of moves
+9.9 → net +9.9

⏳ decay drained -36.6 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E231 2025-06-13 init +44.7 44.7 E231 born by Chamath (explicit_prediction x3) [w=1.06]
E232 2025-06-21 decay -1.8 42.9 E232 silent
E233 2025-06-28 oppose -11.1 31.8 E233 Friedberg opposes x2 [w=0.93]
E233 2025-06-28 reinforce +13.1 44.9 E233 Chamath support x3 [w=1.06]
E234 2025-07-04 reinforce +10.6 55.4 E234 Chamath support x3 [w=1.06]
E235 2025-07-11 decay -2.2 53.2 E235 silent
E236 2025-07-19 decay -2.1 51.1 E236 silent
E237 2025-08-01 reinforce +9.9 61.0 E237 Sacks support x1 (new voice) [w=1.12]
E238 2025-08-09 decay -2.4 58.5 E238 silent
E239 2025-08-15 decay -2.3 56.2 E239 silent
E240 2025-08-22 decay -2.2 53.9 E240 silent
E241 2025-08-29 decay -2.2 51.8 E241 silent
E242 2025-09-07 decay -2.1 49.7 E242 silent
E243 2025-09-19 decay -2.0 47.7 E243 silent
E244 2025-09-27 decay -1.9 45.8 E244 silent
E245 2025-10-03 decay -1.8 44.0 E245 silent
E246 2025-10-10 decay -1.8 42.2 E246 silent
E247 2025-10-17 decay -1.7 40.5 E247 silent
E248 2025-10-24 decay -1.6 38.9 E248 silent
E249 2025-10-31 decay -1.6 37.4 E249 silent
E250 2025-11-07 decay -1.5 35.9 E250 silent
E251 2025-11-14 decay -1.4 34.4 E251 silent
E252 2025-11-22 decay -1.4 33.1 E252 silent
E253 2025-12-06 decay -1.3 31.7 E253 silent
E254 2025-12-13 decay -1.3 30.5 E254 silent