← pool

🌍 Rate hikes bite with a lag - back in recession next year

Sacks' call: the current downturn is a shallow technical recession that the US probably bounces out of with positive GDP growth in Q3 or Q4 2022, but there is a significant risk of falling back into recession next year because 2022's rate hikes take six to nine months to ripple through the economy. Construction is the bellwether and has already been clobbered - housing starts down, inventories piling up, affordability at a 40-year low - and it leads the rest of the economy into the downturn.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 90.4 GREEN
EMBER
band · contested
▼ SHORT SPY
expression · bearish macro
WRONG
result · return -5.6% · vs SPY -11.2%
2023-08-13
born 2022-08-13 (E91) → window closed

⚖ Why this result

fully deterministic — computed from daily closes on the scoring date; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2022-08-13 → 2023-08-13 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▼ SHORT SPY (primary play). SPY rose 5.6% over the window → return (sign flipped for a SHORT) = -5.6% (the call lost money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +5.6% → vs SPY = -5.6 − (+5.6) = -11.2% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the result uses.
    Direction-only read: +0.0% — did SPY move the predicted way relative to the market. The two only differ on a SHORT: this call was right about direction relative to the index but still cost money versus holding it.
    (SPY is itself the primary here — scored on return alone.)
  4. Rule fired:
    · RIGHT — return ≥ +10% AND beat SPY by 5+
    · HALF — return ≥ +5% OR beat SPY at all
    ▶ WRONG — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a WRONG earn 0 each, opposers the opposite — this feeds the scoreboard. supported: Brad Gerstner, Elon Musk, Friedberg | opposed: Chamath, Jason, Sacks | benchmark-primary: scored on R alone

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2022-08-13)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▼ SHORT SPYetf PRIMARY broad US equity read on a 2023 recession
▼ SHORT IWMetf adjacent small caps carry the most domestic-cycle beta into a recession
▼ SHORT XHBetf adjacent homebuilders/construction, the bellwether sector Sacks names as already devastated by the hikes

Mention log newest first

Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) macro 50% · n=10 · E141 (2023-08-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:28:59 SUPPORT
“I would say the market's actually betting here that the Fed is overdoing it because of what you see in that blue line and that the economy is going to slow. The lag effects of this tightening have not yet been felt.”
Jason
Jason macro 63% · n=30 · E140 (2023-08-04) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:01:23 OPPOSE
“But the fact is, America is just crushing it in terms of employment, and that's why we didn't have this crash landing. I think the soft landing is because of employment, and I'll just end there.”
Sacks
Sacks macro 56% · n=40 · E137 (2023-07-14) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 24:32 REVERSAL
“But I think, again, what you're seeing over the last few weeks, it's just more and more evidence that it could be a soft landing, that we may not have a recession and we might even get rate cuts next year.”
Sacks
Sacks macro 56% · n=40 · E136 (2023-07-09) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 38:35 SUPPORT · horizon 6mo
“Yeah, look, I don't think we're out of the woods quite yet. So Druckenmiller, by the way, said that he was predicting a hard landing in the second half of the year. We're just starting the second half of the year. So he's still got six months to be proven correct.”
Chamath
Chamath macro 53% · n=47 · E136 (2023-07-09) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 34:30 OPPOSE
“Hard landing was sort of the Druckenmiller thing that I think that, you know, I said, I think it was a few weeks ago. It's very difficult to see a hard landing when China stimulates just because of their natural gravitational pull in the world economy.”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) macro 50% · n=10 · E136 (2023-07-09) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 30:39 OPPOSE
“But clearly the economy is not crashing. We had a lot of people who said that the economy was going to hit the skids in Q1 or Q2 of this year due to these higher rates. The economy is incredibly resilient.”
Chamath
Chamath macro 53% · n=47 · E133 (2023-06-16) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 20:03 OPPOSE
“And the reason there's not going to be a hard landing is you just saw China today basically say, we're going to start to rip in trillions of dollars.”
Sacks
Sacks macro 56% · n=40 · E130 (2023-05-26) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:12:06 SUPPORT
“I think that speaks to the larger economy is not doing that well. I think the economists a year from now may say that the recession had already begun.”
Sacks
Sacks macro 56% · n=40 · E126 (2023-04-28) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:07:07 SUPPORT
“I'm sticking by it. I think we're still going to have a recession.”
Sacks
Sacks macro 56% · n=40 · E121 (2023-03-24) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 4:38 SUPPORT
“Why won't you just stand pat for one month? You can always raise rates in a month. I think that this move here could in hindsight be seen as the straw that breaks the camel's back.”
Sacks
Sacks macro 56% · n=40 · E119 (2023-03-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 33:08 SUPPORT
“Two days ago, two days ago, Powell was testifying in front of the banking committee. And they asked him, do you see any systemic risks in the banking system because of the rapid rise in interest rates? He said, no, no systemic risk.”
Chamath
Chamath macro 53% · n=47 · E119 (2023-03-11) · positioning · strength 2 ▶ 17:33 SUPPORT
“we, the four of us, have been talking for the last 18 months about the impact of rising rates. And, you know, we talked a lot about, for example, like in our portfolio, my partners and I walked into every company and made them have at least enough money to get through mid-2025.”
Sacks
Sacks macro 56% · n=40 · E118 (2023-03-03) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 49:11 SUPPORT
“So I tend to be a little bit gloomy with respect to the big macro picture because I just don't see how you can change rates this fast.”
Sacks
Sacks macro 56% · n=40 · E114 (2023-02-04) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:01:22 SUPPORT · horizon 12mo
“it's good if we have a soft landing in the economy. I wouldn't assume that that's going to happen. I still think there's a really good chance of recession later this year”
Jason
Jason macro 63% · n=30 · E114 (2023-02-04) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 6:58 OPPOSE
“It's very hard, in other words, Sacks, to have a recession if people are employed, if people are employed.”
Sacks
Sacks macro 56% · n=40 · E109 (2022-12-24) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:49:32 SUPPORT · horizon 12mo
“And now he is predicting a hard landing in 2023 with a deeper recession than many expect.”
Chamath
Chamath macro 53% · n=47 · E109 (2022-12-24) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:44:05 SUPPORT · horizon 18mo
“because I think Elon and I are roughly in the same place we have been for a while, which is like mid-24 is when the recession ends”
Elon Musk
Elon Musk (regular guest ×1.0) macro: 1 resolved, unproven · E109 (2022-12-24) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:18:41 SUPPORT · horizon 12mo
“Well, I think it's more like it does seem like we're headed into a recession here in 2023 The magnitude of that recession is debatable, but I think it's at least a light to moderate recession. Potentially, it's on the order of 2009”
Sacks
Sacks macro 56% · n=40 · E108 (2022-12-16) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:07:54 SUPPORT · horizon 18mo
“We're going to have major economic headwinds for the next four to six quarters. Call it year and a half.”
Sacks
Sacks macro 56% · n=40 · E105 (2022-11-19) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 15:11 SUPPORT
“I mean, remember, like we don't know, I think we all believe that we're going to have a pretty severe recession next year.”
Sacks
Sacks macro 56% · n=40 · E103 (2022-11-05) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 36:59 SUPPORT · horizon 12mo
“But now I think we're headed into the second part of it, which is the real recession, a recession characterized by joblessness. And you're starting to see economists say we're going to go from 3 something percent unemployment rate to say 5 or 6 percent unemployment next year.”
Chamath
Chamath macro 53% · n=47 · E102 (2022-10-29) · positioning · strength 2 ▶ 1:06:13 SUPPORT
“Then it'll go back down because I think what David said is right. But for the short term, this thing is going up.”
Sacks
Sacks macro 56% · n=40 · E102 (2022-10-29) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:04:42 SUPPORT
“But I still think the huge recession is to come next year because all the interest rate increases we've seen. So, the Fed is, you know, pedal to the metal on interest rate increases, just like they were pedal to the metal on printing money.”
Jason
Jason macro 63% · n=30 · E99 (2022-10-07) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 48:53 SUPPORT
“Over a million jobs burned off in August. So without getting into the macro talk, it does feel like what the Fed is doing and companies doing hiring freezes and cuts is finally, finally having an impact.”
Chamath
Chamath macro 53% · n=47 · E98 (2022-10-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 28:16 SUPPORT
“I do think that Stan is right. We are going to see a hard landing recession.”
Sacks
Sacks macro 56% · n=40 · E98 (2022-10-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 7:53 SUPPORT
“And I think we're headed for a broad-based recession. That's what it seems like. You saw Druckenmiller's comments this week predicting a hard landing in 2023 No one's talking about soft landing anymore.”
Friedberg
Friedberg macro 46% · n=40 · E97 (2022-09-23) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 42:45 SUPPORT
“There's an inevitability now that unemployment is going to rise. There is an inevitability now that the economy is going to contract.”
Chamath
Chamath macro 53% · n=47 · E97 (2022-09-23) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 25:30 SUPPORT · horizon 18mo
“The bad news is I think that it's going to be a really tough, sticky time for the US consumer probably over the next 18 months.”
Sacks
Sacks macro 56% · n=40 · E97 (2022-09-23) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 23:27 SUPPORT
“It looks to me like we're headed for, I mean, I call it a double-dip recession, I think a couple of months ago. That's exactly what it's looking like.”
Sacks
Sacks macro 56% · n=40 · E91 (2022-08-13) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 40:03 SUPPORT · horizon 12mo
“So look, I think we're in a shallow technical recession right now. I bet that we probably bounce out of it in Q3 or Q4, but I think there's a significant risk that we're back in it next year. Just my guess.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total push on the score, in conviction points across every mention — supports and opposes · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Sacks
Sacks 56%
16 scoring events · 51% of moves
+111.1 / -22.7 → net +88.4
Chamath
Chamath 53%
7 scoring events · 20% of moves
+27.3 / -24.0 → net +3.3
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner 50% regular guest ×1.0
2 scoring events · 12% of moves
+17.5 / -14.4 → net +3.1
Jason
Jason 63%
3 scoring events · 11% of moves
+5.2 / -24.0 → net -18.8
Friedberg
Friedberg 46%
1 scoring event · 5% of moves
+12.3 → net +12.3
Elon Musk
Elon Musk regular guest ×1.0
1 scoring event · 1% of moves
+2.2 → net +2.2

⏳ decay drained -70.4 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E91 2022-08-13 init +35.0 35.0 E91 born by Sacks (explicit_prediction x2)
E92 2022-08-20 decay -1.4 33.6 E92 silent
E93 2022-08-26 decay -1.3 32.3 E93 silent
E94 2022-09-01 decay -1.3 31.0 E94 silent
E95 2022-09-10 decay -1.2 29.7 E95 silent
E96 2022-09-17 decay -1.2 28.5 E96 silent
E97 2022-09-23 reinforce +12.9 41.4 E97 Sacks support x3
E97 2022-09-23 reinforce +13.2 54.6 E97 Chamath support x2 (new voice)
E97 2022-09-23 reinforce +12.3 66.8 E97 Friedberg support x3 (new voice)
E98 2022-10-01 reinforce +6.0 72.8 E98 Sacks support x3
E98 2022-10-01 reinforce +4.1 76.9 E98 Chamath support x2
E99 2022-10-07 reinforce +5.2 82.1 E99 Jason support x2 (new voice)
E100 2022-10-14 decay -3.3 78.8 E100 silent
E101 2022-10-22 decay -3.2 75.7 E101 silent
E102 2022-10-29 reinforce +4.4 80.0 E102 Sacks support x3
E102 2022-10-29 reinforce +3.0 83.0 E102 Chamath support x2
E103 2022-11-05 reinforce +3.1 86.1 E103 Sacks support x3
E105 2022-11-19 reinforce +2.1 88.2 E105 Sacks support x2
E106 2022-12-03 decay -3.5 84.6 E106 silent
E107 2022-12-10 decay -3.4 81.3 E107 silent
E108 2022-12-16 reinforce +2.8 84.1 E108 Sacks support x2
E109 2022-12-24 reinforce +2.2 86.2 E109 Elon Musk support x3 (new voice) [w=0.50]
E109 2022-12-24 reinforce +2.5 88.7 E109 Chamath support x3
E109 2022-12-24 reinforce +1.7 90.4 E109 Sacks support x2
E110 2023-01-06 decay -3.6 86.8 E110 silent
E111 2023-01-13 decay -3.5 83.3 E111 silent
E112 2023-01-20 decay -3.3 80.0 E112 silent
E113 2023-01-27 decay -3.2 76.8 E113 silent
E114 2023-02-04 oppose -12.0 64.8 E114 Jason opposes x2
E114 2023-02-04 reinforce +5.3 70.1 E114 Sacks support x2
E115 2023-02-11 decay -2.8 67.3 E115 silent
E116 2023-02-17 decay -2.7 64.6 E116 silent
E118 2023-03-03 reinforce +5.3 69.9 E118 Sacks support x2
E119 2023-03-11 reinforce +4.5 74.4 E119 Chamath support x2
E119 2023-03-11 reinforce +3.8 78.2 E119 Sacks support x2
E120 2023-03-17 decay -3.1 75.1 E120 silent
E121 2023-03-24 reinforce +4.5 79.6 E121 Sacks support x3
E122 2023-03-31 decay -3.2 76.4 E122 silent
E123 2023-04-07 decay -3.1 73.4 E123 silent
E124 2023-04-14 decay -2.9 70.4 E124 silent
E125 2023-04-21 decay -2.8 67.6 E125 silent
E126 2023-04-28 reinforce +5.8 73.4 E126 Sacks support x3
E128 2023-05-12 decay -2.9 70.5 E128 silent
E129 2023-05-19 decay -2.8 67.7 E129 silent
E130 2023-05-26 reinforce +4.8 72.5 E130 Sacks support x2
E131 2023-06-02 decay -2.9 69.6 E131 silent
E132 2023-06-10 decay -2.8 66.8 E132 silent
E133 2023-06-16 oppose -12.0 54.8 E133 Chamath opposes x2
E134 2023-06-24 decay -2.2 52.6 E134 silent
E135 2023-07-01 decay -2.1 50.5 E135 silent
E136 2023-07-09 oppose -14.4 36.1 E136 Brad Gerstner opposes x3
E136 2023-07-09 oppose -12.0 24.1 E136 Chamath opposes x2
E136 2023-07-09 reinforce +13.7 37.8 E136 Sacks support x3
E137 2023-07-14 reversal -22.7 15.1 E137 Sacks flips
E139 2023-07-27 decay -0.6 14.5 E139 silent
E140 2023-08-04 oppose -12.0 2.5 E140 Jason opposes x2
E141 2023-08-11 reinforce +17.5 20.1 E141 Brad Gerstner support x3 (flipped from oppose)