← pool

📈 The equity beta trade is done — software back at fair value, alpha only from selection

Brad Gerstner's call after the 2023 melt-up: internet and software multiples went from ~70% above normal to ~30% below normal and are now back at the trailing ten-year average, so the positive arbitrage of 2022 has been squeezed out and public markets are close to fair value. The global-macro beta trade has largely played out; from here returns come from picking individual winners against individual losers rather than from index exposure.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 54.6 WATCH
EMBER
band
▼ SHORT IGV
expression · bearish equities
MISS
outcome · R -20.9% · α -42.2%
2024-08-11
window closed
⚠ CONFLICTING IDEAS ON THE SAME TICKER — the board is arguing with itself; net it before trading (ticker view →)
IGV · SaaSpocalypse is overdone for compliance-moat enterprise software LONG GREEN 71.0 ← stronger than this idea (28.5)
QQQ · It's 1997-98, not 1999 — the melt-up has years left LONG GREEN 67.3 ← stronger than this idea (28.5)
QQQ · The 2026 US boom — 5-6% GDP prints LONG WATCH 54.6 ← stronger than this idea (28.5)

also touching these tickers, same direction: The $3-4T software industrial complex contracts in 2026 19 (IGV)

⚖ Why this verdict

fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2023-08-11 → 2024-08-11 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▼ SHORT IGV (primary play). IGV rose 20.9% over the window → direction-adjusted R = -20.9% (the call lost money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +21.3%α = -20.9 − (+21.3) = -42.2% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
    Stock-selection read: +0.3% — did IGV move the predicted way relative to the market. The two only differ on a SHORT: this call was right about direction relative to the index but still cost money versus holding it.
  4. Rule fired:
    · HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5
    · PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0
    ▶ MISS — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a MISS earn 0 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Brad Gerstner, Chamath, Sacks

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2023-08-11)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▼ SHORT IGVetf PRIMARY the software/internet multiple series he explicitly says is back at its 10-year average
▼ SHORT QQQetf adjacent the beta he says has already been captured
▼ SHORT SPYetf adjacent broad index expression of 'close to fair value, no more beta trade'

Mention log

Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) equities w=0.95 · n=22 · E141 (2023-08-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:11:07 SUPPORT
“But I would say a lot of the positive arbitrage that we saw in 22 has been squeezed out of the public markets, and we're close to fair value. So now if you want to generate alpha, this is going to be about picking individual winners versus individual losers.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E151 (2023-10-27) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:04:24 SUPPORT
“The whole stock market this year is being held up by seven stocks ... If you look at the overall S&P 500, excluding those names, it's flat for the year ... And now those seven names are starting to crack”
Chamath
Chamath equities w=0.84 · n=160 · E156 (2023-12-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 41:14 SUPPORT
“So private equity is buying for three to five times and really one to three times. It's going to be hard for the public market buyer to be paying a lot more than that.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E156 (2023-12-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 43:01 OPPOSE
“If you believe that the 10-year is gonna go back down to, I don't know, this 2.5, 3% range, and if you believe that growth is re-accelerating, then I think there is room for this number, the 5.8 number, to at least grow into the long-term average, which is 7.8.”
Chamath
Chamath equities w=0.84 · n=160 · E181 (2024-05-31) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:42:18 SUPPORT
“We're looking at 5% 30-year treasury rates, which means that you are gonna see multiple compression that's gonna happen across the market for tech stocks.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E189 (2024-07-26) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 7:49 SUPPORT
“The multiples that we have right now are not that insane. I mean, I think the long-term median software multiple is around a seven. So, you know, you see here the mid-growth median 7.7. We're about tracking at the historical pre-COVID mean, and we had that really frothy bubbly period in 2020, and 2021, and that's clearly over.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner w=0.95 regular guest ×1.0
1 scoring event · 40% of moves
+40.1 → net +40.1
Sacks
Sacks w=0.89
3 scoring events · 36% of moves
+24.7 / -10.6 → net +14.1
Chamath
Chamath w=0.84
2 scoring events · 24% of moves
+23.7 → net +23.7

⏳ decay drained -49.5 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E141 2023-08-11 init +40.1 40.1 E141 born by Brad Gerstner (explicit_prediction x3) [w=0.95]
E142 2023-08-18 decay -1.6 38.5 E142 silent
E143 2023-08-25 decay -1.5 36.9 E143 silent
E144 2023-09-01 decay -1.5 35.5 E144 silent
E146 2023-09-22 decay -1.4 34.0 E146 silent
E147 2023-09-29 decay -1.4 32.7 E147 silent
E148 2023-10-07 decay -1.3 31.4 E148 silent
E149 2023-10-13 decay -1.3 30.1 E149 silent
E150 2023-10-20 decay -1.2 28.9 E150 silent
E151 2023-10-27 reinforce +14.2 43.1 E151 Sacks support x2 (new voice) [w=0.89]
E152 2023-11-03 decay -1.7 41.4 E152 silent
E156 2023-12-08 reinforce +13.3 54.6 E156 Chamath support x3 (new voice) [w=0.84]
E156 2023-12-08 oppose -10.6 44.0 E156 Sacks opposes x2 [w=0.89]
E157 2023-12-16 decay -1.8 42.2 E157 silent
E158 2023-12-23 decay -1.7 40.5 E158 silent
E159 2023-12-29 decay -1.6 38.9 E159 silent
E160 2024-01-06 decay -1.6 37.4 E160 silent
E161 2024-01-13 decay -1.5 35.9 E161 silent
E162 2024-01-19 decay -1.4 34.4 E162 silent
E163 2024-01-26 decay -1.4 33.1 E163 silent
E164 2024-02-02 decay -1.3 31.7 E164 silent
E165 2024-02-09 decay -1.3 30.5 E165 silent
E166 2024-02-16 decay -1.2 29.2 E166 silent
E167 2024-02-23 decay -1.2 28.1 E167 silent
E168 2024-03-01 decay -1.1 27.0 E168 silent
E169 2024-03-08 decay -1.1 25.9 E169 silent
E170 2024-03-15 decay -1.0 24.8 E170 silent
E171 2024-03-22 decay -1.0 23.8 E171 silent
E172 2024-03-29 decay -1.0 22.9 E172 silent
E173 2024-04-05 decay -0.9 22.0 E173 silent
E174 2024-04-12 decay -0.9 21.1 E174 silent
E175 2024-04-19 decay -0.8 20.3 E175 silent
E176 2024-04-26 decay -0.8 19.4 E176 silent
E177 2024-05-03 decay -0.8 18.7 E177 silent
E178 2024-05-10 decay -0.7 17.9 E178 silent
E179 2024-05-17 decay -0.7 17.2 E179 silent
E180 2024-05-24 decay -0.7 16.5 E180 silent
E181 2024-05-31 reinforce +10.5 27.0 E181 Chamath support x2 [w=0.84]
E182 2024-06-07 decay -1.1 25.9 E182 silent
E183 2024-06-14 decay -1.0 24.9 E183 silent
E184 2024-06-20 decay -1.0 23.9 E184 silent
E185 2024-06-29 decay -1.0 22.9 E185 silent
E186 2024-07-04 decay -0.9 22.0 E186 silent
E187 2024-07-12 decay -0.9 21.1 E187 silent
E188 2024-07-19 decay -0.8 20.3 E188 silent
E189 2024-07-26 reinforce +10.6 30.9 E189 Sacks support x2 (flipped from oppose) [w=0.89]
E190 2024-08-02 decay -1.2 29.6 E190 silent
E191 2024-08-09 decay -1.2 28.5 E191 silent