🏦 Inflation hasn't peaked and the terminal rate is above what's priced
June's 9.1% CPI is not the top: lagging owners'-equivalent rent keeps prints in the nines even as oil rolls over, so the Fed has to keep going. The true equilibrium (Taylor) rate is nearer 5% than the 3% the curve prices, so rates overshoot market expectations and that repricing is a downside surprise for both bonds and equities.
also touching these tickers, same direction: US fiscal spiral keeps long-end yields grinding higher 67 (TLT)
⚖ Why this verdict
fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set
- Window: 2022-07-14 → 2023-07-14 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
- The call: ▼ SHORT TLT (primary play). TLT fell 9.7% over the window → direction-adjusted R = +9.7% (the call made money).
- Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +20.8%
→ α = +9.7 − (+20.8) = -11.1%
— what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
Stock-selection read: +30.5% — did TLT move the predicted way relative to the market. The two only differ on a SHORT: this call was right about direction relative to the index but still cost money versus holding it.
- Rule fired:
· HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5▶ PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0· MISS — everything else
- Credit: supporters of a PARTIAL earn 0.5 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Chamath, Friedberg | opposed: Sacks | proxy-sensitive: IEF→MISS (+3.4%); SPY→MISS (-20.8%)
Conviction timeline
bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15
Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2022-07-14)
Plays
| expression | symbol | kind | relevance | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▼ SHORT | TLT | etf | PRIMARY | long-duration Treasuries fall as the terminal rate reprices from ~3% toward 4-5% |
| ▼ SHORT | IEF | etf | adjacent | intermediate Treasuries carry the same repricing with less convexity |
| ▼ SHORT | SPY | etf | adjacent | Sacks' explicit read-through - a 4-5% terminal rate is 'a huge downside surprise to the stock market' |
Mention log
“You know, our target, the collective wisdom of the market believes that 3% is enough to get the job done. We're right now at 1.5 to 1.75. So if there's any number between 3 and 5 that is the true price, we have a lot of work to do to get there.”
“Well, the lapping effect turned out not to be enough, and inflation is still rising. So we have not yet peaked on CPI. I understand that core we have peaked, but deciding to exclude energy and food, I mean, that's a pretty arbitrary decision.”
“I think that rates are going to go somewhere between 4.5% to 5%. I think Stan Druckenmiller is right. And I've said this, I don't know, I'm now ad nauseum, so I'll just keep saying it. But I think everybody has consistently been wrong. And they have wanted inflation to be a transitory phenomenon that goes away and they've been consistently wrong. Even in our group chat, we see these forecasts, they've been utterly consistently wrong. So rates are going to go higher than people expect. It'll stay around longer than people want. This will have an impact to the economy.”
“So you may be right about where things stand today, but this is about the trajectory right now of the economy and the trajectory is not good. Inflation is not coming down as fast as people were anticipating. It's worse than expected.”
“kudos to Chamath for basically calling that, you know, when the Fed just a couple of months ago was saying that so-called neutral would be 3 to 3.5%. Chamath was saying, no, it's going to be 4.5%, 5% plus.”
“we seem to have an administration that is enacting and embracing inflationary policies to support what they consider to be economic growth and improved employment conditions in this country. And the unfortunate effect of many of those policies is inflation.”
“I think the way to think about it is this gives the Fed the resolve it needs. It's going to go by 75 It's probably going to go another 75 We're going to have rates by 4 to 450 to 5%, probably within Q1”
“Well, I think that we had, if you take a very balanced view of what happened this week, you have to start, I think, with the Federal Reserve. And really, what they said is rates will probably be higher than all of you think, and they'll be higher for longer than all of you want.”
“One of the things we just talked about was the regime change that's happened where, you know, we all have to act differently now that the risk free rate is probably going to get to 5%.”
“My governing principle, I think I probably said it too many times, but I'll say it again. Rates are going to be higher than we like, and they'll stay here longer than we want. So if you use that as a principle, whenever the consensus thinks we're done, it's been pretty profitable to be on the other side of consensus. And so I still kind of maintain that we're probably going to have a 5.5% fed funds rate.”
“And the thing that's sort of surprising about what Larry Summers is saying is that if you believe that inflation is gonna come roaring back, that's certainly a contrarian bet. That's not what the market is saying right now.”
Who built this conviction
each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement
⏳ decay drained -89.4 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one
Score events
| episode | kind | Δ | after | note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E87 2022-07-14 | init | +45.5 | 45.5 | E87 born by Sacks (explicit_prediction x3) [w=1.08] |
| E87 2022-07-14 | reinforce | +12.9 | 58.4 | E87 Chamath support x3 (new voice) [w=0.88] |
| E88 2022-07-22 | decay | -2.3 | 56.0 | E88 silent |
| E89 2022-07-29 | decay | -2.2 | 53.8 | E89 silent |
| E90 2022-08-05 | decay | -2.2 | 51.6 | E90 silent |
| E91 2022-08-13 | decay | -2.1 | 49.6 | E91 silent |
| E92 2022-08-20 | decay | -2.0 | 47.6 | E92 silent |
| E93 2022-08-26 | decay | -1.9 | 45.7 | E93 silent |
| E94 2022-09-01 | decay | -1.8 | 43.9 | E94 silent |
| E95 2022-09-10 | decay | -1.8 | 42.1 | E95 silent |
| E96 2022-09-17 | reinforce | +9.4 | 51.5 | E96 Sacks support x2 [w=1.08] |
| E96 2022-09-17 | reinforce | +7.6 | 59.2 | E96 Chamath support x3 [w=0.88] |
| E97 2022-09-23 | reinforce | +8.0 | 67.1 | E97 Sacks support x3 [w=1.08] |
| E97 2022-09-23 | reinforce | +5.2 | 72.3 | E97 Chamath support x3 [w=0.88] |
| E97 2022-09-23 | reinforce | +4.9 | 77.2 | E97 Friedberg support x2 (new voice) [w=0.79] |
| E98 2022-10-01 | reinforce | +3.0 | 80.2 | E98 Chamath support x2 [w=0.88] |
| E99 2022-10-07 | decay | -3.2 | 77.0 | E99 silent |
| E100 2022-10-14 | reinforce | +3.0 | 80.0 | E100 Chamath support x2 [w=0.88] |
| E101 2022-10-22 | decay | -3.2 | 76.8 | E101 silent |
| E102 2022-10-29 | decay | -3.1 | 73.7 | E102 silent |
| E103 2022-11-05 | reinforce | +3.4 | 77.2 | E103 Chamath support x2 [w=0.88] |
| E103 2022-11-05 | reinforce | +3.7 | 80.9 | E103 Sacks support x2 [w=1.08] |
| E105 2022-11-19 | reinforce | +2.5 | 83.4 | E105 Sacks support x1 [w=1.08] |
| E105 2022-11-19 | reinforce | +2.2 | 85.6 | E105 Chamath support x2 [w=0.88] |
| E106 2022-12-03 | decay | -3.4 | 82.1 | E106 silent |
| E107 2022-12-10 | decay | -3.3 | 78.8 | E107 silent |
| E108 2022-12-16 | decay | -3.2 | 75.7 | E108 silent |
| E109 2022-12-24 | reinforce | +3.2 | 78.9 | E109 Chamath support x2 [w=0.88] |
| E110 2023-01-06 | decay | -3.2 | 75.7 | E110 silent |
| E111 2023-01-13 | decay | -3.0 | 72.7 | E111 silent |
| E112 2023-01-20 | decay | -2.9 | 69.8 | E112 silent |
| E113 2023-01-27 | decay | -2.8 | 67.0 | E113 silent |
| E114 2023-02-04 | decay | -2.7 | 64.3 | E114 silent |
| E115 2023-02-11 | decay | -2.6 | 61.7 | E115 silent |
| E116 2023-02-17 | decay | -2.5 | 59.3 | E116 silent |
| E118 2023-03-03 | reinforce | +6.4 | 65.7 | E118 Chamath support x3 [w=0.88] |
| E119 2023-03-11 | decay | -2.6 | 63.1 | E119 silent |
| E120 2023-03-17 | decay | -2.5 | 60.5 | E120 silent |
| E121 2023-03-24 | reinforce | +6.2 | 66.8 | E121 Chamath support x3 [w=0.88] |
| E122 2023-03-31 | decay | -2.7 | 64.1 | E122 silent |
| E123 2023-04-07 | decay | -2.6 | 61.5 | E123 silent |
| E124 2023-04-14 | decay | -2.5 | 59.1 | E124 silent |
| E125 2023-04-21 | decay | -2.4 | 56.7 | E125 silent |
| E126 2023-04-28 | decay | -2.3 | 54.4 | E126 silent |
| E128 2023-05-12 | decay | -2.2 | 52.3 | E128 silent |
| E129 2023-05-19 | decay | -2.1 | 50.2 | E129 silent |
| E130 2023-05-26 | decay | -2.0 | 48.2 | E130 silent |
| E131 2023-06-02 | decay | -1.9 | 46.2 | E131 silent |
| E132 2023-06-10 | decay | -1.8 | 44.4 | E132 silent |
| E133 2023-06-16 | decay | -1.8 | 42.6 | E133 silent |
| E134 2023-06-24 | decay | -1.7 | 40.9 | E134 silent |
| E135 2023-07-01 | decay | -1.6 | 39.3 | E135 silent |
| E136 2023-07-09 | decay | -1.6 | 37.7 | E136 silent |
| E137 2023-07-14 | reversal | -22.6 | 15.1 | E137 Sacks flips |