Mark Cuban

The tax rates are completely different than the Biden budget proposals where there's no unrealized capital gains, etc. They went to 28% and 28%. So it's not going to be what was proposed by Biden.

they realize that there's only a couple of ways to reduce the deficit. One, you get inflation under control and that reduces interest rates, and that's going to work in our favor, and I think that's happening now. If it's $1.6 trillion, then if interest rates go below 4 percent, that saves a lot of money and probably the most you can save.

And I said, the most important thing from a technological perspective in this country today, is that we win AI. That is going to find everything militarily for us and economically for us. And that when you try to break up companies like Google and Facebook, you diminish our ability to compete globally with AI.

I think the problem, and this happens with all new technologies, is we're seeing the gold rush right now where everybody calls everything AI, particularly with agents. And I think you can put all these vertical agents together to do all these different things, but agents are just going to be a feature, not a product.

There's nothing that says that open AI is going to win. Nothing at all. And so I don't feel bad about what they're doing.

So I think that in order to train a model, you need access to information. And the Internet ain't what it used to be in terms of being a source of information. And so IP is becoming more valuable. You're not, I think everybody by this time expected all the foundational models to have all this healthcare information. But if I'm Mayo Clinic, I'm not giving Microsoft or Google or OpenAI my IP, because that's what brands me. And so there's going to be a lot of money available there.

I have, but I stopped using it just because it terrified me. because it doesn't know what adversarial things it doesn't know. because you know, anything that's adversarial, that has to train on something it's seen, and it's not smart enough to figure out what it hasn't seen and whether or not it's a risk.

I've literally talked to Kamala Harris at lunch about this specific topic of regulation through litigation. As a lawyer, she got it immediately and she knows it's a problem. She's even mentioned in one of her speeches that that's something that they're going to deal with.

Now, she's either even or ahead or a little bit behind in every single poll. Why do I bring it up? because it means what she's doing is working.

And by working, by requiring transparency in all contracts, signed by anybody anywhere in terms of pricing, you are going to see the same impact on across-the-board pricing of a decrease of 30-40 percent. And so all that is going to reduce out-of-pocket spending for everybody, reduce government spending for everybody, and have a net positive impact.

I don't think they've peaked yet because it for the reasons I just mentioned, if we're able to build a Venetian type casino, and Dallas with an American Airlines Center in the middle of it, the valuation is $20 billion.