← pool

🌍 Supply-chain crunch tips the US into 1970s-style stagflation next year

Ports, labour-force dropouts and factory shutdowns mean prices rise while goods and services aren't produced. Companies that can't deliver product can't book revenue, and that combination causes a stagflationary recession within a year.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 94.8 GREEN
WATCH
band · contested
▼ SHORT SPY
expression · bearish macro
HIT
outcome · R +18.8% · α +37.6%
2022-10-16
window closed

⚖ Why this verdict

fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2021-10-16 → 2022-10-16 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▼ SHORT SPY (primary play). SPY fell 18.8% over the window → direction-adjusted R = +18.8% (the call made money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned -18.8%α = +18.8 − (-18.8) = +37.6% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
    Stock-selection read: +0.0% — did SPY move the predicted way relative to the market. The two only differ on a SHORT: this call beat the index outright.
    (SPY is itself the primary here — scored on R alone.)
  4. Rule fired:
    ▶ HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5 ✓ (R 18.8, α 37.6)
    · PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0
    · MISS — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a HIT earn 1.0 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Chamath, Friedberg, Jason, Ryan Petersen, Sacks | opposed: Brad Gerstner | benchmark-primary: scored on R alone

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2021-10-16)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▼ SHORT SPYetf PRIMARY broad US equities de-rate in a stagflationary recession
▼ SHORT XLYetf adjacent consumer discretionary is hit first by shortages plus falling real income
▼ SHORT XRTetf adjacent retailers cannot sell inventory they cannot get off the ships

Mention log

Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E51 (2021-10-16) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 16:58 SUPPORT · horizon 12mo
“So you have this pile up, I would say, of regulations ultimately, I'd say with COVID as the origin that have now caused this supply chain crisis. And unless it gets fixed, it could absolutely cause a 1970 style stagflation type recession next year.”
Chamath
Chamath macro w=1.06 · n=47 · E51 (2021-10-16) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 32:40 SUPPORT · horizon 18mo
“I think it's coming. I don't think it's a short-term blip. And I think that we are in a period that will resemble the late 70s. ... And I think that, you know, you kind of want to be risk off and not own risk assets. ... I mean, look, I think you got a year to 18 months to kind of clean this stuff up”
Jason
Jason macro w=1.27 · n=30 · E51 (2021-10-16) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 34:05 SUPPORT
“a tray full of champagne glasses on a boat in rough seas, at any point, we could trip and everything comes crashing down”
Friedberg
Friedberg macro w=0.93 · n=40 · E51 (2021-10-16) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 36:15 OPPOSE
“You know, I mean, I think that's the way the equation balances. It's not like the world's going to end.”
Jason
Jason macro w=1.27 · n=30 · E55 (2021-11-13) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 54:43 SUPPORT
“The psychology of this could be could be self-fulfilling as well, because what's going to happen is you're going to have everybody raise prices because it's now become an escalation. ... And then people are going to say, you know what, fuck it, I'll just drive this one for two more years. That's going to cause stagnation.”
Friedberg
Friedberg macro w=0.93 · n=40 · E57 (2021-12-04) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 29:11 OPPOSE
“the last three major drawdowns have been the dot-com crash, then the financial crisis and then the COVID crash. All of them had true systemic risk that caused kind of, there's all these ripple effects and secondary effects. For all you guys, it seems to me that this time what's going on is a devaluation that doesn't have systemic risk attached to it.”
Friedberg
Friedberg macro w=0.93 · n=40 · E58 (2021-12-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 21:27 SUPPORT
“the purchasing power that arises when the inflation is higher than what those things are going up at indicates economic recession underlying that inflationary bubble ... have we pumped enough money into trigger economic growth that we can come to balance where the growth can outpace the inflation? And we're not there.”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E58 (2021-12-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 45:27 OPPOSE · horizon 12mo
“I actually think there's a lot of strength in the economy right now. It's not all negative. ... I actually think there'd be a massive relief rally, and the economy would take off like a rocket next year. ... And we could let things have more of a soft landing, as opposed to the sudden austerity, which is whipsawing the economy.”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E62 (2022-01-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 44:55 SUPPORT
“And so I think there's actually like a much greater risk now of the economy going to recession this year because of the Fed's overreaction this week.”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E64 (2022-01-22) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 54:18 SUPPORT
“we are dealing with balancing the risks of inflation against the risk of recession. I think that is fundamental. And right now, all the statements have been so hawkish that the markets have been just flowing red now for months. And I think the balance of risk is starting to make recession possible in a way that didn't seem possible two, three months ago.”
Chamath
Chamath macro w=1.06 · n=47 · E64 (2022-01-22) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 52:46 SUPPORT
“So we are in a really complicated moment. And I think the risk is that there is an overreaction to incomplete data and we plunge the US economy into a recession. And I just think that that has to be really thoughtfully measured. And guys, we've seen this in 2018-19.”
Friedberg
Friedberg macro w=0.93 · n=40 · E64 (2022-01-22) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 48:01 OPPOSE
“And that doesn't necessarily mean that the economy is at risk. It means that there are valuation bubbles that are going to burst. They're going to decline. And no interest rate policy is going to change that”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E65 (2022-01-29) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 43:36 SUPPORT
“And so I think that the risk of recession now is much higher than it was even a month ago. Now, you know, it's going to be hard to know. So basically, I think what we're saying is it's going to be very hard for the Fed to engineer a soft landing here, where we don't trigger a recession in the process of stopping inflation.”
Friedberg
Friedberg macro w=0.93 · n=40 · E65 (2022-01-29) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 50:51 SUPPORT · horizon 6mo
“So the real risk to the economy, in my opinion, right now, is when and how we're going to work our way through the supply chain issues. And it is so complex and there's a myriad of problems. And it is a global problem that it's really unclear how this is going to play out over the next six months. ... businesses that you didn't realize and didn't expect are going to get hit with supply chain problems are suddenly going to say, guess what, our revenue is off by 20, 30 percent”
Chamath
Chamath macro w=1.06 · n=47 · E65 (2022-01-29) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 52:32 OPPOSE · horizon 9mo
“And the reason I'm less worried is when you actually talk to the companies that are spending enormous amounts of money on CapEx, they've actually guided to the fact that by the end of this year and the beginning of next year, most of these things will be worked out. It's indigestion. I think we're dealing with a six to nine month issue of having turned things off and are now rapidly trying to turn things back on. ... But I do think it will work itself out faster than people expect personally.”
RY
Ryan Petersen (regular guest ×1.0) macro: 4 resolved, unproven · E66 (2022-02-05) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 8:55 SUPPORT
“And so the result will actually show up down the road when all of a sudden they miss revenue three, four quarters down the road. And that's why I've been saying for a couple of shows now that the biggest thing I'm concerned about is when the revenue shortfalls start to hit the companies that are dependent on these supply chains. ... And just this quarter with the quarterly earnings, we're now seeing that the company yesterday that reported called Ingredion, their big food ingredients company, and they just reported how supply chain problems have now backed up to affect. And the stock was down like 10%, 11% yesterday.”
Chamath
Chamath macro w=1.06 · n=47 · E66 (2022-02-05) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 16:10 SUPPORT
“That's an enormous capital problem that these companies now all of a sudden will face, right? So like, the next step beyond all of the supply chain issues could be, and I think Sacks has been talking about this a lot, like a pretty bad recession if these companies have all this inventory and they don't know how to get working capital.”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E66 (2022-02-05) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 44:06 SUPPORT
“And, you know, we know that inflation is a huge problem. The Fed now is raising rates or projecting raising rates very quickly, which is creating. ... It's a very blunt instrument. It could cause a downturn or recession. So that's the big problem.”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E67 (2022-02-12) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:05:47 SUPPORT
“we've been talking on the show for the last, I'd say, a couple of months about balancing the risk of recession versus the risk of inflation. Inflation, I think, has gotten slightly worse. The print went from, the last print was like 7.1% now to 7.5%. ... But the risk of recession, I think, is increasing because what's keeping this economy going is the consumer. And if the consumer sentiment now all of a sudden is tanking, and people feel poor because of inflation, I just, you know, now the risks are starting to become more balanced.”
Chamath
Chamath macro w=1.06 · n=47 · E67 (2022-02-12) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:05:15 SUPPORT
“the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment was released, I think it was today this morning, and it shows exactly what he's saying, which is that, you know, consumers' propensity and confidence in the economy has been falling off a cliff. You know, the month over month change was almost, it was down 8.2%. The year over year change is down almost 20%. ... But I think, Sacks, you're right, on the margin, I think the risk is towards a recession, because people don't see this.”
Chamath
Chamath macro w=1.06 · n=47 · E71 (2022-03-05) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 21:30 SUPPORT
“If you look back over the last 30 or 40 or 50 years and you look at every single period of when there has been a recession, what's interesting to note is that it's not always been the case that the price of energy has risen by 50 percent in a recession. But it is always the case that when energy prices spike by 50 percent, we enter a recession. We will contract as an economy.”
Friedberg
Friedberg macro w=0.93 · n=40 · E71 (2022-03-05) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:14:39 SUPPORT
“Yeah, look, we're talking about I'm talking about capital and energy and food. And some combination of those things are going to cause some serious deleterious effects on people and on markets.”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E72 (2022-03-19) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 54:57 SUPPORT · horizon 12mo
“we have all the risks of recession, we definitely are seeing a slowdown in the economy right now. And I think if this war continues and we don't get the spring planning and things keep deteriorating, I think we're headed for a very serious recession in this country. I think we'll go from slowdown to recession.”
Friedberg
Friedberg macro w=0.93 · n=40 · E72 (2022-03-19) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 40:44 SUPPORT
“But like we're hurting ourselves far more than we realize”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) macro w=1.00 · n=10 · E73 (2022-03-26) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:26:06 SUPPORT
“Look at what's going on in the world with energy prices. We've never had oil over $120 and not gone into a recession. We're facing a global slowdown. That will have big implications for inflation, big implications for rates.”
Chamath
Chamath macro w=1.06 · n=47 · E73 (2022-03-26) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:24:23 SUPPORT
“how can the United States be under so much inflationary pressure, where China is effectively telling you that we are in a contraction and a recessionary period. And so if that's where China is, there's a risk that we may already be there or entering that.”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E73 (2022-03-26) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:28:52 SUPPORT
“This war, the longer it drags on, the longer it basically can spin out of control and become something worse that sucks us in. ... The longer it creates the risk of basically causing a recession in the United States.”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E74 (2022-04-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 13:48 SUPPORT · horizon 24mo
“We're definitely going into a slowdown. And whether it becomes a recession is to be determined. I think there's a very good chance because we already were headed for a slowdown because of interest rate increases, because of inflation. ... we could end up with something like a stack, the 1970s style, stack inflation, where we continue to see inflation with the slowing economy. ... Historically, it's met when the yield curve inverts. There's been a better than two thirds chance for recession at some point in the next year and greater than 98% chance for recession at some point in the next two years.”
Friedberg
Friedberg macro w=0.93 · n=40 · E74 (2022-04-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 15:29 SUPPORT
“That's why they spend less money. And that's why there's recession. ... the rippling effects of the rate of inflation are decreased spending, and there isn't enough time for, you know, the new job creation engine to catch up. ... without a stimulus effect, you're in trouble. That's really the situation we're in. And that's what, you know, can kind of cause these stagflationary effects to drag on.”
Chamath
Chamath macro w=1.06 · n=47 · E74 (2022-04-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 6:03 OPPOSE
“It turns out that it's not as correlated as one thinks. ... That's actually not showing a recession at all. In fact, that shows a very healthy ascent ... It has never really been the case that two's 10s inverts while the forward spread stays up and you have a recession.”
Jason
Jason macro w=1.27 · n=30 · E74 (2022-04-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 11:29 OPPOSE
“So if we do have a recession, and it seems implausible to me that we would have negative growth for two quarters.”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E75 (2022-04-09) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:10:27 SUPPORT
“And there's still risks of inflation and recession in the US. And I think if we are in a recession later this year, I think a lot of people in the US will be asking what was this all for?”
Chamath
Chamath macro w=1.06 · n=47 · E78 (2022-04-30) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 31:54 SUPPORT
“the savings boom is largely over. Personal savings rate fell to 6.2% in March, the lowest since 2013 And so what does that mean? Well, it means that the setup is there for us to sort of really contract what we are able to spend as a society. So I think now the odds even push further in this direction that we could have more quarters of negative GDP.”
Friedberg
Friedberg macro w=0.93 · n=40 · E78 (2022-04-30) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 35:16 SUPPORT
“So that doesn't get credited on the GDP counter because those sales didn't close that quarter. And as we saw with Amazon recently and others and Apple just said that they're expecting, I think, close to a $10 billion hit this quarter because of supply chain issues. ... That doesn't mean that we're not going to have a recession because, you know, when I when I'm not able to spend money on Apple, Apple spending less on their suppliers, they're spending less on their suppliers. So there is a trickling effect of capital flows and the recessionary effect may be hit.”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E78 (2022-04-30) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 38:30 SUPPORT
“I tweeted in February, Hey, anyone notice that we've just entered a recession? And I got dunked on by all the professional economists ... the data just came out negative 1.5% economic growth in Q1. So what I wrote at the time was exactly right.”
Jason
Jason macro w=1.27 · n=30 · E78 (2022-04-30) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 41:54 SUPPORT
“The market knew in December, the market knew in November that the recession was coming.”
Chamath
Chamath macro w=1.06 · n=47 · E80 (2022-05-13) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 10:32 SUPPORT
“Separately, jobless claims are now starting to tick up, which means that companies are beginning to affect layoffs because they feel this pressure. So now you're going to see an unemployment rate that starts to go up.”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E80 (2022-05-13) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 16:00 SUPPORT
“I think like recession now is this inevitable. To Chamath's point, you can't have 14% of global wealth wiped out practically overnight and not have that translate into a big recession.”
Friedberg
Friedberg macro w=0.93 · n=40 · E80 (2022-05-13) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 18:14 SUPPORT
“That's where we have a problem with stagflation and where we are inevitably going to run into a recession.”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) macro w=1.00 · n=10 · E81 (2022-05-23) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 10:20 OPPOSE
“We know that those prices are not sustainable and we have the bond market telling us the same thing. That's why I don't think you should believe the hyperinflation narrative.”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E84 (2022-06-24) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 27:00 SUPPORT
“And if they don't, then we end up with like a chronic sort of stagflationary situation, where you get lower growth and inflation persists. So it's a bunch of bad options right now. ... And this is a bunch of bad options. I think, you know, we are going to have a recession.”
Chamath
Chamath macro w=1.06 · n=47 · E84 (2022-06-24) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 21:24 SUPPORT
“All roads, I think lead to lower equity prices. ... And so if all of a sudden you have some recessionary forces or prices go up and earnings don't, you'll have a contagion in the debt markets. You could have a contagion in the commodity market. So we're dealing with some really tough boundary conditions.”
Friedberg
Friedberg macro w=0.93 · n=40 · E84 (2022-06-24) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 20:24 SUPPORT
“the rate at which we pull the money out, which has had to be really, really fast over the last few weeks, can cause a recession. And that's the biggest concern right now is, will that actually trigger a massive recession or not that everyone's watching?”
Chamath
Chamath macro w=1.06 · n=47 · E85 (2022-06-30) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:04:23 SUPPORT · horizon 4mo
“Jerome Powell just said, I will tank the economy in order to beat inflation. He just said it in the Wall Street Journal. ... I think you're going to see eight and nine percent inflation prints for at least the next three or four months minimum.”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E85 (2022-06-30) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:08:24 SUPPORT
“So I don't see how we get out of this bear market until you get clarity and resolution of inflation and rates, number one, slow down to recession, number two, and basically this war in Europe, number three.”
Friedberg
Friedberg macro w=0.93 · n=40 · E85 (2022-06-30) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:05:46 OPPOSE
“I don't like the term quote recession as if it's some absolute negative thing. ... negative GDP growth coming off of inflated GDP doesn't feel to me as systemically challenging to the economy as some other circumstance”
Chamath
Chamath macro w=1.06 · n=47 · E86 (2022-07-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 24:18 SUPPORT
“But all of those roads unfortunately lead to the same conclusion, which is like, you know, equities get really under pressure. There is no scenario where there's a bid to equities. Why would you buy something that has lower earnings in the future?”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E86 (2022-07-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 33:50 SUPPORT
“I mean, what I just described would be a soft landing. I just am skeptical there's going to be a soft landing because of what Chamath is saying, which is this is a multi-part problem. ... And until we fix the supply side, I don't think that merely reducing demand is going to get us out of this.”
Friedberg
Friedberg macro w=0.93 · n=40 · E86 (2022-07-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 22:47 SUPPORT
“the majority of Americans are facing this really critical budget crisis, where their personal spending levels are now exceeding their income levels, and there's a critical need for credit and for personal debt and spending to go down. And that's what's going to drive significant risk in the next couple of months and quarters and years”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E87 (2022-07-14) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 46:37 SUPPORT
“So I have no doubt that the Fed can stop inflation. I think the question is how much pain are they going to have to inflict? How high do rates have to go? And how long do we live through this sort of stagflationary period?”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E89 (2022-07-29) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 7:15 SUPPORT
“Listen, we're at the beginning of a recession. It might turn out we might have a bounce in Q3. This might be more of a double dip. I suspect that's what it will be. But we know the cause of this. The cause of this recession is inflation.”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E90 (2022-08-05) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 22:27 SUPPORT
“Yeah, you're right. So the commodity prices are reflecting expectations that the economy is slowing down and maybe in a recession.”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E91 (2022-08-13) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 38:35 SUPPORT
“So, inflation is still high, the jobs picture is good. We're technically in a recession.”
Friedberg
Friedberg macro w=0.93 · n=40 · E91 (2022-08-13) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 41:36 OPPOSE
“and things are going to go down inevitably, but I don't think that this should be deemed that there's something fundamentally negative about the US economy.”
Friedberg
Friedberg macro w=0.93 · n=40 · E94 (2022-09-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 57:13 SUPPORT
“So in the province of Shishuan in China, they actually lost power because so much of the power is driven by hydroelectric plants. So streams and water flow has slowed down and stopped. As a result, there's less power. As a result, the factories are being shut down. As a result, key components for manufacturing in the computing industry and kind of mechanical goods are not being produced at the rate that they were being produced before that has a ripple effect in the supply chain, similar to what we saw in COVID.”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E96 (2022-09-17) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:09:21 SUPPORT
“Now, this FedEx executive is saying we're headed for a global recession. So it seems to me that the economic news is just pretty grim here. And we're in stagflation. The Fed has to keep raising interest rates at the same time that we have persistent high chronic inflation.”
Chamath
Chamath macro w=1.06 · n=47 · E96 (2022-09-17) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:11:09 SUPPORT
“So I think, Sacks, you are right that we will be there because you can only bring rates up so high until you break things.”
Jason
Jason macro w=1.27 · n=30 · E96 (2022-09-17) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 1:05:11 SUPPORT
“But either way, I think the Fed's interest rates are doing their job and less packages are being shipped because people are Chamath, you would think, spending less money. And that was the whole point of this exercise was to slow the economy down.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Sacks
Sacks w=1.12
21 scoring events · 37% of moves
+125.3 / -13.5 → net +111.8
Friedberg
Friedberg w=0.93
15 scoring events · 24% of moves
+34.8 / -55.5 → net -20.7
Chamath
Chamath w=1.06
14 scoring events · 23% of moves
+60.9 / -25.5 → net +35.3
Jason
Jason w=1.27
5 scoring events · 10% of moves
+23.2 / -15.2 → net +8.0
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner w=1.00 regular guest ×1.0
2 scoring events · 4% of moves
+2.3 / -12.0 → net -9.7
RY
Ryan Petersen regular guest ×1.0
1 scoring event · 3% of moves
+11.0 → net +11.0

⏳ decay drained -62.3 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E51 2021-10-16 init +47.2 47.2 E51 born by Sacks (explicit_prediction x3) [w=1.12]
E51 2021-10-16 reinforce +15.2 62.4 E51 Chamath support x3 (new voice) [w=1.06]
E51 2021-10-16 reinforce +8.6 71.0 E51 Jason support x1 (new voice) [w=1.27]
E51 2021-10-16 oppose -11.1 59.9 E51 Friedberg opposes x2 [w=0.93]
E52 2021-10-23 decay -2.4 57.5 E52 silent
E53 2021-10-30 decay -2.3 55.2 E53 silent
E54 2021-11-06 decay -2.2 53.0 E54 silent
E55 2021-11-13 reinforce +8.9 61.9 E55 Jason support x2 [w=1.27]
E56 2021-11-20 decay -2.5 59.4 E56 silent
E57 2021-12-04 oppose -11.1 48.3 E57 Friedberg opposes x2 [w=0.93]
E58 2021-12-11 reinforce +7.2 55.5 E58 Friedberg support x2 (flipped from oppose) [w=0.93]
E58 2021-12-11 oppose -13.5 42.0 E58 Sacks opposes x2 [w=1.12]
E59 2021-12-17 decay -1.7 40.3 E59 silent
E60 2021-12-23 decay -1.6 38.7 E60 silent
E61 2021-12-29 decay -1.5 37.2 E61 silent
E62 2022-01-08 reinforce +10.6 47.8 E62 Sacks support x2 (flipped from oppose) [w=1.12]
E63 2022-01-15 decay -1.9 45.9 E63 silent
E64 2022-01-22 oppose -11.1 34.8 E64 Friedberg opposes x2 [w=0.93]
E64 2022-01-22 reinforce +12.5 47.2 E64 Chamath support x3 [w=1.06]
E64 2022-01-22 reinforce +10.7 57.9 E64 Sacks support x3 [w=1.12]
E65 2022-01-29 reinforce +8.5 66.4 E65 Sacks support x3 [w=1.12]
E65 2022-01-29 reinforce +5.6 72.0 E65 Friedberg support x3 (flipped from oppose) [w=0.93]
E65 2022-01-29 oppose -12.8 59.3 E65 Chamath opposes x2 [w=1.06]
E66 2022-02-05 reinforce +11.0 70.3 E66 Ryan Petersen support x3 (new voice)
E66 2022-02-05 reinforce +4.7 75.0 E66 Chamath support x2 (flipped from oppose) [w=1.06]
E66 2022-02-05 reinforce +4.2 79.2 E66 Sacks support x2 [w=1.12]
E67 2022-02-12 reinforce +3.3 82.5 E67 Chamath support x2 [w=1.06]
E67 2022-02-12 reinforce +2.9 85.5 E67 Sacks support x2 [w=1.12]
E68 2022-02-19 decay -3.4 82.1 E68 silent
E70 2022-02-24 decay -3.3 78.8 E70 silent
E71 2022-03-05 reinforce +4.1 82.8 E71 Chamath support x3 [w=1.06]
E71 2022-03-05 reinforce +2.4 85.2 E71 Friedberg support x2 [w=0.93]
E72 2022-03-19 reinforce +2.0 87.3 E72 Friedberg support x2 [w=0.93]
E72 2022-03-19 reinforce +2.6 89.9 E72 Sacks support x3 [w=1.12]
E73 2022-03-26 reinforce +1.6 91.5 E73 Chamath support x2 [w=1.06]
E73 2022-03-26 reinforce +2.3 93.8 E73 Brad Gerstner support x3 (new voice)
E73 2022-03-26 reinforce +1.1 94.8 E73 Sacks support x2 [w=1.12]
E74 2022-04-01 oppose -12.8 82.1 E74 Chamath opposes x2 [w=1.06]
E74 2022-04-01 oppose -15.2 66.9 E74 Jason opposes x2 [w=1.27]
E74 2022-04-01 reinforce +6.7 73.6 E74 Sacks support x3 [w=1.12]
E74 2022-04-01 reinforce +3.7 77.2 E74 Friedberg support x2 [w=0.93]
E75 2022-04-09 reinforce +3.8 81.1 E75 Sacks support x2 [w=1.12]
E76 2022-04-16 decay -3.2 77.8 E76 silent
E77 2022-04-23 decay -3.1 74.7 E77 silent
E78 2022-04-30 reinforce +4.8 79.6 E78 Chamath support x3 (flipped from oppose) [w=1.06]
E78 2022-04-30 reinforce +2.8 82.4 E78 Friedberg support x2 [w=0.93]
E78 2022-04-30 reinforce +3.6 86.0 E78 Sacks support x3 [w=1.12]
E78 2022-04-30 reinforce +2.1 88.1 E78 Jason support x1 (flipped from oppose) [w=1.27]
E79 2022-05-07 decay -3.5 84.6 E79 silent
E80 2022-05-13 reinforce +3.0 87.5 E80 Chamath support x3 [w=1.06]
E80 2022-05-13 reinforce +2.5 90.1 E80 Sacks support x3 [w=1.12]
E80 2022-05-13 reinforce +1.7 91.7 E80 Friedberg support x3 [w=0.93]
E81 2022-05-23 oppose -12.0 79.7 E81 Brad Gerstner opposes x2
E82 2022-05-24 decay -3.2 76.5 E82 silent
E84 2022-06-24 reinforce +3.3 79.8 E84 Friedberg support x2 [w=0.93]
E84 2022-06-24 reinforce +3.9 83.7 E84 Chamath support x3 [w=1.06]
E84 2022-06-24 reinforce +3.3 87.0 E84 Sacks support x3 [w=1.12]
E85 2022-06-30 reinforce +2.5 89.5 E85 Chamath support x3 [w=1.06]
E85 2022-06-30 oppose -11.1 78.4 E85 Friedberg opposes x2 [w=0.93]
E85 2022-06-30 reinforce +4.4 82.7 E85 Sacks support x3 [w=1.12]
E86 2022-07-08 reinforce +2.9 85.6 E86 Friedberg support x3 (flipped from oppose) [w=0.93]
E86 2022-07-08 reinforce +2.8 88.4 E86 Chamath support x3 [w=1.06]
E86 2022-07-08 reinforce +2.4 90.7 E86 Sacks support x3 [w=1.12]
E87 2022-07-14 reinforce +1.6 92.3 E87 Sacks support x2 [w=1.12]
E88 2022-07-22 decay -3.7 88.6 E88 silent
E89 2022-07-29 reinforce +2.3 90.9 E89 Sacks support x3 [w=1.12]
E90 2022-08-05 reinforce +1.5 92.4 E90 Sacks support x2 [w=1.12]
E91 2022-08-13 reinforce +1.3 93.7 E91 Sacks support x2 [w=1.12]
E91 2022-08-13 oppose -11.1 82.6 E91 Friedberg opposes x2 [w=0.93]
E92 2022-08-20 decay -3.3 79.3 E92 silent
E93 2022-08-26 decay -3.2 76.1 E93 silent
E94 2022-09-01 reinforce +3.3 79.5 E94 Friedberg support x2 (flipped from oppose) [w=0.93]
E95 2022-09-10 decay -3.2 76.3 E95 silent
E96 2022-09-17 reinforce +3.6 79.9 E96 Jason support x1 [w=1.27]
E96 2022-09-17 reinforce +4.1 84.0 E96 Sacks support x3 [w=1.12]
E96 2022-09-17 reinforce +2.6 86.5 E96 Chamath support x2 [w=1.06]
E97 2022-09-23 decay -3.5 83.1 E97 silent
E98 2022-10-01 decay -3.3 79.7 E98 silent
E99 2022-10-07 decay -3.2 76.5 E99 silent
E100 2022-10-14 decay -3.1 73.5 E100 silent