← pool

🏛️ California wealth tax fails to pass — but the proposal alone drives the exodus

Sacks' call that California's proposed wealth tax (1% over $50M, 1.5% over $1B) does not pass in 2021 or 2022 — six Democrats are already against it — yet the 10-year look-forward provision alone pushes high-net-worth founders and their capital out of the state ahead of it, so the static $22B revenue estimate inverts into a revenue decline and weaker business formation in California.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 56.6 WATCH
WATCH
band · contested
▼ SHORT CMF
expression · bearish politics-market
PARTIAL
outcome · R +6.8% · α +8.8%
2023-01-01
window closed

⚖ Why this verdict

fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2021-04-01 → 2023-01-01 — first mention + 21-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▼ SHORT CMF (primary play). CMF fell 6.8% over the window → direction-adjusted R = +6.8% (the call made money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned -2.0%α = +6.8 − (-2.0) = +8.8% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
    Stock-selection read: +4.8% — did CMF move the predicted way relative to the market. The two only differ on a SHORT: this call beat the index outright.
  4. Rule fired:
    · HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5
    ▶ PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0
    · MISS — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a PARTIAL earn 0.5 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Brad Gerstner, Friedberg, Sacks | opposed: Chamath

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2021-04-01)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▼ SHORT CMFetf PRIMARY iShares California Muni Bond ETF — the cleanest listed expression of California's tax base and state credit. Loose, rate-dominated mapping: a 2022 score on this instrument will mostly reflect Fed hikes, not founder migration, so read the outcome with suspicion

Mention log

Sacks
Sacks politics-market w=0.97 · n=88 · E28 (2021-04-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:03:31 SUPPORT · horizon 21mo
“It will kill the California economy. ... So I don't think it's going to pass this year or next year. ... But the fact that they're even putting it on the table is making a lot of people second guess whether California is the place they want to create their businesses.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E28 (2021-04-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:06:37 SUPPORT
“And I just don't think this is going to pass because it's not justifiable.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market w=0.97 · n=88 · E85 (2022-06-30) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 13:17 SUPPORT · horizon 12mo
“this is really going to hurt the California tax base, because if you start raising taxes on, you know, California millionaires, more of them are going to leave the state, and then that tax revenue leaves the state. And so it actually hurts the general budget. ... I think we're due for a huge budget shortfall next year because there's going to be no capital gains.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market w=0.97 · n=88 · E94 (2022-09-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 32:48 SUPPORT
“This is a state in which you have a disappearing middle class. The middle class has been moving out of the state by the hundreds of thousands. In fact, last year, we had for the first time net migration out of the state.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E94 (2022-09-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:16:14 SUPPORT · horizon 60mo
“No, the great thing is we have a running A-B test, which will show whether this state central planning can work or not. And again, if we refuse to want to listen to the examples of Russia or all of these other countries that have tried this, then so be it. We will know in the next three to five years that these policies actually don't work and actually that it actually accelerates the exact hellscape that they think they're trying to avoid.”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market w=0.84 · n=74 · E101 (2022-10-22) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:25:17 SUPPORT
“There's certainly a calculus going on with Newsom, I believe, in the impact that having higher tax rates would have on what is clearly not just a theoretical, but an actual evidenced exodus from the state of wealthy and high income earners.”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) politics-market w=0.86 · n=7 · E101 (2022-10-22) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:30:10 SUPPORT
“There is a hostility toward business that has emerged in California that I think is commensurate and related to the tax rate, but also separate.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E101 (2022-10-22) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:27:33 OPPOSE
“So I think that, in my opinion, actually, like there's actually this beautiful symmetry where even if taxes are high, your earnings potential is commensurately higher, such that the net that you're left with is the same as if you were in another place where taxes may be zero, but you're just not going to get exposed to the same ways to make money.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Sacks
Sacks w=0.97
3 scoring events · 54% of moves
+67.3 → net +67.3
Chamath
Chamath w=1.02
3 scoring events · 28% of moves
+22.8 / -12.2 → net +10.5
Friedberg
Friedberg w=0.84
1 scoring event · 10% of moves
+12.7 → net +12.7
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner w=0.86 regular guest ×1.0
1 scoring event · 9% of moves
+10.7 → net +10.7

⏳ decay drained -53.4 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E28 2021-04-01 init +40.6 40.6 E28 born by Sacks (explicit_prediction x3) [w=0.97]
E28 2021-04-01 reinforce +13.7 54.2 E28 Chamath support x2 (new voice) [w=1.02]
E29 2021-04-17 decay -1.1 53.1 E29 silent
E30 2021-04-23 decay -1.1 52.1 E30 silent
E31 2021-05-01 decay -1.0 51.0 E31 silent
E32 2021-05-13 decay -1.0 50.0 E32 silent
E33 2021-05-22 decay -1.0 49.0 E33 silent
E34 2021-05-31 decay -1.0 48.0 E34 silent
E35 2021-06-13 decay -1.0 47.1 E35 silent
E36 2021-06-18 decay -0.9 46.1 E36 silent
E37 2021-06-25 decay -0.9 45.2 E37 silent
E38 2021-07-03 decay -0.9 44.3 E38 silent
E39 2021-07-09 decay -0.9 43.4 E39 silent
E40 2021-07-16 decay -0.9 42.5 E40 silent
E41 2021-07-23 decay -0.9 41.7 E41 silent
E42 2021-07-30 decay -0.8 40.9 E42 silent
E43 2021-08-06 decay -0.8 40.0 E43 silent
E44 2021-08-28 decay -0.8 39.2 E44 silent
E45 2021-09-04 decay -0.8 38.5 E45 silent
E46 2021-09-14 decay -0.8 37.7 E46 silent
E47 2021-09-18 decay -0.8 36.9 E47 silent
E49 2021-10-02 decay -0.7 36.2 E49 silent
E50 2021-10-09 decay -0.7 35.5 E50 silent
E51 2021-10-16 decay -0.7 34.8 E51 silent
E52 2021-10-23 decay -0.7 34.1 E52 silent
E53 2021-10-30 decay -0.7 33.4 E53 silent
E54 2021-11-06 decay -0.7 32.7 E54 silent
E55 2021-11-13 decay -0.7 32.1 E55 silent
E56 2021-11-20 decay -0.6 31.4 E56 silent
E57 2021-12-04 decay -0.6 30.8 E57 silent
E58 2021-12-11 decay -0.6 30.2 E58 silent
E59 2021-12-17 decay -0.6 29.6 E59 silent
E60 2021-12-23 decay -0.6 29.0 E60 silent
E61 2021-12-29 decay -0.6 28.4 E61 silent
E62 2022-01-08 decay -0.6 27.8 E62 silent
E63 2022-01-15 decay -0.6 27.3 E63 silent
E64 2022-01-22 decay -0.5 26.7 E64 silent
E65 2022-01-29 decay -0.5 26.2 E65 silent
E66 2022-02-05 decay -0.5 25.7 E66 silent
E67 2022-02-12 decay -0.5 25.2 E67 silent
E68 2022-02-19 decay -0.5 24.7 E68 silent
E70 2022-02-24 decay -0.5 24.2 E70 silent
E71 2022-03-05 decay -0.5 23.7 E71 silent
E72 2022-03-19 decay -0.5 23.2 E72 silent
E73 2022-03-26 decay -0.5 22.7 E73 silent
E74 2022-04-01 decay -0.5 22.3 E74 silent
E75 2022-04-09 decay -0.4 21.8 E75 silent
E76 2022-04-16 decay -0.4 21.4 E76 silent
E77 2022-04-23 decay -0.4 21.0 E77 silent
E78 2022-04-30 decay -0.4 20.6 E78 silent
E79 2022-05-07 decay -0.4 20.1 E79 silent
E80 2022-05-13 decay -0.4 19.7 E80 silent
E81 2022-05-23 decay -0.4 19.3 E81 silent
E82 2022-05-24 decay -0.4 19.0 E82 silent
E84 2022-06-24 decay -0.4 18.6 E84 silent
E85 2022-06-30 reinforce +14.2 32.7 E85 Sacks support x3 [w=0.97]
E86 2022-07-08 decay -0.7 32.1 E86 silent
E87 2022-07-14 decay -0.6 31.4 E87 silent
E88 2022-07-22 decay -0.6 30.8 E88 silent
E89 2022-07-29 decay -0.6 30.2 E89 silent
E90 2022-08-05 decay -0.6 29.6 E90 silent
E91 2022-08-13 decay -0.6 29.0 E91 silent
E92 2022-08-20 decay -0.6 28.4 E92 silent
E93 2022-08-26 decay -0.6 27.9 E93 silent
E94 2022-09-01 reinforce +12.5 40.4 E94 Sacks support x3 [w=0.97]
E94 2022-09-01 reinforce +9.1 49.5 E94 Chamath support x2 [w=1.02]
E95 2022-09-10 decay -1.0 48.5 E95 silent
E96 2022-09-17 decay -1.0 47.6 E96 silent
E97 2022-09-23 decay -1.0 46.6 E97 silent
E98 2022-10-01 decay -0.9 45.7 E98 silent
E99 2022-10-07 decay -0.9 44.8 E99 silent
E100 2022-10-14 decay -0.9 43.9 E100 silent
E101 2022-10-22 reinforce +12.7 56.6 E101 Friedberg support x3 (new voice) [w=0.84]
E101 2022-10-22 oppose -12.2 44.3 E101 Chamath opposes x2 [w=1.02]
E101 2022-10-22 reinforce +10.7 55.1 E101 Brad Gerstner support x2 (new voice) [w=0.86]
E102 2022-10-29 decay -1.1 54.0 E102 silent
E103 2022-11-05 decay -1.1 52.9 E103 silent
E105 2022-11-19 decay -1.1 51.8 E105 silent
E106 2022-12-03 decay -1.0 50.8 E106 silent
E107 2022-12-10 decay -1.0 49.8 E107 silent
E108 2022-12-16 decay -1.0 48.8 E108 silent
E109 2022-12-24 decay -1.0 47.8 E109 silent