E56: Constitution DAO, Rittenhouse trial coverage, private sector efficiency vs the government
2021-11-20 spoken.md · speaker-labeled ▶ watch ← E55 all episodes E57 →
Every number here is replayed from score_events — the same ledger the pool ranks on. Decay is what the 97 ideas nobody mentioned gave up this week; it applies only when an episode is processed.
Tier crossings
conviction thresholds crossed by this episode — 65 / 45 / 15 · ideas born here show where they landed. why 65 isn't always green
Who moved the board
each voice's force on conviction this episode — supports and opposes, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of this episode's movement
What got argued (9 ideas)
ordered by how hard each idea moved · quotes are verbatim from the transcript, timestamps deep-link into the episode
I would encourage everyone to stop using the term the media or even the term mainstream media and just recognize that there are specific outlets that are on their way down. Yeah, these are content companies that need ratings. They used to be the monopoly and they're no longer. And, you know, they're like yesteryear's news. And it's just, you know, it's like complaining about, you know, whatever, pick any industry that's been disrupted. But they are and will be further disrupted by kind of direct to source fat gathering.
every time you protested at, you know, to shut down a nuclear plant, the resulting effect 40 years later was another 100 megatons of CO2 was put into the air. And it just goes to yet again, another example of we virtue signal nuclear reactors and nuclear power. We go and we get them all shut down. It turned out that we ingested or we we put out as a result an enormous amount of more CO2 than had to be put.
I know of at least half a dozen nuclear power companies that are in advanced stages of doing first installation design right now. And so, it seems like this is going to be a reality. I think it would be an incredible boom to clean energy in the United States and globally if we can get more of these built. I mean, what was the staff? China is building 150 nuclear power plants? They've commissioned 150 nuclear power plants? I mean, it's a no-brainer that that's what we need in the 21st century. It's the best renewable source, very small footprint, very reliable, can run 24-7.
the procurement process is the furthest thing from a free market where you essentially have these licensed people that are allowed to provide services. And so if you actually have the key critical input to making something possible, you have to get bundled in through contractors and subcontractors and general contractors who each take their five and 10 percent.
all this money that gets spent gets sucked out of the private economy somehow. It either comes from taxes or gets added to the national debt, but either way, it comes out of the private economy and resources that could be allocated to the next generation of innovative companies.
Amazon is now doing more to actually unwind duopolies and monopolies in markets than the government and the FTC is, you know, see this thing that Amazon is now doing in the UK with Visa, where they basically shut Visa off. ... And so they are looking at and there's a rumor that they may switch the Amazon credit card off of Visa rails and put them on MasterCard rails. But this is another example, Jason, to your point of like, you know, Bernie and the progressive left would probably rail against the duopoly practices of Visa and MasterCard. They can't get anything done.
What we need is the stuff that the free market cannot afford to fund and stand up, like next-gen nuclear power stations, like biomanufacturing, like large-scale on-demand 3D printing systems. These are the sorts of infrastructure programs that the United States and our workforce could benefit from government subsidies to help the private markets get stood up.
the primary reason for the increase in education costs because the government funds all the student loans, the increase in health care, the increase in defense, all of it is because the government is the customer and they tell the person that's servicing them upfront, they tell the market what they're willing to pay. And so the market just inflates to that amount.
Jason's thesis off the failed ConstitutionDAO bid (Sotheby's, 2021-11-18): a code-governed DAO that assembled $46M from ~20,000 people in 48 hours is a genuinely new capital-formation and fractional-ownership rail — the first crypto use case that beats its analog alternative — and it compounds from here ($400M DAO within two years, $4B within a decade) while forcing US accreditation rules to loosen. Chamath, Friedberg and Sacks all take the other side: it is fractionalized ownership of a trash asset that proved no governance, an ICO in new clothes, and it gets pulled under securities regulation the moment retail loses money. Expressed through ETH, the chain DAOs are formed, funded and gas-metered on — which is also exactly where Chamath aims his counter.
The only fractionalized asset that has ever been proven to appreciate reliably are stocks. ... But I do think that you're overblowing this one example, because I don't think this showed any of that. I think that this showed how unreliable and useless Ethereum is as a transactional layer for these things. You know, the fact that these poor people now have money stuck in a dow that they can't get out of, because the gas fees would negate their contribution.
My point is really that I think structurally what's going to happen is there are going to be more of these things that are going to show up that will rip people off and that will heighten regulatory interest and people will come along and they'll start to clamp down on this stuff.
What I always look at when I see new technologies doing something is I just imagine if it 10x'd and what that would look like, and if it worked, and then I just 10x it one more time. So what we're going to see, I predict, is this $40 million dollar dollar will turn into a $400 million one in the next two years, and then a $4 billion one in the next 10
Episode digest
written during extraction and stored in data/extractions/ep056.json — the auditable source of truth, including everything market-adjacent that did not earn a capture
Aired two days after ConstitutionDAO lost the Sotheby's auction to Ken Griffin, and roughly the top tick of the 2021 crypto market. The first 30 minutes are one long four-way fight over whether that DAO meant anything, and it is the episode's only genuinely new idea: Jason coins the bull case (a code-governed DAO pulled $46M from ~20,000 people in 48 hours; that is a new capital-formation rail, it scales to a $400M DAO in two years and a $4B one in ten, and it will force the SEC's accreditation regime to loosen) and gets buried by the other three. Chamath calls it a PR lark, says the only fractionalized asset that has ever reliably appreciated is equities, and lands the sharpest crypto-specific blow of the episode: the whole thing 'showed how unreliable and useless Ethereum is as a transactional layer,' with $200 contributors now trapped because exit gas exceeds their donation. Friedberg predicts DAOs that transfer ownership get regulated as securities, that the next ones will rip people off, and that the clampdown arrives via Warren/AOC/Sanders — while conceding he'd prefer no regulation at all. Sacks deflates it as ICOs-with-extra-steps and settles on 'massively overhyped' but a worthwhile experiment. Jason's only instrument-level concession is that gas fees push this to Solana — a cheap strength-1 reinforcement of the E050 Solana idea at a moment when SOL was near its all-time high. Reinforced elsewhere: the strongest single call in the episode is Friedberg's nuclear riff off Gates's TerraPower announcement (half a dozen nuclear companies in advanced first-installation design, China commissioning 150 plants, 'a no-brainer... the best renewable source'), with Chamath backing it via the anti-nuclear-protest-caused-100-megatons-of-CO2 meme — a two-voice reinforcement of nuclear-uranium-renaissance five weeks before the 2022 energy crunch. The private-sector-vs-government segment produced one non-obvious tradeable claim: Friedberg's mechanism that anything the government buys inflates to the published budget because there is no walk-away price (education via student loans, healthcare, defense), which he then applies to the just-signed infrastructure bill — 'new bridges and toll bridges or whatever nonsense is going to get inflated' — and Chamath's matching contractor/subcontractor 5-and-10-percent cascade. That pair lands on the E028 infrastructure-contractor-windfall idea (the grift IS the trade) plus the E024 stimulus-inflation idea. Sacks reprises his own golden-era-peaks argument against the $2.1T reconciliation bill being voted out that day ($2.5B for 'tree equity' vs Craft's entire $2B over five years; money either taxed or borrowed comes out of the private economy at nearly $30T of debt). Best sleeper capture: Chamath at 1:00:46 on Amazon shutting Visa off in the UK, the Affirm deal, and a rumoured switch of the Amazon card from Visa to Mastercard rails — big tech unwinding the V/MA duopoly faster than the FTC. That is the E022 payment-fee-pools-to-zero thesis being reloaded six weeks before he formalises it as the V/MA short in the E061 predictions episode; captured on the E022 slug, not the out-of-era E061 one. Trashed / not captured: the entire Rittenhouse block (media-narrative and legal commentary, zero instruments — it feeds only the media-collapse idea, which all four besties hit, Friedberg hardest with Pew/Gallup receipts and 'these are content companies that need ratings, they used to be the monopoly and they're no longer'); the NASA-$360B-vs-SpaceX-$7-11B efficiency comparison and Sacks' 'without private companies we couldn't get astronauts to space' (backward-looking, no instrument, deliberately NOT logged against space-industrial-age); Friedberg's call that Griffin flips the Constitution copy for 2x in a year (a collectible, untradeable); Jason on Helion's $500M fusion round (a question, not a claim); Chamath's equity-vs-equality riff, the Bezos-out-Bernies-Bernie bit, Pete Davidson, and Chamath being 'a little short Donda'. No disclosed positions this episode except Chamath admitting he bought something unnamed at the same auction week ('Quite unique. I will not comment on what it was') and Sacks' Craft Ventures $2B fund-size disclosure. Labels: CLEAN — Jason 122 / Chamath 94 / Sacks 71 / Friedberg 61 turns, all four content-verified (Sacks: Papa Jake at his kid's party, Craft Ventures' $2B, hosting mayor Francis Suarez; Jason: syndicate/250-LP cap/day job; Chamath: 'the dictator', wife Nat, the Aki-and-cashmere-biscuits bit; Friedberg: sultan of science, TerraPower/biomanufacturing, leaves to get his booster). Nine address-by-name handoffs all resolve to the right next speaker ('Sacks, what do you think?' 9:45→9:47, 'Jake, how do you think we're missing something' 38:35→38:47, 'Sacksie Poo... Suarez' 1:13:44→1:13:47). Two merged interjections inside Jason's label — 6:08 contains someone else's 'No, Jason, I think you had store of value. Hold on. Let me finish.' and 9:16 contains 'Jason, you're speaking like an accredited investor' (probably Chamath or Friedberg) — neither is quoted here. SPEAKER_5's two turns are the rolled Bernie Sanders floor clip at 57:43 and an unattributed 'How?' at 43:05; correctly not attributed to a bestie.