E39: West coast super drought & climate crisis, Nuclear virtue signaling, chaos in SF & more
2021-07-09 spoken.md · speaker-labeled ▶ watch ← E38 all episodes E40 →
Every number here is replayed from score_events — the same ledger the pool ranks on. Decay is what the 64 ideas nobody mentioned gave up this week; it applies only when an episode is processed.
Tier crossings
conviction thresholds crossed by this episode — 65 / 45 / 15 · ideas born here show where they landed. why 65 isn't always green
Who moved the board
each voice's force on conviction this episode — supports and opposes, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of this episode's movement
What got argued (7 ideas)
ordered by how hard each idea moved · quotes are verbatim from the transcript, timestamps deep-link into the episode
Uncontrolled property crime and a non-prosecuting DA plus post-COVID commuter collapse push national retailers to close SF stores and residents/investors to leave the state — bearish California urban office and retail real estate. Jason announces he is personally relocating to Texas or Florida.
A 500-year megadrought forces formal allocation cuts (Lake Mead tier-one shortage, Arizona losing ~600k acre-feet) and makes water rights, aquifer access, pipelines, desal and irrigation efficiency the scarce assets — even if political risk caps who is allowed to own them.
if the US Bureau of Reclamation measures Lake Mead under a certain threshold, they can declare a tier one shortage. And what that means, just practically speaking, cutting through all the, you know, jargon is that initially the state of Arizona will be denied around 600,000 acre feet of water next year. What does that mean? That's about 15% of the demand for that state. ... there is an enormous untapped groundwater aquifer in Southern California, which is the size of Lake Mead. It's an incredibly unique thing. It's actually owned by a public company.
Heat-wave AC demand, lost hydro and fire-driven outages push Californians (and the wider west) to buy their own power: home standby and portable generators, rooftop solar plus batteries.
Simultaneous drought across the US west, Brazil, the Mediterranean/southern Europe and large parts of Africa threatens food supply and flips currently self-sufficient countries into importers — bid under agricultural commodities and ag inputs.
No, Jason, even worse than this, we're in a position where we are threatening our own food supply. Just to put a finer point on this, it's not just the western half of the United States that's now suffering from this. It's Brazil, it's the Mediterranean and Southern Europe, and it's large parts of Africa. You add up all those number of people, there are many countries there that are actually self-sufficient, which will then no longer be, will have to import food.
And now you impose it on something like nuclear energy, which is consistently proven to provide an enormously abundant, cheap and clean form of sustainable energy. ... if we have small forms of sustainable, abundant energy that can be basically hyper localized and located where we can do these jobs, the jobs to be done, it's transformational.
Do we want to deal with high energy prices and brownouts and all kinds of problems and rolling blackouts? Or do we want to put this issue behind us? If we just go on a Manhattan project literally to make new nuclear, we would be, this issue would be behind us and we could focus on something else like education.
Mark Andreessen had a good term. He said we're living in a vetocracy, as in the word veto. ... And whether you want to call it NIMBYism or vetocracy, there are just too many people and groups who have the right to say no to anything and block anything important from happening.
But what matters most is that the moisture conditions in our forest land is lower than we've ever seen at this time of year in history. ... So we're going to have more power demand, we have less power available, we have extremely dry forests. ... And so this is setting us up for a number of possible disasters this year.
And so drought conditions have existed for a long time. Has climate change amplified that and made it worse? Yes. But this is entirely foreseeable. ... The problem for him is that fire season now starts in August. And so, we could be in the middle of fire season when this recall election happens.
Episode digest
written during extraction and stored in data/extractions/ep039.json — the auditable source of truth, including everything market-adjacent that did not earn a capture
Drought episode, and it is the most instrument-dense one of the era so far — Friedberg opens with a receipt-heavy megadrought brief (a 2018-19 paper putting western North America in a 500-year megadrought, California snowpack at 0% statewide by June 1 for the first time ever, 120F+ in British Columbia, hydro generation down 70% vs 2019 against 11-15% of state electricity, forest-fuel moisture at record lows) and lands on the near-term forecast that this 'sets us up for a number of possible disasters this year', with the probability of West Coast forest catching fire 'very high' (6:53) and 150 AQI shutting down the 3M Californians who work outdoors. Sacks reinforces from the political side: not a black swan, entirely foreseeable, Newsom moved the recall to September precisely to front-run fire season but 'fire season now starts in August', and forest treatment is 11k acres against a claimed 90k. The tradeable new theses: (1) a bearish California utility/wildfire idea (PCG/EIX) off Friedberg's fire+grid setup; (2) Friedberg's clean forward call that 'there's going to be a big kind of power generator push' with distributed solar as the self-supply route, which Jason backs with actual household spend — six more air purifiers, N95s already ordered, and a generator going in (GNRC/ENPH/RUN); (3) Chamath's water-scarcity thesis, the strongest single capture in the episode: he flags the year-end US Bureau of Reclamation Lake Mead assessment, a tier-one shortage declaration and Arizona losing ~600k acre-feet (15% of state demand) next year, plus the untapped Southern California aquifer 'the size of Lake Mead' that is 'owned by a public company' (Cadiz) but stuck in a multi-decade political slog (PHO/CGW/CDZI/LNN); (4) Chamath's global food-supply extension — drought hitting Brazil, the Mediterranean and Africa flips self-sufficient countries into importers (DBA/WEAT/MOO). Two disclosed-money items: Chamath says at 12:02 he has 'been looking at water investing for a while' and his team found 'incredibly interesting opportunities' around owning water rights and selling them back to states — then kills it himself as 'politically intolerable' for someone like him, floating a foundation structure instead; and at 35:20 he predicts the flip side, that water rights get taken back by eminent domain in an emergency ('sorry, need it back. It's mine'), which Sacks endorses — a real bearish caveat on the water-rights owners inside the otherwise bullish water thesis, logged here rather than as a second mention since one mention per speaker per idea. Jason discloses two (private, one dead) water-monitoring investments. The nuclear segment is the 'virtue signaling' framing from the title: Chamath table-pounds nuclear on the merits — reactor-construction-by-country chart, Three Mile Island/Chernobyl as a two-crash overreaction ('if we stopped flying after two airline crashes'), France at 70% nuclear vs Germany unwinding post-Fukushima, and the hypocrisy of solar/wind advocates ignoring copper/nickel/cobalt tailings dumped in the ocean by Indonesia; Jason wants a Manhattan Project and nuclear-next-to-desal. Nobody names an instrument, and Chamath immediately hedges his own case at 31:08 — 'it will get bogged down in litigation and bureaucracy' — so the bullish nuclear idea is captured with URA as an honest-but-loose primary and the feasibility pushback logged as opposes: Friedberg's '20-year project, doesn't solve the acute problem' and Sacks' vetocracy/NIMBY point. The SF segment is mostly Chesa Boudin politics with two market hooks kept: Sacks on CVS, Walgreens and Target closing stores or cutting hours 'because they understand the hit to their bottom line', and Jason's 85%-of-commuters-gone stat, which roll into a bearish California-urban-real-estate idea (HPP/KRC/CMF) anchored on Jason's own on-record call at 58:29 that 'California is going to be on a decade long slide' plus his live announcement that he is moving to Texas or Florida. Sacks discloses another $50k donated to the Recall Chesa campaign (political, not a market position). COVID close: Israel's data cuts Pfizer efficacy vs Delta to 64% (93% vs hospitalization, down from 99%+), Sacks reports a double-vaxxed close contact testing positive, and Friedberg's market question prompts Chamath's captured call that there's 'a very good chance' politicians try another fall shutdown, which Sacks reinforces via NEA/AFT back-to-school demands — bearish reopening (JETS), even though both simultaneously argue no policy change is warranted and Chamath wants a 'moral decision that we are all getting back to life as normal'. Deliberately not captured: booster predictions (Friedberg 'There will be boosters for sure. Like this fall', Chamath 'probably need a booster... on a cocktail') — consensus news the day after Pfizer announced it would seek booster authorization, and a weak causal link to PFE/MRNA; Newsom recall handicapping with no instrument; Chamath's cynicism-and-IQ study; Friedberg's Tomorrowland anti-science-culture riff; and Jason's plug for private hydro-panel company Source (Zero Mass Water). Zero mentions attach to the 2021 registry: nothing here touches the open E1-E19 ideas, and covid-normalcy-summer-2021 closed 2021-06-19, so the fall-shutdown call is necessarily a new idea. Label notes: roster check clean (Jason 112 turns, Sacks 74, Chamath 44, Friedberg 37, all four named in the intro and all four self-consistent with their fingerprints — Friedberg does the science brief and Climate-Corp-style ag/water detail, Sacks does Yammer/Craft and SF politics, Chamath does the investing angle, Jason moderates). Two small merged-turn artifacts, neither affecting a capture: Friedberg's 23:25 turn ends with 'We can't do both?' which is Jason's line (he answers 'Let's do both' next), and Sacks' 31:40 turn opens with 'Please read a book' which is Chamath finishing his own 31:37 thought.