🤖 The ad duopoly ratchets prices and makes its numbers through the startup bust
Google and Facebook/Instagram are indifferent to the venture funding reset: they guide to numbers and will ratchet ad prices up to hit them, pushing customer-acquisition costs 20-40% higher for everyone downstream. CAC inflation is the transmission channel that kills low-end bottom-up SaaS while the $2T of duopoly market cap holds its own revenue.
other ideas on the same ticker, same direction: Anthropic IPO (~Oct 2026) is attractively priced at $1.5-2T 61 (GOOGL) · Google wins consumer AI via distribution 58 (GOOGL) · Meta becomes America's open-source AI champion 55 (META) · Personal AI agents put the App Store's 30% take and opaque subscription/retail economics on notice 49 (META) · Own AWS, Azure and GCP and nothing else — the clouds capture the AI application dollars 48 (GOOGL) · Frontier AI labs keep durable premium pricing (not commoditized) 38 (GOOGL) · The AI doomer campaign fails — no FDAI, open source survives 31 (META) · Personal AI agents: Google's data moat wins the form factor 23 (GOOGL) · Independent frontier-model labs lose to hyperscaler capital 18 (GOOGL) · Independent frontier-model labs lose to hyperscaler capital 18 (META) · Willow's error-correction scaling puts encryption on a two-to-five-year clock 9 (GOOGL) · Meta's AI assistant takes ten points of search share from Google 6 (META)
⚖ Why this result
fully deterministic — computed from daily closes on the scoring date; nothing below is editable or hand-set
- Window: 2022-03-26 → 2023-03-26 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
- The call: ▲ LONG GOOGL (primary play). GOOGL fell 25.5% over the window → return (sign flipped for a SHORT) = -25.5% (the call lost money).
- Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned -11.7% → vs SPY = -25.5 − (-11.7) = -13.7% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the result uses.
- Rule fired:
· RIGHT — return ≥ +10% AND beat SPY by 5+· HALF — return ≥ +5% OR beat SPY at all▶ WRONG — everything else
- Credit: supporters of a WRONG earn 0 each, opposers the opposite — this feeds the scoreboard. supported: nobody | opposed: Brad Gerstner, Chamath, Friedberg, Jason | proxy-sensitive: META→PARTIAL (-7.9%)
Conviction timeline
bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15
Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2022-03-26)
Plays
Mention log newest first
“There's two other things that they really should be looking at as these ad networks are losing their market share in the overall digital ad spend. There are two other players, Disney and Netflix doing these digital ads on their platforms and having ad tiers. And then you may have noticed Uber is doing an ad business now.”
“that change is now going to make this hit very, very hard beginning in 2024 So the ad networks themselves are already being massively hurt by Apple's ID changes, the third party cookies being removed. It's becoming harder to target consumers, harder to make money for publishers.”
“I mean, Apple is the apex predator of this entire market. We wouldn't be having this conversation but for the fact that Apple's changes with IDFA literally pickpocketed the industry $2 billion this year under the auspices of privacy. And so if you look at these companies usage up, pricing or ARPU down.”
“But I'm on the board of a couple of DTC companies and it is universally the conversation right now, because in the last year, the cost of DTC direct-to-consumer marketing on Facebook and Google was brutal, doubled, tripled, and a lot of the unit economics are falling apart on DTC businesses because of it, you know, costs a lot more to acquire the customer than you make from them.”
“And when I called people on Wall Street, what they said was, because we think this is the company that has the most pressure on earnings. ... And so if you're going to go and question the earnings power of one of the 10 best companies in the world, you may want to consider the earnings power of every other company that's not Facebook.”
“Advertising is going to get hit, right? So one of the first things to go in a recession is advertising. If you're going to belt-tighten at a company, where can you do it? Well, you lay off employees, but you can't get out of your leases, as we talked about in real estate, but you can cut your spending on marketing. ... And so right now, it's looking pretty bleak for Facebook because of the headwinds they have. So the earnings could drop”
“most of these businesses that rely on Facebook and Google and Instagram for customer acquisition, those input costs are going up. And the reason you know that is that's $2 trillion of market cap that doesn't give a flying fuck what's happening in startup land. They're going to make their numbers. Right. ... Those are the most important companies in the world. They will ratchet up the prices. And so your input costs are going up. It's not just the physical supply of materials that I think is going up. It's just the cost of customer acquisition is going to probably go up by 20, 30, 40 percent.”
Who built this conviction
each voice's total push on the score, in conviction points across every mention — supports and opposes · share = % of all mention-driven movement
⏳ decay drained -19.1 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one
Score events
| episode | kind | Δ | after | note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E73 2022-03-26 | init | +42.0 | 42.0 | E73 born by Chamath (explicit_prediction x3) |
| E74 2022-04-01 | decay | -1.7 | 40.3 | E74 silent |
| E75 2022-04-09 | decay | -1.6 | 38.7 | E75 silent |
| E76 2022-04-16 | decay | -1.5 | 37.2 | E76 silent |
| E77 2022-04-23 | decay | -1.5 | 35.7 | E77 silent |
| E78 2022-04-30 | decay | -1.4 | 34.2 | E78 silent |
| E79 2022-05-07 | decay | -1.4 | 32.9 | E79 silent |
| E80 2022-05-13 | decay | -1.3 | 31.6 | E80 silent |
| E81 2022-05-23 | decay | -1.3 | 30.3 | E81 silent |
| E82 2022-05-24 | decay | -1.2 | 29.1 | E82 silent |
| E84 2022-06-24 | decay | -1.2 | 27.9 | E84 silent |
| E85 2022-06-30 | decay | -1.1 | 26.8 | E85 silent |
| E86 2022-07-08 | oppose | -12.0 | 14.8 | E86 Jason opposes x2 |
| E86 2022-07-08 | oppose | -12.0 | 2.8 | E86 Chamath opposes x2 |
| E87 2022-07-14 | decay | -0.1 | 2.7 | E87 silent |
| E88 2022-07-22 | decay | -0.1 | 2.6 | E88 silent |
| E89 2022-07-29 | decay | -0.1 | 2.5 | E89 silent |
| E90 2022-08-05 | decay | -0.1 | 2.4 | E90 silent |
| E91 2022-08-13 | decay | -0.1 | 2.3 | E91 silent |
| E92 2022-08-20 | decay | -0.1 | 2.2 | E92 silent |
| E93 2022-08-26 | decay | -0.1 | 2.1 | E93 silent |
| E94 2022-09-01 | decay | -0.1 | 2.0 | E94 silent |
| E95 2022-09-10 | reinforce | +22.0 | 24.1 | E95 Friedberg support x2 (new voice) |
| E96 2022-09-17 | decay | -1.0 | 23.1 | E96 silent |
| E97 2022-09-23 | decay | -0.9 | 22.2 | E97 silent |
| E98 2022-10-01 | decay | -0.9 | 21.3 | E98 silent |
| E99 2022-10-07 | oppose | -12.0 | 9.3 | E99 Friedberg opposes x2 |
| E100 2022-10-14 | decay | -0.4 | 8.9 | E100 silent |
| E101 2022-10-22 | oppose | -8.9 | 0.0 | E101 Brad Gerstner opposes x3 |
| E102 2022-10-29 | decay | · | 0.0 | E102 silent |
| E103 2022-11-05 | decay | · | 0.0 | E103 silent |
| E105 2022-11-19 | decay | · | 0.0 | E105 silent |
| E106 2022-12-03 | decay | · | 0.0 | E106 silent |
| E107 2022-12-10 | decay | · | 0.0 | E107 silent |
| E108 2022-12-16 | decay | · | 0.0 | E108 silent |
| E109 2022-12-24 | decay | · | 0.0 | E109 silent |
| E110 2023-01-06 | decay | · | 0.0 | E110 silent |
| E111 2023-01-13 | decay | · | 0.0 | E111 silent |
| E112 2023-01-20 | decay | · | 0.0 | E112 silent |
| E113 2023-01-27 | oppose | · | 0.0 | E113 Friedberg opposes x2 |
| E113 2023-01-27 | oppose | · | 0.0 | E113 Jason opposes x2 |
| E114 2023-02-04 | decay | · | 0.0 | E114 silent |
| E115 2023-02-11 | decay | · | 0.0 | E115 silent |
| E116 2023-02-17 | decay | · | 0.0 | E116 silent |
| E118 2023-03-03 | decay | · | 0.0 | E118 silent |
| E119 2023-03-11 | decay | · | 0.0 | E119 silent |
| E120 2023-03-17 | decay | · | 0.0 | E120 silent |
| E121 2023-03-24 | decay | · | 0.0 | E121 silent |