← pool

🤖 Frontier AI labs keep durable premium pricing (not commoditized)

Frontier intelligence has consolidated into an Anthropic/OpenAI duopoly (xAI in the hunt) that can charge a persistent premium over open-source/commodity tokens — Apple-vs-Android economics where the frontier captures most of the profit pool. The bear case: open-source catches up and the six-month lead (and the premium) evaporates.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 48.4 WATCH
EMBER
band · contested
▲ LONG MSFT
expression · bullish tech
—
moved yet?
days to scoring · born 2026-03-06 (E263) → 2027-03-06
IS THIS A TRADE? 🚫 Not a trade: conviction 37.7, ember.
⚠ CONFLICTING IDEAS ON THE SAME TICKER — the board is arguing with itself; net it out (ticker view →)
GOOGL · ChatGPT takes Google search share and the market starts pricing the decay SHORT EMBER 21.2
GOOGL · Tort floodgates open on social media SHORT EMBER 20.4
GOOGL · Blue cities ban or license-cap robotaxis SHORT EMBER 20.3
GOOGL · Meta's AI assistant takes ten points of search share from Google SHORT DORMANT 6.4

other ideas on the same ticker, same direction: Anthropic IPO (~Oct 2026) is attractively priced at $1.5-2T 61 (GOOGL) · Google wins consumer AI via distribution 58 (GOOGL) · Own AWS, Azure and GCP and nothing else — the clouds capture the AI application dollars 48 (MSFT) · Own AWS, Azure and GCP and nothing else — the clouds capture the AI application dollars 48 (GOOGL) · SaaSpocalypse is overdone for compliance-moat enterprise software 24 (MSFT) · Personal AI agents: Google's data moat wins the form factor 23 (GOOGL) · ChatGPT takes Google search share and the market starts pricing the decay 21 (MSFT) · Independent frontier-model labs lose to hyperscaler capital 18 (MSFT) · Independent frontier-model labs lose to hyperscaler capital 18 (GOOGL) · Willow's error-correction scaling puts encryption on a two-to-five-year clock 9 (GOOGL)

⚔ Rivals

competing claims on the same profit pool: a support there is a headwind here expand ▾
Enterprise AI sovereignty: workloads leave frontier APIs for private stacks GREEN 94 ▲ BULLISH Workloads leaving frontier APIs for private stacks is the bear case for frontier API pricing power.
Google wins consumer AI via distribution WATCH 58 ▲ BULLISH Google shipping the most performant model is the commoditisation case against an OpenAI/Anthropic premium.
Meta becomes America's open-source AI champion WATCH 55 ▲ BULLISH Open-weight models commoditising tokens is the direct counter to a durable frontier premium.
Nvidia + Hugging Face makes NVDA the open-source AI champion WATCH 55 ▲ BULLISH An open-source ecosystem winning undercuts the closed-lab premium.
Own AWS, Azure and GCP and nothing else — the clouds capture the AI application dollars WATCH 48 ▲ BULLISH Who keeps the AI profit pool: the model labs or the clouds that host them.
Independent frontier-model labs lose to hyperscaler capital EMBER 18 ▲ BULLISH Independent labs losing to hyperscaler capital is incompatible with those labs keeping premium pricing.

sub-ideas: Anthropic IPO (~Oct 2026) is attractively priced at $1.5-2T 61

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2026-03-06)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▲ LONG MSFTstock PRIMARY largest public-market proxy via OpenAI stake — imperfect until the labs themselves list
▲ LONG GOOGLstock adjacent significant Anthropic ownership stake

Mention log newest first

Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E296 (2026-11-07) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:10:08 SUPPORT POLICY-ADJACENT
“What's going to get legislated is the quid pro quo. The quid pro quo is this. The government gets more power, and the duopoly of closed model companies get more regulatory capture or moats around their business. That's going to be the quid pro quo.”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E296 (2026-11-07) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 57:54 OPPOSE
“Why? Because if you constrain the amount of assets that can actually generate compute, and a smaller surface area of it is available to the leading companies, those leading companies will have to pay more, the user experience will decay, and then other products can have time to catch up.”
Jason
Jason tech 53% · n=56 · E295 (2026-10-30) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 52:55 SUPPORT
“Well, in the face of new evidence, you would have to say that they are lowering the prices and the opportunity in the enterprise is so great that they're not being dramatically impacted by it.”
Friedberg
Friedberg tech 55% · n=66 · E295 (2026-10-30) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 15:51 SUPPORT
“But I think what Claude is showing is that they have such a high margin. They actually have good elasticity on pricing. So they could push price down, and you could start to see them start to segment the market a little bit, where they could start to be more competitive, perhaps, with cheaper tokens for cheaper, easier tasks, and then premium tasks charge a higher price for intelligence, and start to stratify the value of the intelligence that they're providing by changing the price points.”
Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E295 (2026-10-30) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 5:52 SUPPORT POLICY-ADJACENT
“And I think it is a little bit of a refutation to all the people who have been saying over the past year that they're getting commoditized away, that open models are basically are putting them on a hamster wheel where they're basically going to zero on gross margin, or that it's a business that only works because it's heavily subsidized by venture capital. In fact, I think there's a lot of reasons to believe that Anthropic has a pretty big lead. And if you believe that recursive self-improvement has kicked in, as they are claiming it has, then their lead could actually grow.”
NI
Nikesh Arora (guest ×0.5) no tech track record · E294 (2026-10-23) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 9:34 OPPOSE
“We can only get that with open-source, open-weight models. We can interrogate chain of thoughts. That's kind of one reason we're gravitating towards them, as opposed to getting caught into the closed race.”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E294 (2026-10-23) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 4:50 OPPOSE
“the rose-coloured box is LLM traffic. That's the typical spend you're going to spend on the big frontier labs, closed models effectively, either through things like Bedrock on AWS or what have you. What's really interesting is that the blue box is taking up. The blue box is people buying their own GPUs because they're moving to open source.”
Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E293 (2026-10-17) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:00:12 SUPPORT POLICY-ADJACENT
“So they definitely have a duopoly when it comes to revenue and market share. I would argue they have a duopoly when it comes to frontier capability.”
Jason
Jason tech 53% · n=56 · E293 (2026-10-17) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 51:15 OPPOSE
“Thirty times price to sales ratio, Sacks, and this headwind of open source and enterprises moving to that. Most businesses don't need to solve the last seven math problems in the world.”
BE
Ben Horowitz (guest ×0.5) no tech track record · E293 (2026-10-17) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 27:53 SUPPORT
“Whatever you're holding in the equity markets, whatever you're holding, OpenAI and Anthropic are threats to that. There's almost nothing that you can hold in a portfolio that those two companies don't threaten.”
Jason
Jason tech 53% · n=56 · E292 (2026-10-10) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 1:21:40 OPPOSE
“Elon announced, hey, Grok Bot, which is a fantastic product, I highly recommend you try it out, is going to pick the best end-to-end model. Does it matter whatever it is? Quote Elon Musk, whatever is the most likely to give you the best outcome is what they're going to use.”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E292 (2026-10-10) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 29:35 OPPOSE
“you will have certain models emerge who may not be nearly as good in frontier capability, but they simplify the moral ambiguity. And that may be the better decision to make from a business perspective and from a user perspective”
Friedberg
Friedberg tech 55% · n=66 · E291 (2026-10-02) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 21:18 OPPOSE
“Assuming model convergence, and even if models have slight advantages over others, it seems to be the case that we will maintain pacing.”
Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E290 (2026-09-26) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 45:21 SUPPORT
“I think that Anthropic and OpenAI right now are a stable duopoly for frontier intelligence because they have a pretty significant lead over all these other companies, and they are able to charge a premium for that.”
Jason
Jason tech 53% · n=56 · E290 (2026-09-26) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 44:31 OPPOSE
“the vertical language models, the small language models are going to do 80 or 90% of the tasks that many corporations need”
Friedberg
Friedberg tech 55% · n=66 · E290 (2026-09-26) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 41:15 OPPOSE
“there's a stat that I think in the last 12 weeks alone, token use has flipped from 80-20 closed versus open, to 80-20 open versus closed.”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E290 (2026-09-26) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 26:10 OPPOSE
“It'll force OpenAI and Anth to go up the stack. There is no choice. You can't sit there and serve a token that has diminishing value because then all the subsequent value is getting absorbed and made by people wrapping your intelligence token.”
Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E289 (2026-09-11) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:18:02 OPPOSE POLICY-ADJACENT
“as long as we have a closed model duopoly of Frontier AI, and they're reserving the right to get into every vertical application there is, they're declaring in advance they're going to compete with their customers. So how can we trust them with our data?”
Jason
Jason tech 53% · n=56 · E289 (2026-09-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:08:19 OPPOSE
“A lot of these AI application companies are now moving off of the frontier models, and I think that's a headwind.”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E289 (2026-09-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:03:56 OPPOSE
“if you believe that the information that you have is critically important, you cannot use these services the way that they're currently offered by most people.”
Friedberg
Friedberg tech 55% · n=66 · E289 (2026-09-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 23:05 REVERSAL
“open source is what drops the cost of AI by 50X and makes it available to everyone so everyone can benefit from AI. No one gets rich. We all get rich with open source.”
Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E288 (2026-09-04) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 5:28 SUPPORT POLICY-ADJACENT
“the market structure that we have right now is there's two markets ... And then there's Commodity Intelligence, which is everybody else, including all the open models. And they're not competing on being at the frontier. They're competing on price”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E288 (2026-09-04) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 2:41 OPPOSE · horizon 4mo
“these capabilities will be matched or close to matched by a handful of closed-source alternatives and open-source alternatives, probably within the next three or four months ... we are seeing the cost of that incremental unit of intelligence being driven further and further down”
Jason
Jason tech 53% · n=56 · E287 (2026-08-29) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 30:44 OPPOSE
“I think Jensen is going all in on open source based on these two acquisitions, Hugging Face and Poolside... He is going for it. He is going to own open source. And that is a really interesting moment in time for us to look at, because we were sitting here six months ago, 12 months ago, open source would never catch up.”
Friedberg
Friedberg tech 55% · n=66 · E286 (2026-08-21) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 45:03 SUPPORT
“I happen to believe, having looked at this and thought about it, I think that it is possible. I think it is likely to happen soon. People I've talked to in industry do think it's real. ... which is why I think RSI is probably the future.”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E286 (2026-08-21) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 27:46 OPPOSE · horizon 12mo
“wrap it in its own harness, it decays in capability. When you take an open source model and you use any other open source model, it improves ... there are all kinds of ways of using open source technologies that are meaningfully more performant and dramatically cheaper than the closed source alternative.”
Gavin Baker
Gavin Baker (regular guest ×1.0) tech 73% · n=13 · E285 (2026-08-14) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 49:12 SUPPORT
“can orchestrate these open source 150 IQ intellects. ... a very plausible outcome is one which frontier tokens are 65 to 85% of the economic value. Open source tokens are like 80% of the volume. And that's good for everyone.”
Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E285 (2026-08-14) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 44:07 SUPPORT POLICY-ADJACENT
“I actually think that their pricing power may be quite sustainable, ... a decent subset of the market is willing to pay a premium for true frontier intelligence. ... their lead is growing because they're on the way to”
Jason
Jason tech 53% · n=56 · E285 (2026-08-14) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 23:17 OPPOSE
“You just look at the pricing here of GLM 2 versus Claude Opus, and it is 90% cheaper ... increasingly, corporate America is going to embrace these solutions. ... open-source is the safer bet for us. And that's what's happening in corporate America today and inside of startups.”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) tech 71% · n=17 · E284 (2026-08-08) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 18:13 SUPPORT
“Elon comes out and says, not so fast. We're entering the singularity and the frontier models are way further ahead than people think. I believe that to be true. ... Jensen came out this week and said, closed models are actually cheaper. ... explains why they continue to run away with it on the revenue side”
Jason
Jason tech 53% · n=56 · E284 (2026-08-08) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 12:32 OPPOSE
“the difference between the open source models I'm using ... the Frontier models are not necessary anymore. They're just not necessary. ... I'm still going with open source and Gemini being the leaders in this space.”
Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E284 (2026-08-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 9:54 SUPPORT POLICY-ADJACENT
“the market for frontier intelligence has become a duopoly. I think it's a very powerful duopoly. I don't think it's being commoditized. ... Anthropic is now over 80 billion of ARR. Started the year at 10, ... people are willing to pay a premium for true frontier intelligence.”
Jason
Jason tech 53% · n=56 · E283 (2026-07-31) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 45:03 OPPOSE
“You're going to see some of the major customers of Anthropic and OpenAI — the eight and nine-figure customers, people spending 50 million, 100 million a year — they're leaving... Eleven Labs, Figma, Lovable... they're all working on their own models... my team has installed Kimi. It is 80% or 90% cheaper already... [and] a friend of ours in the inference space has a customer who just moved nine figures off the Frontier Labs onto GLM 5.2... that's going to be a massive headwind against these companies, massive.”
Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E283 (2026-07-31) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 38:13 SUPPORT POLICY-ADJACENT
“Peter Thiel once said that monopolies pretend to be commodities... the market for Frontier AI is already a duopoly... the AI duopoly has a big incentive to promote anything that suggests that they're not actually in complete control of this market, but I think they are... Anthropic breaking into 70 plus billion of ARR [with 80%+ gross margins improving], OpenAI did more net new ARR in July than all of Q2... [per Dwarkesh] demand 10x-ing while compute builds at 3x means compute prices rise — only the most lucrative algorithms can afford to compete for compute. It's a self-reinforcing flywheel... like Apple and Android — Android got the share, Apple got the monetization.”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E282 (2026-07-24) · sentiment · strength 3 ▶ 9:48 OPPOSE
“These models are getting commoditized much faster than anybody thought... there is no meaningful sustained advantage once a model publishes their performance criteria — within weeks, other models match and in some cases exceed the performance... I've never seen a sector absorb hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars [where pricing power] effectively evaporates in months... the real business model is not in the foundational model anymore. It's at the application layer above and it's in the infrastructure below... if you're going to build a business model that tries to ascribe this layer as having a lot of terminal value, that is a mathematical mistake.”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E281 (2026-07-18) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 44:10 OPPOSE
“Zucks is about $1.50, Elon is about $1 and the Chinese models are 50 cents. ... on top of the whole data sovereignty, bleeding your alpha away, can you imagine that you're paying 56 bucks as well, per million input tokens for that risk? That is insanity. ... it doesn't take a company that's much, much worse than you to beat you when your cost is 50 to 100x more.”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) tech 71% · n=17 · E280 (2026-07-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 47:22 SUPPORT
“the share of wallet, is actually increasing to the frontier labs, while the share of tokens, ... The difference between spending 3 bucks on a cheap model or 15 bucks on an expensive model to replace a $200 an hour consultant, ... The non-consensus argument might be that intelligence is not converging at all, ... as it becomes recursive, you actually extend the lead, ... the distance between the frontier and everybody else doesn't converge, it actually extends,”
Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E280 (2026-07-11) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 40:28 SUPPORT POLICY-ADJACENT
“Open source went from 19% last year to 11% this year [of enterprise AI spend]... anyone who's saying that these closed models are going to lose or are somehow losing, you're just not seeing it in the data... this is a case of the spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak... it is just phenomenally convenient to go with the frontier labs... there's only two companies making meaningful revenue... I could see AI easily becoming another tech market that becomes a duopoly.”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E279 (2026-07-03) · positioning · strength 2 ▶ 9:47 OPPOSE
“when you use our harness with Claude, it was simultaneously 1.4x cheaper and 1.5x faster than just using Anthropic Opus 48 alone. But if you wrap the open-source model with our software factory, it was 16.4x cheaper. ... if you are a reasonable company, why are you not finding an independent way to access this intelligence in a way that doesn't leak your edge away? To ... continue to make the same decision, I think is really insanely dumb.”
Gavin Baker
Gavin Baker (regular guest ×1.0) tech 73% · n=13 · E278 (2026-06-26) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 47:01 OPPOSE
“how good GLM 5.2 is, has challenged some of my beliefs. ... I profoundly believe the future is composable models. ... half the queries are going to go to the open source model, maybe 85%, ... shift economic value from the margins of the frontier labs to the infrastructure. ... To date, frontier tokens are capturing 90% of the economic value. And open source tokens are probably 80% plus of tokens processed.”
Friedberg
Friedberg tech 55% · n=66 · E277 (2026-06-19) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 50:48 OPPOSE
“there's currently a natural market force for two things. One is more open source, and second is a fragmentation of the AI stack. ... I'm not sure that what we're looking at today as being some oligopoly of three or four businesses is really where we're going to stand. ... People are also going to run models locally.”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E275 (2026-05-29) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 41:21 OPPOSE
“there is no single best model anymore. At the top of the leaderboard, Opus 47, GPT-55, Sonnet 46, appear almost indistinguishable, separated by less than, ... these things are getting commoditized way too quickly and then you'd say, well, what's the ROI on all this incremental spend?”
Marc Benioff
Marc Benioff (guest ×0.5) no tech track record · E273 (2026-05-15) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 20:16 OPPOSE
“the Chinese models are as competitive as these US models, ... the highest end chips is kind of more of an ego gratification for us. We”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) tech 71% · n=17 · E268 (2026-04-10) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 44:13 SUPPORT
“these revenue ramps are happening while the world is already using open source. This is not frontier only. ... The TAM of intelligence is dramatically larger than any TAM we've ever seen”
Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E268 (2026-04-10) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 39:43 SUPPORT POLICY-ADJACENT
“it's possible that if you're the early leader in coding ... you have the most access to code bases, you might get the most training tokens. There is a potential flywheel there, ... the market for coding tokens could be monopolized.”
Jason
Jason tech 53% · n=56 · E268 (2026-04-10) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 30:42 OPPOSE
“I believe open source is going to win the day on the large language models and take 90% of the token usage, and I think the entire frontier model space could be undercut by open source... SLMs, the smaller language models that are verticalized now, that will run on desktops... that is their biggest competitive threat, and I hope it happens.”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) tech 71% · n=17 · E264 (2026-03-13) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 30:18 SUPPORT
“the models and the agents on top of them, ... Anthropic at five or six billion dollars of revenue in a single month, ... the TAM is dramatically bigger than any of us think ... the frontier labs can do well even in the face of it.”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E263 (2026-03-06) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 55:17 OPPOSE
“these things are all kind of becoming the same. Eventually, they're all getting access to enough power, enough compute. They're generating similar results, ... even more important that you have a complexion of models.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total push on the score, in conviction points across every mention — supports and opposes · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Sacks
Sacks 39%
11 scoring events · 30% of moves
+153.4 → net +153.4
Chamath
Chamath 45%
12 scoring events · 24% of moves
+20.0 / -104.6 → net -84.6
Jason
Jason 53%
10 scoring events · 16% of moves
+8.4 / -71.2 → net -62.9
Friedberg
Friedberg 55%
6 scoring events · 12% of moves
+23.7 / -36.3 → net -12.5
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner 71% regular guest ×1.0
4 scoring events · 10% of moves
+53.5 → net +53.5
Gavin Baker
Gavin Baker 73% regular guest ×1.0
2 scoring events · 4% of moves
+11.3 / -8.8 → net +2.5
BE
Ben Horowitz guest ×0.5
1 scoring event · 2% of moves
+11.2 → net +11.2
Marc Benioff
Marc Benioff guest ×0.5
1 scoring event · 1% of moves
+0.0 / -6.0 → net -6.0
NI
Nikesh Arora guest ×0.5
1 scoring event · 1% of moves
+0.0 / -3.0 → net -3.0

⏳ decay drained -13.9 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E263 2026-03-06 init +20.0 20.0 E263 born by Chamath (sentiment x2)
E264 2026-03-13 reinforce +18.0 38.0 E264 Brad Gerstner support x2 (new voice)
E265 2026-03-19 decay -1.5 36.5 E265 silent
E266 2026-03-27 decay -1.5 35.0 E266 silent
E267 2026-04-03 decay -1.4 33.6 E267 silent
E268 2026-04-10 oppose -12.0 21.6 E268 Jason opposes x2
E268 2026-04-10 reinforce +17.6 39.3 E268 Sacks support x2 (new voice)
E268 2026-04-10 reinforce +9.1 48.4 E268 Brad Gerstner support x2
E269 2026-04-17 decay -1.9 46.4 E269 silent
E270 2026-04-24 decay -1.9 44.6 E270 silent
E271 2026-05-01 decay -1.8 42.8 E271 silent
E272 2026-05-08 decay -1.7 41.1 E272 silent
E273 2026-05-15 oppose -6.0 35.1 E273 Marc Benioff opposes x2 [w=0.50]
E274 2026-05-22 decay -1.4 33.7 E274 silent
E275 2026-05-29 oppose -12.0 21.7 E275 Chamath opposes x2
E276 2026-06-13 decay -0.9 20.8 E276 silent
E277 2026-06-19 oppose -12.0 8.8 E277 Friedberg opposes x2
E278 2026-06-26 oppose -8.8 0.0 E278 Gavin Baker opposes x2
E279 2026-07-03 oppose · 0.0 E279 Chamath opposes x2
E280 2026-07-11 reinforce +15.0 15.0 E280 Sacks support x2
E280 2026-07-11 reinforce +12.8 27.8 E280 Brad Gerstner support x2
E281 2026-07-18 oppose -12.0 15.8 E281 Chamath opposes x2
E282 2026-07-24 oppose -14.4 1.4 E282 Chamath opposes x3
E283 2026-07-31 reinforce +14.8 16.1 E283 Sacks support x2
E283 2026-07-31 oppose -12.0 4.1 E283 Jason opposes x2
E284 2026-08-08 reinforce +17.3 21.4 E284 Sacks support x3
E284 2026-08-08 oppose -12.0 9.4 E284 Jason opposes x2
E284 2026-08-08 reinforce +13.6 23.0 E284 Brad Gerstner support x2
E285 2026-08-14 oppose -12.0 11.0 E285 Jason opposes x2
E285 2026-08-14 reinforce +13.4 24.3 E285 Sacks support x2
E285 2026-08-14 reinforce +11.3 35.7 E285 Gavin Baker support x2 (flipped from oppose)
E286 2026-08-21 oppose -12.0 23.7 E286 Chamath opposes x2
E286 2026-08-21 reinforce +11.4 35.1 E286 Friedberg support x2 (flipped from oppose)
E287 2026-08-29 oppose -12.0 23.1 E287 Jason opposes x2
E288 2026-09-04 oppose -12.0 11.1 E288 Chamath opposes x2
E288 2026-09-04 reinforce +13.3 24.5 E288 Sacks support x2
E289 2026-09-11 reversal -14.7 9.8 E289 Friedberg flips
E289 2026-09-11 oppose -9.8 0.0 E289 Chamath opposes x3
E289 2026-09-11 oppose · 0.0 E289 Jason opposes x2
E289 2026-09-11 oppose · 0.0 E289 Sacks opposes x2
E290 2026-09-26 oppose · 0.0 E290 Chamath opposes x3
E290 2026-09-26 oppose · 0.0 E290 Friedberg opposes x2
E290 2026-09-26 oppose · 0.0 E290 Jason opposes x2
E290 2026-09-26 reinforce +18.0 18.0 E290 Sacks support x3 (flipped from oppose)
E291 2026-10-02 oppose -9.6 8.4 E291 Friedberg opposes x1
E292 2026-10-10 oppose -8.4 0.0 E292 Chamath opposes x2
E292 2026-10-10 oppose · 0.0 E292 Jason opposes x1
E293 2026-10-17 reinforce +11.2 11.2 E293 Ben Horowitz support x2 (new voice) [w=0.50]
E293 2026-10-17 oppose -11.2 0.0 E293 Jason opposes x2
E293 2026-10-17 reinforce +15.0 15.0 E293 Sacks support x2
E294 2026-10-23 oppose -12.0 3.0 E294 Chamath opposes x2
E294 2026-10-23 oppose -3.0 0.0 E294 Nikesh Arora opposes x2 [w=0.50]
E295 2026-10-30 reinforce +18.0 18.0 E295 Sacks support x3
E295 2026-10-30 reinforce +12.3 30.3 E295 Friedberg support x2 (flipped from oppose)
E295 2026-10-30 reinforce +8.4 38.7 E295 Jason support x1 (flipped from oppose)
E296 2026-11-07 oppose -12.0 26.7 E296 Chamath opposes x2
E296 2026-11-07 reinforce +11.0 37.7 E296 Sacks support x2