← pool · child of Frontier AI labs keep durable premium pricing (not commoditized)
🤖 Anthropic IPO (~Oct 2026) is attractively priced at $1.5-2T
Anthropic exits 2026 at $100-120B ARR (10x YoY, reportedly profitable); a $1.5-2T IPO is only ~16-20x sales and the stock trades up, with next-year exit ARR consensus around $400-500B. Its quarterly numbers become the pace car for the whole AI trade.
other ideas on the same ticker, same direction: Google wins consumer AI via distribution 58 (GOOGL) · Own AWS, Azure and GCP and nothing else — the clouds capture the AI application dollars 48 (GOOGL) · Frontier AI labs keep durable premium pricing (not commoditized) 38 (GOOGL) · Personal AI agents: Google's data moat wins the form factor 23 (GOOGL) · Independent frontier-model labs lose to hyperscaler capital 18 (GOOGL) · Willow's error-correction scaling puts encryption on a two-to-five-year clock 9 (GOOGL)
⚔ Rivals
competing claims on the same profit pool: a support there is a headwind here
expand ▾
Conviction timeline
bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15
Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2026-03-06)
Plays
| expression | symbol | kind | relevance | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▲ LONG | GOOGL | stock | PRIMARY | only public-market proxy today (large Anthropic stake) — REPLACE with the direct ticker when the IPO lists |
📝 Expression memo
DERIVEDNEVER SCORED
how you'd actually express the thesis — All-In Alpha's opinion, not theirs, and nothing in it is scored
expand ▾
Expression memo — Anthropic lists in the trillions and trades up; GOOGL is the only public proxy until it does
Generated 2026-10-31 (born green at 73.3 on E295, EARLY flag at −6.4% excess vs SPY · window 2026-03-06 → 2027-03-06 · 51 mentions across 25 episodes, 7 net supporting voices at the crossing). This is the idea's second green stint: in at 66.0 with a RUNNING flag on E272 (2026-05-08), out at 59.7 on E276 (2026-06-13), back in on E295. Everything below the "spoken core" is DERIVED — ALL-IN ALPHA'S OWN — NEVER SCORED. Verdicts and the scoreboard trace only to the spoken plays.
The unusual thing about this green: it is the most-argued idea on the board, and the instrument that scores it is not the company. Fifty-one mentions, the besties have turned bearish and bullish again as a group inside six weeks, and until Anthropic lists, every verdict here is a verdict on Alphabet. Read the EARLY flag as honest for once: GOOGL has trailed SPY by 6.4% since the idea's first mention in March, so the proxy has not run.
The spoken core (what IS scored)
- GOOGL (primary, the only play) — the idea page's own rationale: "only public-market proxy today (large Anthropic stake) — REPLACE with the direct ticker when the IPO lists." Nothing in this idea's score comes from Anthropic itself until that swap happens.
Spoken receipts, E295 (the crossing episode, four for four): - Sacks @5:52: "It could very well be. I mean, I think this is probably going to be the biggest venture outcome of all time, especially given the time in which this was created. I mean, this is only a six-year-old company." - Friedberg, the penetration math @11:19: "Anthropics customers that could spend $100,000 or more, and have it be less than 1% of their total spend, the addressable customer base is about a million customers. So they're only, call it 1% of total customer penetration potential." - Chamath, the float argument @32:06: "the demands they're going to put on the capital markets into the IPO are going to be less, which means that they'll have more pricing power. They'll be able to manage the float better. All of these dynamics, I think, give you a constructive read going into the IPO." - Jason @51:08: "It's possible Anthropics business is bigger than the top three franchises in the history of business put together."
The road here, in the record: - Friedberg opened it on E263 (2026-03-06): "Anthropic is a trillion five market cap at the end of the day." - Sacks's peak call on E272: "let me be the first to congratulate Dario on winning the AI race... from January 1st to March 31st, they grew from roughly 10 billion of ARR to 30 billion." - The September bear turn took the idea out of green: Sacks on E289, "I don't see how they can IPO now in the trillions"; Chamath on E289, "They'll demand an enormous discount", and on E290, "what would otherwise in a very clean sheet IPO maybe would have been a two trillion dollar market cap? Now, you're at one or less"; Friedberg on E290 named open weights as "the biggest risk factor for Anthropic". - The October re-turn: Ben Horowitz on E293, "I think the IPO will be fine, like whether you want to be in at 2 trillion or 1.9 trillion or 2.3 trillion"; Chamath on E293, "Can they raise $80 billion in an IPO at $1.7, $8, or $9 trillion? I think so, handily."
Guests talking their book, on the record and weighted as guests: Brad Gerstner (E264, E268, E280, E284: "I'm a buyer of the shares today", "Altimeter would be a buyer at scale and at size"), Gavin Baker (E278: "I think Anthropic is worth $3 trillion today"), Jensen Huang (E265), Marc Benioff (E273, as a customer), Ben Horowitz (E293). Every one of them holds or sells to Anthropic. Their support is counted at guest weight and should be read as the sell side's view.
Second-order beneficiaries (derived)
frontier-ai-premium(ember, 38.7, resurrected from zero this episode) is the same thesis one layer down. Sacks's E295 line, "a little bit of a refutation to all the people who have been saying over the past year that they're getting commoditized away", is the pricing-power leg, and that lane is owned there.ai-compute-capex-supercycle(green, 98.2) got its best receipt of the year from the same S-1 read: four of four supports on E295. If Anthropic's inference margin is real, the labs-to-renters-to-Nvidia chain is funded. Counted as two bullish bets, the pair double-counts one assumption.independent-frontier-labs-lose-to-hyperscaler-capital-2024(dormant, 3.9) is a named rival, and Sacks REVERSED on it this episode: "this is a company with over 300 billion of dry powder." A headwind on the idea page was withdrawn by its own author. That is the strongest structural change in this idea's favour this week.hyperscaler-clouds-capture-the-ai-application-dollars-2025(ember, 38.6) carries Friedberg's cloud-infrastructure leg. Alphabet and Amazon both hold Anthropic stakes and both host it, so the cloud leg and this idea are partly the same bet.- Ours, not spoken: Amazon is also an Anthropic shareholder, and
amazon-compounder(ember, 28.0) sits on the board with only Jason's support. Nobody on the pod named AMZN as an Anthropic proxy.
Supplier / product-level drivers (derived — what to actually watch)
- The S-1's inference gross margin and customer-concentration table. Friedberg's penetration math and the capex-supercycle read both hang on the margin being real at scale, and the filing is the first audited number.
- Pricing. Friedberg on E295: "they could push price down, and you could start to see them start to segment." A price cut that holds revenue growth confirms elasticity; one that does not is the commoditization case arriving.
- Compute and power supply. Chamath's E271 and E272 argument was that a missed number would be supply, "nothing to do with demand".
ai-power-scarcity-moat(watch, 61.6, Chamath support 3 this episode) is the leading indicator for whether the ARR path holds. - Raise size against the float. Chamath's E293 figure was $80 billion. A smaller primary raise with a tighter float confirms his E295 "more pricing power" read; a larger one is the opposite.
- Enterprise churn to open weights. The recorded bear case (Friedberg E276 and E290, Jason E282 and E285). Anthropic's own enterprise cohort disclosures are the only clean test.
Options angles (derived)
- Window evals 2027-03-06 (about four months from generation).
- Honest problem: GOOGL is a weak instrument for this idea. Alphabet's Anthropic stake is a small fraction of its market cap, and GOOGL has its own E295 story (the "$500B wipeout" segment: Friedberg opposed
google-ai-winner, Jason bought shares live). A HIT or MISS here will mostly be Alphabet's quarter. Any GOOGL expression is a bet on Google with a thin Anthropic kicker until the ticker swap. - If the listing lands inside the window, the direct expression is the listing itself, and the thesis names its own test: a $1.5–2T print that trades up. Before that, call spreads on GOOGL into the window pay for Google, not Anthropic. The only Anthropic-specific derived expression is a basket of listed shareholders (GOOGL, AMZN), and that is ours, not spoken.
- Calibration at generation, stated straight (snapshot 2026-10-31): bullish greens on the trade ledger, n=75, mean α +17.2%, median α +2.8%, beat SPY 53%; tech bullish, n=21, mean α +34.1%, median +6.3%. The mean is carried by a few big winners; the median is the honest per-idea number.
What kills it (invalidation — including the opposes already in the pool)
- The besties have already been wrong on this idea in both directions. September's bears (Sacks, Chamath, Friedberg, Jason on E289 and E290) are October's bulls, and nothing in between was resolved; the mood changed. An idea that goes from four opposes to four supports in six weeks is a sentiment gauge, not a thesis, and it has exited green once already.
- Supply, not demand, can miss the number (Chamath, E269: "a five alarm fire for them. They, more than anybody else, needs to get their hands on compute"). A power-constrained quarter would score as a MISS even with the demand thesis intact.
- The commoditization case is live on the board.
enterprise-ai-sovereigntyis GREEN at 92.4 and is a named rival: enterprises moving off frontier APIs hits the API revenue a listing is priced on. Friedberg supported both ideas this episode.google-ai-winner(watch, 52.1), the other rival, got Jason's strongest support of the night. Both rivals have current support. - Liability and trust were out-voted, not withdrawn. Jason's "giant hack" liability (E289), the risk factors written by management (Sacks, E290), the sandbox and censorship argument (Chamath, E276 and E279), the "commoditize everyone's business" partner backlash (Friedberg, E279). None of these mentions was reversed.
- Jason's growth number is the quiet one that matters (E285: "There's no way they get to a trillion in revenue next year. I think maybe they could triple, get to 300 or 400"). If the Street's 2027 consensus is the 400–500 billion that Sacks and Gavin Baker named and the guide is Jason's 300–400, a 1.5–2T listing re-rates down inside the window.
- The proxy cuts both ways. A Google miss (this week's segment) can MISS this idea with Anthropic doing fine, and a Google beat can HIT it with the listing delayed.
- The idea's own eval: 2027-03-06. Stale memo if the band drops, and this idea has dropped before (E276). Memos never refresh themselves.
Mention log newest first
“You have to remember, the foundational model companies are not home-free. What does home-free mean? That they have a fortress balance sheet, a profitable business model, and quasi-infinite compute for their own ambitions. Right now, they are renters, and the renter class in data centers as of Tuesday is very much at risk.”
“And so the demands they're going to put on the capital markets into the IPO are going to be less, which means that they'll have more pricing power. They'll be able to manage the float better. All of these dynamics, I think, give you a constructive read going into the IPO.”
“So if you just say, hey, look, Anthropics customers that could spend $100,000 or more, and have it be less than 1% of their total spend, the addressable customer base is about a million customers. So they're only, call it 1% of total customer penetration potential.”
“It could very well be. I mean, I think this is probably going to be the biggest venture outcome of all time, especially given the time in which this was created. I mean, this is only a six-year-old company.”
“Yeah, so I think the IPO will be fine, like whether you want to be in at 2 trillion or 1.9 trillion or 2.3 trillion.”
“That is the biggest risk factor for Anthropic, is they were first out the gate to get the enterprise on AI, to build tools and whatnot. But as this market shifts to open source and open weights, boom, here it is, right here.”
“And I'll tell you what they'll do. They'll demand an enormous discount. And the reason they'll ask for an enormous discount is the other part of what Sacks & Friedberg said, which is it creates massive long-tail product liability risk”
“I actually was going to say 4-500 billion as exit ARR for next year. Seems very comfortable... the over-under really is 500 billion exit ARR for next year, and I think they think they'll do the over... the Anthropic IPO is really important for the market — everyone's going to be looking to Anthropic's quarterly earnings as the pace car.”
“[On $2T:] these leaks are always coming from the bankers who probably lost lead left... if it comes out at two trillion, it probably means the roadshow went incredibly well. People do want to own this. [I said 3 to 4 trillion] was a market clearing price... Whatever the Wall Street consensus is for 2027, I'll take a 25 to 30% over on that... 4-500 billion is within the zone of realistic and achievable.”
“I hear a lot of people saying 1.5 or 2 trillion dollars. ... it's going to be run rating over 100 billion maybe by the end of the year. That's like 10 to 15 times revenue. That is not that much for a company that just grew 10x and is rumored to be profitable in Q2.”
“Anthropic is now over 80 billion of ARR. ... it had forecast 100 billion as exit ARR for the year, and most people said that ... Now it looks like they're going to do it with a couple of months to spare. So their estimates are going up, I mean, 110, 120 or higher for end of year ARR.”
“I believe that this is going to derail their IPOs. ... they're going to get caught in a trap. ... They overspend. They don't have the same profitability and it doesn't pencil out. ... have all moved en masse, GLM 5.2, making their own models. ... They are going to start losing a lot of customers to open source,”
“They started the year at 10 billion of ARR. They're now over 70 billion... the fastest growing tech company at scale in history... they're easily going to get to 100 billion... they're going to be fine... both Anthropic and OpenAI are taking their estimates up right now... The idea that they're at risk of getting their entire franchise destroyed — it's not in the data yet... it's not only about the model, it's also about the harness, the connectors, the enterprise agreements.”
“rumored to be trending over 100 billion in revenue ... I think it would be a blockbuster IPO. ... Altimeter would be a buyer at scale and at size in both of those IPOs. ... If these guys end the year over $100 billion, ... they're on a revenue trajectory that they could 3 to 5x again next year. ... 200 billion of incremental revenue is incomprehensible in the history of Silicon Valley, ... intelligence is the largest TAM we've ever seen in the history of the world.”
“I suspect that if you can get out now, you should get out now before all of that starts to seep into the water table. ... Enterprise is probably a little bit more brittle because there are fewer buyers and they're more demanding. Consumer, on the other hand, ... when I use Fable 5, the problem is that it's nerfed on a bunch of things that I would normally research. ... it shouldn't really matter what model I'm using”
“In a relative value basis right now, OpenAI equity I think is more reasonably priced than Anthropic equity. ... OpenAI can fall back on a really healthy consumer business. Sure, the difficulty that Anthropic is going to face is that, ... they have lost this fundamental trust about being able to stay within their sandbox. ... pigeonholed and you get cornered and people find ways to work around it.”
“there's been an effort by Anthropic to go around and sign up life sciences companies to contributing to a new life sciences focused model. ... nearly everyone I've spoken with has woken up to the fact that they are basically trying to commoditize everyone's business. ... you are effectively commoditizing the asset that you have,”
“Anthropic quote unquote blindsided its then business partner with the launch of Claude Design. ... Chief Product Officer had actually even served on Figma's board and didn't resign until three days before the launch ... Claude Science, Claude Security, Claude Legal, Claude Financial and of course, Claude Code. ... they're watching where the value is being created on top of their models, then they're moving in directly. ... if you're an enterprise customer or a developer, why in the world would you ever want to share any proprietary data with them? You are mortgaging your future,”
“I think Anthropic is worth $3 trillion today. ... that is roughly where it would probably trade as a public company. ... they're going to end this year well over $100 billion. ... It will be very profitable at that scale because it'll be inference dominated and people are reporting they have 85 percent gross margins on inference.”
“the hyperscalers are out over their ski tips. They have trillions of dollars of on balance sheet and off balance sheet exposure to AI. The best thing that they can do to underwrite all of that money is to kneecap the frontier labs and play gatekeeper, charge a toll, take a tax. It is business 101”
“once you're in one of these situations, it's always harder to extricate yourself ... hubris and they misplayed it. And it ended up getting kicked out under their own nascent pre-approval regime. ... by not releasing mythos in April, the company suffered massively commercially.”
“Over the last couple of weeks, they've begun to restrict the ability to use the models to do that ... we are likely going to end up needing to use open-source models and run them locally ourselves. ... forcing a lot of companies to go and get open-source Chinese models ... We're seeing this across the landscape with startups, with large-scale enterprises. Everyone's making that move. ... We're gonna chase people off of this platform.”
“they will increasingly take in prompts, evaluate the prompts, and decide what to do with them ... a person, you should generally now think there's a risk of censorship. If you're a company, I think it's almost a non-starter. ... you'll get cut off from a very important source of business differentiation”
“there is the potential for the monopolization of this market to a greater degree than people may be pricing in right now. ... Anthropic's now at, they seem to have pulled away from OpenAI, which is not surprising and something I predicted. Look, if you have one company that's growing at 10x year over year and another company that's growing at 3x year over year, within two years, the first company will have 90% market share.”
“Claude is really good at product. Like Claude for Excel is better than Copilot. Not by a little, by a lot. So anyone that's going to run against them, they are a worthy foe.”
“What is happening with AI right now, with Anthropic growing faster than any company in history at massive scale? ... they're bigger than 100 different countries for sure. Exactly. And compounding really fast and now profitable.”
“These coding agents are awesome. Anthropic is awesome. Like I am going to probably use $300 million of Anthropic this year at Salesforce... my gosh, have you seen Anthropic? It is a rocket ship that will not stop.”
“let me be the first to congratulate Dario on winning the AI race. ... from January 1st to March 31st, they grew from roughly 10 billion of ARR to 30 billion. ... unless something about their current trajectory changes, Anthropic will be the most powerful monopoly ever created in human history.”
“Anthropic and OpenAI's revenue performance has nothing to do with demand, zero. It is entirely to do with the supply constraints that exist in data centers and specifically in power. If they had infinite power, ... their revenues would probably be even more parabolic. ... the five-year view for those two companies is quite robust.”
“I think they're going to be fine. I think this is a multi-trillion dollar company. I think Anthropic is a multi-trillion dollar company. ... Everything in this market is power constrained. The reason that these folks may miss a number ... nothing to do with demand. It is entirely 100 percent due to the supply of the power necessary to generate the output token.”
“Opus 4.7, the latest Anthropic release, appears to be a bust... they're rolling back to 4.6... Opus 4.7 is rationing compute, reducing thinking time... Anthropic is token constrained... I'm seeing a lot of people saying that they are shifting their coding usage from Opus to GPT 5.5.”
“If I were them, it is a five alarm fire for them. They, more than anybody else, needs to get their hands on compute. ... otherwise that revenue could either slow down or hit a wall, and it will not be because of product quality and adoption. It will entirely be because of the Friendster effect. You just couldn't keep the site up.”
“The OpenAI growth rate has been around 3-4x a year. The Anthropic growth rate has been around 10x a year... they're going to end this year at 80-100 billion, at least on the current trajectory... you could see Anthropic taking a lead here that, let's say over the next one or two years, could be insurmountable.”
“We've got billions in both companies at this point... They added 4 billion of revenue in January, 7 billion in February, 10 or 11 billion in March [annualized]... the largest revenue explosion in the history of technology... I would not be shocked if you see Anthropic exiting this year at $80 to $100 billion in revenue... I'm a buyer of the shares today.”
“Is there a market for OpenAI at 800 billion? Yes, and there should be. ... These are trillion dollar companies. They both are. And they both deserve to be. ... These two companies need to get out as quickly as possible.”
“[Dario forecast a trillion dollars of model/agent revenue by 2030] I think he's being very conservative. I believe Dario and Anthropic is going to do way better than that. Way better than that... every single enterprise software company will also be a value-added reseller of Anthropic tokens.”
“There's not a single good example that we can find of sustained, positive margin expansion and impact of AI inside of a true corporate enterprise that is not right now a small test... everybody has to show up to their board and have an AI checkbox... I am spending triple every three months and not seeing my revenues tripling.”
“I bought a lot more since then, Jason. ... we had a $6 billion month out of Anthropic in February, ... more revenue than the annual revenue of Databricks and Snowflake ... said they would both go public this year. I ... want to get some of these shares in the accounts of all these kids”
“I think Anthropic is the multiple bet. I think Anthropic is a trillion five market cap at the end of the day, unless this blows them up... Anthropic is worth a lot more than 350... They just added 6 billion in the last month... everyone's saying the same thing, which is Anthropic may actually be fulfilling the promise of AI.”
Who built this conviction
each voice's total push on the score, in conviction points across every mention — supports and opposes · share = % of all mention-driven movement
⏳ decay drained -11.2 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one
Score events
| episode | kind | Δ | after | note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E263 2026-03-06 | init | +35.0 | 35.0 | E263 born by Friedberg (explicit_prediction x2) |
| E263 2026-03-06 | oppose | -12.0 | 23.0 | E263 Chamath opposes x2 |
| E264 2026-03-13 | reinforce | +20.8 | 43.8 | E264 Brad Gerstner support x3 (new voice) |
| E264 2026-03-13 | oppose | -12.0 | 31.8 | E264 Chamath opposes x2 |
| E265 2026-03-19 | reinforce | +7.7 | 39.5 | E265 Jensen Huang support x2 (new voice) [w=0.50] |
| E266 2026-03-27 | decay | -1.6 | 37.9 | E266 silent |
| E267 2026-04-03 | reinforce | +9.3 | 47.2 | E267 Chamath support x2 (flipped from oppose) |
| E268 2026-04-10 | reinforce | +9.5 | 56.7 | E268 Brad Gerstner support x3 |
| E269 2026-04-17 | reinforce | +9.7 | 66.4 | E269 Sacks support x2 (new voice) |
| E269 2026-04-17 | oppose | -12.0 | 54.4 | E269 Chamath opposes x2 |
| E270 2026-04-24 | decay | -2.2 | 52.3 | E270 silent |
| E271 2026-05-01 | oppose | -9.6 | 42.7 | E271 Sacks opposes x1 |
| E271 2026-05-01 | reinforce | +8.6 | 51.3 | E271 Chamath support x2 (flipped from oppose) |
| E272 2026-05-08 | reinforce | +7.3 | 58.6 | E272 Chamath support x2 |
| E272 2026-05-08 | reinforce | +7.5 | 66.0 | E272 Sacks support x3 (flipped from oppose) |
| E273 2026-05-15 | reinforce | +3.8 | 69.9 | E273 Marc Benioff support x2 (new voice) [w=0.50] |
| E274 2026-05-22 | reinforce | +6.8 | 76.6 | E274 Gavin Baker support x2 (new voice) |
| E275 2026-05-29 | reinforce | +4.2 | 80.8 | E275 Bill Gurley support x1 (new voice) |
| E275 2026-05-29 | reinforce | +2.9 | 83.7 | E275 Sacks support x2 |
| E276 2026-06-13 | oppose | -12.0 | 71.7 | E276 Chamath opposes x2 |
| E276 2026-06-13 | oppose | -12.0 | 59.7 | E276 Friedberg opposes x2 |
| E277 2026-06-19 | oppose | -12.0 | 47.7 | E277 Sacks opposes x2 |
| E277 2026-06-19 | oppose | -12.0 | 35.7 | E277 Chamath opposes x2 |
| E278 2026-06-26 | reinforce | +11.6 | 47.3 | E278 Gavin Baker support x3 |
| E279 2026-07-03 | oppose | -12.0 | 35.3 | E279 Sacks opposes x2 |
| E279 2026-07-03 | oppose | -12.0 | 23.3 | E279 Friedberg opposes x2 |
| E279 2026-07-03 | oppose | -12.0 | 11.3 | E279 Chamath opposes x2 |
| E280 2026-07-11 | oppose | -11.3 | 0.0 | E280 Chamath opposes x2 |
| E280 2026-07-11 | reinforce | +18.0 | 18.0 | E280 Brad Gerstner support x3 |
| E281 2026-07-18 | decay | -0.7 | 17.3 | E281 silent |
| E282 2026-07-24 | reinforce | +12.4 | 29.7 | E282 Sacks support x2 (flipped from oppose) |
| E282 2026-07-24 | oppose | -12.0 | 17.7 | E282 Jason opposes x2 |
| E283 2026-07-31 | decay | -0.7 | 17.0 | E283 silent |
| E284 2026-08-08 | reinforce | +12.5 | 29.4 | E284 Sacks support x2 |
| E284 2026-08-08 | reinforce | +10.6 | 40.0 | E284 Brad Gerstner support x2 |
| E285 2026-08-14 | reinforce | +9.0 | 49.0 | E285 Gavin Baker support x2 |
| E285 2026-08-14 | oppose | -12.0 | 37.0 | E285 Jason opposes x2 |
| E285 2026-08-14 | reinforce | +9.4 | 46.5 | E285 Sacks support x2 |
| E286 2026-08-21 | reinforce | +6.4 | 52.9 | E286 Sacks support x1 |
| E287 2026-08-29 | decay | -2.1 | 50.8 | E287 silent |
| E288 2026-09-04 | decay | -2.0 | 48.7 | E288 silent |
| E289 2026-09-11 | oppose | -12.0 | 36.7 | E289 Jason opposes x2 |
| E289 2026-09-11 | oppose | -14.4 | 22.3 | E289 Sacks opposes x3 |
| E289 2026-09-11 | oppose | -14.4 | 7.9 | E289 Chamath opposes x3 |
| E290 2026-09-26 | oppose | -7.9 | 0.0 | E290 Sacks opposes x3 |
| E290 2026-09-26 | oppose | · | 0.0 | E290 Jason opposes x2 |
| E290 2026-09-26 | oppose | · | 0.0 | E290 Chamath opposes x3 |
| E290 2026-09-26 | oppose | · | 0.0 | E290 Friedberg opposes x2 |
| E291 2026-10-02 | decay | · | 0.0 | E291 silent |
| E292 2026-10-10 | oppose | · | 0.0 | E292 Jason opposes x1 |
| E293 2026-10-17 | reinforce | +15.0 | 15.0 | E293 Jason support x2 (flipped from oppose) |
| E293 2026-10-17 | reinforce | +11.5 | 26.5 | E293 Ben Horowitz support x3 (new voice) [w=0.50] |
| E293 2026-10-17 | reinforce | +11.0 | 37.5 | E293 Sacks support x2 (flipped from oppose) |
| E293 2026-10-17 | reinforce | +9.4 | 46.9 | E293 Chamath support x2 (flipped from oppose) |
| E294 2026-10-23 | decay | -1.9 | 45.0 | E294 silent |
| E295 2026-10-30 | reinforce | +9.9 | 54.9 | E295 Sacks support x3 |
| E295 2026-10-30 | reinforce | +8.1 | 63.0 | E295 Friedberg support x3 (flipped from oppose) |
| E295 2026-10-30 | reinforce | +5.5 | 68.6 | E295 Chamath support x2 |
| E295 2026-10-30 | reinforce | +4.7 | 73.3 | E295 Jason support x2 |
| E296 2026-11-07 | oppose | -12.0 | 61.3 | E296 Chamath opposes x2 |