← pool

🏦 Rates fall to ~2.5% within two years

Chamath's dated rate-path call: rather than argue about whether the first cut lands in Q1 or Q2 2024, look two years out and you get to roughly 2.5% — about 160bp below the December-2023 level. The whole curve reprices lower, which he frames as the single biggest change coming for capital allocators.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 50.2 WATCH
DORMANT
band · contested
▲ LONG TLT
expression · bullish rates
MISS
outcome · R +1.0% · α -51.4%
2025-12-08
window closed
⚠ CONFLICTING IDEA ON THE SAME TICKER — the board is arguing with itself; net it before trading (ticker view →)
TLT · US fiscal spiral keeps long-end yields grinding higher SHORT GREEN 67.5 ← stronger than this idea (13.0)

also touching these tickers, same direction: Fed easing + disinflation into 2026 11 (TLT)

⚖ Why this verdict

fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2023-12-08 → 2025-12-08 — first mention + 24-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▲ LONG TLT (primary play). TLT rose 1.0% over the window → direction-adjusted R = +1.0% (the call made money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +52.4%α = +1.0 − (+52.4) = -51.4% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
  4. Rule fired:
    · HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5
    · PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0
    ▶ MISS — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a MISS earn 0 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Friedberg, Sacks, Thomas Laffont | opposed: Chamath | proxy-sensitive: IEF→PARTIAL (+10.2%); SHY→PARTIAL (+9.7%)

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2023-12-08)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▲ LONG TLTetf PRIMARY long duration is the levered expression of a 160bp fall in rates
▲ LONG IEFetf adjacent 7-10y treasuries capture the belly of the move with less convexity risk
▲ LONG SHYetf adjacent the front end reprices first as the Fed walks policy toward 2.5%

Mention log

Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E156 (2023-12-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 34:35 SUPPORT · horizon 24mo
“the more fundamental thing is if you look two years out, you probably see rates around two and a half percent. And that's 160 basis points from here.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E163 (2024-01-26) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 13:14 SUPPORT
“are we at this inflection point where rates will always be between 2 and 4 percent for a very long time?”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E163 (2024-01-26) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 15:34 OPPOSE
“it's not clear that the 10-year is going to be going back down to 2%, 3% where it was during the ZERP period. It probably will be around 4%, plus or minus.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E171 (2024-03-22) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:03:04 SUPPORT · horizon 21mo
“Powell did say finally, it looks pretty likely we're going to get these three cuts, so we're going to be down to 4.5 to 4.75 on Fed funds by the end of the year. It probably means that we'll get another 50 to 75 basis points to 2025, so people will look out to the end of 2025 and look at a Fed funds rate that's sort of like 3.75 to 4%.”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E171 (2024-03-22) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:03:52 OPPOSE
“inflation has not come down to the Fed's target of 2%. It's still right around 3%, 3.1%.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E174 (2024-04-12) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 25:10 REVERSAL · horizon 3mo
“the idea of a persistent inflation rate is a lot more credible than it was six months ago... we're probably now on balance 50-50 between a hike and a cut. And I think if you don't see this thing change in the next three months, you're going to see 75-25 for a hike of at least 25 basis points”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E183 (2024-06-14) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:12:09 SUPPORT
“So I think unemployment is going back up. I think GDP is going to shrink. And so I kind of tend to be in this camp that we're going to see more than one rate cut.”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E183 (2024-06-14) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:21:27 OPPOSE
“So I think he's going to be more concerned about airing on the side of tamping down inflation than airing on the side of the economy not doing as well.”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E187 (2024-07-12) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 10:25 OPPOSE
“So it's very unlikely that we get back to a two-handle, at least in this kind of era, and as a result, you'll probably see the market kind of assume that we're going to be at a 3% kind of inflation level for quite some time.”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E187 (2024-07-12) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 12:07 OPPOSE
“We should just understand that what that means is permanently higher interest rates”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E190 (2024-08-02) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 33:07 SUPPORT
“So Jerome Powell is probably going to cut 25 And I think that if they get to him, he'll try to cut 50 But the problem is it won't solve the problem.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E193 (2024-08-23) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 6:47 SUPPORT · horizon 1mo
“the silver lining is that it probably now tips the balance of action in September to a cut. And if it was 25 basis points, there's probably going to be a lot of folks lobbying the Fed to cut 50”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E193 (2024-08-23) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 13:06 SUPPORT
“But I do think that the economy is obviously showing significant weakness. Inflation is not completely solved, but it's down to 2.9 percent. At least it has a two handle on it now. And so, yeah, I think the market is pricing in these rate cuts for a reason.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E196 (2024-09-20) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 9:19 SUPPORT · horizon 27mo
“why will they cut probably all the way down to 2% or 3% by the end of 26? It's because we now need to stimulate the economy.”
MA
Mark Cuban (guest ×0.5) no rates track record · E198 (2024-10-03) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:11:19 SUPPORT
“they realize that there's only a couple of ways to reduce the deficit. One, you get inflation under control and that reduces interest rates, and that's going to work in our favor, and I think that's happening now. If it's $1.6 trillion, then if interest rates go below 4 percent, that saves a lot of money and probably the most you can save.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E201 (2024-10-25) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 44:18 REVERSAL
“I mean, my gosh, it could easily be 6%. It could easily be 7% or 8%”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E201 (2024-10-25) · positioning · strength 3 ▶ 39:46 OPPOSE
“the easy one to avoid is treasuries. Do you really want to accept a 4.2% yield for 10 years”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E201 (2024-10-25) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 41:06 OPPOSE
“you could see a scenario where equities and gold go up while fixed income goes down to have higher rates”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E202 (2024-11-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 7:06 OPPOSE
“The market is saying we are expecting higher rates for longer.”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E202 (2024-11-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 19:15 OPPOSE
“And what we're seeing is that the long rates are not going back down.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E204 (2024-11-16) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 18:59 REVERSAL · horizon 60mo
“What does 4.5% mean? I mean, if you're going to run 8% of GDP level deficits for the next four or five or six years, you're going to have the 10 year at 7 to 8%. That's just mathematical.”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E205 (2024-11-23) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 26:28 SUPPORT
“So if DOGE, working with the rest of the government, OMB, the Treasury, Congress, executive orders, can now convince the markets that the US financial picture is more sustainable, we'll get credit for that. Interest rates will come down and that will lead to a boom in the economy.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E205 (2024-11-23) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 31:41 SUPPORT
“Yields contracted by five basis points. You know what the value of that is?”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E214 (2025-02-07) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 1:55 SUPPORT
“Elon and Besant and others in the administration have echoed, trying to get government deficit below 3% of GDP. That seems to be the economic magical number. And if you can do that, rates drop.”
AN
Antonio Gracias (guest ×0.5) no rates track record · E214 (2025-02-07) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 7:22 SUPPORT
“The bond markets were going up. The bond bond was going up a lot because people believe that you couldn't stop spending, creating inflation. You see those trading down now as DOGE is starting to take effect. People see it's real.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E217 (2025-03-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 31:56 SUPPORT · horizon 6mo
“So we've had some pretty meaningful compression in the 10 year, which I think is really interesting. I think it's very good for Besant and for Trump. And I think I've mentioned this before, but we got to go in and refinance $10 trillion in the next six months. So you could see this thing maybe even get under 4% if we get a good string of data.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E218 (2025-03-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 1 ▶ 1:06:26 SUPPORT
“We have $10 trillion we need to go out and borrow in the next nine months. And so if we can pay 3%, 3.8%, 4%, we save ourselves trillions of dollars versus if we had to pay 4.5%, 5%, 5.5%.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E220 (2025-03-22) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:02:36 REVERSAL
“So I think there's an overcorrection here that's happening, which I think is dangerous. And I think it's going to slow down the pace of cuts, which I think will then create a lot of other pressure in the economy.”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E220 (2025-03-22) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:04:52 SUPPORT
“About a month ago, the 10-year was at 4.5 percent, and today it's at 4.22 percent. And so in the last month, we've seen rates on the 10-year decline by about a quarter point or about 30 basis points. And so the bond market is giving some kind of opening to the Fed saying, look, we expect that this is going to be deflationary, this is going to be recessionary. We are expecting you to cut rates to the Fed.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E227 (2025-05-09) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 25:16 REVERSAL
“I mean, if we're in a sustained period of four to five percent rates, I mean, we should talk about that at some point, but there's huge implications to the economy if this thing stays where it is, huge.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E229 (2025-05-24) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 8:17 REVERSAL · horizon 7mo
“Today, the 10-year is around 4.5 percent. At the rate in which it's escalating since Liberation Day, by the end of this year, we're going to be past 5 percent. The 30-year is on a rate now to get past 6.25, maybe even reach 6.5 percent.”
TH
Thomas Laffont (regular guest ×1.0) rates: 1 resolved, unproven · E232 (2025-06-21) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 6:19 SUPPORT
“What if actually AI can increase productivity and regrow GDP faster than expectations, right? And perhaps that's one of the reasons why interest rates might not be quite as high as you might expect, given some of the trends that you guys have talked about.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Chamath
Chamath w=0.88
16 scoring events · 57% of moves
+123.4 / -76.6 → net +46.7
Sacks
Sacks w=1.08
8 scoring events · 23% of moves
+25.8 / -54.6 → net -28.8
Friedberg
Friedberg w=0.79
5 scoring events · 11% of moves
+16.9 / -23.6 → net -6.7
TH
Thomas Laffont regular guest ×1.0
1 scoring event · 5% of moves
+17.6 → net +17.6
AN
Antonio Gracias guest ×0.5
1 scoring event · 2% of moves
+8.0 → net +8.0
MA
Mark Cuban guest ×0.5
1 scoring event · 2% of moves
+6.3 → net +6.3

⏳ decay drained -30.2 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E156 2023-12-08 init +30.6 30.6 E156 born by Chamath (explicit_prediction x2) [w=0.88]
E157 2023-12-16 decay -0.6 30.0 E157 silent
E158 2023-12-23 decay -0.6 29.4 E158 silent
E159 2023-12-29 decay -0.6 28.8 E159 silent
E160 2024-01-06 decay -0.6 28.2 E160 silent
E161 2024-01-13 decay -0.6 27.7 E161 silent
E162 2024-01-19 decay -0.6 27.1 E162 silent
E163 2024-01-26 reinforce +9.6 36.7 E163 Chamath support x2 [w=0.88]
E163 2024-01-26 oppose -13.0 23.7 E163 Sacks opposes x2 [w=1.08]
E164 2024-02-02 decay -0.5 23.2 E164 silent
E165 2024-02-09 decay -0.5 22.8 E165 silent
E166 2024-02-16 decay -0.5 22.3 E166 silent
E167 2024-02-23 decay -0.4 21.9 E167 silent
E168 2024-03-01 decay -0.4 21.4 E168 silent
E169 2024-03-08 decay -0.4 21.0 E169 silent
E170 2024-03-15 decay -0.4 20.6 E170 silent
E171 2024-03-22 reinforce +10.4 31.0 E171 Chamath support x2 [w=0.88]
E171 2024-03-22 oppose -13.0 18.0 E171 Sacks opposes x2 [w=1.08]
E172 2024-03-29 decay -0.4 17.6 E172 silent
E173 2024-04-05 decay -0.4 17.3 E173 silent
E174 2024-04-12 reversal -10.4 6.9 E174 Chamath flips
E175 2024-04-19 decay -0.1 6.8 E175 silent
E176 2024-04-26 decay -0.1 6.6 E176 silent
E177 2024-05-03 decay -0.1 6.5 E177 silent
E178 2024-05-10 decay -0.1 6.4 E178 silent
E179 2024-05-17 decay -0.1 6.2 E179 silent
E180 2024-05-24 decay -0.1 6.1 E180 silent
E181 2024-05-31 decay -0.1 6.0 E181 silent
E182 2024-06-07 decay -0.1 5.9 E182 silent
E183 2024-06-14 reinforce +12.4 18.2 E183 Chamath support x2 (flipped from reversal) [w=0.88]
E183 2024-06-14 oppose -13.0 5.2 E183 Sacks opposes x2 [w=1.08]
E184 2024-06-20 decay -0.1 5.1 E184 silent
E185 2024-06-29 decay -0.1 5.0 E185 silent
E186 2024-07-04 decay -0.1 4.9 E186 silent
E187 2024-07-12 oppose -4.9 0.0 E187 Friedberg opposes x2 [w=0.79]
E187 2024-07-12 oppose · 0.0 E187 Sacks opposes x2 [w=1.08]
E188 2024-07-19 decay · 0.0 E188 silent
E189 2024-07-26 decay · 0.0 E189 silent
E190 2024-08-02 reinforce +13.1 13.1 E190 Chamath support x2 [w=0.88]
E191 2024-08-09 decay -0.3 12.9 E191 silent
E192 2024-08-16 decay -0.3 12.6 E192 silent
E193 2024-08-23 reinforce +13.8 26.4 E193 Chamath support x3 [w=0.88]
E193 2024-08-23 reinforce +9.6 35.9 E193 Sacks support x1 (flipped from oppose) [w=1.08]
E194 2024-08-30 decay -0.7 35.2 E194 silent
E195 2024-09-06 decay -0.7 34.5 E195 silent
E196 2024-09-20 reinforce +10.3 44.8 E196 Chamath support x3 [w=0.88]
E197 2024-09-27 decay -0.9 43.9 E197 silent
E198 2024-10-03 reinforce +6.3 50.2 E198 Mark Cuban support x2 (new voice) [w=0.50]
E199 2024-10-11 decay -1.0 49.2 E199 silent
E200 2024-10-18 decay -1.0 48.3 E200 silent
E201 2024-10-25 oppose -15.6 32.7 E201 Sacks opposes x3 [w=1.08]
E201 2024-10-25 oppose -9.4 23.2 E201 Friedberg opposes x2 [w=0.79]
E201 2024-10-25 reversal -13.9 9.3 E201 Chamath flips
E202 2024-11-01 oppose -9.3 0.0 E202 Friedberg opposes x2 [w=0.79]
E202 2024-11-01 oppose · 0.0 E202 Sacks opposes x2 [w=1.08]
E203 2024-11-08 decay · 0.0 E203 silent
E204 2024-11-16 oppose · 0.0 E204 Chamath opposes x3 (marked reversal; no prior support to flip) [w=0.88]
E205 2024-11-23 reinforce +16.2 16.2 E205 Sacks support x2 (flipped from oppose) [w=1.08]
E205 2024-11-23 reinforce +8.8 25.0 E205 Chamath support x1 (flipped from reversal) [w=0.88]
E206 2024-12-07 decay -0.5 24.5 E206 silent
E207 2024-12-13 decay -0.5 24.1 E207 silent
E208 2024-12-20 decay -0.5 23.6 E208 silent
E209 2025-01-04 decay -0.5 23.1 E209 silent
E210 2025-01-11 decay -0.5 22.6 E210 silent
E211 2025-01-18 decay -0.5 22.2 E211 silent
E212 2025-01-25 decay -0.4 21.7 E212 silent
E213 2025-01-31 decay -0.4 21.3 E213 silent
E214 2025-02-07 reinforce +7.4 28.7 E214 Friedberg support x1 (flipped from oppose) [w=0.79]
E214 2025-02-07 reinforce +8.0 36.7 E214 Antonio Gracias support x2 (new voice) [w=0.50]
E215 2025-02-15 decay -0.7 36.0 E215 silent
E216 2025-02-21 decay -0.7 35.3 E216 silent
E217 2025-03-01 reinforce +8.5 43.8 E217 Chamath support x2 [w=0.88]
E218 2025-03-08 reinforce +5.9 49.7 E218 Chamath support x1 [w=0.88]
E219 2025-03-15 decay -1.0 48.7 E219 silent
E220 2025-03-22 reversal -29.2 19.5 E220 Chamath flips
E220 2025-03-22 reinforce +9.5 29.0 E220 Friedberg support x2 [w=0.79]
E221 2025-03-29 decay -0.6 28.4 E221 silent
E222 2025-04-05 decay -0.6 27.8 E222 silent
E223 2025-04-11 decay -0.6 27.3 E223 silent
E224 2025-04-19 decay -0.5 26.7 E224 silent
E225 2025-04-26 decay -0.5 26.2 E225 silent
E226 2025-05-02 decay -0.5 25.7 E226 silent
E227 2025-05-09 oppose -10.5 15.2 E227 Chamath opposes x2 (marked reversal; no prior support to flip) [w=0.88]
E228 2025-05-17 decay -0.3 14.9 E228 silent
E229 2025-05-24 oppose -12.6 2.3 E229 Chamath opposes x3 (marked reversal; no prior support to flip) [w=0.88]
E231 2025-06-13 decay -0.0 2.2 E231 silent
E232 2025-06-21 reinforce +17.6 19.8 E232 Thomas Laffont support x1 (new voice)
E233 2025-06-28 decay -0.4 19.4 E233 silent
E234 2025-07-04 decay -0.4 19.0 E234 silent
E235 2025-07-11 decay -0.4 18.6 E235 silent
E236 2025-07-19 decay -0.4 18.3 E236 silent
E237 2025-08-01 decay -0.4 17.9 E237 silent
E238 2025-08-09 decay -0.4 17.6 E238 silent
E239 2025-08-15 decay -0.4 17.2 E239 silent
E240 2025-08-22 decay -0.3 16.9 E240 silent
E241 2025-08-29 decay -0.3 16.5 E241 silent
E242 2025-09-07 decay -0.3 16.2 E242 silent
E243 2025-09-19 decay -0.3 15.9 E243 silent
E244 2025-09-27 decay -0.3 15.5 E244 silent
E245 2025-10-03 decay -0.3 15.2 E245 silent
E246 2025-10-10 decay -0.3 14.9 E246 silent
E247 2025-10-17 decay -0.3 14.6 E247 silent
E248 2025-10-24 decay -0.3 14.3 E248 silent
E249 2025-10-31 decay -0.3 14.1 E249 silent
E250 2025-11-07 decay -0.3 13.8 E250 silent
E251 2025-11-14 decay -0.3 13.5 E251 silent
E252 2025-11-22 decay -0.3 13.2 E252 silent
E253 2025-12-06 decay -0.3 13.0 E253 silent