← pool

🤖 Foundation models are a big-tech oligopoly - the substrate gets given away

The model layer belongs to the hyperscalers, not to startups: Microsoft (through OpenAI), Google/DeepMind and Meta build the substrates, and competition forces them to commoditize those substrates and give them away as close to free as possible. Startups cannot build the models themselves and can only monetize the application layer on top of somebody else's API, so the listed expression of generative AI is the incumbents' compute and distribution rather than the model-layer startups VCs are funding.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 70.4 GREEN
EMBER
band · contested
▲ LONG MSFT
expression · bullish tech
RIGHT
result · return +63.8% · vs SPY +42.4%
2024-01-13
born 2023-01-13 (E111) → window closed
⚠ CONFLICTING IDEAS ON THE SAME TICKER — the board is arguing with itself; net it out (ticker view →)
GOOGL · ChatGPT takes Google search share and the market starts pricing the decay SHORT EMBER 21.2
GOOGL · Tort floodgates open on social media SHORT EMBER 20.4
META · Tort floodgates open on social media SHORT EMBER 20.4
GOOGL · Blue cities ban or license-cap robotaxis SHORT EMBER 20.3
GOOGL · Meta's AI assistant takes ten points of search share from Google SHORT DORMANT 6.4
META · Narrow Section 230 carve-out unleashes a tort wave on social platforms SHORT DORMANT 3.0

other ideas on the same ticker, same direction: Anthropic IPO (~Oct 2026) is attractively priced at $1.5-2T 61 (GOOGL) · Google wins consumer AI via distribution 58 (GOOGL) · Meta becomes America's open-source AI champion 55 (META) · Personal AI agents put the App Store's 30% take and opaque subscription/retail economics on notice 49 (META) · Own AWS, Azure and GCP and nothing else — the clouds capture the AI application dollars 48 (MSFT) · Own AWS, Azure and GCP and nothing else — the clouds capture the AI application dollars 48 (GOOGL) · Frontier AI labs keep durable premium pricing (not commoditized) 38 (MSFT) · Frontier AI labs keep durable premium pricing (not commoditized) 38 (GOOGL) · The AI doomer campaign fails — no FDAI, open source survives 31 (META) · SaaSpocalypse is overdone for compliance-moat enterprise software 24 (MSFT) · Personal AI agents: Google's data moat wins the form factor 23 (GOOGL) · ChatGPT takes Google search share and the market starts pricing the decay 21 (MSFT) · Independent frontier-model labs lose to hyperscaler capital 18 (MSFT) · Independent frontier-model labs lose to hyperscaler capital 18 (GOOGL) · Independent frontier-model labs lose to hyperscaler capital 18 (META) · Willow's error-correction scaling puts encryption on a two-to-five-year clock 9 (GOOGL) · Meta's AI assistant takes ten points of search share from Google 6 (META)

⚖ Why this result

fully deterministic — computed from daily closes on the scoring date; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2023-01-13 → 2024-01-13 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▲ LONG MSFT (primary play). MSFT rose 63.8% over the window → return (sign flipped for a SHORT) = +63.8% (the call made money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +21.4% → vs SPY = +63.8 − (+21.4) = +42.4% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the result uses.
  4. Rule fired:
    ▶ RIGHT — return ≥ +10% AND beat SPY by 5+ ✓ (return 63.8, vs SPY 42.4)
    · HALF — return ≥ +5% OR beat SPY at all
    · WRONG — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a RIGHT earn 1.0 each, opposers the opposite — this feeds the scoreboard. supported: Brad Gerstner, Chamath, Sacks | opposed: Friedberg, Jason

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2023-01-13)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▲ LONG MSFTstock PRIMARY Sacks calls OpenAI 'kind of a Microsoft proxy' - Microsoft is the listed way to own the model layer
▲ LONG GOOGLstock adjacent DeepMind is Google's model asset and Chamath expects Google to open-source models to defend search
▲ LONG METAstock adjacent Sacks expects Facebook to do 'something huge in AI'; PyTorch is already its substrate contribution

Mention log newest first

Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E143 (2023-08-25) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 19:19 SUPPORT
“basically these big companies have decided, no, we're just gonna make all these models extremely good, extremely useful and very, very free. And so a lot of the resources are going there to subsidize, economically subsidize, and by implication, economically destroy the value of that category. That's going to be good for startups.”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E135 (2023-07-01) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:03:18 SUPPORT
“So whenever I see a chip maker and a cloud provider come together to put in a lot of money, it's essentially round tripping cash.”
Jason
Jason tech 53% · n=56 · E135 (2023-07-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 56:58 OPPOSE
“they're trialing, Friedberg, on average, six, seven, eight language models before they pick one, and they're not picking OpenAI every time.”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) tech 71% · n=17 · E133 (2023-06-16) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:27:44 SUPPORT
“when you think about what these hyperscalers are going to do, they're not gonna spend a billion, they're not gonna spend 10 billion. They'll spend a hundred billion dollars, right, in order to be in this race.”
Friedberg
Friedberg tech 55% · n=66 · E132 (2023-06-10) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:27:04 OPPOSE
“Foundational models are getting disrupted every other week. They're being decreased in size, parameters are being reduced. They're being commoditized. You can run these things on M2 chips.”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E130 (2023-05-26) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:02:10 SUPPORT · horizon 72mo
“But the most important thing, I think, to remember is that where the real value gets accrued is five, six, seven years later when the software and services companies show up and create a huge moat. And those are the Googles and the Facebooks and the Apples of the world.”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E129 (2023-05-19) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 29:02 SUPPORT
“I think in order for you to be able to compile that model, to generate that initial instantiation, you're still running it in a cluster of thousands of GPUs.”
Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E129 (2023-05-19) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 23:19 SUPPORT
“I think it's more of a moat where, because it's not that the ladder comes up and nobody else can get in, but the regulations are going to be a pretty big moat around major incumbents who know they qualify for this because they're going to write these standards.”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E128 (2023-05-12) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 14:54 SUPPORT
“There's this fuzzy gray area where a lot of people can find utility in a lot of different products, and then the one with the better distribution wins.”
Friedberg
Friedberg tech 55% · n=66 · E122 (2023-03-31) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 56:48 OPPOSE
“The model runs on 700 gigs. That's less data than fits on my iPhone. So I could take that model, I could take the parameters of that model, and I could create an entirely new version, I could fork it, and I could do something entirely new with it.”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E122 (2023-03-31) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 20:32 SUPPORT
“And then you have the distribution endpoints of which there are many whose economic incentives are very high, right? So Facebook doesn't want to just sit around and have all this traffic go to ChatGPT.”
Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E118 (2023-03-03) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 15:03 SUPPORT
“Maybe it just all ends up accreting to the big companies who can make massive investments in this space.”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) tech 71% · n=17 · E118 (2023-03-03) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 11:31 SUPPORT
“It may all end up with Microsoft and Google. I mean, this may end up looking like iOS and Android at the foundation model level.”
Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E116 (2023-02-17) · sentiment · strength 3 ▶ 1:24:57 SUPPORT
“The market has not resolved to the right answer with all the other big tech problems because they're monopolies.”
Friedberg
Friedberg tech 55% · n=66 · E116 (2023-02-17) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:16:06 OPPOSE
“And you know, as LLMs aren't right now, they feel like they're this monopoly held by Google and held by Microsoft and OpenAI. I think very quickly, like all technologies, they will commoditize.”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E116 (2023-02-17) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:05:35 OPPOSE
“I think that you'll see the emergence of these various models that are actually optimized for various ways of thinking or political leanings.”
Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E115 (2023-02-11) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:29:38 SUPPORT
“The good news is that the Google monopoly has finally been cracked. The bad news is that it's Microsoft and even bigger monopoly. That's the one that's done it. But it just shows how vulnerable all these big tech companies are.”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E115 (2023-02-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 42:19 SUPPORT
“This is something that we've said before, which is that ChatGPT is an incredibly important innovation, but it's an element of a platform who will get quickly commoditized because everybody will compete over time.”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E111 (2023-01-13) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 35:07 SUPPORT
“So my point is, David's right, the huge companies, I think, will create the substrates.”
Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E111 (2023-01-13) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 32:48 SUPPORT
“I don't think startups are going to be able to create the AI themselves, but they might be able to benefit from the APIs.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total push on the score, in conviction points across every mention — supports and opposes · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Chamath
Chamath 45%
9 scoring events · 36% of moves
+67.1 / -12.0 → net +55.1
Sacks
Sacks 39%
5 scoring events · 31% of moves
+67.8 → net +67.8
Friedberg
Friedberg 55%
3 scoring events · 18% of moves
+0.0 / -38.4 → net -38.4
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner 71% regular guest ×1.0
2 scoring events · 9% of moves
+20.3 → net +20.3
Jason
Jason 53%
1 scoring event · 6% of moves
+0.0 / -12.0 → net -12.0

⏳ decay drained -62.1 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E111 2023-01-13 init +35.0 35.0 E111 born by Sacks (explicit_prediction x2)
E111 2023-01-13 reinforce +14.6 49.6 E111 Chamath support x2 (new voice)
E112 2023-01-20 decay -2.0 47.6 E112 silent
E113 2023-01-27 decay -1.9 45.7 E113 silent
E114 2023-02-04 decay -1.8 43.9 E114 silent
E115 2023-02-11 reinforce +8.4 52.3 E115 Chamath support x2
E115 2023-02-11 reinforce +7.2 59.5 E115 Sacks support x2
E116 2023-02-17 oppose -12.0 47.5 E116 Chamath opposes x2
E116 2023-02-17 oppose -14.4 33.1 E116 Friedberg opposes x3
E116 2023-02-17 reinforce +12.0 45.1 E116 Sacks support x3
E118 2023-03-03 reinforce +12.3 57.5 E118 Brad Gerstner support x2 (new voice)
E118 2023-03-03 reinforce +6.4 63.8 E118 Sacks support x2
E119 2023-03-11 decay -2.6 61.3 E119 silent
E120 2023-03-17 decay -2.5 58.8 E120 silent
E121 2023-03-24 decay -2.4 56.5 E121 silent
E122 2023-03-31 reinforce +6.5 63.0 E122 Chamath support x2 (flipped from oppose)
E122 2023-03-31 oppose -12.0 51.0 E122 Friedberg opposes x2
E123 2023-04-07 decay -2.0 49.0 E123 silent
E124 2023-04-14 decay -2.0 47.0 E124 silent
E125 2023-04-21 decay -1.9 45.1 E125 silent
E126 2023-04-28 decay -1.8 43.3 E126 silent
E128 2023-05-12 reinforce +8.5 51.8 E128 Chamath support x2
E129 2023-05-19 reinforce +7.2 59.1 E129 Sacks support x2
E129 2023-05-19 reinforce +6.1 65.2 E129 Chamath support x2
E130 2023-05-26 reinforce +5.2 70.4 E130 Chamath support x2
E131 2023-06-02 decay -2.8 67.6 E131 silent
E132 2023-06-10 oppose -12.0 55.6 E132 Friedberg opposes x2
E133 2023-06-16 reinforce +8.0 63.6 E133 Brad Gerstner support x3
E134 2023-06-24 decay -2.5 61.0 E134 silent
E135 2023-07-01 oppose -12.0 49.0 E135 Jason opposes x2
E135 2023-07-01 reinforce +7.6 56.7 E135 Chamath support x2
E136 2023-07-09 decay -2.3 54.4 E136 silent
E137 2023-07-14 decay -2.2 52.2 E137 silent
E139 2023-07-27 decay -2.1 50.2 E139 silent
E140 2023-08-04 decay -2.0 48.2 E140 silent
E141 2023-08-11 decay -1.9 46.2 E141 silent
E142 2023-08-18 decay -1.8 44.4 E142 silent
E143 2023-08-25 reinforce +10.0 54.4 E143 Chamath support x3
E144 2023-09-01 decay -2.2 52.2 E144 silent
E146 2023-09-22 decay -2.1 50.1 E146 silent
E147 2023-09-29 decay -2.0 48.1 E147 silent
E148 2023-10-07 decay -1.9 46.2 E148 silent
E149 2023-10-13 decay -1.8 44.3 E149 silent
E150 2023-10-20 decay -1.8 42.6 E150 silent
E151 2023-10-27 decay -1.7 40.9 E151 silent
E152 2023-11-03 decay -1.6 39.2 E152 silent
E156 2023-12-08 decay -1.6 37.7 E156 silent
E157 2023-12-16 decay -1.5 36.2 E157 silent
E158 2023-12-23 decay -1.4 34.7 E158 silent
E159 2023-12-29 decay -1.4 33.3 E159 silent
E160 2024-01-06 decay -1.3 32.0 E160 silent
E161 2024-01-13 decay -1.3 30.7 E161 silent