← pool

🏛️ TikTok gets banned or force-divested and US platforms take the attention

The bipartisan Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act gives ByteDance 165 days to divest TikTok or be pulled from the Apple and Google app stores, and all four besties back it - Sacks and Jason on the divestiture case, Chamath on Palmer Luckey's reciprocity principle (they cannot sell to us what we cannot sell to them). If TikTok's 170m US users are disrupted, the ad dollars and attention go to the listed US platforms.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 86.9 GREEN
WATCH
band · contested
▲ LONG META
expression · bullish politics-market
RIGHT
result · return +24.0% · vs SPY +10.0%
2025-03-08
born 2024-03-08 (E169) → window closed
⚠ CONFLICTING IDEAS ON THE SAME TICKER — the board is arguing with itself; net it out (ticker view →)
GOOGL · ChatGPT takes Google search share and the market starts pricing the decay SHORT EMBER 21.2
GOOGL · Tort floodgates open on social media SHORT EMBER 20.4
META · Tort floodgates open on social media SHORT EMBER 20.4
GOOGL · Blue cities ban or license-cap robotaxis SHORT EMBER 20.3
GOOGL · Meta's AI assistant takes ten points of search share from Google SHORT DORMANT 6.4
META · Narrow Section 230 carve-out unleashes a tort wave on social platforms SHORT DORMANT 3.0
SNAP · Narrow Section 230 carve-out unleashes a tort wave on social platforms SHORT DORMANT 3.0

other ideas on the same ticker, same direction: Anthropic IPO (~Oct 2026) is attractively priced at $1.5-2T 61 (GOOGL) · Google wins consumer AI via distribution 58 (GOOGL) · Meta becomes America's open-source AI champion 55 (META) · Personal AI agents put the App Store's 30% take and opaque subscription/retail economics on notice 49 (META) · Own AWS, Azure and GCP and nothing else — the clouds capture the AI application dollars 48 (GOOGL) · Frontier AI labs keep durable premium pricing (not commoditized) 38 (GOOGL) · The AI doomer campaign fails — no FDAI, open source survives 31 (META) · Personal AI agents: Google's data moat wins the form factor 23 (GOOGL) · Independent frontier-model labs lose to hyperscaler capital 18 (GOOGL) · Independent frontier-model labs lose to hyperscaler capital 18 (META) · Willow's error-correction scaling puts encryption on a two-to-five-year clock 9 (GOOGL) · Meta's AI assistant takes ten points of search share from Google 6 (META)

⚖ Why this result

fully deterministic — computed from daily closes on the scoring date; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2024-03-08 → 2025-03-08 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▲ LONG META (primary play). META rose 24.0% over the window → return (sign flipped for a SHORT) = +24.0% (the call made money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +14.0% → vs SPY = +24.0 − (+14.0) = +10.0% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the result uses.
  4. Rule fired:
    ▶ RIGHT — return ≥ +10% AND beat SPY by 5+ ✓ (return 24.0, vs SPY 10.0)
    · HALF — return ≥ +5% OR beat SPY at all
    · WRONG — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a RIGHT earn 1.0 each, opposers the opposite — this feeds the scoreboard. supported: Chamath, Jason, Keith Rabois, Thomas Laffont | opposed: Friedberg, Sacks | proxy-sensitive: SNAP→MISS (-21.5%)

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2024-03-08)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▲ LONG METAstock PRIMARY Reels is the largest direct substitute for TikTok attention and ad budget
▲ LONG GOOGLstock adjacent YouTube Shorts is the other short-form beneficiary
▲ LONG SNAPstock adjacent Spotlight competes for the same short-form teen audience

Mention log newest first

Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market 42% · n=74 · E212 (2025-01-25) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 53:35 OPPOSE
“I do worry a lot about the precedent being set here with respect to foreign government actions on US companies in their local countries. Imagine the CCP tells Tesla they have to sell their Chinese operations and give 50% of the Chinese operations to the Chinese government because of their concerns about security”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market 51% · n=95 · E212 (2025-01-25) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 45:41 SUPPORT
“But at the end of the day, the president was very clear that it is completely and entirely worthless without his permit, and he wants to own 50% of this asset. Now, if you're a buyer of something, you're not going to pay $100 billion if you control whether it can exist or not. You're basically going to pay today's equivalent of one franc, which would be one dollar.”
TH
Thomas Laffont (regular guest ×1.0) politics-market: 3 resolved, unproven · E212 (2025-01-25) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 35:52 SUPPORT
“But I think you put it all together, you know, is 100 billion a reasonable scenario? ... And then could it be a trillion dollar asset, the way Trump has mentioned? I mean, in a world where Facebook's one and a half, right? And the penetration of TikTok in the US is 50% of what Metta is. I don't think it's unrealistic.”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market 42% · n=74 · E211 (2025-01-18) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:17:22 SUPPORT
“Seems like they're going to strike a deal. Chuck Schumer today is calling for a delay in the ban. I'm sure by the time this episode airs, something will have been worked out to create some space for them to get a deal done. But I think they want to get a deal done and keep TikTok active in the US. Seems like both the Dems and the Republicans are pushing for it.”
Jason
Jason politics-market 49% · n=61 · E211 (2025-01-18) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:15:38 SUPPORT
“if you think about the two biggest imports from China right now, it's fentanyl and TikTok. They want to make us addicted. They want to impact our society. They want to divide us. This is a massive psyops that's going on. It is a psyops, and it is a spyware, and it's been proven they spied on journalists. These are bad actors. It has to go.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market 51% · n=95 · E211 (2025-01-18) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:11:19 SUPPORT
“So I do agree with Mark that we have to find a suitable home. And I think that we'll probably find one. And I think that it probably happens under the Trump presidency. And whoever gets their hands on it gets their hands on an incredible asset that they will be able to buy extremely cheaply. Because there is no way that there is a fair market value here deal for that asset.”
Mark Pincus
Mark Pincus (guest ×0.5) no politics-market track record · E211 (2025-01-18) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:09:11 SUPPORT
“And so I'm, the best outcome, I think, would be forced to divest and sell to another American company. But if that doesn't happen, I'm kind of nervous about a real backlash.”
Jason
Jason politics-market 49% · n=61 · E207 (2024-12-13) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:01:39 SUPPORT
“So if they'll do it to their own people, they would have no problem doing it to an adversary and, ask yourself, if the shareholders care about money, they would be willing to divest, right? No problem. They want to take the company public. So if you won't divest and get off the board as the CCP, it's because you see this as a valuable tool, right?”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market 51% · n=95 · E207 (2024-12-13) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:00:38 SUPPORT
“I said, you have to look at the Pegasus-like equivalent, infiltration of WhatsApp, having been done on TikTok... But there's probably 1,000 to 10,000 to 15,000 people. I do suspect that state actors are smart enough to figure out how to triangulate who.”
Keith Rabois
Keith Rabois (regular guest ×1.0) politics-market: 2 resolved, unproven · E207 (2024-12-13) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 54:56 SUPPORT
“You don't even have to have a conversation. In my view, TikTok is a threat to the national security of the United States.”
Jason
Jason politics-market 49% · n=61 · E199 (2024-10-11) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:10:44 SUPPORT
“I'm 100% certain that the CCP is using it, because people have tracked already journalists using it. So if they've already done it, it's 100%.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market 48% · n=87 · E199 (2024-10-11) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:09:45 OPPOSE
“And I think that this idea that it's somehow a propaganda tool around programming our youth, I think that's a moral panic that's been exaggerated.”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market 42% · n=74 · E199 (2024-10-11) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 1:09:40 BRUSH_OFF
“Looks like they gathered some reasonable data.”
Jason
Jason politics-market 49% · n=61 · E176 (2024-04-26) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:22:17 SUPPORT
“I want to see this thing banned immediately, or divest. I would prefer it be divested, because I think people love it.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market 51% · n=95 · E176 (2024-04-26) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:20:50 SUPPORT
“I don't think the product is much of anything. It's probably no better or no worse than shorts or reels or some of these other alternatives.”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market 42% · n=74 · E176 (2024-04-26) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:17:47 SUPPORT · horizon 12mo
“if I'm bite dance, I'm very likely going to hire a bunch of bankers, run an auction process, and sell this thing, and I have a year to do it.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market 48% · n=87 · E176 (2024-04-26) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:12:13 SUPPORT
“this divestiture thing is a total fig leaf because it's not clear that China is going to allow TikTok to divest ... So I don't think they're going to be able to divest. I think they're just going to get shut down.”
Jason
Jason politics-market 49% · n=61 · E175 (2024-04-19) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:01:35 OPPOSE
“the algorithm is such a key component of that TikTok experience... Shorts serves up garbage. Instagram serves up garbage.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market 51% · n=95 · E175 (2024-04-19) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:01:09 OPPOSE
“I stumbled into the fact that YouTube has YouTube Shorts, and there is a lot of that content, but it's terrible and the algorithm is really bad. And so fortunately, I just stopped using YouTube.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market 48% · n=87 · E170 (2024-03-15) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:18:27 SUPPORT
“100 million people are soon going to be asking. When TikTok gets shut down, 100 million people who used it every day are going to be like, why did this happen?”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market 51% · n=95 · E170 (2024-03-15) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:00:47 SUPPORT
“I think divestiture should not be allowed. I actually just think, unfortunately, this app should just be shut down, and the people will migrate to Instagram, and the people will migrate to YouTube.”
Jason
Jason politics-market 49% · n=61 · E170 (2024-03-15) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:00:03 SUPPORT
“Just divest. And if they won't divest, it tells you everything you need to know. This is super valuable to them, and that algorithm is so valuable that they know they can program the US citizenry.”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market 42% · n=74 · E170 (2024-03-15) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 56:13 SUPPORT
“If TikTok gets banned in the US it's going to benefit Metta. It's going to benefit Instagram. ... It's going to benefit a few other social networks. It's going to benefit Elon at Twitter.”
Jason
Jason politics-market 49% · n=61 · E169 (2024-03-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:15:44 SUPPORT
“This thing is far too powerful for the CCP to have any kind of access to it, for the Chinese government to have any kind of access to it. It has to be divested.”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market 42% · n=74 · E169 (2024-03-08) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:13:29 SUPPORT
“I think we saw this during, after October 7th, that there was a significant surge in pro-Hamas videos relative to Israel support videos. That's the sort of thing where you could kind of see something that sets an opinion that may be disruptive to the social fabric, to the election cycle”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market 51% · n=95 · E169 (2024-03-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:12:15 SUPPORT
“I think you have to deal with TikTok as a business issue. And I agree with Palmer Luckey, which is, they should not be able to sell to us what we cannot sell to them. And I think that that's a fair principle that we can live on.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market 48% · n=87 · E169 (2024-03-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:08:16 SUPPORT
“Look, if it's true that TikTok is sharing data with the CCP, then I think the United States is well within its rights to either ban it or to cause it to be divested. And I personally like the divestiture option.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total push on the score, in conviction points across every mention — supports and opposes · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Jason
Jason 49%
7 scoring events · 37% of moves
+81.2 / -12.0 → net +69.2
Chamath
Chamath 51%
7 scoring events · 22% of moves
+43.5 / -12.0 → net +31.5
Friedberg
Friedberg 42%
6 scoring events · 18% of moves
+23.2 / -22.7 → net +0.6
Sacks
Sacks 48%
4 scoring events · 14% of moves
+24.4 / -12.0 → net +12.4
Keith Rabois
Keith Rabois regular guest ×1.0
1 scoring event · 4% of moves
+11.3 → net +11.3
Mark Pincus
Mark Pincus guest ×0.5
1 scoring event · 3% of moves
+6.5 → net +6.5
TH
Thomas Laffont regular guest ×1.0
1 scoring event · 1% of moves
+3.3 → net +3.3

⏳ decay drained -82.7 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E169 2024-03-08 init +42.0 42.0 E169 born by Jason (explicit_prediction x3)
E169 2024-03-08 reinforce +13.1 55.0 E169 Sacks support x2 (new voice)
E169 2024-03-08 reinforce +10.1 65.2 E169 Chamath support x2 (new voice)
E169 2024-03-08 reinforce +7.8 73.0 E169 Friedberg support x2 (new voice)
E170 2024-03-15 reinforce +4.0 77.1 E170 Friedberg support x2
E170 2024-03-15 reinforce +4.1 81.2 E170 Jason support x3
E170 2024-03-15 reinforce +3.4 84.6 E170 Chamath support x3
E170 2024-03-15 reinforce +2.3 86.9 E170 Sacks support x2
E171 2024-03-22 decay -3.5 83.4 E171 silent
E172 2024-03-29 decay -3.3 80.1 E172 silent
E173 2024-04-05 decay -3.2 76.9 E173 silent
E174 2024-04-12 decay -3.1 73.8 E174 silent
E175 2024-04-19 oppose -12.0 61.8 E175 Chamath opposes x2
E175 2024-04-19 oppose -12.0 49.8 E175 Jason opposes x2
E176 2024-04-26 reinforce +9.0 58.8 E176 Sacks support x3
E176 2024-04-26 reinforce +6.2 65.0 E176 Friedberg support x2
E176 2024-04-26 reinforce +5.2 70.3 E176 Chamath support x2 (flipped from oppose)
E176 2024-04-26 reinforce +4.5 74.7 E176 Jason support x2 (flipped from oppose)
E177 2024-05-03 decay -3.0 71.7 E177 silent
E178 2024-05-10 decay -2.9 68.9 E178 silent
E179 2024-05-17 decay -2.8 66.1 E179 silent
E180 2024-05-24 decay -2.6 63.5 E180 silent
E181 2024-05-31 decay -2.5 60.9 E181 silent
E182 2024-06-07 decay -2.4 58.5 E182 silent
E183 2024-06-14 decay -2.3 56.1 E183 silent
E184 2024-06-20 decay -2.2 53.9 E184 silent
E185 2024-06-29 decay -2.2 51.7 E185 silent
E186 2024-07-04 decay -2.1 49.7 E186 silent
E187 2024-07-12 decay -2.0 47.7 E187 silent
E188 2024-07-19 decay -1.9 45.8 E188 silent
E189 2024-07-26 decay -1.8 43.9 E189 silent
E190 2024-08-02 decay -1.8 42.2 E190 silent
E191 2024-08-09 decay -1.7 40.5 E191 silent
E192 2024-08-16 decay -1.6 38.9 E192 silent
E193 2024-08-23 decay -1.6 37.3 E193 silent
E194 2024-08-30 decay -1.5 35.8 E194 silent
E195 2024-09-06 decay -1.4 34.4 E195 silent
E196 2024-09-20 decay -1.4 33.0 E196 silent
E197 2024-09-27 decay -1.3 31.7 E197 silent
E198 2024-10-03 decay -1.3 30.4 E198 silent
E199 2024-10-11 brush_off -10.7 19.8 E199 Friedberg brushes off
E199 2024-10-11 oppose -12.0 7.8 E199 Sacks opposes x2
E199 2024-10-11 reinforce +13.8 21.6 E199 Jason support x2
E200 2024-10-18 decay -0.9 20.8 E200 silent
E201 2024-10-25 decay -0.8 19.9 E201 silent
E202 2024-11-01 decay -0.8 19.1 E202 silent
E203 2024-11-08 decay -0.8 18.4 E203 silent
E204 2024-11-16 decay -0.7 17.6 E204 silent
E205 2024-11-23 decay -0.7 16.9 E205 silent
E206 2024-12-07 decay -0.7 16.2 E206 silent
E207 2024-12-13 reinforce +11.3 27.6 E207 Keith Rabois support x3 (new voice) [w=0.50]
E207 2024-12-13 reinforce +10.9 38.4 E207 Chamath support x2
E207 2024-12-13 reinforce +9.2 47.7 E207 Jason support x2
E208 2024-12-20 decay -1.9 45.7 E208 silent
E209 2025-01-04 decay -1.8 43.9 E209 silent
E210 2025-01-11 decay -1.8 42.2 E210 silent
E211 2025-01-18 reinforce +6.5 48.7 E211 Mark Pincus support x2 (new voice) [w=0.50]
E211 2025-01-18 reinforce +9.2 57.9 E211 Chamath support x3
E211 2025-01-18 reinforce +7.6 65.5 E211 Jason support x3
E211 2025-01-18 reinforce +5.2 70.7 E211 Friedberg support x2 (flipped from brush_off)
E212 2025-01-25 reinforce +3.3 74.0 E212 Thomas Laffont support x2 (new voice) [w=0.50]
E212 2025-01-25 reinforce +4.7 78.6 E212 Chamath support x3
E212 2025-01-25 oppose -12.0 66.6 E212 Friedberg opposes x2
E213 2025-01-31 decay -2.7 64.0 E213 silent
E214 2025-02-07 decay -2.6 61.4 E214 silent
E215 2025-02-15 decay -2.5 59.0 E215 silent
E216 2025-02-21 decay -2.4 56.6 E216 silent
E217 2025-03-01 decay -2.3 54.3 E217 silent
E218 2025-03-08 decay -2.2 52.2 E218 silent