+0.0
net board stance
what this means
114.41
-0.4% · close 2026-09-08
-4% / -1% / -2%
1m / 3m / 12m
-38%
vs SPY since 2023-10-07
48%
of 52w range · -7.8% off high
0/1
hit rate as primary · α -54
Where we stand — 0 live ideas
No active idea holds this ticker. Anything below is history.
Where the winds are blowing
NET BOARD STANCE, LAST 60 EPISODES —
rising = the besties are building this position, falling = abandoning it. Replayed from
score_events; an idea counts from birth until its window closes.
PRICE VS SPY OVER THE SAME WINDOW, % — did the
talk lead the tape or follow it?
Who's pushing which way
each voice's net push ON THIS TICKER — their most recent stance per idea × the idea's direction × strength, so supporting a bearish idea pushes down. Not conviction (that lives on the idea); this is direction of travel per person. what w= means
Track record on XLY
As a PRIMARY play the besties are 0 hit / 0 partial / 1 miss over 1 closed window — credit 0.0, average α -54.2. Adjacent plays are listed but never scored.
The tape — what was actually said
every capture on any idea holding XLY, newest first · quotes verbatim, timestamps deep-link into the episode
obviously the 3% number is way ahead of expectations. It's a fantastic number. It just feels like everything is humming on all cylinders here.
There's a lot of spending in there, as we've talked about here, putting that aside, it feels like the economy is in really great shape.
And what I was noticing was that we were going to come in, I said, in the low threes. And I think, you know, if Atlanta Fed is right, I don't think they are, but I think it's going to be in the low to mid threes. It's going to be meaningfully greater than what people are expecting.
PH
Philippe Laffont
oppose ×2
▼ on
🌍 Payroll revisions expose an economy materially weaker than the headline data
E227 · 2025-05-09
▶ 15:23
on the hard data, the part that's most surprising is that consumers have very weak sentiment, but in the meantime, consumer spending is remarkably resilient.
JO
Joe Lonsdale
support ×2
▼ on
🌍 Payroll revisions expose an economy materially weaker than the headline data
E218 · 2025-03-08
▶ 18:52
And it's a really important point also that we should mention, is that the last four years, the economy has looked OK. But part of that is because government's been hiring like mad.
I am surprised that we don't see even more dramatic revisions. And that probably again is like errors on top of errors. I really don't trust, like, you know, you showed the GDP data or you showed the unemployment rate, Jason?
One of the big things that we've talked about is how many backward revisions there are to everything from non-farm payrolls to GDP, that they've become so unreliable.
And we talked about this before, where this is also a problem at the federal level when you look at GDP and job growth, because it looks like a lot of these jobs are actually fake, manufactured, government-type jobs.
that actually maps to a lot of this intuition that I have had over the last few months when I've said I think we're in a low-key recession
I do think that that's one big turnaround that's happened in the last 90 days, which is really, I think, a big surprise to a lot of folks is just how robust things are
So just to be clear about what's happening, 85% of this quarter's GDP was induced by the government.
at some point here equities are probably going to be cheaper before they're going to get more expensive
this is less about the election and more about the markets not liking the Fed's rate cut on September 18th
So Powell's rhetoric is in a way at odds with the magnitude of this cut. So why didn't they just cut 25 basis points?
I think that the smart financial actors are guessing recession or guessing contraction. I think what they're also guessing is similar to non-farm payrolls. We're going to go through a couple of difficult GDP revisions, probably downward.
It's telling you that the people that own it have realized that it's less of a technology business and it's more of a cyclical business that ebbs and flows with the ability to spend money on behalf of the consumer.
Yeah, I mean, I think the economy is a lot slower than what people thought
I predicted this would happen, and I didn't know exactly how we would get the correction, but now it's come out. By the way, it's not just this 818,000 jobs. If you look at the last 12 months and out of all the restatements, it's been something like 1.2 million.
one of the biggest surprises of 2023 is that we didn't have a recession. I mean, I think most people were betting on a recession in 23 They thought that a soft landing would be almost impossible.
maybe the overall economic data right now is mixed to positive. I'll certainly concede that.
That is Federal Reserve data that tells the truth about the US economy. And it turns out that the economy is pretty good and doing a lot for a lot of people.
The GDP is 5% or something like that and unemployment is low. So the economy is actually doing extraordinary. That's just the fact.
everybody's going to wake up with a heck of a credit card bill at 15 or 20 percent, and they're not going to be able to pay it
at some point, the consumer realizes that they're just not as wealthy as they thought they were ... you just wonder if the consumer is like Wiley Coyote and has gone off a cliff but just hasn't looked down yet
some of these industries where you have these large ticket purchases that drive consumer consumption, their backs are against the wall ... I do think that you're going to just have a little bit of belt tightening in the consumer.