← pool

📈 2021 is the peak of the risk-capital golden era

Sacks calls the top on the 1,000-unicorns-a-year boom: taxes and spending are going up big time no matter what passes in Washington, peacetime deficits and the national debt are at records, China has a looming debt crisis and supply chains are short — so we will look back at 2021 as the golden era and say we screwed it up. The listed end of that pipe, the recent-IPO and high-multiple growth cohort, is where it prices.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 96.1 GREEN
WATCH
band · contested
▼ SHORT IPO
expression · bearish equities
HIT
outcome · R +54.1% · α +69.6%
2022-10-02
window closed
⚠ CONFLICTING IDEAS ON THE SAME TICKER — the board is arguing with itself; net it before trading (ticker view →)
ARKK · It's 1997-98, not 1999 — the melt-up has years left LONG GREEN 67.3
IPO · 2026 is the year of mega-IPOs LONG DORMANT 6.3

⚖ Why this verdict

fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2021-10-02 → 2022-10-02 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▼ SHORT IPO (primary play). IPO fell 54.1% over the window → direction-adjusted R = +54.1% (the call made money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned -15.4%α = +54.1 − (-15.4) = +69.6% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
    Stock-selection read: +38.7% — did IPO move the predicted way relative to the market. The two only differ on a SHORT: this call beat the index outright.
  4. Rule fired:
    ▶ HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5 ✓ (R 54.1, α 69.6)
    · PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0
    · MISS — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a HIT earn 1.0 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Bill Gurley, Brad Gerstner, Chamath, Jason, Sacks | opposed: Friedberg

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2021-10-02)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▼ SHORT IPOetf PRIMARY Renaissance IPO ETF is the listed proxy for the venture-funded cohort whose funding cycle Sacks says is topping
▼ SHORT ARKKetf adjacent highest-beta listed expression of the risk-capital bid
▼ SHORT IWMetf adjacent small-cap risk appetite rolls over with the cycle

Mention log

Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E49 (2021-10-02) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:20:25 SUPPORT
“what I'm worried about is taxes are going up big time, no matter what happens in Washington, spending is going up big time. We now have peacetime deficits that are the biggest that they've ever been. The national debt, the peacetime national debt is the highest it's ever been. ... I mean, there's a lot of things here that could upset the apple cart. And what I'm afraid of is we're going to look back at this year, the thousand unicorns being minted and say that really was the golden era and everything happened after that. We really screwed it up.”
Friedberg
Friedberg equities w=0.87 · n=120 · E49 (2021-10-02) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:21:03 BRUSH_OFF
“Sacks, you sound like the old guy at Starbucks that says that every generation and complains about the last generation were in the golden era and it's all downhill from here.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E56 (2021-11-20) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 56:21 SUPPORT
“all this money that gets spent gets sucked out of the private economy somehow. It either comes from taxes or gets added to the national debt, but either way, it comes out of the private economy and resources that could be allocated to the next generation of innovative companies.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E57 (2021-12-04) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 53:21 SUPPORT
“Keith and I just talked about how we're about to enter a very different kind of macro environment for growth stocks. And we don't know how long it's going to take. ... But there's no question that multiples and valuations are going to come down. And there's a lot of younger founders and investors who never lived through a bear market or a down cycle. And they're about to get a rude awakening.”
Chamath
Chamath equities w=0.84 · n=160 · E57 (2021-12-04) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 26:23 SUPPORT · horizon 18mo
“The real problem is all these companies that I think raised a lot of money in private markets are now going to get stuck because if the public markets have compressed multiples by 30 to 50%, they are the ultimate buyer. ... All these private businesses and then all of the ones that were planning IPOs in the next 12 to 18 months are probably in a little bit more of a challenging spot than they were before.”
Jason
Jason equities w=0.97 · n=105 · E57 (2021-12-04) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 31:42 SUPPORT
“if you look at private markets, it's obvious that they were getting ahead of themselves. ... So the idea that a private company with 20 million or 30 million in SaaS revenue was worth 50, 60, 70 times that, that's not the case right now in the public markets. And maybe it goes back down to 20 or 30, but you just have to have that runway to land the plane, correct? ... the sense of entitlement I'm seeing on all sides of the table right now, from founders to board members to investors, it just seems like everybody's in some sort of mad dash to secure some bag by any means necessary. And there's no focus on the customers and the product and the team.”
Friedberg
Friedberg equities w=0.87 · n=120 · E58 (2021-12-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 53:34 SUPPORT
“He took SoftBank money. SoftBank, as you guys, as we all know, creates a very strong incentive and capitalizes businesses to go after kind of ultra, perhaps unnatural growth. ... the loss of jobs is the cost of capital with these ultra high growth incentives that are kind of being structurally built into the fundraising rounds in these later stage deals lately.”
Chamath
Chamath equities w=0.84 · n=160 · E58 (2021-12-11) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 55:29 SUPPORT
“The root cause of why this is here, as far as I can tell, is not a company that doesn't have consumer demand. It's a company that may have been mismanaged for growth to meet the consumer demand because of too much money. ... maybe we overgrew because we were drunk on free money. And now we have to realize that we actually have too much capacity for the demand that actually exists.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E58 (2021-12-11) · positioning · strength 3 ▶ 1:01:06 SUPPORT
“listen, we may be going into a very different environment, and I think the company is worth the valuation we got, but if you just look at the public comps, valuations are down 30%, 40%. ... So if we were to take more money into the round at the same valuation, that's kind of a good deal for the company, and it gives us more runway, gives us more insurance.”
Friedberg
Friedberg equities w=0.87 · n=120 · E62 (2022-01-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 36:29 SUPPORT
“to take a write down on 900 unicorns is going to cause a write down of hundreds of billions of dollars across all VC portfolios in aggregate, because they're not going to end up going public. ... they've all got these great marked books right now. You know, the books are all marked to 3X, you know, multiple and invested capital. And now they're going to end up having these liquidity events that are going to come in at shockingly low valuations. And there's going to be this great write down and retrenchment.”
Chamath
Chamath equities w=0.84 · n=160 · E62 (2022-01-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 37:24 SUPPORT
“Mid-tier maybe, but my point is when you have 900 companies with a billion dollars in plus, they have to go public. They have to go public. Correct. You can't go public into a valuation framework that values you at 30 to 40% less of your last private mark.”
Jason
Jason equities w=0.97 · n=105 · E62 (2022-01-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 38:09 SUPPORT
“One is The Athletic yesterday, which had raised money at 500 million just two years ago, just sold for about 500 million to The New York Times. ... And so there'll be plenty of those that occur. So there'll be a lot of pushes, I think, is my prediction of those 900 unicorns.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E62 (2022-01-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 40:36 SUPPORT
“I think that the trickle down effect is inevitable, but I'm not sure it's fully kicked in yet. It's going to take a few high profile deals to land at, say, 50 times ARR instead of 100 times ARR in order for everybody to know that there's a new valuation level.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E65 (2022-01-29) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 5:37 SUPPORT
“the public markets have massively corrected. And now finally, you know, we talked about this few few months ago, those new price levels have trickled their way down into venture markets. And so finally, you know, venture deals are starting to price at more reasonable prices. ... I think that the prices now are coming down because what I've heard is that the crossover investors like Tiger, like KOTU who are deploying all this money, they've really slowed down now. I think they're all kind of licking their wounds. And so like all of this money that was flooding into the venture space is kind of on pause right now.”
Chamath
Chamath equities w=0.84 · n=160 · E65 (2022-01-29) · positioning · strength 3 ▶ 8:06 SUPPORT
“But my private book was up a billion dollars. And I told the team, I'm like, no, this is not real. So we have to take those marks because, you know, you have other venture firms that are pricing these deals and we get audited K1s. ... And I said, this is not real. We were at best break even and probably lost money. But you can't, you can't not take these marks because like, you know, you have an entire fund complex that lives on these marks.”
Friedberg
Friedberg equities w=0.87 · n=120 · E65 (2022-01-29) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 9:12 SUPPORT
“there's a significant disincentive for venture firms to take markdowns, to raise capital into a private business at a price that's lower than the prior round. Because when they do that, the marked value of their portfolio goes down. And then it makes it harder for that venture firm to go out and raise the next fund that they're going to try and raise from their LPs, because it looks like they're not good investors.”
Jason
Jason equities w=0.97 · n=105 · E65 (2022-01-29) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 12:01 SUPPORT
“As everything was going up, these new fund managers are like, we're at 100 IRR, we're at 200% IRR, because this crypto investment we did got marked up. And I was just thinking about what Bill Gurley would always say, which I think is a Howard Marks quote, you can't eat IRR.”
Chamath
Chamath equities w=0.84 · n=160 · E68 (2022-02-19) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 43:05 SUPPORT · horizon 24mo
“the overwhelming misvaluation of late stage private companies ... But I think the reality is that at some point in the next year or two, these other companies have to get public. ... The problem is if you're high burn and you were counting on yet another successive round or you're at a point in your life cycle where you need to go public, in the next two years, if you go public, you will get taken to the woodshed.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E68 (2022-02-19) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 47:44 SUPPORT
“I think Tiger built a great business in providing late stage sort of passive, non-dilutive capital to companies, SaaS companies. ... I think those valuations are going to come down.”
Friedberg
Friedberg equities w=0.87 · n=120 · E68 (2022-02-19) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:00:47 SUPPORT
“Tiger's model was, let's just get the multiples up. There's multiple expansion and growth, so we'll make money two ways when the company goes public in 18 to 24 months. Obviously, when the markets end up tanking and all those multiples compress, no growth rate is going to solve that problem for you.”
Friedberg
Friedberg equities w=0.87 · n=120 · E70 (2022-02-24) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 58:53 SUPPORT
“I think an opportunity to move away from speculative behavior into real kind of cherry picking, productive, cash generating businesses ... I think the whole time frame around like speculative stuff is kind of wiped out. I think that that era is gone now.”
Jason
Jason equities w=0.97 · n=105 · E71 (2022-03-05) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:06:59 SUPPORT
“deals are taking longer to close, people are starting to do diligence again, and people are discussing what the right valuation for this early stage startup is, which is good. ... late stage madness is gone. It's over.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E71 (2022-03-05) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:07:32 SUPPORT
“Yeah, I mean, I think 100 times ARR is over, but we no one really knows where it's landing. So I've seen some deals get done at 60 to 80 times, but no one really knows where it should be.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E72 (2022-03-19) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 54:57 SUPPORT
“I think that there's going to be a trickle down effect of what's happened in the market to privates. And the valuations are going to go back to their pre-COVID levels. ... So we're seeing a massive repricing of deals and that's going to continue.”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) equities w=0.95 · n=22 · E73 (2022-03-26) · positioning · strength 3 ▶ 27:32 SUPPORT
“This fall is when we'll start to see real price discovery. You couldn't pry a late stage dollar out of my hand right now, because I don't think that we have real price discovery going on.”
Chamath
Chamath equities w=0.84 · n=160 · E73 (2022-03-26) · positioning · strength 2 ▶ 45:20 SUPPORT
“I don't think that there are, I don't want to be investing incremental capital into a late stage startup that's poorly run, that doesn't have their margins in line, and then having to work it out. Why do that? Again, I can just go in the S&P 500 and get 8%.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E73 (2022-03-26) · positioning · strength 2 ▶ 40:42 SUPPORT
“Not because we won't get hit with the same valuation corrections that everybody else is going to suffer, but because a few years ago, we decided we were going to invest in a certain kind of company. I mean, high margin SaaS and marketplace businesses that were not capital intensive. ... And we turned down investments that were growing fast, but they had a horrible burn multiple. And so and I do think most of our companies raised last year when, you know, they made hay while the sun shined.”
Jason
Jason equities w=0.97 · n=105 · E75 (2022-04-09) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 7:56 SUPPORT
“we've been talking a little bit about the contraction in tech, the growth stocks having their multiples lowered, and we knew this was coming, but it's been a horrible week for large companies starting the layoffs”
Chamath
Chamath equities w=0.84 · n=160 · E75 (2022-04-09) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 13:14 SUPPORT · horizon 18mo
“I think the worst means that there's an 18 month period where you cannot raise money on your terms, you have to raise money on the market terms. ... if you're not in a position to show good growth over these next two years, I would encourage you to just get your balance sheet in order to wait it out.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E75 (2022-04-09) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 14:14 SUPPORT
“If they just slammed on the brakes three or four months ago, when we were talking on the spot about the coming downturn, they could still have $30 million in the bank. ... if you're a high-burn company right now, that's not generating a lot of revenue to go along with it. You better slam on the brakes and rationalize your cost structure before it's too late.”
Jason
Jason equities w=0.97 · n=105 · E78 (2022-04-30) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 24:27 SUPPORT
“I've been on many calls with founders who've met with 50 VCs, and the conversations are moving to, you know, how many months to break even? And, you know, how many customers do you have? And how have they increased? And let's talk about the churn. It is getting super pragmatic out there. If you're a founder, and we said this a year ago, but it's worth stating here, this is not the moment I would try to over optimize. If you have a term sheet or money on the table, I would close it.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E78 (2022-04-30) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 38:41 SUPPORT
“you look at all the engines of sort of growth and prosperity, the small caps, the recent IPOs, the growth stocks, they've been absolutely hammered. It really hasn't been this bad since the.com crash of 2000, and not just the April period, but all the way in October where it kept going. And then the 2008 real estate crash. So we're already top three worst situations for growth stocks in the last 20 years.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E80 (2022-05-13) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 49:51 SUPPORT
“The crossover investors are washed out of the system, they're gone. I mean, Tiger's already deployed all of its capital, and I don't know when they're going to be back. ... Even if you had the same amount of money being raised and deployed, but it was happening over three years instead of one, that would be a two-thirds reduction in the availability of capital in the system.”
Friedberg
Friedberg equities w=0.87 · n=120 · E80 (2022-05-13) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 32:43 OPPOSE
“In the contrast of everyone saying, hey, there's no capital available, there's no capital available. That's not true. There's more capital than has ever been available.”
Jason
Jason equities w=0.97 · n=105 · E80 (2022-05-13) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 32:50 SUPPORT
“So those are commitments, it's not cash in the bank.”
BI
Bill Gurley (regular guest ×1.0) equities w=1.11 · n=9 · E81 (2022-05-23) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:13 SUPPORT
“It's more like a sawtooth. It risks on is a very slow process and it's reflexive. So it grows and grows and grows and grows. And then risk off tends to be very abrupt. ... This cycle, risk on was from 2009 to five months ago. ... And risk off is five months. And the thing that's really tough about that is it requires mental adjustment very quickly”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) equities w=0.95 · n=22 · E81 (2022-05-23) · positioning · strength 3 ▶ 37:00 SUPPORT
“if somebody calls me up tomorrow and says, hey, Tiger's doing this deal at 75 times ARR. Do you want to do it? They would have to pry the dollar out of my fucking hand with a crowbar. I'm not risking my money or my partner's money doing something that we're not underwriting.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E85 (2022-06-30) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:02:21 SUPPORT
“there's been a regime change in the public markets. The way that investors look at these companies is changing. It's not about growth at all costs anymore. ... What investors want right now, they still want growth, but they want it with low burn. High burn operations are going to get punished.”
Chamath
Chamath equities w=0.84 · n=160 · E85 (2022-06-30) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:03:24 SUPPORT
“Because what David said I think is 100,000% right, what Sacks just said. There is a massive, massive regime change here.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E88 (2022-07-22) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:34:01 SUPPORT
“If you were a VC last year, you should have been realizing as much as you can because valuation levels are really high.”
Chamath
Chamath equities w=0.84 · n=160 · E88 (2022-07-22) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:34:44 SUPPORT
“If you're if you're a venture investor who took a longitudinal view on public market stocks and then have now seen 60 to 70 percent write downs of those same stocks that you could have distributed, you should still have something to answer to.”
Jason
Jason equities w=0.97 · n=105 · E88 (2022-07-22) · positioning · strength 3 ▶ 1:35:26 SUPPORT
“What I feel smart about, I'll be honest, is we had, I think, let's just say, I'm making up a number here, four to five times we were offered the opportunity to trim our positions in secondary with our winners from people who wanted to buy secondary shares. I did it probably four out of five times.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E91 (2022-08-13) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 11:42 SUPPORT
“Tiger had huge funds. They were deploying very quickly, but there was a lot of so-called tourist money, basically money from crossover funds. Investors who are not primarily VCs came into the ecosystem over the last few years, and a lot of that was driven by sovereigns and by liquidity. So, you know, you can't forget that we had $10 trillion of liquidity pumped into the system over the last couple of years, and many billions of that found its way into the tech ecosystem.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E97 (2022-09-23) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 21:19 SUPPORT
“But I would tend to think that this is an overly optimistic, overly rosy scenario.”
Jason
Jason equities w=0.97 · n=105 · E97 (2022-09-23) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 15:37 SUPPORT
“I think when the tide goes out, we find out, right? And this is what's happening. The tide's out, and you're going to find all the weakness in the system. It's all going to get flushed.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E98 (2022-10-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 9:02 SUPPORT
“So this whole like frothy environment that you had for in Hollywood last year, that's just over. The faucet's been turned off, and it's not even turned off to a trickle. It's just stopped.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Sacks
Sacks w=0.89
18 scoring events · 44% of moves
+92.4 → net +92.4
Friedberg
Friedberg w=0.87
7 scoring events · 20% of moves
+15.8 / -25.5 → net -9.7
Jason
Jason w=0.97
9 scoring events · 16% of moves
+33.5 → net +33.5
Chamath
Chamath w=0.84
9 scoring events · 16% of moves
+33.1 → net +33.1
BI
Bill Gurley w=1.11 regular guest ×1.0
1 scoring event · 3% of moves
+5.4 → net +5.4
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner w=0.95 regular guest ×1.0
2 scoring events · 2% of moves
+3.9 → net +3.9

⏳ decay drained -78.5 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E49 2021-10-02 init +37.2 37.2 E49 born by Sacks (explicit_prediction x3) [w=0.89]
E49 2021-10-02 brush_off -13.0 24.2 E49 Friedberg brushes off
E50 2021-10-09 decay -1.0 23.2 E50 silent
E51 2021-10-16 decay -0.9 22.3 E51 silent
E52 2021-10-23 decay -0.9 21.4 E52 silent
E53 2021-10-30 decay -0.9 20.5 E53 silent
E54 2021-11-06 decay -0.8 19.7 E54 silent
E55 2021-11-13 decay -0.8 18.9 E55 silent
E56 2021-11-20 reinforce +10.8 29.7 E56 Sacks support x2 [w=0.89]
E57 2021-12-04 reinforce +13.2 42.9 E57 Chamath support x2 (new voice) [w=0.84]
E57 2021-12-04 reinforce +12.5 55.4 E57 Jason support x2 (new voice) [w=0.97]
E57 2021-12-04 reinforce +7.1 62.5 E57 Sacks support x3 [w=0.89]
E58 2021-12-11 reinforce +4.9 67.4 E58 Friedberg support x2 (flipped from brush_off) [w=0.87]
E58 2021-12-11 reinforce +4.1 71.5 E58 Chamath support x2 [w=0.84]
E58 2021-12-11 reinforce +4.5 76.0 E58 Sacks support x3 [w=0.89]
E59 2021-12-17 decay -3.0 73.0 E59 silent
E60 2021-12-23 decay -2.9 70.1 E60 silent
E61 2021-12-29 decay -2.8 67.3 E61 silent
E62 2022-01-08 reinforce +5.1 72.4 E62 Friedberg support x3 [w=0.87]
E62 2022-01-08 reinforce +4.2 76.5 E62 Chamath support x3 [w=0.84]
E62 2022-01-08 reinforce +3.4 80.0 E62 Jason support x2 [w=0.97]
E62 2022-01-08 reinforce +2.7 82.6 E62 Sacks support x2 [w=0.89]
E63 2022-01-15 decay -3.3 79.3 E63 silent
E64 2022-01-22 decay -3.2 76.1 E64 silent
E65 2022-01-29 reinforce +3.2 79.3 E65 Sacks support x2 [w=0.89]
E65 2022-01-29 reinforce +3.1 82.4 E65 Chamath support x3 [w=0.84]
E65 2022-01-29 reinforce +2.3 84.7 E65 Friedberg support x2 [w=0.87]
E65 2022-01-29 reinforce +2.2 86.9 E65 Jason support x2 [w=0.97]
E66 2022-02-05 decay -3.5 83.5 E66 silent
E67 2022-02-12 decay -3.3 80.1 E67 silent
E68 2022-02-19 reinforce +3.0 83.1 E68 Chamath support x3 [w=0.84]
E68 2022-02-19 reinforce +2.2 85.4 E68 Sacks support x2 [w=0.89]
E68 2022-02-19 reinforce +1.9 87.3 E68 Friedberg support x2 [w=0.87]
E70 2022-02-24 reinforce +1.7 88.9 E70 Friedberg support x2 [w=0.87]
E71 2022-03-05 reinforce +1.6 90.5 E71 Jason support x2 [w=0.97]
E71 2022-03-05 reinforce +1.3 91.8 E71 Sacks support x2 [w=0.89]
E72 2022-03-19 reinforce +1.3 93.1 E72 Sacks support x3 [w=0.89]
E73 2022-03-26 reinforce +1.8 94.9 E73 Brad Gerstner support x3 (new voice) [w=0.95]
E73 2022-03-26 reinforce +0.7 95.6 E73 Sacks support x2 [w=0.89]
E73 2022-03-26 reinforce +0.6 96.1 E73 Chamath support x2 [w=0.84]
E74 2022-04-01 decay -3.8 92.3 E74 silent
E75 2022-04-09 reinforce +1.1 93.4 E75 Jason support x2 [w=0.97]
E75 2022-04-09 reinforce +1.0 94.4 E75 Chamath support x3 [w=0.84]
E75 2022-04-09 reinforce +0.9 95.3 E75 Sacks support x3 [w=0.89]
E76 2022-04-16 decay -3.8 91.5 E76 silent
E77 2022-04-23 decay -3.7 87.8 E77 silent
E78 2022-04-30 reinforce +1.8 89.6 E78 Jason support x2 [w=0.97]
E78 2022-04-30 reinforce +1.4 91.0 E78 Sacks support x2 [w=0.89]
E79 2022-05-07 decay -3.6 87.3 E79 silent
E80 2022-05-13 oppose -12.5 74.9 E80 Friedberg opposes x3 [w=0.87]
E80 2022-05-13 reinforce +3.7 78.5 E80 Jason support x2 [w=0.97]
E80 2022-05-13 reinforce +3.4 81.9 E80 Sacks support x3 [w=0.89]
E81 2022-05-23 reinforce +5.4 87.4 E81 Bill Gurley support x3 (new voice) [w=1.11]
E81 2022-05-23 reinforce +2.2 89.5 E81 Brad Gerstner support x3 [w=0.95]
E82 2022-05-24 decay -3.6 85.9 E82 silent
E84 2022-06-24 decay -3.4 82.5 E84 silent
E85 2022-06-30 reinforce +2.8 85.3 E85 Sacks support x3 [w=0.89]
E85 2022-06-30 reinforce +1.8 87.1 E85 Chamath support x2 [w=0.84]
E86 2022-07-08 decay -3.5 83.7 E86 silent
E87 2022-07-14 decay -3.3 80.3 E87 silent
E88 2022-07-22 reinforce +3.1 83.5 E88 Sacks support x3 [w=0.89]
E88 2022-07-22 reinforce +2.1 85.5 E88 Chamath support x2 [w=0.84]
E88 2022-07-22 reinforce +2.5 88.1 E88 Jason support x3 [w=0.97]
E89 2022-07-29 decay -3.5 84.5 E89 silent
E90 2022-08-05 decay -3.4 81.2 E90 silent
E91 2022-08-13 reinforce +2.5 83.7 E91 Sacks support x2 [w=0.89]
E92 2022-08-20 decay -3.3 80.3 E92 silent
E93 2022-08-26 decay -3.2 77.1 E93 silent
E94 2022-09-01 decay -3.1 74.0 E94 silent
E95 2022-09-10 decay -3.0 71.1 E95 silent
E96 2022-09-17 decay -2.8 68.2 E96 silent
E97 2022-09-23 reinforce +4.6 72.8 E97 Jason support x2 [w=0.97]
E97 2022-09-23 reinforce +3.6 76.5 E97 Sacks support x2 [w=0.89]
E98 2022-10-01 reinforce +3.8 80.2 E98 Sacks support x3 [w=0.89]