+33.7
net board stance
what this means
86.49
+0.3% · close 2026-09-08
+9% / +15% / +14%
1m / 3m / 12m
+31%
vs SPY since 2023-11-03
79%
of 52w range · -6.5% off high
3/4
hit rate as primary · α +38
Where we stand — 1 live idea
| idea | call | play | conviction | contributes | flag | eval in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 📈 It's 1997-98, not 1999 — the melt-up has years left | ▲ LONG | adjacent ×0.5 | 67.3 | +33.7 | EARLY | 1090d |
Where the winds are blowing
NET BOARD STANCE, LAST 60 EPISODES —
rising = the besties are building this position, falling = abandoning it. Replayed from
score_events; an idea counts from birth until its window closes.
PRICE VS SPY OVER THE SAME WINDOW, % — did the
talk lead the tape or follow it?
Who's pushing which way
each voice's net push ON THIS TICKER — their most recent stance per idea × the idea's direction × strength, so supporting a bearish idea pushes down. Not conviction (that lives on the idea); this is direction of travel per person. what w= means
What resolves next
kill dates for the live ideas holding this ticker — each one turns into a scored verdict on that date, whether we like it or not
Track record on ARKK
As a PRIMARY play the besties are 3 hit / 0 partial / 1 miss over 4 closed windows — credit 0.75, average α +38.4. Adjacent plays are listed but never scored.
The tape — what was actually said
every capture on any idea holding ARKK, newest first · quotes verbatim, timestamps deep-link into the episode
With the.com boom, it was all like metrics that weren't dollars. What we're seeing now is revenue and profits and growth in revenue and profits that we've never seen before. ... it is all real dollars flowing versus speculative utilization.
I think it's 97, 98 ... I do think we are seeing at the late stage a disconnection in reality and valuations, where companies are being given far too much credit.
I'm starting to wonder if this is 1998 or 1999 ... I think it's more 1998 than 1999 because I don't think we've seen the peak yet
I think the thing is we're in the early part of the euphoria ... I don't see this stopping. We're at the beginning of the beginning. I think it's going to be like this for another probably three years.
the general tone here is a deep tech investment is very likely to fail because you spend so much money before you even know... So it's a tough data point for other deep tech companies that need to raise a lot of capital.
This really has the risk of tipping over into policy, I would say, in a Biden second term, where Biden agrees to do what our European allies are already calling for, which is send in NATO troops to Ukraine to save Ukraine from what Politico calls an imminent collapse. I think this is a very dangerous situation. I mean, we're really talking about here is World War III.
I think the point is that I think there is a speculative party going on right now. And I'm not saying that Reddit is part of it, but whenever these things are so mispriced, it just means that people are ready to gamble a little bit.
My take on this is that this was a bailout... This company wasn't going anywhere, and it raised hundreds of millions of dollars.
What's happening in the war is that the Russians just took this city of Deikha, which basically totally refutes the whole stalemate narrative, as I've been saying for a while. It's not a stalemate. The Russians are winning ... Why do I think this is a big deal? Because if something like this happens, it could really expand the Ukraine War ... this could lead to a major escalation in the war.
People will take money that's sitting in cash, as you've pointed to, Chamath, there's trillions of dollars sitting in cash. And they want to look for some returns, some alpha. They're going to put it into markets.
when we look back 18 to 24 months from now, the market will probably be materially higher because there's just so much money on the sidelines... I think that all roads lead to a continued melt up.
We could be pulled into a war in the Middle East at any time. We still have a proxy war going in Ukraine. ... So there are a lot of risks still on the horizon.
I think now what the setup is for 2024 is basically we will melt up up until the first cut and then there'll probably be some real selling.
a lot of businesses that raised a lot of capital at a very high valuation, and then you have this multiple compression that's just happened in the last two years, their valuation effectively, if they were to go public today or get sold, is less than the capital they raised. And that's the most extreme scenario where suddenly all the common shareholders get wiped out in terms of their return.
I run into two and three person teams every day that I think are exceptionally talented, who should be inside of a company.
It was a rager, folks. People partied well into the next day, and we're still seeing the cleanup.
Just people knowing that they're on the way down, that they've peaked and are on the way down is going to unlock a lot of capital.
If you see a quarter point rate cut in Q1, a trillion of the $5.7 trillion in money market accounts will rip into the market.
So if you believe that we're going to be in a cycle of rate decreases and that whole thing has played its way out, then everything's going to rally.
if what we think is now this is just a version of conflict, timeout, and the market de-risks that, then it's actually pretty positive for equities, for startups
The one that needs cash continuously and will for a long period of time is really screwed
I'll just note when a company does shut down, that process typically takes two or three quarters ... anything you're seeing in 2023, that might be a shutdown where the employees were all laid off in late 2022
This is the bubble of 2021 working its way through the system ... So I think you're going to see this dynamic for the next 18 months or so. But this is not a new dynamic. This is the lagging indicator of what we've been talking about since the regime change of the first half of 2022
New options are issued and a round is done at a significant discount. And there's a huge recap and a pay to play and all this other sort of stuff starts to play out that the original founders in the company get wiped out. ... I think that's the scary scenario that's likely going to play out
And I can tell you like most startups in startup world right now are in the danger zone... if you're a startup with sub one million of ARR and you're in the danger zone, you're probably just gonna have to pack it in