← pool

🏛️ DOGE delivers real federal spending cuts under unified Republican control

With the White House, Senate (53-54 seats) and House in Republican hands, the Elon-led DOGE effort plus the zero-based-budgeting frame the besties pushed into the campaign produces material cuts to federal spending, headcount and programs inside the first year - executive orders where possible, congressional action where required. Chamath believes the Republicans earnestly mean it and that radical transparency will make the low-hanging fruit obvious; Sacks concedes the full $2T Elon wants will not clear Congress because spending is a bipartisan problem, but expects a real number to get through. The tradeable read-through is a revenue and backlog hit to the federal-services contractor complex that lives off discretionary agency budgets. Timing framing spans the debate: Sacks argues material cuts inside the first year, while Friedberg and Chamath frame a roughly two-year window against Vivek's stated 2026 semiquincentennial shot clock; the idea carries the longer stated window so both sides are judged on what they actually claimed.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 87.4 GREEN
EMBER
band · contested
▼ SHORT BAH
expression · bearish politics-market
entry flag
days to eval · 2026-11-08
IS THIS A TRADE? 🚫 Not a trade — conviction 16.0 is EMBER, below WATCH (45) and far from the GREEN entry bar (65). If more weighted voices pile on, it climbs; two mentions isn't conviction. direction semantics: bearish = the plays below are expected to FALL if the thesis is right → expression is short / puts.

sub-ideas: DOGE lease terminations flood the office market and hit federal landlords 9

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2024-11-08)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▼ SHORT BAHstock PRIMARY Booz Allen is the most federal-consulting-levered listed contractor - nearly all revenue from US agency budgets
▼ SHORT CACIstock adjacent CACI is a pure-play federal IT/services vendor exposed to headcount and program cuts
▼ SHORT ICFIstock adjacent federal consulting pure-play, highest revenue concentration in discretionary agency spend
▼ SHORT LDOSstock adjacent Leidos revenue concentrated in civil and defense agency IT and services spend

Mention log

Sacks
Sacks politics-market w=0.97 · n=88 · E203 (2024-11-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 51:38 SUPPORT · horizon 12mo
“I think that on Doge, there's clearly a strong desire of many in the Republican Party, and Elon, and the people that Elon brought with him for major government reform. Much more efficiency, much less spending. I think that we have to get as much of that past as possible in the first, certainly in the first year.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E203 (2024-11-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:11:40 SUPPORT
“by the way, we introduced a long time ago this idea of zero-based budgeting into the lexicon and language of these political candidates that they used all the way through to the finish line. I do believe the Republicans earnestly mean it.”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market w=0.84 · n=74 · E204 (2024-11-16) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:13:40 SUPPORT · horizon 24mo
“I'm saying this is going to bring in the most disruptive force that federal agencies have ever seen. And the intention with Trump isn't to find some person to keep running things the way they have been run in the past. His mandate from the people who elected him based on the message he put out there is to do the opposite, which is to go in and be as disruptive and damaging and destructive as possible.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E204 (2024-11-16) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:17:01 SUPPORT · horizon 24mo
“Vivek put out a very compelling post on X where he basically said, like, look, when you, on the one hand, there's going to be radical transparency, but on the other hand, there's a lot of case law that we can use to kind of try to really dismantle the government apparatus and they're putting themselves on a shot clock to do it by 2026 for the 250th anniversary. So I think I'm really predisposed to this idea that it'll force the government to be very resilient at the end of this process, and I think that's a good thing.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market w=0.97 · n=88 · E204 (2024-11-16) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:19:48 OPPOSE
“I would also just say that with respect to the other picks, there's obviously a lot of hysteria going on, a lot of hyperbole about the downsides. I don't think it's going to be like a meteor hitting the earth. I don't think it's that destructive. I think that it's more like, will some eggs be broken up to make an omelette, right?”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E208 (2024-12-20) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 34:06 SUPPORT
“This was a multi-hundred billion dollar grift that was stopped on a dime over 12 hours of tweets.”
AA
Aaron Levie (regular guest ×1.0) politics-market: 3 resolved, unproven · E208 (2024-12-20) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 27:55 SUPPORT
“I think we're seeing some early indication of what DOGE will be able to do.”
Jason
Jason politics-market w=1.00 · n=62 · E208 (2024-12-20) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 43:48 SUPPORT
“Root for them and root for this process, please, because this is a path to fixing the most acute existential problem we have, which is our debt.”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market w=0.84 · n=74 · E208 (2024-12-20) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 21:27 OPPOSE
“So I don't know if it cracks with DOGE. I really don't know if people step up and recognize the limits of government and what the limits should be of the federal government on an electorate basis.”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market w=0.84 · n=74 · E212 (2025-01-25) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 18:56 OPPOSE
“I feel like Doge and cost cutting is going to be a lot harder to realize than folks assume. Nearly everyone I met with who works in government or is entering government had this, if not disdain for Doge, a concern that it doesn't really align interests with the political objectives of politicians, that they need to get more stuff for their constituents in order to get re-elected and that they're not going to vote programs away.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E212 (2025-01-25) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 21:34 OPPOSE
“what they say is that folks that actually allocate the internal spending in the United States gets a lot more scrutiny because there's all of this horse trading because they want some of this money to get allocated into their specific area. It is going to be a very complicated thing.”
Jason
Jason politics-market w=1.00 · n=62 · E212 (2025-01-25) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 22:40 SUPPORT
“So the Overton window is wide open now to discuss even the budget of the VA and where is the money going to come from? So, I think we're actually going to make progress on it. This was like a sacred cow and now we're talking about it.”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market w=0.84 · n=74 · E213 (2025-01-31) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:15:30 OPPOSE
“I will tell you once again, after our visit in DC last week, there was not a single member of Congress that I spoke with who views cutting to be a mandate for them in the laws that they're trying to pass. They all have a very different kind of agenda than DOGE.”
TR
Travis Kalanick (regular guest ×1.0) no politics-market track record · E213 (2025-01-31) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:16:20 SUPPORT
“If it was really hard to hire people and they could even make it harder to hire people, do they fight bureaucracy with bureaucracy that it's harder to spend, harder to hire people, harder to procure certain things that you're supposed to spend money on? You can reduce this spend through a lot of very interesting nuanced rules that they're in control of.”
Jason
Jason politics-market w=1.00 · n=62 · E213 (2025-01-31) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:43:22 SUPPORT
“This is the naming and shaming of government waste that's actually going to work. And the DOGE account on Twitter is doing it. They're basically saying, hey, we're giving foreign aid for this project, for that project.”
AN
Antonio Gracias (guest ×0.5) no politics-market track record · E214 (2025-02-07) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 7:22 SUPPORT
“I think it's kind of 10% of the budget is probably fraud. I think it might be low, actually. So you're talking about $650 billion, a trillion in waste. I think that's probably about right. That alone fixes the problem.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E214 (2025-02-07) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 10:08 SUPPORT
“Because I think what we're finding early days is the rot is super pervasive. There's no accountability. And so I think you need people to look at it with fresh eyes.”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market w=0.84 · n=74 · E214 (2025-02-07) · sentiment · strength 3 ▶ 17:52 SUPPORT
“Yeah, this is the eggplant emoji. It's what we needed. If you zoom out on what DOGE is doing, I think the best way to describe it is zero-based budgeting.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market w=0.97 · n=88 · E214 (2025-02-07) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 32:23 SUPPORT POLICY-ADJACENT
“Let me up level this for a second. Okay, so we knew the US government runs a $2 trillion deficit every year. We're in debt, almost $40 trillion. And we also knew that anytime anyone tries to cut anything in Washington, the whole city screams bloody murder. Okay, so the question is just why? Well, now we know. The money is all going to them.”
Jason
Jason politics-market w=1.00 · n=62 · E214 (2025-02-07) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 48:51 SUPPORT
“Now we see what happens when somebody picks up the issue of stop wasting money. It is a popular issue. This is only going to make Trump more popular.”
Jason
Jason politics-market w=1.00 · n=62 · E216 (2025-02-21) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 34:13 SUPPORT
“We're talking about close to $300 billion in savings over five years if they hit, which isn't a crazy target, 8% a year.”
PA
Patrick Collison (guest ×0.5) no politics-market track record · E216 (2025-02-21) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 41:01 SUPPORT
“as far as I can tell, the cuts proposed over the next couple of years for the Defense Department are of approximately the same magnitude as the reduction in the defense budget that occurred between 2010 and today. And so it's not like this is some unprecedented transformation in DOD budget.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E217 (2025-03-01) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 34:50 SUPPORT
“No, I think he is the mechanism of implementing the austerity. I think people want this austerity. Just the question is, what happens when the actual byproducts of that austerity are felt by people for six or seven years? I don't know what the answer is.”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market w=0.84 · n=74 · E217 (2025-03-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 35:48 OPPOSE
“Meanwhile, you've got Elon and Trump saying, hey, we're cutting, we're cutting, we're saving, we're going to get to a trillion dollars a year. But that's not showing up necessarily in the budget. Is it showing up in the actions out of Doge, TBD?”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market w=0.84 · n=74 · E218 (2025-03-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 24:46 SUPPORT
“The direct employees of federal agencies is a fraction of people that are employed indirectly by government spending. This is super important. Because as we all know, many government agencies write checks to large contractors, subcontractors, and third party service providers that do the work for them.”
JO
Joe Lonsdale (regular guest ×1.0) politics-market w=1.00 · n=5 · E218 (2025-03-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 26:04 OPPOSE
“If it was equal to what Elon was doing, it'd be at least five trillion dollars. And I push a bunch of them. They say, Oh, the Congressional Budget Office and all these things. I'm sure there's some tough things there. But like, this is crazy. We need to see what these cuts need to be on Doge. And we need to cut five trillion. And none of these people have the balls to do that. It's not the political will to do it, is my interpretation.”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market w=0.84 · n=74 · E220 (2025-03-22) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:04:52 SUPPORT
“We've never been in a situation where in a hundred days, a federal government is setting out to cut their spending by a trillion dollars, which has a significant effect, a recessionary effect on the economy, because there's less federal dollars flowing out, which goes as revenue into various businesses and income for a lot of people that are employed as contractors or directly by federal government agencies”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E221 (2025-03-29) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 43:48 SUPPORT
“When we were there, we heard about one consulting firm, 95 plus of all of their revenue, multi-billion dollar revenue comes from Time and Materials contracts with the United States government. We heard throughout the week, I've reposted it on X, $65 billion is paid out to consulting organizations beyond just that one in these Time and Materials cost plus contracts.”
Gavin Baker
Gavin Baker (regular guest ×1.0) politics-market w=1.50 · n=5 · E221 (2025-03-29) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 42:43 SUPPORT
“I would say Doge's efforts are important. If you can really cut a trillion dollars of kind of waste, fraud and abuse out of the government spending, that's good.”
BE
Ben Shapiro (regular guest ×1.0) politics-market w=0.50 · n=6 · E222 (2025-04-05) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 58:22 OPPOSE
“And while I love what DOGE is doing, the systemic drivers of our national debt are not actually being touched at this point by DOGE. I mean, it's the means-tested welfare programs that are really the systemic long-term drivers of our national debt.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E223 (2025-04-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:03:01 SUPPORT
“So as Doge sort of slows down that money flow, and as the consensus in Congress gets to a better budget, I think that you're going to see that the government was probably responsible for 100 to 150 basis points of just waste. And if you take that out, you will technically be in a recession.”
LA
Larry Summers (guest ×0.5) no politics-market track record · E223 (2025-04-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:25:47 OPPOSE
“my belief is that the revenue loss from the dose's destruction of significant part of the functioning of our nation's tax collection system is likely to exceed in terms of contributing more to the deficit than any savings that is successfully realized.”
EZ
Ezra Klein (guest ×0.5) no politics-market track record · E223 (2025-04-11) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:33:06 OPPOSE
“I am not going to tell you that there are zero Doge cuts that made sense. But I am going to say that what I see them doing overall is highly destructive state capacity”
Jason
Jason politics-market w=1.00 · n=62 · E223 (2025-04-11) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:51:13 SUPPORT
“I give the administration, like I give Doge an A++. It's obvious like they're doing the right thing. I give the communication like a B, like just increase the communication and you can see they're doing that.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market w=0.97 · n=88 · E223 (2025-04-11) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 1:36:47 SUPPORT POLICY-ADJACENT
“What Elon is trying to do, we have a two trillion dollar annual deficit. He's trying to figure out how to cut it.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market w=0.97 · n=88 · E225 (2025-04-26) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:07:44 OPPOSE
“my biggest concern is not something that Doge is going to do or not. It's not up to Doge to do that. It's up to, frankly, these old bulls in Congress who control the appropriations process. Are they going to basically backslide and just put the spending back in?”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market w=0.84 · n=74 · E225 (2025-04-26) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:13:31 OPPOSE
“Polymarket showing an 84% chance of less than $50 billion being cut in 2025”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market w=0.97 · n=88 · E226 (2025-05-02) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 16:13 SUPPORT POLICY-ADJACENT
“So I think for the first time in decades, we've actually started to make real cuts in government, real cuts in the federal workforce. And look, we'd like to do more, but that is a huge shift in the conversation.”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market w=0.84 · n=74 · E228 (2025-05-17) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 49:29 OPPOSE
“And I've said this from day one that DOJ can only do so much. And clearly that's the case where they're now talking about sub $300 billion a year in potential annual savings from DOJ action. At the end of the day, Congress needs to take action.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E229 (2025-05-24) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 8:17 OPPOSE
“This thing is like anti-DOGE. If DOGE was meant to be a reflection of the American voting population's desire for meaningful reform in government, cost controls, some form of austerity, and to get this debt spiral in check, this is the opposite of that.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market w=0.97 · n=88 · E229 (2025-05-24) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 14:13 OPPOSE POLICY-ADJACENT
“I mean, do I wish that it made all the DOGE cuts permanent through rescissions? Yeah, absolutely. I think it's outrageous that there are enough House Republicans who didn't want to back up DOGE that wasn't enacted.”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market w=0.84 · n=74 · E229 (2025-05-24) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 21:22 OPPOSE
“I think the writings on the wall that the system is winning and the rebels came in and they tried to fix the inefficiencies in government with DOGE under Elon's leadership and our friend Antonio's participation and a great group of individuals who are true patriots who are spending time trying to help reassess how the government operates.”
Jason
Jason politics-market w=1.00 · n=62 · E229 (2025-05-24) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 33:04 OPPOSE
“He was elected to balance his budget and to have austerity. He's going to put more onto the debt, and we sat here on this very podcast, the four of us, and said this was the most important issue on the world, and Trump is putting gasoline on the fire.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E235 (2025-07-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:15:11 SUPPORT
“So if the CEO of the United States, President Trump, isn't allowed to fire people, then all of that stuff just compounds. So I think that this is a really important thing that just happened. It allows us to now level set how big should the government be.”
TR
Travis Kalanick (regular guest ×1.0) no politics-market track record · E235 (2025-07-11) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 1:17:25 SUPPORT
“Except that ruling doesn't happen without Doge. That Doge caused that ruling to occur.”
KE
Keith Rabois (regular guest ×1.0) politics-market: 2 resolved, unproven · E235 (2025-07-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 1 ▶ 1:19:01 SUPPORT
“Like this EO is only approved to allow for the planning. I think the vote might be closer. I think there's still a majority on the Supreme Court for the actual implementation, but it may not be 8-1 when there's a specific plan that has to navigate its way through the courts again.”
BI
Bill Hagerty (guest ×0.5) no politics-market track record · E236 (2025-07-19) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:12:13 SUPPORT
“So the focus is going to be to continue to find opportunities to basically legislate what has been found in DOJ, the other activities well beyond DOJ. Every department head, every agency is looking for ways to streamline regulations and to cut the cost and to operate more efficiently. I've got to believe there are tremendous opportunities there and many billions more dollars that will come out of the budget as a result.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Chamath
Chamath w=1.02
10 scoring events · 26% of moves
+81.1 / -26.9 → net +54.2
Friedberg
Friedberg w=0.84
11 scoring events · 23% of moves
+22.5 / -74.4 → net -51.9
Sacks
Sacks w=0.97
7 scoring events · 15% of moves
+25.6 / -34.8 → net -9.2
Jason
Jason w=1.00
7 scoring events · 10% of moves
+33.0 / -9.4 → net +23.6
TR
Travis Kalanick regular guest ×1.0
2 scoring events · 6% of moves
+23.3 → net +23.3
KE
Keith Rabois regular guest ×1.0
1 scoring event · 3% of moves
+13.4 → net +13.4
AA
Aaron Levie regular guest ×1.0
1 scoring event · 3% of moves
+13.0 → net +13.0
JO
Joe Lonsdale w=1.00 regular guest ×1.0
1 scoring event · 3% of moves
+0.0 / -12.0 → net -12.0
Gavin Baker
Gavin Baker w=1.50 regular guest ×1.0
1 scoring event · 2% of moves
+9.8 → net +9.8
LA
Larry Summers guest ×0.5
1 scoring event · 2% of moves
+0.0 / -7.2 → net -7.2
BI
Bill Hagerty guest ×0.5
1 scoring event · 2% of moves
+6.9 → net +6.9
BE
Ben Shapiro w=0.50 regular guest ×1.0
1 scoring event · 1% of moves
+0.0 / -6.0 → net -6.0
EZ
Ezra Klein guest ×0.5
1 scoring event · 1% of moves
+0.0 / -6.0 → net -6.0
AN
Antonio Gracias guest ×0.5
1 scoring event · 1% of moves
+5.2 → net +5.2
PA
Patrick Collison guest ×0.5
1 scoring event · 0% of moves
+1.9 → net +1.9

⏳ decay drained -43.0 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E203 2024-11-08 init +35.7 35.7 E203 born by Chamath (explicit_prediction x2) [w=1.02]
E203 2024-11-08 reinforce +14.0 49.7 E203 Sacks support x2 (new voice) [w=0.97]
E204 2024-11-16 reinforce +11.4 61.1 E204 Friedberg support x3 (new voice) [w=0.84]
E204 2024-11-16 reinforce +6.0 67.0 E204 Chamath support x2 [w=1.02]
E204 2024-11-16 oppose -11.6 55.4 E204 Sacks opposes x2 [w=0.97]
E205 2024-11-23 decay -1.1 54.3 E205 silent
E206 2024-12-07 decay -1.1 53.2 E206 silent
E207 2024-12-13 decay -1.1 52.2 E207 silent
E208 2024-12-20 oppose -10.1 42.1 E208 Friedberg opposes x2 [w=0.84]
E208 2024-12-20 reinforce +13.0 55.2 E208 Aaron Levie support x2 (new voice)
E208 2024-12-20 reinforce +8.2 63.4 E208 Chamath support x3 [w=1.02]
E208 2024-12-20 reinforce +8.2 71.6 E208 Jason support x2 (new voice)
E209 2025-01-04 decay -1.4 70.2 E209 silent
E210 2025-01-11 decay -1.4 68.8 E210 silent
E211 2025-01-18 decay -1.4 67.4 E211 silent
E212 2025-01-25 oppose -12.1 55.4 E212 Friedberg opposes x3 [w=0.84]
E212 2025-01-25 oppose -12.2 43.1 E212 Chamath opposes x2 [w=1.02]
E212 2025-01-25 reinforce +8.5 51.6 E212 Jason support x2
E213 2025-01-31 oppose -10.1 41.6 E213 Friedberg opposes x2 [w=0.84]
E213 2025-01-31 reinforce +13.1 54.7 E213 Travis Kalanick support x2 (new voice)
E213 2025-01-31 reinforce +6.8 61.5 E213 Jason support x2
E214 2025-02-07 reinforce +5.2 66.7 E214 Antonio Gracias support x3 (new voice) [w=0.50]
E214 2025-02-07 reinforce +6.1 72.8 E214 Chamath support x3 (flipped from oppose) [w=1.02]
E214 2025-02-07 reinforce +4.1 76.9 E214 Friedberg support x3 (flipped from oppose) [w=0.84]
E214 2025-02-07 reinforce +2.7 79.6 E214 Sacks support x1 (flipped from oppose) [w=0.97]
E214 2025-02-07 reinforce +3.1 82.7 E214 Jason support x2
E215 2025-02-15 decay -1.7 81.0 E215 silent
E216 2025-02-21 reinforce +2.3 83.3 E216 Jason support x1
E216 2025-02-21 reinforce +1.9 85.2 E216 Patrick Collison support x2 (new voice) [w=0.50]
E217 2025-03-01 reinforce +2.3 87.4 E217 Chamath support x2 [w=1.02]
E217 2025-03-01 oppose -10.1 77.4 E217 Friedberg opposes x2 [w=0.84]
E218 2025-03-08 reinforce +2.8 80.2 E218 Friedberg support x2 (flipped from oppose) [w=0.84]
E218 2025-03-08 oppose -12.0 68.2 E218 Joe Lonsdale opposes x2
E219 2025-03-15 decay -1.4 66.9 E219 silent
E220 2025-03-22 reinforce +4.2 71.0 E220 Friedberg support x2 [w=0.84]
E221 2025-03-29 reinforce +9.8 80.8 E221 Gavin Baker support x2 (new voice) [w=1.50]
E221 2025-03-29 reinforce +3.5 84.3 E221 Chamath support x3 [w=1.02]
E222 2025-04-05 oppose -6.0 78.3 E222 Ben Shapiro opposes x2 [w=0.50]
E223 2025-04-11 reinforce +4.0 82.3 E223 Chamath support x3 [w=1.02]
E223 2025-04-11 oppose -7.2 75.1 E223 Larry Summers opposes x3 [w=0.50]
E223 2025-04-11 oppose -6.0 69.1 E223 Ezra Klein opposes x2 [w=0.50]
E223 2025-04-11 reinforce +3.6 72.7 E223 Sacks support x1 [w=0.97]
E223 2025-04-11 reinforce +4.1 76.8 E223 Jason support x2
E224 2025-04-19 decay -1.5 75.3 E224 silent
E225 2025-04-26 oppose -11.6 63.7 E225 Sacks opposes x2 [w=0.97]
E225 2025-04-26 oppose -10.1 53.6 E225 Friedberg opposes x2 [w=0.84]
E226 2025-05-02 reinforce +5.4 59.0 E226 Sacks support x1 (flipped from oppose) [w=0.97]
E227 2025-05-09 decay -1.2 57.8 E227 silent
E228 2025-05-17 oppose -10.1 47.8 E228 Friedberg opposes x2 [w=0.84]
E229 2025-05-24 oppose -14.7 33.1 E229 Chamath opposes x3 [w=1.02]
E229 2025-05-24 oppose -11.6 21.5 E229 Sacks opposes x2 [w=0.97]
E229 2025-05-24 oppose -12.1 9.4 E229 Friedberg opposes x3 [w=0.84]
E229 2025-05-24 oppose -9.4 0.0 E229 Jason opposes x2
E231 2025-06-13 decay · 0.0 E231 silent
E232 2025-06-21 decay · 0.0 E232 silent
E233 2025-06-28 decay · 0.0 E233 silent
E234 2025-07-04 decay · 0.0 E234 silent
E235 2025-07-11 reinforce +15.3 15.3 E235 Chamath support x2 (flipped from oppose) [w=1.02]
E235 2025-07-11 reinforce +10.2 25.5 E235 Travis Kalanick support x1
E235 2025-07-11 reinforce +13.4 38.9 E235 Keith Rabois support x1 (new voice)
E236 2025-07-19 reinforce +6.9 45.8 E236 Bill Hagerty support x2 (new voice) [w=0.50]
E237 2025-08-01 decay -0.9 44.8 E237 silent
E238 2025-08-09 decay -0.9 44.0 E238 silent
E239 2025-08-15 decay -0.9 43.1 E239 silent
E240 2025-08-22 decay -0.9 42.2 E240 silent
E241 2025-08-29 decay -0.8 41.4 E241 silent
E242 2025-09-07 decay -0.8 40.5 E242 silent
E243 2025-09-19 decay -0.8 39.7 E243 silent
E244 2025-09-27 decay -0.8 38.9 E244 silent
E245 2025-10-03 decay -0.8 38.2 E245 silent
E246 2025-10-10 decay -0.8 37.4 E246 silent
E247 2025-10-17 decay -0.7 36.6 E247 silent
E248 2025-10-24 decay -0.7 35.9 E248 silent
E249 2025-10-31 decay -0.7 35.2 E249 silent
E250 2025-11-07 decay -0.7 34.5 E250 silent
E251 2025-11-14 decay -0.7 33.8 E251 silent
E252 2025-11-22 decay -0.7 33.1 E252 silent
E253 2025-12-06 decay -0.7 32.5 E253 silent
E254 2025-12-13 decay -0.6 31.8 E254 silent
E255 2025-12-19 decay -0.6 31.2 E255 silent
E256 2025-12-31 decay -0.6 30.6 E256 silent
E257 2026-01-10 decay -0.6 29.9 E257 silent
E258 2026-01-17 decay -0.6 29.3 E258 silent
E259 2026-01-30 decay -0.6 28.8 E259 silent
E260 2026-02-07 decay -0.6 28.2 E260 silent
E261 2026-02-13 decay -0.6 27.6 E261 silent
E262 2026-02-28 decay -0.6 27.1 E262 silent
E263 2026-03-06 decay -0.5 26.5 E263 silent
E264 2026-03-13 decay -0.5 26.0 E264 silent
E265 2026-03-19 decay -0.5 25.5 E265 silent
E266 2026-03-27 decay -0.5 25.0 E266 silent
E267 2026-04-03 decay -0.5 24.5 E267 silent
E268 2026-04-10 decay -0.5 24.0 E268 silent
E269 2026-04-17 decay -0.5 23.5 E269 silent
E270 2026-04-24 decay -0.5 23.0 E270 silent
E271 2026-05-01 decay -0.5 22.6 E271 silent
E272 2026-05-08 decay -0.5 22.1 E272 silent
E273 2026-05-15 decay -0.4 21.7 E273 silent
E274 2026-05-22 decay -0.4 21.2 E274 silent
E275 2026-05-29 decay -0.4 20.8 E275 silent
E276 2026-06-13 decay -0.4 20.4 E276 silent
E277 2026-06-19 decay -0.4 20.0 E277 silent
E278 2026-06-26 decay -0.4 19.6 E278 silent
E279 2026-07-03 decay -0.4 19.2 E279 silent
E280 2026-07-11 decay -0.4 18.8 E280 silent
E281 2026-07-18 decay -0.4 18.4 E281 silent
E282 2026-07-24 decay -0.4 18.1 E282 silent
E283 2026-07-31 decay -0.4 17.7 E283 silent
E284 2026-08-08 decay -0.4 17.4 E284 silent
E285 2026-08-14 decay -0.3 17.0 E285 silent
E286 2026-08-21 decay -0.3 16.7 E286 silent
E287 2026-08-29 decay -0.3 16.3 E287 silent
E288 2026-09-04 decay -0.3 16.0 E288 silent