← pool

📈 Rivian at $100B+ is disconnected from reality

Rivian IPO'd on 2021-11-10 and printed a ~$120B market cap having delivered 148 trucks to its own employees. Jason's call: fair value is roughly the $17B of cash on the balance sheet plus ~$3B, i.e. ~$20B, so the gap between price and reality is $50-100B, and the billion-dollar-plus valuation without a shipped product pattern (Theranos, Magic Leap, Quibi) always ends between disappointment and fraud. Chamath and Friedberg take the other side: the truck is well engineered, the Amazon delivery-van order made it default alive, institutions rather than speculators placed the $16B book, and zero rates justify paying today for volume 10-20 years out.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 40.8 EMBER
DORMANT
band · contested
▼ SHORT RIVN
expression · bearish equities
HIT
outcome · R +76.6% · α +90.1%
2022-11-13
window closed

⚖ Why this verdict

fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2021-11-13 → 2022-11-13 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▼ SHORT RIVN (primary play). RIVN fell 76.6% over the window → direction-adjusted R = +76.6% (the call made money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned -13.4%α = +76.6 − (-13.4) = +90.1% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
    Stock-selection read: +63.2% — did RIVN move the predicted way relative to the market. The two only differ on a SHORT: this call beat the index outright.
  4. Rule fired:
    ▶ HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5 ✓ (R 76.6, α 90.1)
    · PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0
    · MISS — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a HIT earn 1.0 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Jason, Sacks | opposed: Chamath, Friedberg

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2021-11-13)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▼ SHORT RIVNstock PRIMARY the stock under debate, IPO'd three days before this episode at a ~$120B cap on 148 delivered trucks
▼ SHORT LCIDstock adjacent Chamath pairs Lucid and Rivian as the same pre-revenue EV re-rating

Mention log

Jason
Jason equities w=0.97 · n=105 · E55 (2021-11-13) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 30:31 SUPPORT
“Rivian has 17 billion in cash. Somebody asked me at the poker game last night, what I value Rivian at, I said, 17 plus 3, 17 million in cash plus 3 billion, double roughly what Tesla's was the market's hotter right now, whatever. But I put them at 20 billion and people were giving a hard time about it. I said, I think that's actually the realistic valuation for this company. ... No, but the distance between the valuation and reality is in the $50 to $100 billion range.”
Chamath
Chamath equities w=0.84 · n=160 · E55 (2021-11-13) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 33:47 OPPOSE
“Rivian, just in defense of Rivian for a second, what I have heard is that it's a it's a well-engineered car or truck rather. They've done a very smart path to market, which is essentially to, you know, build these delivery trucks for Amazon that allowed them to even frankly, you know, be default alive. ... What I have heard from people who were investors in both Lucid and Rivian is that they have sat in the cars, they've driven the cars, they've spent time with them, they've seen the factories, and it's very much real. Now what they're debating is ramp and velocity and scale. I don't know. I don't have a position in either.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E55 (2021-11-13) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 37:42 SUPPORT
“I don't know anything about this Rivian company, but where I think J. Cal's right is we've seen over and over again that when a company gets, when a startup gets a billion-dollar-plus valuation without a product, invariably, it ends up somewhere between a disappointment and outright fraud.”
Friedberg
Friedberg equities w=0.87 · n=120 · E55 (2021-11-13) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 32:12 OPPOSE
“other people are coming in and looking at this company and saying they've built facilities, they've built assembly lines, and they've got pre orders and bookings for lots and lots of cars down in the future. ... the market is looking at a time horizon that it has never looked at before, which is making bets that are at 10, 15, 20 years in the future. And that's because of the condition that we're in right now from a monetary policy point of view. Interest rates are so low, there's no where to get yield in other assets.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Jason
Jason w=0.97
1 scoring event · 53% of moves
+40.8 → net +40.8
Sacks
Sacks w=0.89
1 scoring event · 21% of moves
+15.9 → net +15.9
Friedberg
Friedberg w=0.87
1 scoring event · 13% of moves
+0.0 / -10.4 → net -10.4
Chamath
Chamath w=0.84
1 scoring event · 13% of moves
+0.0 / -10.1 → net -10.1

⏳ decay drained -30.7 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E55 2021-11-13 init +40.8 40.8 E55 born by Jason (explicit_prediction x3) [w=0.97]
E55 2021-11-13 oppose -10.4 30.4 E55 Friedberg opposes x2 [w=0.87]
E55 2021-11-13 oppose -10.1 20.3 E55 Chamath opposes x2 [w=0.84]
E55 2021-11-13 reinforce +15.9 36.2 E55 Sacks support x2 (new voice) [w=0.89]
E56 2021-11-20 decay -1.4 34.8 E56 silent
E57 2021-12-04 decay -1.4 33.4 E57 silent
E58 2021-12-11 decay -1.3 32.0 E58 silent
E59 2021-12-17 decay -1.3 30.8 E59 silent
E60 2021-12-23 decay -1.2 29.5 E60 silent
E61 2021-12-29 decay -1.2 28.3 E61 silent
E62 2022-01-08 decay -1.1 27.2 E62 silent
E63 2022-01-15 decay -1.1 26.1 E63 silent
E64 2022-01-22 decay -1.0 25.1 E64 silent
E65 2022-01-29 decay -1.0 24.1 E65 silent
E66 2022-02-05 decay -1.0 23.1 E66 silent
E67 2022-02-12 decay -0.9 22.2 E67 silent
E68 2022-02-19 decay -0.9 21.3 E68 silent
E70 2022-02-24 decay -0.9 20.5 E70 silent
E71 2022-03-05 decay -0.8 19.6 E71 silent
E72 2022-03-19 decay -0.8 18.8 E72 silent
E73 2022-03-26 decay -0.8 18.1 E73 silent
E74 2022-04-01 decay -0.7 17.4 E74 silent
E75 2022-04-09 decay -0.7 16.7 E75 silent
E76 2022-04-16 decay -0.7 16.0 E76 silent
E77 2022-04-23 decay -0.6 15.4 E77 silent
E78 2022-04-30 decay -0.6 14.8 E78 silent
E79 2022-05-07 decay -0.6 14.2 E79 silent
E80 2022-05-13 decay -0.6 13.6 E80 silent
E81 2022-05-23 decay -0.5 13.1 E81 silent
E82 2022-05-24 decay -0.5 12.5 E82 silent
E84 2022-06-24 decay -0.5 12.0 E84 silent
E85 2022-06-30 decay -0.5 11.5 E85 silent
E86 2022-07-08 decay -0.5 11.1 E86 silent
E87 2022-07-14 decay -0.4 10.6 E87 silent
E88 2022-07-22 decay -0.4 10.2 E88 silent
E89 2022-07-29 decay -0.4 9.8 E89 silent
E90 2022-08-05 decay -0.4 9.4 E90 silent
E91 2022-08-13 decay -0.4 9.0 E91 silent
E92 2022-08-20 decay -0.4 8.7 E92 silent
E93 2022-08-26 decay -0.3 8.3 E93 silent
E94 2022-09-01 decay -0.3 8.0 E94 silent
E95 2022-09-10 decay -0.3 7.7 E95 silent
E96 2022-09-17 decay -0.3 7.4 E96 silent
E97 2022-09-23 decay -0.3 7.1 E97 silent
E98 2022-10-01 decay -0.3 6.8 E98 silent
E99 2022-10-07 decay -0.3 6.5 E99 silent
E100 2022-10-14 decay -0.3 6.3 E100 silent
E101 2022-10-22 decay -0.3 6.0 E101 silent
E102 2022-10-29 decay -0.2 5.8 E102 silent
E103 2022-11-05 decay -0.2 5.5 E103 silent