📈 Stock-based comp and Evergreen dilution get repriced
Institutional shareholders stop excusing 2.5-4% a year of dilution from stock-based comp and automatic Evergreen grants: the SBC add-back that makes unprofitable software look free-cash-flow positive gets exposed as a shell game, high-SBC software is marked down for it, and Silicon Valley compensation shifts toward cash with the standard $400k engineer salary getting challenged.
also touching these tickers, same direction: The $3-4T software industrial complex contracts in 2026 19 (IGV)
⚖ Why this verdict
fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set
- Window: 2022-06-30 → 2023-06-30 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
- The call: ▼ SHORT IGV (primary play). IGV rose 28.3% over the window → direction-adjusted R = -28.3% (the call lost money).
- Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +19.4%
→ α = -28.3 − (+19.4) = -47.7%
— what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
Stock-selection read: -8.9% — did IGV move the predicted way relative to the market. The two only differ on a SHORT: this call was right about direction relative to the index but still cost money versus holding it.
- Rule fired:
· HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5· PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0▶ MISS — everything else
- Credit: supporters of a MISS earn 0 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Brad Gerstner, Chamath, Friedberg, Jason, Sacks
Conviction timeline
bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15
Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2022-06-30)
Plays
| expression | symbol | kind | relevance | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▼ SHORT | IGV | etf | PRIMARY | the listed software cohort carrying the heaviest stock-based comp and Evergreen dilution |
| ▼ SHORT | WCLD | etf | adjacent | the higher-growth cloud tail where SBC as a share of revenue is highest |
Mention log
“it seems to me that a lot of the big portfolio managers of big institutional funds are starting to pay really close attention to this quote unquote standard in Silicon Valley that stock based comp expense has become so high and Evergreens have become kind of a standard. ... And I don't think it would be too surprising, number one, to see cash salaries go up. And number two, as a result of that, to see salaries become rationalized in Silicon Valley, where engineers may start to get challenged on the standard 400k per year that everyone's become used to”
“when people talk about free cash flow, they tout it a lot, tech companies tout it a lot, because you're allowed to add back in stock-based comp as if it didn't exist. ... So when the only source of free cash is stock-based comp, that free cash flow doesn't reflect the company's true profitability. This is what I mean by people play these shell games with these numbers”
“So when you take this big tech put out of the market, you will get true price discovery and you will find out what the real price should be for this kind of an engineer, that kind of a product manager.”
“Because if you look at these compensation plans, all of these professional stock owners, they complain all the time about stock based comp, right? And these companies have budgets between 2 and 5% a year that they give away.”
“One hundred percent. This has been the greatest grift in the history of Silicon Valley for sure.”
“Can you imagine the totality of stock based comp that's been given out by all these companies since two thousand and fifteen when they were cagering their employee bases by twenty five percent a year? I bet you it's a trillion and a half dollars at least.”
Who built this conviction
each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement
⏳ decay drained -89.6 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one
Score events
| episode | kind | Δ | after | note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E85 2022-06-30 | init | +36.4 | 36.4 | E85 born by Friedberg (explicit_prediction x3) [w=0.87] |
| E85 2022-06-30 | reinforce | +14.4 | 50.8 | E85 Chamath support x3 (new voice) [w=0.84] |
| E85 2022-06-30 | reinforce | +9.8 | 60.6 | E85 Sacks support x2 (new voice) [w=0.89] |
| E85 2022-06-30 | reinforce | +8.6 | 69.2 | E85 Jason support x2 (new voice) [w=0.97] |
| E86 2022-07-08 | decay | -2.8 | 66.4 | E86 silent |
| E87 2022-07-14 | decay | -2.7 | 63.8 | E87 silent |
| E88 2022-07-22 | decay | -2.6 | 61.2 | E88 silent |
| E89 2022-07-29 | decay | -2.4 | 58.8 | E89 silent |
| E90 2022-08-05 | decay | -2.4 | 56.4 | E90 silent |
| E91 2022-08-13 | decay | -2.3 | 54.2 | E91 silent |
| E92 2022-08-20 | decay | -2.2 | 52.0 | E92 silent |
| E93 2022-08-26 | decay | -2.1 | 49.9 | E93 silent |
| E94 2022-09-01 | decay | -2.0 | 47.9 | E94 silent |
| E95 2022-09-10 | decay | -1.9 | 46.0 | E95 silent |
| E96 2022-09-17 | decay | -1.8 | 44.2 | E96 silent |
| E97 2022-09-23 | decay | -1.8 | 42.4 | E97 silent |
| E98 2022-10-01 | reinforce | +9.0 | 51.4 | E98 Friedberg support x3 [w=0.87] |
| E98 2022-10-01 | reinforce | +7.1 | 58.5 | E98 Jason support x2 [w=0.97] |
| E98 2022-10-01 | reinforce | +5.2 | 63.7 | E98 Chamath support x2 [w=0.84] |
| E99 2022-10-07 | decay | -2.5 | 61.1 | E99 silent |
| E100 2022-10-14 | decay | -2.4 | 58.7 | E100 silent |
| E101 2022-10-22 | decay | -2.3 | 56.3 | E101 silent |
| E102 2022-10-29 | reinforce | +5.5 | 61.8 | E102 Chamath support x2 [w=0.84] |
| E103 2022-11-05 | decay | -2.5 | 59.4 | E103 silent |
| E105 2022-11-19 | reinforce | +5.1 | 64.5 | E105 Chamath support x2 [w=0.84] |
| E106 2022-12-03 | decay | -2.6 | 61.9 | E106 silent |
| E107 2022-12-10 | decay | -2.5 | 59.4 | E107 silent |
| E108 2022-12-16 | reinforce | +5.3 | 64.7 | E108 Friedberg support x2 [w=0.87] |
| E109 2022-12-24 | decay | -2.6 | 62.1 | E109 silent |
| E110 2023-01-06 | decay | -2.5 | 59.6 | E110 silent |
| E111 2023-01-13 | decay | -2.4 | 57.2 | E111 silent |
| E112 2023-01-20 | decay | -2.3 | 54.9 | E112 silent |
| E113 2023-01-27 | decay | -2.2 | 52.7 | E113 silent |
| E114 2023-02-04 | decay | -2.1 | 50.6 | E114 silent |
| E115 2023-02-11 | decay | -2.0 | 48.6 | E115 silent |
| E116 2023-02-17 | decay | -1.9 | 46.7 | E116 silent |
| E118 2023-03-03 | reinforce | +6.7 | 53.4 | E118 Chamath support x2 [w=0.84] |
| E118 2023-03-03 | reinforce | +12.0 | 65.4 | E118 Brad Gerstner support x3 (new voice) [w=0.95] |
| E119 2023-03-11 | decay | -2.6 | 62.8 | E119 silent |
| E120 2023-03-17 | decay | -2.5 | 60.3 | E120 silent |
| E121 2023-03-24 | decay | -2.4 | 57.8 | E121 silent |
| E122 2023-03-31 | decay | -2.3 | 55.5 | E122 silent |
| E123 2023-04-07 | decay | -2.2 | 53.3 | E123 silent |
| E124 2023-04-14 | decay | -2.1 | 51.2 | E124 silent |
| E125 2023-04-21 | decay | -2.0 | 49.1 | E125 silent |
| E126 2023-04-28 | decay | -2.0 | 47.2 | E126 silent |
| E128 2023-05-12 | decay | -1.9 | 45.3 | E128 silent |
| E129 2023-05-19 | decay | -1.8 | 43.5 | E129 silent |
| E130 2023-05-26 | decay | -1.7 | 41.7 | E130 silent |
| E131 2023-06-02 | decay | -1.7 | 40.1 | E131 silent |
| E132 2023-06-10 | decay | -1.6 | 38.5 | E132 silent |
| E133 2023-06-16 | decay | -1.5 | 36.9 | E133 silent |
| E134 2023-06-24 | decay | -1.5 | 35.4 | E134 silent |