🤖 SaaS gets replaced by MaaS — Models as a Service
Chamath's framing: enterprise software becomes single-purpose models that solve a function rather than seat-licensed applications, so 'you can name a bunch of SaaS companies that were purveyors of SaaS that will get replaced by essentially GPT-3 or some other language model' — expense management, forecasting and support first, incrementally. He calls this phase one, before multimodal models and the proprietary-data arms race. Bearish the application-layer SaaS complex, with the value migrating to whoever supplies the models.
other ideas on the same ticker, same direction: Own AWS, Azure and GCP and nothing else — the clouds capture the AI application dollars 48 (MSFT) · Frontier AI labs keep durable premium pricing (not commoditized) 38 (MSFT) · The $3-4T software industrial complex contracts in 2026 34 (IGV) · SaaSpocalypse is overdone for compliance-moat enterprise software 24 (MSFT) · ChatGPT takes Google search share and the market starts pricing the decay 21 (MSFT) · Independent frontier-model labs lose to hyperscaler capital 18 (MSFT)
⚖ Why this result
fully deterministic — computed from daily closes on the scoring date; nothing below is editable or hand-set
- Window: 2022-12-03 → 2023-12-03 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
- The call: ▼ SHORT IGV (primary play). IGV rose 51.9% over the window → return (sign flipped for a SHORT) = -51.9% (the call lost money).
- Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +16.7%
→ vs SPY = -51.9 − (+16.7) = -68.6%
— what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the result uses.
Direction-only read: -35.1% — did IGV move the predicted way relative to the market. The two only differ on a SHORT: this call was right about direction relative to the index but still cost money versus holding it.
- Rule fired:
· RIGHT — return ≥ +10% AND beat SPY by 5+· HALF — return ≥ +5% OR beat SPY at all▶ WRONG — everything else
- Credit: supporters of a WRONG earn 0 each, opposers the opposite — this feeds the scoreboard. supported: Chamath, Friedberg | opposed: Sacks | proxy-sensitive: MSFT (long)→HIT (+51.0%)
Conviction timeline
bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15
Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2022-12-03)
Plays
| expression | symbol | kind | relevance | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▼ SHORT | IGV | etf | PRIMARY | the application-software complex Chamath says gets substituted by models |
| ▼ SHORT | CRM | stock | adjacent | largest pure-play seat-licensed SaaS vendor — the archetype of the 'purveyor of SaaS' being replaced |
| ▲ LONG | MSFT | stock | adjacent | long side of the substitution: the listed model supplier that captures the spend |
Mention log newest first
“And not all those companies are losing money. A growing number of them are making money. I just think that's like a sweeping overgeneralization. So I still think software businesses are some of the best businesses.”
“So even if you set out a team and said, just copy exactly what Figma has, with a copilot enabling 50 engineers, that's like 500 engineers cranking on something, I would be surprised if they couldn't just replicate the product end-to-end.”
“I think there's going to be SaaS software products that were just good before, but now will actually be great because the incorporation of APIs from, you know, AI foundation models will just turbocharge the capabilities.”
“So I think it's just a matter of time until we start to cannibalize these extremely expensive, ossified large organizations that have relied on a very complicated go-to-market and sales and marketing motion. I don't think you need it anymore in a world of agents and auto GPTs. And I think that to me is quite interesting because A, it creates an obvious set of public company shorts.”
“And I think we're still a ways away from the, you know, human being completely out of the loop. I think right now, I see it mostly as a force for good, as opposed to something that's creating a ton of dislocation.”
“I also don't think that you're not going to need to hire engineers because Copilot is going to do it for you. I think what Copilot will do is make your typical engineer more productive. They had some graphs around how Copilot reduced coding time by 50%.”
“The first is that I think we're going to replace SaaS with what I call MAS, which is Models as a Service. And so a lot of what software will be, particularly in the enterprise, will get replaced with a single-use model that allows you to solve a function. So these chat examples are one, and you can name a bunch of SaaS companies that were purveyors of SaaS that will get replaced by essentially GPT-3 or some other language model.”
Who built this conviction
each voice's total push on the score, in conviction points across every mention — supports and opposes · share = % of all mention-driven movement
⏳ decay drained -50.5 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one
Score events
| episode | kind | Δ | after | note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E106 2022-12-03 | init | +42.0 | 42.0 | E106 born by Chamath (explicit_prediction x3) |
| E107 2022-12-10 | decay | -1.7 | 40.3 | E107 silent |
| E108 2022-12-16 | decay | -1.6 | 38.7 | E108 silent |
| E109 2022-12-24 | decay | -1.5 | 37.2 | E109 silent |
| E110 2023-01-06 | decay | -1.5 | 35.7 | E110 silent |
| E111 2023-01-13 | reinforce | +17.4 | 53.0 | E111 Friedberg support x3 (new voice) |
| E112 2023-01-20 | decay | -2.1 | 50.9 | E112 silent |
| E113 2023-01-27 | decay | -2.0 | 48.9 | E113 silent |
| E114 2023-02-04 | decay | -2.0 | 46.9 | E114 silent |
| E115 2023-02-11 | reinforce | +9.6 | 56.5 | E115 Chamath support x3 |
| E115 2023-02-11 | oppose | -14.4 | 42.1 | E115 Sacks opposes x3 |
| E116 2023-02-17 | decay | -1.7 | 40.4 | E116 silent |
| E118 2023-03-03 | decay | -1.6 | 38.8 | E118 silent |
| E119 2023-03-11 | decay | -1.6 | 37.2 | E119 silent |
| E120 2023-03-17 | decay | -1.5 | 35.7 | E120 silent |
| E121 2023-03-24 | decay | -1.4 | 34.3 | E121 silent |
| E122 2023-03-31 | reinforce | +9.9 | 44.2 | E122 Chamath support x2 |
| E123 2023-04-07 | decay | -1.8 | 42.4 | E123 silent |
| E124 2023-04-14 | oppose | -12.0 | 30.4 | E124 Sacks opposes x2 |
| E124 2023-04-14 | reinforce | +12.5 | 42.9 | E124 Friedberg support x3 |
| E124 2023-04-14 | reinforce | +10.3 | 53.2 | E124 Chamath support x3 |
| E125 2023-04-21 | oppose | -12.0 | 41.2 | E125 Sacks opposes x2 |
| E126 2023-04-28 | decay | -1.6 | 39.6 | E126 silent |
| E128 2023-05-12 | decay | -1.6 | 38.0 | E128 silent |
| E129 2023-05-19 | decay | -1.5 | 36.5 | E129 silent |
| E130 2023-05-26 | reinforce | +9.5 | 46.0 | E130 Chamath support x2 |
| E131 2023-06-02 | decay | -1.8 | 44.1 | E131 silent |
| E132 2023-06-10 | decay | -1.8 | 42.4 | E132 silent |
| E133 2023-06-16 | decay | -1.7 | 40.7 | E133 silent |
| E134 2023-06-24 | decay | -1.6 | 39.1 | E134 silent |
| E135 2023-07-01 | decay | -1.6 | 37.5 | E135 silent |
| E136 2023-07-09 | decay | -1.5 | 36.0 | E136 silent |
| E137 2023-07-14 | reinforce | +9.6 | 45.6 | E137 Chamath support x2 |
| E137 2023-07-14 | oppose | -12.0 | 33.6 | E137 Sacks opposes x2 |
| E139 2023-07-27 | decay | -1.3 | 32.3 | E139 silent |
| E140 2023-08-04 | decay | -1.3 | 31.0 | E140 silent |
| E141 2023-08-11 | decay | -1.2 | 29.7 | E141 silent |
| E142 2023-08-18 | decay | -1.2 | 28.5 | E142 silent |
| E143 2023-08-25 | decay | -1.1 | 27.4 | E143 silent |
| E144 2023-09-01 | decay | -1.1 | 26.3 | E144 silent |
| E146 2023-09-22 | decay | -1.1 | 25.2 | E146 silent |
| E147 2023-09-29 | decay | -1.0 | 24.2 | E147 silent |
| E148 2023-10-07 | decay | -1.0 | 23.3 | E148 silent |
| E149 2023-10-13 | decay | -0.9 | 22.3 | E149 silent |
| E150 2023-10-20 | decay | -0.9 | 21.4 | E150 silent |
| E151 2023-10-27 | decay | -0.9 | 20.6 | E151 silent |
| E152 2023-11-03 | decay | -0.8 | 19.8 | E152 silent |