← pool

🏛️ Litigation forces the app-store duopoly to open up and cut the 30% rake

Epic's jury win over Google Play puts the mobile app-store tax in play: Sacks and Jason argue the Apple/Google duopoly is an absolute gatekeeper monopoly that keeps ratcheting its rake and has to be controlled by restricting anti-competitive conduct, and that a coordinated industry litigation wave forces open sideloading and third-party stores, compressing a ~$135B/yr high-margin services line. Friedberg and Chamath take the direct other side: Google wins on appeal, the case proves nothing about the body of law, 15% on renewing subscriptions is commercially reasonable, and app-store behaviour does not materially change.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 55.4 WATCH
EMBER
band · contested
▼ SHORT AAPL
expression · bearish politics-market
MISS
outcome · R -28.8% · α -58.6%
2024-12-16
window closed
⚠ CONFLICTING IDEAS ON THE SAME TICKER — the board is arguing with itself; net it before trading (ticker view →)
GOOGL · Google wins consumer AI via distribution LONG WATCH 61.2 ← stronger than this idea (31.7)
GOOGL · Anthropic IPO (~Oct 2026) is attractively priced at $1.5-2T LONG WATCH 53.9 ← stronger than this idea (31.7)
GOOGL · Personal AI agents: Google's data moat wins the form factor LONG EMBER 29.3
GOOGL · Frontier AI labs keep durable premium pricing (not commoditized) LONG EMBER 26.6
AAPL · Apple: the AI dark horse via local models LONG EMBER 22.7
GOOGL · Own AWS, Azure and GCP and nothing else — the clouds capture the AI application dollars LONG EMBER 20.6
GOOGL · Independent frontier-model labs lose to hyperscaler capital LONG DORMANT 14.0
GOOGL · Willow's error-correction scaling puts encryption on a two-to-five-year clock LONG DORMANT 8.8
AAPL · Apple relocates US-bound iPhone assembly to India on the stated 18-month timeline LONG DORMANT 7.7
GOOGL · Meta's AI assistant takes ten points of search share from Google LONG DORMANT 7.4

also touching these tickers, same direction: Blue cities ban or license-cap robotaxis 28 (GOOGL) · Tort floodgates open on social media 15 (GOOGL) · ChatGPT takes Google search share and the market starts pricing the decay 9 (GOOGL) · ChatGPT takes Google search share and the market starts pricing the decay 9 (AAPL)

⚖ Why this verdict

fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2023-12-16 → 2024-12-16 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▼ SHORT AAPL (primary play). AAPL rose 28.8% over the window → direction-adjusted R = -28.8% (the call lost money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +29.8%α = -28.8 − (+29.8) = -58.6% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
    Stock-selection read: +1.0% — did AAPL move the predicted way relative to the market. The two only differ on a SHORT: this call was right about direction relative to the index but still cost money versus holding it.
  4. Rule fired:
    · HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5
    · PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0
    ▶ MISS — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a MISS earn 0 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Friedberg, Jason, Sacks | opposed: Chamath

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2023-12-16)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▼ SHORT AAPLstock PRIMARY App Store plus services is ~$85B of annual revenue at the highest margin in the company; the closed-iOS rake is the biggest single pool at risk
▼ SHORT GOOGLstock adjacent the actual defendant - Play Store is ~$50B of revenue, about 17% of Alphabet's total, and the jury verdict targets its billing lock-in

Mention log

Sacks
Sacks politics-market w=0.97 · n=88 · E157 (2023-12-16) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 17:47 SUPPORT
“these app stores are absolute monopolies within their ecosystem and Apple and Google Android are absolutely a duopoly within the mobile space... And so I do think they have to be controlled. And I think Epic is doing the ecosystem a favor.”
Jason
Jason politics-market w=1.00 · n=62 · E157 (2023-12-16) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 22:31 SUPPORT
“The entire industry should come at them in unison, tons of lawsuits, group lawsuits, until they allow, when you turn on your Apple phone, the ability to load Amazon's app store, Epic's app store, whoever else wants to have an app store.”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market w=0.84 · n=74 · E157 (2023-12-16) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 11:37 OPPOSE
“Google's going to appeal. They feel very strongly they'll win an appeal... it's going to be very hard to kind of see a massive change in App Store behavior as a result of this case, even though it's been hyped up to be that”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E157 (2023-12-16) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 16:05 OPPOSE
“And so I think Friedberg is right. What does it materially prove? Nothing with respect to the body of law.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market w=0.97 · n=88 · E169 (2024-03-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 51:43 SUPPORT
“I mean, whatever dispute you have with Epic, you don't boot them out of your app store because you don't like their criticism of you. I mean, this is basically proving exactly what everyone's been saying about Apple.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E169 (2024-03-08) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:03:46 SUPPORT
“And in this AI shift, they can still do that, where now people are chipping away at the 30%, right? People are saying, well, I can just build around you. They need to do something.”
Jason
Jason politics-market w=1.00 · n=62 · E169 (2024-03-08) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:03:30 SUPPORT
“Services seems like the best place for them to make money, but as we see, the app store is under assault.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market w=0.97 · n=88 · E171 (2024-03-22) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 4:31 OPPOSE
“at least based on the press coverage, I have yet to see a single smoking gun example coming out of this lawsuit... I'm a little bit doubtful right now that the government's going to be able to win this case”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E171 (2024-03-22) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 10:37 OPPOSE
“I don't think anything is going to happen here because it's taken them five years to file. There's at least a 50% chance that the administration is going to turn over, which means that this lawsuit changes or goes away entirely.”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market w=0.84 · n=74 · E171 (2024-03-22) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 12:19 OPPOSE
“Google and Apple don't price fix because Android is an open access system. You can put any application you want, any way you want. There are several app stores to put Android apps on your Android device.”
Jason
Jason politics-market w=1.00 · n=62 · E171 (2024-03-22) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 19:56 SUPPORT
“these companies will, if you give them an inch, they'll take the mile. And that's exactly what Apple does consistently. They consistently try to squeeze... I think the government's going to win changing three of these.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market w=0.97 · n=88 · E183 (2024-06-14) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 47:09 SUPPORT
“as they've always said, we can't do this because it would jeopardize user privacy and user security. Well, here they are opening themselves up to OpenAI in a very deep and fundamental way”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market w=0.84 · n=74 · E191 (2024-08-09) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 49:51 SUPPORT
“we've talked a lot about the 30% VIG that Apple takes on their App Store, and how regulators are now stepping in and take a look at this”
RE
Reid Hoffman (guest ×0.5) no politics-market track record · E194 (2024-08-30) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 36:26 SUPPORT
“everyone likes to talk about Google, I think the prime candidate is likely to be, and I'm speaking as an individual and as a venture capitalist here, is Apple with the App Store.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market w=0.97 · n=88 · E194 (2024-08-30) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 37:36 SUPPORT
“Apple, really good example, because they drive everything through the App Store, you're not allowed to do side loading. They want to take, what is it, the 30% piece of any sales”
Jason
Jason politics-market w=1.00 · n=62 · E194 (2024-08-30) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 40:50 SUPPORT
“forcing Apple to allow, you know, a startup to do an App Store would solve the entire problem. And it seems like that's where it's going to go.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Jason
Jason w=1.00
4 scoring events · 35% of moves
+74.7 → net +74.7
Sacks
Sacks w=0.97
5 scoring events · 32% of moves
+55.4 / -13.9 → net +41.5
Chamath
Chamath w=1.02
3 scoring events · 15% of moves
+8.1 / -24.5 → net -16.4
Friedberg
Friedberg w=0.84
3 scoring events · 15% of moves
+7.7 / -24.1 → net -16.4
RE
Reid Hoffman guest ×0.5
1 scoring event · 4% of moves
+8.0 → net +8.0

⏳ decay drained -59.7 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E157 2023-12-16 init +42.0 42.0 E157 born by Jason (explicit_prediction x3)
E157 2023-12-16 oppose -12.1 29.9 E157 Friedberg opposes x3 [w=0.84]
E157 2023-12-16 oppose -12.2 17.7 E157 Chamath opposes x2 [w=1.02]
E157 2023-12-16 reinforce +21.5 39.2 E157 Sacks support x3 (new voice) [w=0.97]
E158 2023-12-23 decay -1.6 37.6 E158 silent
E159 2023-12-29 decay -1.5 36.1 E159 silent
E160 2024-01-06 decay -1.4 34.6 E160 silent
E161 2024-01-13 decay -1.4 33.3 E161 silent
E162 2024-01-19 decay -1.3 31.9 E162 silent
E163 2024-01-26 decay -1.3 30.6 E163 silent
E164 2024-02-02 decay -1.2 29.4 E164 silent
E165 2024-02-09 decay -1.2 28.2 E165 silent
E166 2024-02-16 decay -1.1 27.1 E166 silent
E167 2024-02-23 decay -1.1 26.0 E167 silent
E168 2024-03-01 decay -1.0 25.0 E168 silent
E169 2024-03-08 reinforce +13.0 38.0 E169 Sacks support x3 [w=0.97]
E169 2024-03-08 reinforce +9.3 47.3 E169 Jason support x2
E169 2024-03-08 reinforce +8.1 55.4 E169 Chamath support x2 (flipped from oppose) [w=1.02]
E170 2024-03-15 decay -2.2 53.2 E170 silent
E171 2024-03-22 oppose -13.9 39.3 E171 Sacks opposes x3 [w=0.97]
E171 2024-03-22 oppose -12.2 27.0 E171 Chamath opposes x2 [w=1.02]
E171 2024-03-22 oppose -12.1 15.0 E171 Friedberg opposes x3 [w=0.84]
E171 2024-03-22 reinforce +15.3 30.3 E171 Jason support x3
E172 2024-03-29 decay -1.2 29.1 E172 silent
E173 2024-04-05 decay -1.2 27.9 E173 silent
E174 2024-04-12 decay -1.1 26.8 E174 silent
E175 2024-04-19 decay -1.1 25.7 E175 silent
E176 2024-04-26 decay -1.0 24.7 E176 silent
E177 2024-05-03 decay -1.0 23.7 E177 silent
E178 2024-05-10 decay -0.9 22.7 E178 silent
E179 2024-05-17 decay -0.9 21.8 E179 silent
E180 2024-05-24 decay -0.9 21.0 E180 silent
E181 2024-05-31 decay -0.8 20.1 E181 silent
E182 2024-06-07 decay -0.8 19.3 E182 silent
E183 2024-06-14 reinforce +11.7 31.0 E183 Sacks support x2 (flipped from oppose) [w=0.97]
E184 2024-06-20 decay -1.2 29.8 E184 silent
E185 2024-06-29 decay -1.2 28.6 E185 silent
E186 2024-07-04 decay -1.1 27.4 E186 silent
E187 2024-07-12 decay -1.1 26.3 E187 silent
E188 2024-07-19 decay -1.1 25.3 E188 silent
E189 2024-07-26 decay -1.0 24.3 E189 silent
E190 2024-08-02 decay -1.0 23.3 E190 silent
E191 2024-08-09 reinforce +7.7 31.0 E191 Friedberg support x1 (flipped from oppose) [w=0.84]
E192 2024-08-16 decay -1.2 29.8 E192 silent
E193 2024-08-23 decay -1.2 28.6 E193 silent
E194 2024-08-30 reinforce +8.0 36.6 E194 Reid Hoffman support x2 (new voice) [w=0.50]
E194 2024-08-30 reinforce +9.2 45.8 E194 Sacks support x2 [w=0.97]
E194 2024-08-30 reinforce +8.1 53.9 E194 Jason support x2
E195 2024-09-06 decay -2.2 51.8 E195 silent
E196 2024-09-20 decay -2.1 49.7 E196 silent
E197 2024-09-27 decay -2.0 47.7 E197 silent
E198 2024-10-03 decay -1.9 45.8 E198 silent
E199 2024-10-11 decay -1.8 44.0 E199 silent
E200 2024-10-18 decay -1.8 42.2 E200 silent
E201 2024-10-25 decay -1.7 40.5 E201 silent
E202 2024-11-01 decay -1.6 38.9 E202 silent
E203 2024-11-08 decay -1.6 37.3 E203 silent
E204 2024-11-16 decay -1.5 35.9 E204 silent
E205 2024-11-23 decay -1.4 34.4 E205 silent
E206 2024-12-07 decay -1.4 33.0 E206 silent
E207 2024-12-13 decay -1.3 31.7 E207 silent