← pool

🌍 American exceptionalism soars and the economy booms in 2022

Empowered millennials/Gen-Z plus Gen-X taking over from retiring boomers create a perfect storm of capital, energy and ideas — the US economy booms in 2022.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 58.7 WATCH
DORMANT
band · contested
▲ LONG QQQ
expression · bullish macro
MISS
outcome · R -33.2% · α -14.8%
2022-12-29
window closed

also touching these tickers, same direction: It's 1997-98, not 1999 — the melt-up has years left 67 (QQQ) · The 2026 US boom — 5-6% GDP prints 55 (QQQ)

⚖ Why this verdict

fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2021-12-29 → 2022-12-29 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▲ LONG QQQ (primary play). QQQ fell 33.2% over the window → direction-adjusted R = -33.2% (the call lost money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned -18.4%α = -33.2 − (-18.4) = -14.8% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
  4. Rule fired:
    · HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5
    · PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0
    ▶ MISS — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a MISS earn 0 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Friedberg, Jason | opposed: Brad Gerstner, Chamath, Sacks

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2021-12-29)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▲ LONG QQQetf PRIMARY tech-led-boom proxy (SPY as primary would degenerate the alpha rule to zero by construction)

Mention log

Jason
Jason macro w=1.27 · n=30 · E61 (2021-12-29) · annual_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 41:47 SUPPORT · horizon 12mo
“My most contrarian belief is that American influence and exceptionalism is going to soar... a perfect storm of a ton of capital, a ton of energy, lots of new ideas... the economy is going to boom. And we will prove once again that we're the greatest country and economy in the world.”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E62 (2022-01-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 44:55 OPPOSE
“I mean, they had they had the Goldilocks scenario down about three weeks ago and I think they're going to tank the thing now or there's a much greater risk of that.”
Friedberg
Friedberg macro w=0.93 · n=40 · E64 (2022-01-22) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 50:11 SUPPORT
“the economy underlying, there are lots of great businesses that are growing and doing well, and there's stability that's emerging”
Jason
Jason macro w=1.27 · n=30 · E65 (2022-01-29) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 50:02 SUPPORT
“So let's look in the good news column. Wages way up. Earnings way up. 10 million job openings in the United States. Pretty close to record low unemployment. And the pandemic ending. And people having record savings in their bank accounts and personal balance sheets.”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E65 (2022-01-29) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 53:45 OPPOSE
“Well, the negatives are that yes, the unemployment rate is very low, but a lot of people have dropped out of the labor force. So the labor participation rate is still quite low. ... And then the fact that wages are going up is good, but we don't know how much that's inflation. So those would be the negatives.”
Chamath
Chamath macro w=1.06 · n=47 · E71 (2022-03-05) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 21:30 OPPOSE
“Look, David and I have been the ones that said the risk is to a recession. We are now teetering towards a recession.”
Chamath
Chamath macro w=1.06 · n=47 · E72 (2022-03-19) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 50:32 SUPPORT
“The economy is still quite strong. ... And we could actually support 2%, 2.5% interest rates and still actually grow really well.”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) macro w=1.00 · n=10 · E73 (2022-03-26) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:25:49 OPPOSE
“I tweeted a few weeks ago, the Fed's probably behind the curve on recession, not inflation, right? We have massive demand destruction going on right now in the US economy.”
Jason
Jason macro w=1.27 · n=30 · E74 (2022-04-01) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 16:07 SUPPORT
“Almost every other time we've had a recession, people couldn't find jobs. ... And now we're sitting here with more jobs than we can fill. There's still over 10 million jobs available, and people are still resigning from jobs.”
Chamath
Chamath macro w=1.06 · n=47 · E74 (2022-04-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 24:34 OPPOSE
“Something is happening that we need to take seriously, and none of the outcomes here are growthy good outcomes. ... we're going to be going into the back half of the year in a midterm election where the economy is slowing, interest rates are high, prices are high. This is a horrible setup for the day.”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E74 (2022-04-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 13:48 OPPOSE
“So these are all negative indicators. ... And I think we're either going to have a recession or something very close to it.”
Chamath
Chamath macro w=1.06 · n=47 · E78 (2022-04-30) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 31:54 OPPOSE
“We have a quarter of negative GDP. We have China in lockdowns. We have every company that's in the manufacturing supply chain ecosystem telling the world that we don't really know what this is going to look like. Intel today actually said there's going to be shortages in chips through 2024”
Jason
Jason macro w=1.27 · n=30 · E78 (2022-04-30) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 37:14 REVERSAL
“we're obviously either in a recession or, you know, dancing around it. We're basically, you know, on the edge of the cliff right now, I think is probably the most accurate.”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E78 (2022-04-30) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 38:41 OPPOSE
“we've got a slowing economy with negative GDP growth. You've got inflation is still rampant. ... And when you have that kind of wealth destruction, it eventually trickles down into the economy because people just feel, companies start cutting budgets, people have less money. The spending goes down.”
Jason
Jason macro w=1.27 · n=30 · E80 (2022-05-13) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:08:58 REVERSAL
“Those two things could be what saves us, could save us during this recession. It's something distinctly unique about this recession, is job openings and low unemployment.”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E80 (2022-05-13) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:30:37 OPPOSE
“from where we're sitting, we're seeing a stock market crash, a panic and a recession and he doesn't even see it.”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) macro w=1.00 · n=10 · E81 (2022-05-23) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 7:22 OPPOSE
“Somebody who can afford to pay $1,200 a month in December could afford a $350,000 home. Today can afford a $240,000 home. ... If you look at what consumer confidence is, it's the lowest in 10 years, right? Consumer confidence is a leading indicator of slowing down.”
Jason
Jason macro w=1.27 · n=30 · E84 (2022-06-24) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 56:07 REVERSAL
“there's a whole group of investors who have only known the up market. There's a whole group of founders who are only in the growth market. If you're under 40 years old, you don't understand what you're about to experience.”
Jason
Jason macro w=1.27 · n=30 · E85 (2022-06-30) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:05:20 REVERSAL · horizon 12mo
“How many quarters will this recession be? If we had to pick a range, pick a two quarter range. ... I'm thinking three to five.”
Jason
Jason macro w=1.27 · n=30 · E86 (2022-07-08) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 21:23 SUPPORT
“So this is going to have an impact. It's going to catch up, but there's so many jobs available and there's so many people unemployed. I think it's manageable.”
Jason
Jason macro w=1.27 · n=30 · E90 (2022-08-05) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 15:41 SUPPORT · horizon 12mo
“Jobs, and we've talked about this every month as we watch it, finally dipped under 11 million, as Sacks predicted. You know, we're going to shed three or four hundred thousand jobs, it seems, every month, which should take this, you know, 10, 11 million number over the next year down to maybe five or six, which would still be an unbelievable number, still put us at very robust, full employment, which has been a big question.”
Jason
Jason macro w=1.27 · n=30 · E91 (2022-08-13) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 47:26 SUPPORT
“which is, hey, if we have increased participation, that's great. Increases monetary velocity, increases participation in the economy. That's a possible path out.”
Chamath
Chamath macro w=1.06 · n=47 · E91 (2022-08-13) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 48:08 OPPOSE
“Even in secular decline on that trend for 25 years. So maybe on the margins, a few folks run out of stimulus and decide to go and get a job. But I don't think, again, it's kind of like, you know, when you're at the blackjack table in Vegas and somebody's clapping. I feel like all the, like what we're talking about right now is clapping as a strategy.”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E103 (2022-11-05) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 24:26 OPPOSE
“I think the larger point is just that it feels to me like the economy is headed off a cliff right now. I mean, I can tell you within our larger portfolio of companies, like I can see the trajectory. So after Q1 board meetings, I would say about two-thirds of portfolio companies were hitting their numbers and one-third were missing.”
Jason
Jason macro w=1.27 · n=30 · E103 (2022-11-05) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 31:55 SUPPORT
“And this was the Fed's goal, right? They wanted to take away this free capital. They want to slow the economy down. And it seems like they're making progress. They did the 75 basis point hike this week. But we're adding jobs to the economy. We have more job openings and we had 2.6% GDP growth.”
Chamath
Chamath macro w=1.06 · n=47 · E109 (2022-12-24) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 20:33 OPPOSE
“I mean, I whiffed. It just completely missed the global macro shift that we embarked on in full force starting in Q1 of this year.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Jason
Jason w=1.27
11 scoring events · 47% of moves
+143.2 → net +143.2
Chamath
Chamath w=1.06
6 scoring events · 26% of moves
+12.3 / -66.2 → net -53.9
Sacks
Sacks w=1.12
6 scoring events · 19% of moves
+0.0 / -56.7 → net -56.7
Friedberg
Friedberg w=0.93
1 scoring event · 4% of moves
+13.4 → net +13.4
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner w=1.00 regular guest ×1.0
2 scoring events · 4% of moves
+0.0 / -12.0 → net -12.0

⏳ decay drained -27.4 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E61 2021-12-29 init +50.7 50.7 E61 born by Jason (annual_prediction x2) [w=1.27]
E62 2022-01-08 oppose -13.5 37.2 E62 Sacks opposes x2 [w=1.12]
E63 2022-01-15 decay -1.5 35.7 E63 silent
E64 2022-01-22 reinforce +13.4 49.1 E64 Friedberg support x2 (new voice) [w=0.93]
E65 2022-01-29 reinforce +9.7 58.7 E65 Jason support x2 [w=1.27]
E65 2022-01-29 oppose -13.5 45.2 E65 Sacks opposes x2 [w=1.12]
E66 2022-02-05 decay -1.8 43.4 E66 silent
E67 2022-02-12 decay -1.7 41.7 E67 silent
E68 2022-02-19 decay -1.7 40.0 E68 silent
E70 2022-02-24 decay -1.6 38.4 E70 silent
E71 2022-03-05 oppose -15.3 23.1 E71 Chamath opposes x3 [w=1.06]
E72 2022-03-19 reinforce +12.3 35.4 E72 Chamath support x2 (flipped from oppose) [w=1.06]
E73 2022-03-26 oppose -12.0 23.4 E73 Brad Gerstner opposes x2
E74 2022-04-01 oppose -13.5 9.9 E74 Sacks opposes x2 [w=1.12]
E74 2022-04-01 reinforce +17.1 27.0 E74 Jason support x2 [w=1.27]
E74 2022-04-01 oppose -12.8 14.2 E74 Chamath opposes x2 [w=1.06]
E75 2022-04-09 decay -0.6 13.7 E75 silent
E76 2022-04-16 decay -0.5 13.1 E76 silent
E77 2022-04-23 decay -0.5 12.6 E77 silent
E78 2022-04-30 oppose -12.6 0.0 E78 Chamath opposes x2 [w=1.06]
E78 2022-04-30 reversal · 0.0 E78 Jason flips
E78 2022-04-30 oppose · 0.0 E78 Sacks opposes x2 [w=1.12]
E79 2022-05-07 decay · 0.0 E79 silent
E80 2022-05-13 oppose · 0.0 E80 Jason opposes x2 (marked reversal; no prior support to flip) [w=1.27]
E80 2022-05-13 oppose · 0.0 E80 Sacks opposes x2 [w=1.12]
E81 2022-05-23 oppose · 0.0 E81 Brad Gerstner opposes x2
E82 2022-05-24 decay · 0.0 E82 silent
E84 2022-06-24 oppose · 0.0 E84 Jason opposes x2 (marked reversal; no prior support to flip) [w=1.27]
E85 2022-06-30 oppose · 0.0 E85 Jason opposes x2 (marked reversal; no prior support to flip) [w=1.27]
E86 2022-07-08 reinforce +19.0 19.0 E86 Jason support x2 (flipped from reversal) [w=1.27]
E87 2022-07-14 decay -0.8 18.2 E87 silent
E88 2022-07-22 decay -0.7 17.5 E88 silent
E89 2022-07-29 decay -0.7 16.8 E89 silent
E90 2022-08-05 reinforce +15.8 32.6 E90 Jason support x2 [w=1.27]
E91 2022-08-13 reinforce +12.8 45.4 E91 Jason support x2 [w=1.27]
E91 2022-08-13 oppose -12.8 32.7 E91 Chamath opposes x2 [w=1.06]
E92 2022-08-20 decay -1.3 31.3 E92 silent
E93 2022-08-26 decay -1.3 30.1 E93 silent
E94 2022-09-01 decay -1.2 28.9 E94 silent
E95 2022-09-10 decay -1.2 27.7 E95 silent
E96 2022-09-17 decay -1.1 26.6 E96 silent
E97 2022-09-23 decay -1.1 25.6 E97 silent
E98 2022-10-01 decay -1.0 24.5 E98 silent
E99 2022-10-07 decay -1.0 23.6 E99 silent
E100 2022-10-14 decay -0.9 22.6 E100 silent
E101 2022-10-22 decay -0.9 21.7 E101 silent
E102 2022-10-29 decay -0.9 20.8 E102 silent
E103 2022-11-05 oppose -16.2 4.6 E103 Sacks opposes x3 [w=1.12]
E103 2022-11-05 reinforce +18.1 22.8 E103 Jason support x2 [w=1.27]
E105 2022-11-19 decay -0.9 21.8 E105 silent
E106 2022-12-03 decay -0.9 21.0 E106 silent
E107 2022-12-10 decay -0.8 20.1 E107 silent
E108 2022-12-16 decay -0.8 19.3 E108 silent
E109 2022-12-24 oppose -12.8 6.6 E109 Chamath opposes x2 [w=1.06]