← pool

🤖 Generative AI is the next Silicon Valley bubble cycle

Friedberg's dated market prediction three days after ChatGPT launched: a hundred thousand startups emerge, all VC and investor attention rotates to this capability, and the next hype/bubble cycle in Silicon Valley will absolutely be generative AI — an internet-moment reflex where 'this changes everything' is the consensus, so a bubble forms. Capital floods the compute and model layer regardless of whether the applications work.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 91.5 GREEN
EMBER
band · contested
▲ LONG NVDA
expression · bullish tech
RIGHT
result · return +181.7% · vs SPY +164.9%
2023-12-03
born 2022-12-03 (E106) → window closed
⚠ CONFLICTING IDEA ON THE SAME TICKER — the board is arguing with itself; net it out (ticker view →)
NVDA · Nvidia risk: special-purpose silicon + Huawei SHORT DORMANT 1.9

other ideas on the same ticker, same direction: AI compute capex supercycle has 12-24 months of runway 86 (NVDA) · AI compute capex supercycle has 12-24 months of runway 86 (SMH) · Nvidia + Hugging Face makes NVDA the open-source AI champion 55 (NVDA) · Nvidia + Hugging Face makes NVDA the open-source AI champion 55 (SMH) · Own AWS, Azure and GCP and nothing else — the clouds capture the AI application dollars 48 (MSFT) · DRAM/HBM: the bottleneck that matters 42 (SMH) · Frontier AI labs keep durable premium pricing (not commoditized) 38 (MSFT) · The AI doomer campaign fails — no FDAI, open source survives 31 (NVDA) · The AI doomer campaign fails — no FDAI, open source survives 31 (SMH) · SaaSpocalypse is overdone for compliance-moat enterprise software 24 (MSFT) · ChatGPT takes Google search share and the market starts pricing the decay 21 (MSFT) · Independent frontier-model labs lose to hyperscaler capital 18 (MSFT)

⚖ Why this result

fully deterministic — computed from daily closes on the scoring date; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2022-12-03 → 2023-12-03 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▲ LONG NVDA (primary play). NVDA rose 181.7% over the window → return (sign flipped for a SHORT) = +181.7% (the call made money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +16.7% → vs SPY = +181.7 − (+16.7) = +164.9% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the result uses.
  4. Rule fired:
    ▶ RIGHT — return ≥ +10% AND beat SPY by 5+ ✓ (return 181.7, vs SPY 164.9)
    · HALF — return ≥ +5% OR beat SPY at all
    · WRONG — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a RIGHT earn 1.0 each, opposers the opposite — this feeds the scoreboard. supported: Bill Gurley, Brad Gerstner, Chamath, Jason | opposed: Friedberg, Sacks

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2022-12-03)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▲ LONG NVDAstock PRIMARY the compute every generative-AI startup has to buy — the listed way to own a private-market hype cycle
▲ LONG MSFTstock adjacent OpenAI's commercial and cloud partner, the other listed beneficiary of the capital rotation
▲ LONG SMHetf adjacent broad semis exposure to an AI capex hype cycle

Mention log newest first

Friedberg
Friedberg tech 55% · n=66 · E147 (2023-09-29) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:14:34 REVERSAL
“I've been using a lot of different tools the last couple of months, and I'm kind of getting to the point that I feel that much of what's happening is underhyped rather than overhyped.”
Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E143 (2023-08-25) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 24:59 OPPOSE
“what happened with fiber is there was a big build out of over capacity, but then the number of applications kept growing until that capacity got used. And I think we're probably going to see something like that here”
Jason
Jason tech 53% · n=56 · E143 (2023-08-25) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 16:42 SUPPORT
“So is this like the dark fiber of this era where we're just going to build so much capacity that there's just going to be not enough jobs to run on it in your mind?”
Friedberg
Friedberg tech 55% · n=66 · E143 (2023-08-25) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 14:25 SUPPORT
“we're at this point right now, and I would argue a bit of a cycle that there looks to be a bubble. And what I mean by that is that there's a lot of inefficient spending going on”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) tech 71% · n=17 · E141 (2023-08-11) · sentiment · strength 3 ▶ 46:00 SUPPORT
“We're seeing four, five, six hundred million dollar deals get done on zero revenue, two, three million dollars in revenue.”
Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E141 (2023-08-11) · positioning · strength 3 ▶ 29:38 SUPPORT
“I think there's a mania going on with AI, both in terms of the size of these rounds and the valuations. It's like 2021 for a lot of AI companies. We're not participating in that craziness.”
Bill Gurley
Bill Gurley (regular guest ×1.0) tech: 2 resolved, unproven · E141 (2023-08-11) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 24:00 SUPPORT
“the AI deals, one thing that might be interesting is if you pulled the AI deals out, I bet those numbers would be more akin to what they were two or three years ago”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E136 (2023-07-09) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 17:15 SUPPORT
“So yeah, again, it's part of the hype cycle and we all kind of fell for it. The only winner here is NVIDIA. I think the loser here are most of the VCs who pumped in hundreds of millions to billions of dollars and ran those stuff too early.”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E135 (2023-07-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:10:53 SUPPORT
“That will play out in AI as well. It's just that we're at the beginning of the hype cycle, right?”
Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E135 (2023-07-01) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 54:21 SUPPORT
“Now, I don't think that's necessarily a rational behavior. I think that's more of evidence of a mania going on.”
Friedberg
Friedberg tech 55% · n=66 · E133 (2023-06-16) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:34:42 SUPPORT · horizon 24mo
“But if that's really where things are headed, then does the $100 million to train models today really make sense if training those same models can be done for $5 million in 18 to 24 months?”
Jason
Jason tech 53% · n=56 · E133 (2023-06-16) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:29:54 SUPPORT
“Constraint makes for great art. Constraint makes for great startups. You need to have pressure on a startup for them to deliver. You cannot give startups five years of runway and expect it's gonna work.”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) tech 71% · n=17 · E133 (2023-06-16) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:19:13 SUPPORT
“The truth of the matter is almost all those companies went to zero, even though you got a couple bets right. You got the internet right. You got search right. But you didn't have to invest a dollar in search until 2003 and you would have captured 98, 99% of the value.”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E133 (2023-06-16) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:16:37 SUPPORT
“So whoever's putting money in thinking they know what the fuck they're doing, you might as well just light it on fire, go to Vegas and have some fun with it, because you will get more enjoyment from that than you will from making these kinds of investments.”
Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E130 (2023-05-26) · sentiment · strength 3 ▶ 1:12:06 SUPPORT
“The AI startups, there's a lot of interesting things happening in there and money is being pushed at them by VCs. It's very frothy, arguably bubbly.”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E129 (2023-05-19) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 7:40 SUPPORT
“And if you see, if you gauge the sentiment, the hedge funds and family offices right now are just giddy about AI. And it turns out if you look at the 13Fs, they're all long NVIDIA and AMD.”
Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E125 (2023-04-21) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 54:07 SUPPORT · horizon 24mo
“But at least there's a reason now to believe that, say, dozens of unicorns could be created in the next couple of years.”
Friedberg
Friedberg tech 55% · n=66 · E125 (2023-04-21) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 50:07 SUPPORT
“And so we'll create this massively bubble-ific, you know, index of AI stuff. But some number of these things with some great leaders will emerge and will accrue extraordinary value across many industries.”
Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E122 (2023-03-31) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 55:12 SUPPORT
“If you look at 70% of the last YC class was ready, all AI startups. I'm sure the next one will probably be 95%.”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E122 (2023-03-31) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 25:17 SUPPORT
“And after all of this money that's been burned in crypto land and NFTs and all of this Web 3 nonsense, to yet again whip up the next hype cycle, I think doesn't serve us well.”
Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E120 (2023-03-17) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 58:33 SUPPORT
“And then also we have this really interesting AI wave happening now, and there's a lot of opportunities to invest in that new cycle.”
Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E118 (2023-03-03) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 22:03 SUPPORT
“If you're a founder and you build one feature on top of the open AI API, now all of a sudden you're going to market yourself as an AI company.”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) tech 71% · n=17 · E118 (2023-03-03) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 11:31 OPPOSE
“But, you know, when I look at $10 or $11 billion, you know, let's put it in context. Meta is going to spend $20 billion in one year alone on ARVR.”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E118 (2023-03-03) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 8:48 SUPPORT
“And so the 500-odd companies, Jason, you mentioned, will get a lot of it and it'll get torched because most of them probably won't amount to much of anything in the short term.”
Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E114 (2023-02-04) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 46:03 SUPPORT
“Now, at the same time, I do think that if AI is the next wave, and the next sort of platform opportunity, as we all think it is, I do think that places more of an emphasis on technical skills and I was, I was literally just having this conversation at Kraft that gee, maybe the next hire we should make at Kraft should be someone who's really deep technically so they can help go deeper on technical due diligence of AI companies.”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E114 (2023-02-04) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 45:24 SUPPORT
“So you're right, they may take this money and misallocate it into these companies that are just rebranding themselves.”
Friedberg
Friedberg tech 55% · n=66 · E114 (2023-02-04) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 44:02 SUPPORT
“there is this friggin tidal wave of AI companies and there is this incredible amount of lubricant in the dry powder that's sitting on the side of the market right now that all these venture funds raised in the last two years that is going to lubricate all these AI companies into every vertical in every market.”
Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E112 (2023-01-20) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:23:08 SUPPORT
“AI is already the hot thing. Everyone's kind of looking at this now.”
Friedberg
Friedberg tech 55% · n=66 · E111 (2023-01-13) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 53:28 REVERSAL
“I don't think it's about being a hype cycle. I think it's about the investment opportunity against fundamentally rewriting all compute tools, because if all compute tools ultimately can use this capability in their interface and in their modeling, then it very much changes everything.”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E111 (2023-01-13) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 51:20 SUPPORT
“And I think the problem with the hype cycle is that you're going to have to marry it with an economic model for VCs to really make money.”
Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E111 (2023-01-13) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 30:55 SUPPORT
“Well, it's definitely the next VC hype cycle. Everyone's kind of glomming on to this because VC really right now needs a savior. Just look at the public markets, everything we're investing in is in the toilets. So we all really want to believe that this is going to be the next wave.”
Friedberg
Friedberg tech 55% · n=66 · E109 (2022-12-24) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 2:01:38 SUPPORT
“And as you guys know, there's an absolute frigging tidal wave of people trying to start companies that are leveraging tools and generative AI to kind of reinvent everything from workplace tools, enterprise software, all the way through to media, games and entertainment.”
Friedberg
Friedberg tech 55% · n=66 · E106 (2022-12-03) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:16:08 SUPPORT
“And as a result, my guess is the next hype cycle, the next bubble cycle in Silicon Valley will absolutely be this generative AI business concept.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total push on the score, in conviction points across every mention — supports and opposes · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Friedberg
Friedberg 55%
8 scoring events · 52% of moves
+73.4 / -84.0 → net -10.6
Sacks
Sacks 39%
11 scoring events · 24% of moves
+62.3 / -12.0 → net +50.3
Chamath
Chamath 45%
8 scoring events · 14% of moves
+43.8 → net +43.8
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner 71% regular guest ×1.0
3 scoring events · 6% of moves
+6.1 / -12.0 → net -5.9
Jason
Jason 53%
2 scoring events · 2% of moves
+5.6 → net +5.6
Bill Gurley
Bill Gurley regular guest ×1.0
1 scoring event · 1% of moves
+4.3 → net +4.3

⏳ decay drained -63.9 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E106 2022-12-03 init +42.0 42.0 E106 born by Friedberg (explicit_prediction x3)
E107 2022-12-10 decay -1.7 40.3 E107 silent
E108 2022-12-16 decay -1.6 38.7 E108 silent
E109 2022-12-24 reinforce +9.2 47.9 E109 Friedberg support x2
E110 2023-01-06 decay -1.9 46.0 E110 silent
E111 2023-01-13 reinforce +12.2 58.1 E111 Sacks support x2 (new voice)
E111 2023-01-13 reinforce +9.4 67.6 E111 Chamath support x2 (new voice)
E111 2023-01-13 reversal -40.5 27.0 E111 Friedberg flips
E112 2023-01-20 reinforce +10.9 38.0 E112 Sacks support x2
E113 2023-01-27 decay -1.5 36.5 E113 silent
E114 2023-02-04 reinforce +11.4 47.9 E114 Friedberg support x3 (flipped from reversal)
E114 2023-02-04 reinforce +7.8 55.7 E114 Chamath support x2
E114 2023-02-04 reinforce +6.6 62.4 E114 Sacks support x2
E115 2023-02-11 decay -2.5 59.9 E115 silent
E116 2023-02-17 decay -2.4 57.5 E116 silent
E118 2023-03-03 reinforce +7.7 65.1 E118 Chamath support x3
E118 2023-03-03 oppose -12.0 53.1 E118 Brad Gerstner opposes x2
E118 2023-03-03 reinforce +7.0 60.2 E118 Sacks support x2
E119 2023-03-11 decay -2.4 57.7 E119 silent
E120 2023-03-17 reinforce +6.3 64.1 E120 Sacks support x2
E121 2023-03-24 decay -2.6 61.5 E121 silent
E122 2023-03-31 reinforce +5.8 67.3 E122 Chamath support x2
E122 2023-03-31 reinforce +5.9 73.2 E122 Sacks support x3
E123 2023-04-07 decay -2.9 70.3 E123 silent
E124 2023-04-14 decay -2.8 67.4 E124 silent
E125 2023-04-21 reinforce +5.9 73.3 E125 Friedberg support x3
E125 2023-04-21 reinforce +4.0 77.3 E125 Sacks support x2
E126 2023-04-28 decay -3.1 74.2 E126 silent
E128 2023-05-12 decay -3.0 71.2 E128 silent
E129 2023-05-19 reinforce +4.3 75.6 E129 Chamath support x2
E130 2023-05-26 reinforce +4.4 80.0 E130 Sacks support x3
E131 2023-06-02 decay -3.2 76.8 E131 silent
E132 2023-06-10 decay -3.1 73.7 E132 silent
E133 2023-06-16 reinforce +4.7 78.4 E133 Chamath support x3
E133 2023-06-16 reinforce +3.9 82.3 E133 Brad Gerstner support x3 (flipped from oppose)
E133 2023-06-16 reinforce +4.0 86.3 E133 Jason support x2 (new voice)
E133 2023-06-16 reinforce +2.5 88.8 E133 Friedberg support x3
E134 2023-06-24 decay -3.6 85.2 E134 silent
E135 2023-07-01 reinforce +2.2 87.4 E135 Sacks support x2
E135 2023-07-01 reinforce +2.3 89.7 E135 Chamath support x3
E136 2023-07-09 reinforce +1.9 91.5 E136 Chamath support x3
E137 2023-07-14 decay -3.7 87.9 E137 silent
E139 2023-07-27 decay -3.5 84.4 E139 silent
E140 2023-08-04 decay -3.4 81.0 E140 silent
E141 2023-08-11 reinforce +4.3 85.3 E141 Bill Gurley support x2 (new voice)
E141 2023-08-11 reinforce +2.7 87.9 E141 Sacks support x3
E141 2023-08-11 reinforce +2.2 90.1 E141 Brad Gerstner support x3
E142 2023-08-18 decay -3.6 86.5 E142 silent
E143 2023-08-25 reinforce +2.4 88.9 E143 Friedberg support x3
E143 2023-08-25 reinforce +1.7 90.6 E143 Jason support x2
E143 2023-08-25 oppose -12.0 78.6 E143 Sacks opposes x2
E144 2023-09-01 decay -3.1 75.4 E144 silent
E146 2023-09-22 decay -3.0 72.4 E146 silent
E147 2023-09-29 reversal -43.5 29.0 E147 Friedberg flips
E148 2023-10-07 decay -1.2 27.8 E148 silent
E149 2023-10-13 decay -1.1 26.7 E149 silent
E150 2023-10-20 decay -1.1 25.6 E150 silent
E151 2023-10-27 decay -1.0 24.6 E151 silent
E152 2023-11-03 decay -1.0 23.6 E152 silent