← pool

🌍 China's crackdown spirals its own economy down

By throttling entrepreneurs and killing the Deng bargain, Beijing has shot itself in both feet: talent and capital stop showing up, innovation stalls, and China's economy declines relative to the US rather than compounding. This is the axis the besties actually fought over.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 53.2 WATCH
EMBER
band · contested
▼ SHORT FXI
expression · bearish macro
HIT
outcome · R +23.9% · α +28.6%
2022-07-30
window closed
⚠ CONFLICTING IDEA ON THE SAME TICKER — the board is arguing with itself; net it before trading (ticker view →)
MCHI · China's automated manufacturing base outruns US reindustrialization LONG EMBER 25.4

⚖ Why this verdict

fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2021-07-30 → 2022-07-30 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▼ SHORT FXI (primary play). FXI fell 23.9% over the window → direction-adjusted R = +23.9% (the call made money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned -4.7%α = +23.9 − (-4.7) = +28.6% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
    Stock-selection read: +19.2% — did FXI move the predicted way relative to the market. The two only differ on a SHORT: this call beat the index outright.
  4. Rule fired:
    ▶ HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5 ✓ (R 23.9, α 28.6)
    · PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0
    · MISS — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a HIT earn 1.0 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Jason, Sacks | opposed: Chamath, Friedberg

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2021-07-30)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▼ SHORT FXIetf PRIMARY broad China large-cap read on whether the economy de-rates or compounds
▼ SHORT ASHRetf adjacent onshore A-shares — separates domestic economy from the ADR-specific damage
▼ SHORT MCHIetf adjacent wider all-cap China exposure

Mention log

Jason
Jason macro w=1.27 · n=30 · E42 (2021-07-30) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 35:22 SUPPORT
“I think this is going to be like a spiraling down of their economy. I don't think it's going to spiral up. ... I think they just throttled innovation and they just shot themselves in both feet. I think they're going to regret this decision.”
Chamath
Chamath macro w=1.06 · n=47 · E42 (2021-07-30) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 33:17 OPPOSE
“I disagree with you. No, I disagree with you. And the reason I disagree with you is... ... Because you know what, if you're coming from China, and you can only make a billion versus 45 billion, I think you still take the shot. ... Everybody, guess what? Because if you want a shred of fucking lithium, if you want a battery, if you want nickel, if you want anything to happen, you need to work with China.”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E42 (2021-07-30) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 34:02 OPPOSE
“I think J. Cal is right in the sense, I don't think it's gonna be like a binary decision where all of a sudden everyone just stops doing business in China, but they're gonna be hedging their bets.”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E49 (2021-10-02) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 1:20:25 SUPPORT
“We have a looming debt crisis in China. We have supply chain shortages.”
Chamath
Chamath macro w=1.06 · n=47 · E64 (2022-01-22) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 44:31 SUPPORT
“So this weekend, China cut interest rates. ... Well, if you are cutting rates, it is because you are worried about the other problem, which is that the economy is basically turned over and you need to become more accommodating.”
Chamath
Chamath macro w=1.06 · n=47 · E72 (2022-03-19) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 37:44 SUPPORT
“China is still a fundamentally export driven economy, of which 35% just alone goes to the United States. When you add in Europe and other OECD countries, it's almost 60%. ... I think the idea that all of a sudden, Russia will be able to backdoor all of these things through China into the rest of the world, I think is not really realistic.”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E72 (2022-03-19) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 35:46 OPPOSE
“Russia will become a Chinese client ... those resources are going to flow on a conveyor belt, on a belt and road conveyor belt from Moscow to Beijing, and they're going to fuel the Chinese economy”
CL
Claire Cormier Thielke (guest ×0.5) no macro track record · E82 (2022-05-24) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 25:29 OPPOSE
“I think there was a concern that there would be an entire meltdown of the full Chinese economy, which is not what we feel on the ground. I think, if anything, it's created a set of opportunities to really level set, especially on the living sector. It's really accelerated some policies to make it easier to build and to create rental housing ... China is only as urbanized as the US was in about 1950”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E82 (2022-05-24) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 29:27 SUPPORT
“China is on the precipice of this because of this one China policy. I think the stat that I saw, which is stunning, is there's 1.2 billion people in China? 1.4? By 2100, it's going to be around 600 million. If that's true, the point is just that there's a real issue.”
Chamath
Chamath macro w=1.06 · n=47 · E84 (2022-06-24) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:26:50 OPPOSE
“China's input cost has been capped. And so they don't suffer the same rate of inflation that the rest of us do. ... we allowed our largest competitive frenemy, if you will, to basically be able to, you know, drive their entire economy at 30 to 40% of the discount to what we have to pay to do the same.”
Jason
Jason macro w=1.27 · n=30 · E88 (2022-07-22) · sentiment · strength 3 ▶ 47:52 SUPPORT
“China is in chaos right now, apparently, in terms of slowing economic growth, bank protests, mortgage protests, exactly what I predicted last year when you guys were talking about China was going to dunk on us.”
Sacks
Sacks macro w=1.12 · n=40 · E88 (2022-07-22) · sentiment · strength 3 ▶ 1:02:01 SUPPORT
“It's really a self-own. I mean, they've moved away from the policies that have made them so successful economically over the last 40 years. And then on top of that, you got this debt crisis and this housing crisis.”
Friedberg
Friedberg macro w=0.93 · n=40 · E88 (2022-07-22) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:08:04 OPPOSE
“They can take a five- ten- and thirty-year outlook and make a plan and invest against it. It's what they did from the beginning. I wouldn't count them out, but there's certainly a lot of challenges they're facing right now.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Jason
Jason w=1.27
2 scoring events · 34% of moves
+74.0 → net +74.0
Sacks
Sacks w=1.12
5 scoring events · 31% of moves
+39.9 / -27.0 → net +12.9
Chamath
Chamath w=1.06
4 scoring events · 26% of moves
+27.2 / -28.1 → net -0.9
Friedberg
Friedberg w=0.93
1 scoring event · 5% of moves
+0.0 / -11.1 → net -11.1
CL
Claire Cormier Thielke guest ×0.5
1 scoring event · 3% of moves
+0.0 / -7.2 → net -7.2

⏳ decay drained -36.2 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E42 2021-07-30 init +53.2 53.2 E42 born by Jason (explicit_prediction x3) [w=1.27]
E42 2021-07-30 oppose -12.8 40.4 E42 Chamath opposes x2 [w=1.06]
E42 2021-07-30 oppose -13.5 26.9 E42 Sacks opposes x2 [w=1.12]
E43 2021-08-06 decay -1.1 25.9 E43 silent
E44 2021-08-28 decay -1.0 24.8 E44 silent
E45 2021-09-04 decay -1.0 23.8 E45 silent
E46 2021-09-14 decay -1.0 22.9 E46 silent
E47 2021-09-18 decay -0.9 22.0 E47 silent
E49 2021-10-02 reinforce +10.5 32.5 E49 Sacks support x1 (flipped from oppose) [w=1.12]
E50 2021-10-09 decay -1.3 31.2 E50 silent
E51 2021-10-16 decay -1.2 29.9 E51 silent
E52 2021-10-23 decay -1.2 28.8 E52 silent
E53 2021-10-30 decay -1.2 27.6 E53 silent
E54 2021-11-06 decay -1.1 26.5 E54 silent
E55 2021-11-13 decay -1.1 25.4 E55 silent
E56 2021-11-20 decay -1.0 24.4 E56 silent
E57 2021-12-04 decay -1.0 23.4 E57 silent
E58 2021-12-11 decay -0.9 22.5 E58 silent
E59 2021-12-17 decay -0.9 21.6 E59 silent
E60 2021-12-23 decay -0.9 20.7 E60 silent
E61 2021-12-29 decay -0.8 19.9 E61 silent
E62 2022-01-08 decay -0.8 19.1 E62 silent
E63 2022-01-15 decay -0.8 18.4 E63 silent
E64 2022-01-22 reinforce +13.0 31.4 E64 Chamath support x2 (flipped from oppose) [w=1.06]
E65 2022-01-29 decay -1.3 30.1 E65 silent
E66 2022-02-05 decay -1.2 28.9 E66 silent
E67 2022-02-12 decay -1.2 27.8 E67 silent
E68 2022-02-19 decay -1.1 26.7 E68 silent
E70 2022-02-24 decay -1.1 25.6 E70 silent
E71 2022-03-05 decay -1.0 24.6 E71 silent
E72 2022-03-19 oppose -13.5 11.1 E72 Sacks opposes x2 [w=1.12]
E72 2022-03-19 reinforce +14.2 25.3 E72 Chamath support x2 [w=1.06]
E73 2022-03-26 decay -1.0 24.2 E73 silent
E74 2022-04-01 decay -1.0 23.3 E74 silent
E75 2022-04-09 decay -0.9 22.3 E75 silent
E76 2022-04-16 decay -0.9 21.4 E76 silent
E77 2022-04-23 decay -0.9 20.6 E77 silent
E78 2022-04-30 decay -0.8 19.8 E78 silent
E79 2022-05-07 decay -0.8 19.0 E79 silent
E80 2022-05-13 decay -0.8 18.2 E80 silent
E81 2022-05-23 decay -0.7 17.5 E81 silent
E82 2022-05-24 oppose -7.2 10.3 E82 Claire Cormier Thielke opposes x3 [w=0.50]
E82 2022-05-24 reinforce +15.1 25.4 E82 Sacks support x2 (flipped from oppose) [w=1.12]
E84 2022-06-24 oppose -15.3 10.1 E84 Chamath opposes x3 [w=1.06]
E85 2022-06-30 decay -0.4 9.7 E85 silent
E86 2022-07-08 decay -0.4 9.3 E86 silent
E87 2022-07-14 decay -0.4 8.9 E87 silent
E88 2022-07-22 reinforce +20.8 29.7 E88 Jason support x3 [w=1.27]
E88 2022-07-22 reinforce +14.2 43.9 E88 Sacks support x3 [w=1.12]
E88 2022-07-22 oppose -11.1 32.8 E88 Friedberg opposes x2 [w=0.93]
E89 2022-07-29 decay -1.3 31.5 E89 silent