← pool

📈 Zillow's iBuyer collapse is structural, not a stumble

Zillow Offers did not fail on execution alone: the Zestimate was built as lead-gen where an inflated price is the feature and accuracy is a bug, so underwriting home purchases off it guaranteed overpaying on a 3% margin of safety, and the new business was fundamentally competitive with the media/broker franchise it was supposed to feed. Friedberg adds that Zillow called itself a market maker while actually speculating on model-projected prices with nobody doing ground truth. The besties treat this as a lasting strategic wound at a company a Silicon Valley legend runs, not a fixable quarter.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 47.8 WATCH
DORMANT
band
▼ SHORT ZG
expression · bearish equities
HIT
outcome · R +52.8% · α +71.3%
2022-11-06
window closed

⚖ Why this verdict

fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2021-11-06 → 2022-11-06 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▼ SHORT ZG (primary play). ZG fell 52.8% over the window → direction-adjusted R = +52.8% (the call made money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned -18.5%α = +52.8 − (-18.5) = +71.3% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
    Stock-selection read: +34.3% — did ZG move the predicted way relative to the market. The two only differ on a SHORT: this call beat the index outright.
  4. Rule fired:
    ▶ HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5 ✓ (R 52.8, α 71.3)
    · PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0
    · MISS — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a HIT earn 1.0 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Chamath, Friedberg

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2021-11-06)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▼ SHORT ZGstock PRIMARY the company that wrote off the iBuyer unit, cut 25% of staff and lost ~$9B of market cap in the week before this episode

Mention log

Chamath
Chamath equities w=0.84 · n=160 · E54 (2021-11-06) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 40:46 SUPPORT
“it speaks to two big mistakes that Zillow made. The first is that catching a wave of disruption is very difficult when you have an old line business that is fundamentally competitive with the new line of business. ... Zestimate over time basically calcified this idea of price inflation. So the accuracy was never a goal. ... the open door margin on average is about 10%. The Zillow margin on average was 3%. So they had a much more razor thin margin of safety here, which again speaks to pricing.”
Friedberg
Friedberg equities w=0.87 · n=120 · E54 (2021-11-06) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 37:14 SUPPORT
“they were trying to be a, quote, market maker in the business. And it turned out that what they were really doing was being more of a speculator, right? ... one could argue this was flawed from the beginning. The execution clearly was way off. ... the maturity of a Silicon Valley entrepreneur who's crushed it so many times doesn't mean that they're perfect. And this was a big miss.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Chamath
Chamath w=0.84
1 scoring event · 74% of moves
+35.2 → net +35.2
Friedberg
Friedberg w=0.87
1 scoring event · 26% of moves
+12.6 → net +12.6

⏳ decay drained -40.8 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E54 2021-11-06 init +35.2 35.2 E54 born by Chamath (explicit_prediction x3) [w=0.84]
E54 2021-11-06 reinforce +12.6 47.8 E54 Friedberg support x2 (new voice) [w=0.87]
E55 2021-11-13 decay -1.9 45.9 E55 silent
E56 2021-11-20 decay -1.8 44.1 E56 silent
E57 2021-12-04 decay -1.8 42.3 E57 silent
E58 2021-12-11 decay -1.7 40.6 E58 silent
E59 2021-12-17 decay -1.6 39.0 E59 silent
E60 2021-12-23 decay -1.6 37.4 E60 silent
E61 2021-12-29 decay -1.5 35.9 E61 silent
E62 2022-01-08 decay -1.4 34.5 E62 silent
E63 2022-01-15 decay -1.4 33.1 E63 silent
E64 2022-01-22 decay -1.3 31.8 E64 silent
E65 2022-01-29 decay -1.3 30.5 E65 silent
E66 2022-02-05 decay -1.2 29.3 E66 silent
E67 2022-02-12 decay -1.2 28.1 E67 silent
E68 2022-02-19 decay -1.1 27.0 E68 silent
E70 2022-02-24 decay -1.1 25.9 E70 silent
E71 2022-03-05 decay -1.0 24.9 E71 silent
E72 2022-03-19 decay -1.0 23.9 E72 silent
E73 2022-03-26 decay -1.0 22.9 E73 silent
E74 2022-04-01 decay -0.9 22.0 E74 silent
E75 2022-04-09 decay -0.9 21.1 E75 silent
E76 2022-04-16 decay -0.8 20.3 E76 silent
E77 2022-04-23 decay -0.8 19.5 E77 silent
E78 2022-04-30 decay -0.8 18.7 E78 silent
E79 2022-05-07 decay -0.7 18.0 E79 silent
E80 2022-05-13 decay -0.7 17.2 E80 silent
E81 2022-05-23 decay -0.7 16.5 E81 silent
E82 2022-05-24 decay -0.7 15.9 E82 silent
E84 2022-06-24 decay -0.6 15.2 E84 silent
E85 2022-06-30 decay -0.6 14.6 E85 silent
E86 2022-07-08 decay -0.6 14.1 E86 silent
E87 2022-07-14 decay -0.6 13.5 E87 silent
E88 2022-07-22 decay -0.5 12.9 E88 silent
E89 2022-07-29 decay -0.5 12.4 E89 silent
E90 2022-08-05 decay -0.5 11.9 E90 silent
E91 2022-08-13 decay -0.5 11.5 E91 silent
E92 2022-08-20 decay -0.5 11.0 E92 silent
E93 2022-08-26 decay -0.4 10.6 E93 silent
E94 2022-09-01 decay -0.4 10.1 E94 silent
E95 2022-09-10 decay -0.4 9.7 E95 silent
E96 2022-09-17 decay -0.4 9.3 E96 silent
E97 2022-09-23 decay -0.4 9.0 E97 silent
E98 2022-10-01 decay -0.4 8.6 E98 silent
E99 2022-10-07 decay -0.3 8.3 E99 silent
E100 2022-10-14 decay -0.3 7.9 E100 silent
E101 2022-10-22 decay -0.3 7.6 E101 silent
E102 2022-10-29 decay -0.3 7.3 E102 silent
E103 2022-11-05 decay -0.3 7.0 E103 silent