← pool

🏛️ Crypto owners become a swing bloc and force a pro-crypto framework

Three years of Gensler/Warren enforcement produced a political awakening: 50 million American crypto owners now treat protection of that wealth as a single issue, Trump has turned sharply pro-crypto, and the besties expect that to be worth low-single-digit to 500bp of turnout in November. The read-through is a US regulatory framework that ends the enforcement-by-litigation regime, which lifts the compliance overhang off listed US crypto infrastructure.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 73.0 GREEN
EMBER
band · contested
▲ LONG COIN
expression · bullish politics-market
PARTIAL
outcome · R +9.2% · α -4.0%
2025-05-31
window closed

also touching these tickers, same direction: Retail speculation complex (Robinhood/prediction markets/gambling) wins 2026 12 (HOOD) · Everything becomes a market — prediction-market financialization 10 (HOOD)

⚖ Why this verdict

fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2024-05-31 → 2025-05-31 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▲ LONG COIN (primary play). COIN rose 9.2% over the window → direction-adjusted R = +9.2% (the call made money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +13.2%α = +9.2 − (+13.2) = -4.0% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
  4. Rule fired:
    · HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5
    ▶ PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0
    · MISS — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a PARTIAL earn 0.5 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Chamath, Friedberg, Jason, Joe Lonsdale, Keith Rabois, Sacks | opposed: Aaron Levie | proxy-sensitive: HOOD→HIT (+216.5%); cg:bitcoin→HIT (+55.0%)

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2024-05-31)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▲ LONG COINstock PRIMARY listed US exchange carrying the regulatory overhang that a framework removes
▲ LONG HOODstock adjacent retail crypto trading revenue reopens under a clear framework
▲ LONG cg:bitcoincrypto adjacent policy-risk discount comes out of the asset class

Mention log

Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E181 (2024-05-31) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:01:02 SUPPORT
“But if there are 50 million people who have now decided to have at least a hedge against the establishment and the traditional financial system, and you are threatening to take that wealth away, I could see how 80% of those folks show up to the ballot box and say, all right, which one of you will just leave me alone?”
Jason
Jason politics-market w=1.00 · n=62 · E181 (2024-05-31) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 59:39 SUPPORT
“I think we're going to have a crypto framework and it's worth probably five points in this election.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market w=0.97 · n=88 · E181 (2024-05-31) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 58:48 SUPPORT
“And now the crypto people have basically had a political awakening and realized they have to get involved in the political system.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E183 (2024-06-14) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 14:05 SUPPORT
“it's very clear that he was pro-innovation. So he was really supportive of AI in the details that he talked about. He was very supportive of crypto in those details. And he's very much low regulation, low taxation.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market w=0.97 · n=88 · E183 (2024-06-14) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 10:58 SUPPORT
“Now they're backing this guy for his policies on war, immigration, crypto and more. This election is referendum on those issues.”
MA
Mark Cuban (guest ×0.5) no politics-market track record · E198 (2024-10-03) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:19:52 SUPPORT
“I've literally talked to Kamala Harris at lunch about this specific topic of regulation through litigation. As a lawyer, she got it immediately and she knows it's a problem. She's even mentioned in one of her speeches that that's something that they're going to deal with.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market w=0.97 · n=88 · E204 (2024-11-16) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 19:22 SUPPORT
“So look, the bottom line here is that I think that we are close to having clear rules of the road codified by Congress, which is what the crypto industry has been asking for. And the days of Gensler terrorizing crypto companies by issuing Wells notices without clarifying what the rules are that he is prosecuting, those days are about to be over. So I think this is why the crypto markets are rallying.”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market w=0.84 · n=74 · E204 (2024-11-16) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 10:41 SUPPORT
“The deregulatory nature on its own benefits markets that have been encumbered by regulatory oversight and regulatory challenges like crypto, finance and fintech. Those types of businesses are clearly going to benefit or expected to benefit significantly by being able to launch products more quickly and have features and ways that they can generate revenue that they might be challenged to do under the current regulatory schemas.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E205 (2024-11-23) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 46:10 BRUSH_OFF
“I think there's many more traditional forms of economic growth that we can have before we need to make ICOs legal and easier.”
Jason
Jason politics-market w=1.00 · n=62 · E205 (2024-11-23) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 46:04 SUPPORT
“But you're not free to create a token, right? There should be some clear path of regulation for that.”
JO
Joe Lonsdale (regular guest ×1.0) politics-market w=1.00 · n=5 · E206 (2024-12-07) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 20:58 SUPPORT
“And the reason they're that angry at them is they were purposely not defining the rules in certain cases and then going after people after not having to find it in order to kind of like play a gotcha game. It was very dishonorable. And Paul sees all that and there's no way he's going to allow that”
KE
Keith Rabois (regular guest ×1.0) politics-market: 2 resolved, unproven · E207 (2024-12-13) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:05:07 SUPPORT
“I think a lot of people had been hesitant to start new crypto companies, and there's a belief and confidence in the new administration, the SEC, etc.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E208 (2024-12-20) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 14:35 SUPPORT
“But anyways, the point is, if Sacks can really push the adoption of stable coins, number one, and then number two, is to incentivize much, much cheaper transactional rails, then I think he can go to Bitcoin and these other more long-tail crypto projects off of a back of momentum.”
AA
Aaron Levie (regular guest ×1.0) politics-market: 3 resolved, unproven · E208 (2024-12-20) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 16:22 OPPOSE
“But there's like, I don't think you could get 10 crypto people to agree on how you regulate that second category because some people believe I should be able to issue an NFT on anything and I should be able to trade that.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market w=0.97 · n=88 · E212 (2025-01-25) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 1:51:35 SUPPORT POLICY-ADJACENT
“The main thing it does is it forms an internal working group with the goal of making the US the world leader in crypto. ... And the members of this working group are going to be, there's me, there's the head of the SEC, the Secretary of the Treasury, and all the agencies and departments that have an interest in crypto.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market w=0.97 · n=88 · E214 (2025-02-07) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 34:27 SUPPORT POLICY-ADJACENT · horizon 6mo
“This was basically a statement of commitment from the chairs of the four committees that we're going to get legislation done this year, maybe in the next six months. I mean, that's really the goal. And we've never had that before. So that is pretty monumental.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market w=0.97 · n=88 · E218 (2025-03-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:57:46 SUPPORT POLICY-ADJACENT
“There is a bill that passed the last Congress in the House, but Biden basically, he didn't veto it, but he basically, he and the Democrats stopped in the Senate, the Democrats did. It was called FIT 21 And it was authored by French Hill, who's now the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee. So we expect that he will be introducing a new version of his bill, probably in the next few weeks. I don't think I'm breaking any news by saying this. I think people expect it. And that's going to provide the framework for market structure.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Chamath
Chamath w=1.02
4 scoring events · 39% of moves
+52.8 / -22.6 → net +30.1
Sacks
Sacks w=0.97
6 scoring events · 23% of moves
+44.5 → net +44.5
JO
Joe Lonsdale w=1.00 regular guest ×1.0
1 scoring event · 8% of moves
+15.7 → net +15.7
Jason
Jason w=1.00
2 scoring events · 8% of moves
+14.9 → net +14.9
AA
Aaron Levie regular guest ×1.0
1 scoring event · 6% of moves
+0.0 / -12.0 → net -12.0
Friedberg
Friedberg w=0.84
1 scoring event · 6% of moves
+11.3 → net +11.3
KE
Keith Rabois regular guest ×1.0
1 scoring event · 5% of moves
+9.5 → net +9.5
MA
Mark Cuban guest ×0.5
1 scoring event · 4% of moves
+7.9 → net +7.9

⏳ decay drained -82.4 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E181 2024-05-31 init +42.9 42.9 E181 born by Chamath (explicit_prediction x3) [w=1.02]
E181 2024-05-31 reinforce +12.4 55.3 E181 Sacks support x2 (new voice) [w=0.97]
E181 2024-05-31 reinforce +10.1 65.3 E181 Jason support x2 (new voice)
E182 2024-06-07 decay -2.6 62.7 E182 silent
E183 2024-06-14 reinforce +5.4 68.1 E183 Sacks support x2 [w=0.97]
E183 2024-06-14 reinforce +4.9 73.0 E183 Chamath support x2 [w=1.02]
E184 2024-06-20 decay -2.9 70.1 E184 silent
E185 2024-06-29 decay -2.8 67.3 E185 silent
E186 2024-07-04 decay -2.7 64.6 E186 silent
E187 2024-07-12 decay -2.6 62.0 E187 silent
E188 2024-07-19 decay -2.5 59.5 E188 silent
E189 2024-07-26 decay -2.4 57.2 E189 silent
E190 2024-08-02 decay -2.3 54.9 E190 silent
E191 2024-08-09 decay -2.2 52.7 E191 silent
E192 2024-08-16 decay -2.1 50.6 E192 silent
E193 2024-08-23 decay -2.0 48.5 E193 silent
E194 2024-08-30 decay -1.9 46.6 E194 silent
E195 2024-09-06 decay -1.9 44.7 E195 silent
E196 2024-09-20 decay -1.8 42.9 E196 silent
E197 2024-09-27 decay -1.7 41.2 E197 silent
E198 2024-10-03 reinforce +7.9 49.2 E198 Mark Cuban support x3 (new voice) [w=0.50]
E199 2024-10-11 decay -2.0 47.2 E199 silent
E200 2024-10-18 decay -1.9 45.3 E200 silent
E201 2024-10-25 decay -1.8 43.5 E201 silent
E202 2024-11-01 decay -1.7 41.8 E202 silent
E203 2024-11-08 decay -1.7 40.1 E203 silent
E204 2024-11-16 reinforce +11.3 51.4 E204 Friedberg support x2 (new voice) [w=0.84]
E204 2024-11-16 reinforce +8.5 59.8 E204 Sacks support x3 [w=0.97]
E205 2024-11-23 reinforce +4.8 64.7 E205 Jason support x1
E205 2024-11-23 brush_off -22.6 42.0 E205 Chamath brushes off
E206 2024-12-07 reinforce +15.7 57.7 E206 Joe Lonsdale support x3 (new voice)
E207 2024-12-13 reinforce +9.5 67.2 E207 Keith Rabois support x2 (new voice)
E208 2024-12-20 reinforce +5.0 72.2 E208 Chamath support x2 (flipped from brush_off) [w=1.02]
E208 2024-12-20 oppose -12.0 60.2 E208 Aaron Levie opposes x2
E209 2025-01-04 decay -2.4 57.8 E209 silent
E210 2025-01-11 decay -2.3 55.5 E210 silent
E211 2025-01-18 decay -2.2 53.3 E211 silent
E212 2025-01-25 reinforce +5.4 58.7 E212 Sacks support x1 [w=0.97]
E213 2025-01-31 decay -2.3 56.3 E213 silent
E214 2025-02-07 reinforce +6.3 62.7 E214 Sacks support x2 [w=0.97]
E215 2025-02-15 decay -2.5 60.2 E215 silent
E216 2025-02-21 decay -2.4 57.8 E216 silent
E217 2025-03-01 decay -2.3 55.4 E217 silent
E218 2025-03-08 reinforce +6.5 61.9 E218 Sacks support x2 [w=0.97]
E219 2025-03-15 decay -2.5 59.4 E219 silent
E220 2025-03-22 decay -2.4 57.1 E220 silent
E221 2025-03-29 decay -2.3 54.8 E221 silent
E222 2025-04-05 decay -2.2 52.6 E222 silent
E223 2025-04-11 decay -2.1 50.5 E223 silent
E224 2025-04-19 decay -2.0 48.5 E224 silent
E225 2025-04-26 decay -1.9 46.5 E225 silent
E226 2025-05-02 decay -1.9 44.7 E226 silent
E227 2025-05-09 decay -1.8 42.9 E227 silent
E228 2025-05-17 decay -1.7 41.2 E228 silent
E229 2025-05-24 decay -1.6 39.5 E229 silent