← pool

🏦 Inflation stays sticky in 2023 — the wage chapter

Inflation's third chapter is wage inflation (unionization, minimum-wage hikes, low labor participation): it does not fall off a cliff the way consensus expects, keeping rates higher for longer — bearish long-duration bonds.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 80.5 GREEN
DORMANT
band · contested
▼ SHORT TLT
expression · bearish rates
PARTIAL
outcome · R +5.3% · α -17.1%
2024-01-06
window closed
⚠ CONFLICTING IDEA ON THE SAME TICKER — the board is arguing with itself; net it before trading (ticker view →)
TLT · Fed easing + disinflation into 2026 LONG DORMANT 10.5 ← stronger than this idea (8.4)

also touching these tickers, same direction: US fiscal spiral keeps long-end yields grinding higher 67 (TLT)

⚖ Why this verdict

fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2023-01-06 → 2024-01-06 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▼ SHORT TLT (primary play). TLT fell 5.3% over the window → direction-adjusted R = +5.3% (the call made money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +22.4%α = +5.3 − (+22.4) = -17.1% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
    Stock-selection read: +27.7% — did TLT move the predicted way relative to the market. The two only differ on a SHORT: this call was right about direction relative to the index but still cost money versus holding it.
  4. Rule fired:
    · HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5
    ▶ PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0
    · MISS — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a PARTIAL earn 0.5 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Friedberg, Jason, Sacks | opposed: Brad Gerstner, Chamath

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2023-01-06)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▼ SHORT TLTetf PRIMARY long-duration Treasuries — the asset that loses if inflation refuses to fall

Mention log

Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E110 (2023-01-06) · annual_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 55:35 SUPPORT · horizon 12mo
“Inflation, which people expect to fall off a cliff, doesn't fall off a cliff as fast or as meaningfully as people want... the pendulum is swinging very markedly away from capital and towards labor... my big contrarian wager for this year is wage inflation that keeps inflation not going down as much as people want.”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E114 (2023-02-04) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 5:17 SUPPORT
“And I think probably where we're sitting at this moment is you'd have to say that the risks of inflation returning are slightly higher, but the risks of a recession are slightly lower because with this kind of jobs report, better chance of having a soft landing here.”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E114 (2023-02-04) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 8:04 SUPPORT
“And that the implication of a tight job market is wages go up and wages go up, inflation goes up and because companies need to charge more because they have to pay more to get talent. And this obviously continues to support the escalatory spiral that drives inflation.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E114 (2023-02-04) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 9:21 SUPPORT
“Because we don't have this first inflationary cycle under control, there could be a risk that that we reignite inflation. And so then, then they have to capitulate the Fed has to capitulate again and start another hiking cycle.”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) rates: 2 resolved, unproven · E118 (2023-03-03) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 40:09 OPPOSE
“My suspicion, if you look at Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, the consensus view is that we're still heading in the direction of 4% faster than I think people emotionally think. So I would say there's maximum uncertainty in the world. The fear that inflation is uncapped, the way Larry Summers was articulating November and December, is less today than it was.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E121 (2023-03-24) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 7:02 SUPPORT
“Look, I've maintained now for nine months that rates are going to be higher than we like and longer than we want. And so I think it's high time that we acknowledge that we have a sticky inflation problem whose back we have to break.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E123 (2023-04-07) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 28:46 SUPPORT
“This is also where you have to expect the Fed will really want inflation to stay high. That's sort of what we've said before. The only way out of this mathematically is to keep rates high.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E126 (2023-04-28) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 20:25 SUPPORT
“But when you show that chart, Jason, what it means is it's just really hard to find people. And so the only way you're going to get people off their butt to go into work, to sit in a chair, to do a job that you need them to do is to pay them more. And in finding that, wages will have to go up.”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E128 (2023-05-12) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 37:49 SUPPORT
“You've got core CPI is still sticky. Yes, CPI is coming down, but it looks like, you know, inflation is still a problem. This is not a great setup for economic recovery.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E133 (2023-06-16) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 20:03 SUPPORT · horizon 84mo
“And so you just have to get prepared for rates just being sticky and inflation being sticky. And I think that that's probably the most reasonable base case for the rest of the decade.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E136 (2023-07-09) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 34:30 SUPPORT
“So by continuing to constrict the money supply, have rates that are relatively elevated, maybe a quarter or two longer than they need to, it gives them a lot of positive optionality if they need to step in if something bad really happens.”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E136 (2023-07-09) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:08:54 SUPPORT
“I talk with a lot of people in the farm economy, as you guys know, and this is an endemic problem in California agriculture, is that the lack of a labor force that allows the farms to be profitable is really impacting folks' ability to operate and to grow, and that ultimately translates into consumer prices and so on.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E137 (2023-07-14) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 5:02 SUPPORT
“So I think that Larry is right. I think that I still believe what I've said for a while, which is rates will be higher for longer.”
Friedberg
Friedberg rates w=0.79 · n=14 · E137 (2023-07-14) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 18:56 SUPPORT
“if their rates go from, you know, eight bucks to 15 bucks to 25 bucks an hour, the cost of fast food goes up”
Jason
Jason rates w=0.86 · n=7 · E137 (2023-07-14) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 16:49 SUPPORT
“So I don't know who's gonna work in all these factories if we don't have an immigration policy.”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) rates: 2 resolved, unproven · E141 (2023-08-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:32:29 OPPOSE
“Remember, we're seeing inflation roll over huge, and we have a chips act and an infrastructure. We have massive government spending going on, and we still see inflation rolling over. So I just find it interesting that within six months, we've gone from worrying about hyperinflation to Bloomberg running a headline summer of disinflation.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E146 (2023-09-22) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:15:08 SUPPORT · horizon 12mo
“the markets were really trying to force Jerome Powell to start the cutting cycle. And now they had to move the date at which they could expect cuts out by a year. ... You're going to have to reprice a lot of risk assets.”
Sacks
Sacks rates w=1.08 · n=12 · E146 (2023-09-22) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:18:02 SUPPORT · horizon 12mo
“And the reason is because the market had started to price in rate cuts next year. ... So as a result of that, interest rates are going to stay higher longer, which means that risk capital will be less available.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E152 (2023-11-03) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 20:32 REVERSAL
“I think what changed for the market was the Fed's rhetoric. And I think that they were holding on to this option that they were going to show up out of nowhere with another 25 or 50 basis point increase. And I think that that's fundamentally now off the table.”
Chamath
Chamath rates w=0.88 · n=16 · E159 (2023-12-29) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 32:43 REVERSAL
“I think that I've been saying for a while that rates will be higher for longer for quite a while now. And I was really surprised when Jay Powell had this press conference in December, in early December, and just basically capitulated and just said, you know what, guys, we're going to be cutting probably three times next year.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Chamath
Chamath w=0.88
11 scoring events · 62% of moves
+87.8 / -43.2 → net +44.7
Sacks
Sacks w=1.08
3 scoring events · 15% of moves
+31.2 → net +31.2
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner regular guest ×1.0
2 scoring events · 13% of moves
+0.0 / -26.4 → net -26.4
Friedberg
Friedberg w=0.79
3 scoring events · 8% of moves
+16.1 → net +16.1
Jason
Jason w=0.86
1 scoring event · 3% of moves
+5.3 → net +5.3

⏳ decay drained -62.5 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E110 2023-01-06 init +35.0 35.0 E110 born by Chamath (annual_prediction x2) [w=0.88]
E111 2023-01-13 decay -1.4 33.6 E111 silent
E112 2023-01-20 decay -1.3 32.3 E112 silent
E113 2023-01-27 decay -1.3 31.0 E113 silent
E114 2023-02-04 reinforce +16.8 47.8 E114 Sacks support x2 (new voice) [w=1.08]
E114 2023-02-04 reinforce +9.2 57.0 E114 Friedberg support x2 (new voice) [w=0.79]
E114 2023-02-04 reinforce +5.6 62.7 E114 Chamath support x2 [w=0.88]
E115 2023-02-11 decay -2.5 60.2 E115 silent
E116 2023-02-17 decay -2.4 57.7 E116 silent
E118 2023-03-03 oppose -12.0 45.7 E118 Brad Gerstner opposes x2
E119 2023-03-11 decay -1.8 43.9 E119 silent
E120 2023-03-17 decay -1.8 42.2 E120 silent
E121 2023-03-24 reinforce +9.1 51.3 E121 Chamath support x3 [w=0.88]
E122 2023-03-31 decay -2.1 49.2 E122 silent
E123 2023-04-07 reinforce +6.7 55.9 E123 Chamath support x2 [w=0.88]
E124 2023-04-14 decay -2.2 53.7 E124 silent
E125 2023-04-21 decay -2.1 51.5 E125 silent
E126 2023-04-28 reinforce +7.6 59.1 E126 Chamath support x3 [w=0.88]
E128 2023-05-12 reinforce +8.0 67.1 E128 Sacks support x3 [w=1.08]
E129 2023-05-19 decay -2.7 64.4 E129 silent
E130 2023-05-26 decay -2.6 61.8 E130 silent
E131 2023-06-02 decay -2.5 59.4 E131 silent
E132 2023-06-10 decay -2.4 57.0 E132 silent
E133 2023-06-16 reinforce +6.8 63.8 E133 Chamath support x3 [w=0.88]
E134 2023-06-24 decay -2.6 61.2 E134 silent
E135 2023-07-01 decay -2.4 58.8 E135 silent
E136 2023-07-09 reinforce +5.4 64.2 E136 Chamath support x2 [w=0.88]
E136 2023-07-09 reinforce +4.2 68.4 E136 Friedberg support x2 [w=0.79]
E137 2023-07-14 reinforce +4.1 72.6 E137 Chamath support x2 [w=0.88]
E137 2023-07-14 reinforce +5.3 77.8 E137 Jason support x2 (new voice) [w=0.86]
E137 2023-07-14 reinforce +2.6 80.5 E137 Friedberg support x2 [w=0.79]
E139 2023-07-27 decay -3.2 77.2 E139 silent
E140 2023-08-04 decay -3.1 74.1 E140 silent
E141 2023-08-11 oppose -14.4 59.7 E141 Brad Gerstner opposes x3
E142 2023-08-18 decay -2.4 57.4 E142 silent
E143 2023-08-25 decay -2.3 55.1 E143 silent
E144 2023-09-01 decay -2.2 52.9 E144 silent
E146 2023-09-22 reinforce +7.4 60.3 E146 Chamath support x3 [w=0.88]
E146 2023-09-22 reinforce +6.5 66.7 E146 Sacks support x2 [w=1.08]
E147 2023-09-29 decay -2.7 64.1 E147 silent
E148 2023-10-07 decay -2.6 61.5 E148 silent
E149 2023-10-13 decay -2.5 59.0 E149 silent
E150 2023-10-20 decay -2.4 56.7 E150 silent
E151 2023-10-27 decay -2.3 54.4 E151 silent
E152 2023-11-03 reversal -32.7 21.8 E152 Chamath flips
E156 2023-12-08 decay -0.9 20.9 E156 silent
E157 2023-12-16 decay -0.8 20.1 E157 silent
E158 2023-12-23 decay -0.8 19.3 E158 silent
E159 2023-12-29 oppose -10.5 8.8 E159 Chamath opposes x2 (marked reversal; no prior support to flip) [w=0.88]
E160 2024-01-06 decay -0.4 8.4 E160 silent