← pool

📈 This drawdown is the best vintage in a decade to build and deploy

Answering a listener question about Bill Gurley's piece: every best-performing fund vintage since 2000 was formed in the middle of a downturn (03, 08-09), so capital deployed and companies founded now earn the generational returns. The mechanism is talent consolidating behind the products that actually got traction as weak seed and Series A companies wind down, plus the disappearance of the big-tech comp put that used to make startup hiring impossible. The liquid expression is the beaten-down listed risk-capital cohort bought at this point in the cycle.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 71.3 GREEN
EMBER
band · contested
▲ LONG IPO
expression · bullish equities
PARTIAL
outcome · R +16.5% · α -6.1%
2023-10-14
window closed
⚠ CONFLICTING IDEAS ON THE SAME TICKER — the board is arguing with itself; net it before trading (ticker view →)
BX · Private equity model is broken SHORT DORMANT 14.5
BX · Endowment liquidity crunch forces discounted private-equity secondaries SHORT DORMANT 11.8

also touching these tickers, same direction: 2026 is the year of mega-IPOs 6 (IPO)

⚖ Why this verdict

fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2022-10-14 → 2023-10-14 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▲ LONG IPO (primary play). IPO rose 16.5% over the window → direction-adjusted R = +16.5% (the call made money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +22.6%α = +16.5 − (+22.6) = -6.1% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
  4. Rule fired:
    · HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5
    ▶ PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0
    · MISS — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a PARTIAL earn 0.5 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Friedberg, Jason, Sacks | opposed: Brad Gerstner, Chamath | proxy-sensitive: BX→HIT (+27.9%)

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2022-10-14)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▲ LONG IPOetf PRIMARY the listed recent-IPO/risk-capital cohort is the only liquid proxy for 'buy this vintage'; the underlying claim is about private company formation
▲ LONG BXstock adjacent listed alt-asset manager deploying into exactly this vintage - same proxy the venture-mega-GP idea uses

Mention log

Chamath
Chamath equities w=0.84 · n=160 · E100 (2022-10-14) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 35:58 SUPPORT
“All of the, if you look back in history since 2000, all of the best performing funds of all times were the ones that were formed right in the middle of the downturns. 03, 08, 9 These are the vintages that have always been the best.”
Jason
Jason equities w=0.97 · n=105 · E100 (2022-10-14) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 34:29 SUPPORT
“And I've talked about this before on the show, the consolidation of talent behind the winning ideas, the experiments that actually worked, products that got some traction, are now having an easier time hiring talent.”
Chamath
Chamath equities w=0.84 · n=160 · E114 (2023-02-04) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 18:39 SUPPORT · horizon 60mo
“So these are like really interesting trends that I think just say that as rates creep back up, and if we can intersect that with some improvements in technology over the next five to 10 years that we've all talked about, it could be a real boon for startups and startup investing.”
Friedberg
Friedberg equities w=0.87 · n=120 · E114 (2023-02-04) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 21:29 OPPOSE · horizon 36mo
“If that holds true, so that may be kind of a counterbalancing effect here where it may take three years before that effect plays out, where there's more of a dearth of capital.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E114 (2023-02-04) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 24:04 SUPPORT
“I think to the point of Chamath's study that, you know, that the counterintuitive finding in his study was that great companies are created during times when we're not in a bubble”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) equities w=0.95 · n=22 · E118 (2023-03-03) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 27:06 SUPPORT
“I'm not going to invest in venture in the next two vintages, which may be the best two vintages we've seen in a long time because prices are adjusting”
Jason
Jason equities w=0.97 · n=105 · E118 (2023-03-03) · positioning · strength 3 ▶ 48:18 SUPPORT
“This feels like the best it's been for me as an angel investor, seed investor, seed fund for a long time. This is fantastic. Great deal flow.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E118 (2023-03-03) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 49:11 SUPPORT
“But if you're talking about new investment, new rounds, new companies that are starting with a clean sheet of paper and a blank slate, you're right. Things seem good and normal. People are making intelligent investments.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E120 (2023-03-17) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 58:33 SUPPORT
“All of that being said, I think I'd rather be an investor today than an investor two years ago or one year ago, because at least the valuations have corrected to some degree.”
Friedberg
Friedberg equities w=0.87 · n=120 · E120 (2023-03-17) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:04:10 SUPPORT
“In fact, the contrary point to Sacks' comment is that it is a great time to be buying these shares and it is a great time to be investing and it is a great time because as we've talked about countless times, there are extraordinary technologies from AI to biotech becoming software to fusion to novel applications with AI and SaaS and on and on and on.”
Chamath
Chamath equities w=0.84 · n=160 · E120 (2023-03-17) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 59:53 OPPOSE
“So even if you think these vintages are great, I don't think they're open for business.”
Jason
Jason equities w=0.97 · n=105 · E120 (2023-03-17) · positioning · strength 3 ▶ 1:06:33 SUPPORT
“What we did was we just said anybody who gets to an MVP and it's two or three builder co-founders, we'll give them a 25k check. And I did 20 or 30 of these 25k checks in the last couple of months”
Jason
Jason equities w=0.97 · n=105 · E125 (2023-04-21) · positioning · strength 3 ▶ 56:31 SUPPORT
“It's so funny you say that, Sacks, because I literally am looking for an office space in San Mateo to start like doing the incubator in person again. And on Monday, I'm having 60 companies come to San Francisco.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E125 (2023-04-21) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 54:07 SUPPORT
“But look, I think all of this, this maelstrom is great for an investor.”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) equities w=0.95 · n=22 · E133 (2023-06-16) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 56:13 SUPPORT
“If you do those three things, you know, simultaneously, like, you got a good shot at producing really incredible vintage.”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) equities w=0.95 · n=22 · E134 (2023-06-24) · positioning · strength 2 ▶ 1:11:48 OPPOSE
“So why hasn't Altimeter purchased any of this? Because the prices aren't low enough to induce me to get off the sidelines to purchase the shares.”
Jason
Jason equities w=0.97 · n=105 · E141 (2023-08-11) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 45:26 SUPPORT
“this seems like the greatest setup ever. Feels like the setup last year of buying equities when everybody was scared. If everybody is tightening their belts, if VC funds are not going to deploy, this feels like the time to be deploying.”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) equities w=0.95 · n=22 · E141 (2023-08-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 46:00 OPPOSE
“And while this might happen, while this might happen, I'm going to take the other side. I don't think that's what the lived experiences of most VCs in Silicon Valley today on Series A, Series B, Series C, is certainly not in the area we're competing.”
Friedberg
Friedberg equities w=0.87 · n=120 · E143 (2023-08-25) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 43:45 SUPPORT
“And those businesses, by the way, that we saw on the.com boom and the global financial crisis that were able to do that during the Doldrum Death Valley March that everyone's going through right now, they emerged victorious... On the other side of this trial era, a number of very high quality companies will emerge”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Chamath
Chamath w=0.84
3 scoring events · 29% of moves
+45.7 / -12.1 → net +33.6
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner w=0.95 regular guest ×1.0
4 scoring events · 23% of moves
+20.3 / -25.2 → net -4.9
Jason
Jason w=0.97
5 scoring events · 21% of moves
+43.0 → net +43.0
Sacks
Sacks w=0.89
4 scoring events · 15% of moves
+30.0 → net +30.0
Friedberg
Friedberg w=0.87
3 scoring events · 13% of moves
+15.0 / -10.4 → net +4.6

⏳ decay drained -70.6 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E100 2022-10-14 init +35.2 35.2 E100 born by Chamath (explicit_prediction x3) [w=0.84]
E100 2022-10-14 reinforce +14.2 49.3 E100 Jason support x2 (new voice) [w=0.97]
E101 2022-10-22 decay -2.0 47.4 E101 silent
E102 2022-10-29 decay -1.9 45.5 E102 silent
E103 2022-11-05 decay -1.8 43.7 E103 silent
E105 2022-11-19 decay -1.7 41.9 E105 silent
E106 2022-12-03 decay -1.7 40.2 E106 silent
E107 2022-12-10 decay -1.6 38.6 E107 silent
E108 2022-12-16 decay -1.5 37.1 E108 silent
E109 2022-12-24 decay -1.5 35.6 E109 silent
E110 2023-01-06 decay -1.4 34.2 E110 silent
E111 2023-01-13 decay -1.4 32.8 E111 silent
E112 2023-01-20 decay -1.3 31.5 E112 silent
E113 2023-01-27 decay -1.3 30.2 E113 silent
E114 2023-02-04 reinforce +10.5 40.8 E114 Chamath support x3 [w=0.84]
E114 2023-02-04 oppose -10.4 30.4 E114 Friedberg opposes x2 [w=0.87]
E114 2023-02-04 reinforce +13.9 44.2 E114 Sacks support x2 (new voice) [w=0.89]
E115 2023-02-11 decay -1.8 42.5 E115 silent
E116 2023-02-17 decay -1.7 40.8 E116 silent
E118 2023-03-03 reinforce +12.7 53.5 E118 Brad Gerstner support x2 (new voice) [w=0.95]
E118 2023-03-03 reinforce +8.1 61.6 E118 Jason support x3 [w=0.97]
E118 2023-03-03 reinforce +5.1 66.7 E118 Sacks support x2 [w=0.89]
E119 2023-03-11 decay -2.7 64.0 E119 silent
E120 2023-03-17 reinforce +5.7 69.8 E120 Sacks support x3 [w=0.89]
E120 2023-03-17 oppose -12.1 57.7 E120 Chamath opposes x3 [w=0.84]
E120 2023-03-17 reinforce +6.6 64.3 E120 Friedberg support x3 (flipped from oppose) [w=0.87]
E120 2023-03-17 reinforce +6.2 70.6 E120 Jason support x3 [w=0.97]
E121 2023-03-24 decay -2.8 67.7 E121 silent
E122 2023-03-31 decay -2.7 65.0 E122 silent
E123 2023-04-07 decay -2.6 62.4 E123 silent
E124 2023-04-14 decay -2.5 59.9 E124 silent
E125 2023-04-21 reinforce +5.3 65.2 E125 Sacks support x2 [w=0.89]
E125 2023-04-21 reinforce +6.1 71.3 E125 Jason support x3 [w=0.97]
E126 2023-04-28 decay -2.9 68.5 E126 silent
E128 2023-05-12 decay -2.7 65.7 E128 silent
E129 2023-05-19 decay -2.6 63.1 E129 silent
E130 2023-05-26 decay -2.5 60.6 E130 silent
E131 2023-06-02 decay -2.4 58.2 E131 silent
E132 2023-06-10 decay -2.3 55.8 E132 silent
E133 2023-06-16 reinforce +7.6 63.4 E133 Brad Gerstner support x3 [w=0.95]
E134 2023-06-24 oppose -11.5 52.0 E134 Brad Gerstner opposes x2 [w=0.95]
E135 2023-07-01 decay -2.1 49.9 E135 silent
E136 2023-07-09 decay -2.0 47.9 E136 silent
E137 2023-07-14 decay -1.9 46.0 E137 silent
E139 2023-07-27 decay -1.8 44.1 E139 silent
E140 2023-08-04 decay -1.8 42.4 E140 silent
E141 2023-08-11 reinforce +8.4 50.8 E141 Jason support x2 [w=0.97]
E141 2023-08-11 oppose -13.7 37.0 E141 Brad Gerstner opposes x3 [w=0.95]
E142 2023-08-18 decay -1.5 35.5 E142 silent
E143 2023-08-25 reinforce +8.4 43.9 E143 Friedberg support x2 [w=0.87]
E144 2023-09-01 decay -1.8 42.2 E144 silent
E146 2023-09-22 decay -1.7 40.5 E146 silent
E147 2023-09-29 decay -1.6 38.9 E147 silent
E148 2023-10-07 decay -1.6 37.3 E148 silent
E149 2023-10-13 decay -1.5 35.8 E149 silent