← pool · child of The IPO window reopens - but only at a real discount to 2021 marks

📈 Down-round IPOs wipe out the late-stage preference stack

Gurley's mechanism inside the reopening IPO window: hyper-competition in 2019-2021 stripped out the term that let investors protect their liquidation preference on an IPO, so when these unicorns list at a discount the late-stage preferred converts to common and the preference is simply washed. Brad sizes it at 50-70% down for the last Instacart round. Founders and early holders are the beneficiaries; the last private round is the loser, and going public becomes the cheapest way to clean an unfinanceable cap table.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 80.7 GREEN
DORMANT
band
▼ SHORT SFTBY
expression · bearish equities
MISS
outcome · R -10.3% · α -31.6%
2024-08-11
window closed
⚠ CONFLICTING IDEA ON THE SAME TICKER — the board is arguing with itself; net it before trading (ticker view →)
IPO · 2026 is the year of mega-IPOs LONG DORMANT 6.3

also touching these tickers, same direction: Private equity model is broken 14 (BX) · Endowment liquidity crunch forces discounted private-equity secondaries 12 (BX)

⚖ Why this verdict

fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2023-08-11 → 2024-08-11 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▼ SHORT SFTBY (primary play). SFTBY rose 10.3% over the window → direction-adjusted R = -10.3% (the call lost money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +21.3%α = -10.3 − (+21.3) = -31.6% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
    Stock-selection read: +10.9% — did SFTBY move the predicted way relative to the market. The two only differ on a SHORT: this call was right about direction relative to the index but still cost money versus holding it.
  4. Rule fired:
    · HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5
    · PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0
    ▶ MISS — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a MISS earn 0 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Bill Gurley, Brad Gerstner, Chamath, Jason, Sacks

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2023-08-11)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▼ SHORT SFTBYstock PRIMARY archetypal late-stage preferred holder and the seller whose NAV rides on where its private book converts
▼ SHORT BXstock adjacent private-capital manager carrying structured late-stage positions at preference-protected marks
▼ SHORT IPOetf adjacent the down-round IPO cohort itself

Mention log

BI
Bill Gurley (regular guest ×1.0) equities w=1.11 · n=9 · E141 (2023-08-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 52:32 SUPPORT
“because of hyper competition and investing in 99, 2020, 2021, there was a term removed from most term sheets that gave investors the right to protect their LICPREF on an IPO. That's gone in most of these cases. So you could convert LICPREF under, which for a founder or an early stage angel investor would be a huge win.”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) equities w=0.95 · n=22 · E141 (2023-08-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 55:47 SUPPORT
“if you were a investor in that last round of Instacart and you were buying preferred shares and thought you were protected, that preference is washed, right? So you're going to be down 50, 60, 70% on those preferred shares because you're going to be converted into common in that IPO.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E143 (2023-08-25) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 41:39 SUPPORT
“there are a lot of companies which have built up huge prep stacks because they raise too much money at the peak at valuations are too high. Going public does allow you to reset your whole prep stack because all the preferred with all the rights and preferences converts to common.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E146 (2023-09-22) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:08:08 SUPPORT
“I think their only hope is to go public, because that wipes out the pref stack and everyone basically just owns their percentage of the company.”
Jason
Jason equities w=0.97 · n=105 · E146 (2023-09-22) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:09:05 SUPPORT
“My understanding of some of these late rounds during peak ZERP 2021 from talking to Bill Gurley was people did not negotiate those rights”
Chamath
Chamath equities w=0.84 · n=160 · E146 (2023-09-22) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:07:24 SUPPORT
“I think most of these unicorns are worth less than their total press stack.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement

BI
Bill Gurley w=1.11 regular guest ×1.0
1 scoring event · 54% of moves
+46.7 → net +46.7
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner w=0.95 regular guest ×1.0
1 scoring event · 16% of moves
+13.7 → net +13.7
Sacks
Sacks w=0.89
2 scoring events · 15% of moves
+13.1 → net +13.1
Chamath
Chamath w=0.84
1 scoring event · 8% of moves
+6.8 → net +6.8
Jason
Jason w=0.97
1 scoring event · 6% of moves
+5.4 → net +5.4

⏳ decay drained -71.2 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E141 2023-08-11 init +46.7 46.7 E141 born by Bill Gurley (explicit_prediction x3) [w=1.11]
E141 2023-08-11 reinforce +13.7 60.4 E141 Brad Gerstner support x3 (new voice) [w=0.95]
E142 2023-08-18 decay -2.4 58.0 E142 silent
E143 2023-08-25 reinforce +8.4 66.4 E143 Sacks support x2 (new voice) [w=0.89]
E144 2023-09-01 decay -2.7 63.7 E144 silent
E146 2023-09-22 reinforce +6.8 70.5 E146 Chamath support x2 (new voice) [w=0.84]
E146 2023-09-22 reinforce +4.7 75.2 E146 Sacks support x3 [w=0.89]
E146 2023-09-22 reinforce +5.4 80.7 E146 Jason support x2 (new voice) [w=0.97]
E147 2023-09-29 decay -3.2 77.4 E147 silent
E148 2023-10-07 decay -3.1 74.3 E148 silent
E149 2023-10-13 decay -3.0 71.4 E149 silent
E150 2023-10-20 decay -2.9 68.5 E150 silent
E151 2023-10-27 decay -2.7 65.8 E151 silent
E152 2023-11-03 decay -2.6 63.1 E152 silent
E156 2023-12-08 decay -2.5 60.6 E156 silent
E157 2023-12-16 decay -2.4 58.2 E157 silent
E158 2023-12-23 decay -2.3 55.9 E158 silent
E159 2023-12-29 decay -2.2 53.6 E159 silent
E160 2024-01-06 decay -2.1 51.5 E160 silent
E161 2024-01-13 decay -2.1 49.4 E161 silent
E162 2024-01-19 decay -2.0 47.4 E162 silent
E163 2024-01-26 decay -1.9 45.5 E163 silent
E164 2024-02-02 decay -1.8 43.7 E164 silent
E165 2024-02-09 decay -1.7 42.0 E165 silent
E166 2024-02-16 decay -1.7 40.3 E166 silent
E167 2024-02-23 decay -1.6 38.7 E167 silent
E168 2024-03-01 decay -1.5 37.1 E168 silent
E169 2024-03-08 decay -1.5 35.6 E169 silent
E170 2024-03-15 decay -1.4 34.2 E170 silent
E171 2024-03-22 decay -1.4 32.9 E171 silent
E172 2024-03-29 decay -1.3 31.5 E172 silent
E173 2024-04-05 decay -1.3 30.3 E173 silent
E174 2024-04-12 decay -1.2 29.1 E174 silent
E175 2024-04-19 decay -1.2 27.9 E175 silent
E176 2024-04-26 decay -1.1 26.8 E176 silent
E177 2024-05-03 decay -1.1 25.7 E177 silent
E178 2024-05-10 decay -1.0 24.7 E178 silent
E179 2024-05-17 decay -1.0 23.7 E179 silent
E180 2024-05-24 decay -0.9 22.8 E180 silent
E181 2024-05-31 decay -0.9 21.8 E181 silent
E182 2024-06-07 decay -0.9 21.0 E182 silent
E183 2024-06-14 decay -0.8 20.1 E183 silent
E184 2024-06-20 decay -0.8 19.3 E184 silent
E185 2024-06-29 decay -0.8 18.6 E185 silent
E186 2024-07-04 decay -0.7 17.8 E186 silent
E187 2024-07-12 decay -0.7 17.1 E187 silent
E188 2024-07-19 decay -0.7 16.4 E188 silent
E189 2024-07-26 decay -0.7 15.8 E189 silent
E190 2024-08-02 decay -0.6 15.1 E190 silent
E191 2024-08-09 decay -0.6 14.5 E191 silent