🏦 Inflation may not show up — breakevens are rolling over
Chamath's 10-year breakeven check has come down to ~2.42% over 18 days and Washington is walking back the size of the spending package, so the inflation scare fades and duration is the beneficiary.
0
CONVICTION
peaked 66.9 GREEN
EMBER
band · contested
▲ LONG TLT
expression · bullish rates
MISS
outcome · R -14.4% · α -14.1%
2022-05-31
window closed
⚠ CONFLICTING IDEA ON THE SAME TICKER
— the board is arguing with itself; net it before trading (ticker view →)
TLT ·
US fiscal spiral keeps long-end yields grinding higher
SHORT
GREEN 67.5
← stronger than this idea (18.7)
also touching these tickers, same direction: Fed easing + disinflation into 2026 11 (TLT)
⚖ Why this verdict
fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set
- Window: 2021-05-31 → 2022-05-31 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
- The call: ▲ LONG TLT (primary play). TLT fell 14.4% over the window → direction-adjusted R = -14.4% (the call lost money).
- Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned -0.3% → α = -14.4 − (-0.3) = -14.1% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
- Rule fired:
· HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5· PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0▶ MISS — everything else
- Credit: supporters of a MISS earn 0 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Brad Gerstner, Jason | opposed: Chamath, Friedberg, Sacks
Conviction timeline
bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15
Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2021-05-31)
Plays
| expression | symbol | kind | relevance | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▲ LONG | TLT | etf | PRIMARY | long-duration Treasuries rally if the inflation impulse fails to materialize |
| ▲ LONG | IEF | etf | adjacent | belly of the curve, same disinflation expression with less duration risk |
Mention log
Chamath
rates w=0.88 · n=16
· E34 (2021-05-31) · explicit_prediction · strength 2
▶ 1:04:16
SUPPORT
“One last thing for you guys, on a market check, my 10-year break evens, remember, we're now down to 242 It's been 18 days. ... My little inflation check, my little inflation check. And it seems like things are trending in the right direction.”
Sacks
rates w=1.08 · n=12
· E34 (2021-05-31) · explicit_prediction · strength 2
▶ 1:05:07
SUPPORT
“Well, I think what happened, Chamath, is you put it well, I think a couple of pods ago, the market sent a signal to Biden that, look, this is too much taxing, too much spending. It's too inflationary. ... So I think there's less inflationary pressure coming out of Washington, hopefully.”
Friedberg
rates w=0.79 · n=14
· E40 (2021-07-16) · sentiment · strength 2
▶ 25:40
SUPPORT
“We were afraid of inflation. Lumber prices today, by the way, are lower than they were when this whole kind of inflationary thing started and everyone was freaking out about it. So, you know, lumber prices are lower than they were at the start of the year, which is, you know, like a lot of this kind of inflation risk has kind of come out of the equation already. So, the markets have taken that pricing out.”
Chamath
rates w=0.88 · n=16
· E53 (2021-10-30) · explicit_prediction · strength 3
▶ 34:44
REVERSAL
“The thing that I have struggled with the most in these last few weeks is trying to come to a conclusion on inflation. My worry is that it's here and it will be persistent. ... And so I think what we've created is a really distortive inflationary cycle that's going to really hurt the United States because as Sacks talked about, we cannot print enough money to pay for the debt when interest rates go up.”
Friedberg
rates w=0.79 · n=14
· E57 (2021-12-04) · explicit_prediction · strength 2
▶ 38:42
SUPPORT
· horizon 12mo
“I just sent you a link to freight rates for cargo ships coming from China to LA. ... It's dropped by 50% and it's continuing to drop week after week right now. And we're seeing the same in lumber prices right now. ... these pricing issues that we've been seeing in the recent term may in fact still be transitory. We may see them work their way out at the end of 2022 And we're starting to see the early signs of that actually playing out.”
Jason
rates w=0.86 · n=7
· E57 (2021-12-04) · sentiment · strength 1
▶ 42:17
SUPPORT
“But competition does seem to drive prices lower. And so if we do see more people participating as employees or employment, well, then there'd be some competition for less competition for labor. And we might see more competition in other places in the economy.”
Chamath
rates w=0.88 · n=16
· E62 (2022-01-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 2
▶ 32:14
SUPPORT
“the volatility in the 10-year yield is slowing way down. And if that continues to hold, that means that people are really saying there's a small amount of real inflation, a reasonable amount of transitory inflation, and we're about to kind of wash most of it through the system with 100 basis points of rate hikes.”
Chamath
rates w=0.88 · n=16
· E67 (2022-02-12) · explicit_prediction · strength 2
▶ 56:33
SUPPORT
“one of the most interesting things is the rate of change of this inflation was actually lower month over month. And so if you think about it that way, we had a bad CPI print, but it's actually not going up as much. And in fact, it's starting to trail off and a lot of economists now forecast basically this inflation peaking or already having peaked over the last few weeks.”
Brad Gerstner
(regular guest ×1.0)
rates: 2 resolved, unproven
· E73 (2022-03-26) · explicit_prediction · strength 2
▶ 1:26:06
SUPPORT
· horizon 3mo
“PMI in January came in at 0.2 versus the consensus estimate of 0.6. That means the producer level of inflation was meaningfully less than we expected. ... That's why I think there's also a probability by the middle of the summer, the Fed in the United States is saying we now see a balanced risk between growth and inflation.”
Chamath
rates w=0.88 · n=16
· E73 (2022-03-26) · sentiment · strength 2
▶ 1:24:23
SUPPORT
“Now, here we are again. We're worried about this inflationary boogeyman. And the Chinese government basically extended these tax cuts, increased the tax cuts, and essentially said we're going to be very stimulative in the economy, especially through the back half of the year.”
Friedberg
rates w=0.79 · n=14
· E74 (2022-04-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 2
▶ 19:52
OPPOSE
“One thing I'll say about inflation, let's say you're running a company and you raise your prices, you're not often going back and dropping your prices again. ... consumables, durables typically stay high after they inflate. You end up having this persisting effect and it's really hard to just grow your way out of that without stimulus.”
Chamath
rates w=0.88 · n=16
· E74 (2022-04-01) · sentiment · strength 2
▶ 20:52
SUPPORT
“And incrementally, especially if you use technology, those things tend to be deflationary, so they do get cheaper. ... So you have this deflationary, natural deflationary effect where you tend to save money on the things you used to pay for”
BR
Brian Armstrong
(guest ×0.5)
no rates track record
· E77 (2022-04-23) · explicit_prediction · strength 2
▶ 48:15
OPPOSE
“because, frankly, you know, the dollar is seeing a lot of inflation. You guys have talked about it many times on this show. So do you really want to have a stable, quote, stable coin that is inflating 8% a year? ... they're basically looking at the consumer price index and they're trying to basically have flat purchasing power and assume that the dollar and various fiat currencies around the world are actually going to go through more inflation.”
Brad Gerstner
(regular guest ×1.0)
rates: 2 resolved, unproven
· E81 (2022-05-23) · explicit_prediction · strength 3
▶ 7:22
SUPPORT
· horizon 12mo
“You tell me, is the price of the used car this time next year higher than 29 or lower than 29? It's going to be lower because we're destroying demand by raising interest rates. ... That and consumer confidence tells me forward looking inflation is rolling.”
Who built this conviction
each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement
⏳ decay drained -50.6 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one
Score events
| episode | kind | Δ | after | note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E34 2021-05-31 | init | +37.9 | 37.9 | E34 born by Sacks (explicit_prediction x2) [w=1.08] |
| E34 2021-05-31 | reinforce | +12.2 | 50.1 | E34 Chamath support x2 (new voice) [w=0.88] |
| E35 2021-06-13 | decay | -2.0 | 48.1 | E35 silent |
| E36 2021-06-18 | decay | -1.9 | 46.2 | E36 silent |
| E37 2021-06-25 | decay | -1.8 | 44.4 | E37 silent |
| E38 2021-07-03 | decay | -1.8 | 42.6 | E38 silent |
| E39 2021-07-09 | decay | -1.7 | 40.9 | E39 silent |
| E40 2021-07-16 | reinforce | +10.5 | 51.3 | E40 Friedberg support x2 (new voice) [w=0.79] |
| E41 2021-07-23 | decay | -2.1 | 49.3 | E41 silent |
| E42 2021-07-30 | decay | -2.0 | 47.3 | E42 silent |
| E43 2021-08-06 | decay | -1.9 | 45.4 | E43 silent |
| E44 2021-08-28 | decay | -1.8 | 43.6 | E44 silent |
| E45 2021-09-04 | decay | -1.7 | 41.9 | E45 silent |
| E46 2021-09-14 | decay | -1.7 | 40.2 | E46 silent |
| E47 2021-09-18 | decay | -1.6 | 38.6 | E47 silent |
| E49 2021-10-02 | decay | -1.5 | 37.0 | E49 silent |
| E50 2021-10-09 | decay | -1.5 | 35.5 | E50 silent |
| E51 2021-10-16 | decay | -1.4 | 34.1 | E51 silent |
| E52 2021-10-23 | decay | -1.4 | 32.8 | E52 silent |
| E53 2021-10-30 | reversal | -19.7 | 13.1 | E53 Chamath flips |
| E54 2021-11-06 | decay | -0.5 | 12.6 | E54 silent |
| E55 2021-11-13 | oppose | -12.6 | 0.0 | E55 Chamath opposes x3 (marked reversal; no prior support to flip) [w=0.88] |
| E56 2021-11-20 | decay | · | 0.0 | E56 silent |
| E57 2021-12-04 | reinforce | +11.8 | 11.8 | E57 Friedberg support x2 [w=0.79] |
| E57 2021-12-04 | reinforce | +13.6 | 25.4 | E57 Jason support x1 (new voice) [w=0.86] |
| E58 2021-12-11 | reinforce | +7.0 | 32.4 | E58 Friedberg support x1 [w=0.79] |
| E59 2021-12-17 | decay | -1.3 | 31.1 | E59 silent |
| E60 2021-12-23 | decay | -1.2 | 29.9 | E60 silent |
| E61 2021-12-29 | decay | -1.2 | 28.7 | E61 silent |
| E62 2022-01-08 | reinforce | +9.4 | 38.1 | E62 Chamath support x2 (flipped from reversal) [w=0.88] |
| E63 2022-01-15 | decay | -1.5 | 36.5 | E63 silent |
| E64 2022-01-22 | reinforce | +8.3 | 44.9 | E64 Chamath support x2 [w=0.88] |
| E65 2022-01-29 | decay | -1.8 | 43.1 | E65 silent |
| E66 2022-02-05 | decay | -1.7 | 41.3 | E66 silent |
| E67 2022-02-12 | reinforce | +7.7 | 49.0 | E67 Chamath support x2 [w=0.88] |
| E68 2022-02-19 | decay | -2.0 | 47.1 | E68 silent |
| E70 2022-02-24 | decay | -1.9 | 45.2 | E70 silent |
| E71 2022-03-05 | decay | -1.8 | 43.4 | E71 silent |
| E72 2022-03-19 | reinforce | +7.4 | 50.8 | E72 Chamath support x2 [w=0.88] |
| E73 2022-03-26 | reinforce | +6.5 | 57.3 | E73 Chamath support x2 [w=0.88] |
| E73 2022-03-26 | reinforce | +9.6 | 66.9 | E73 Brad Gerstner support x2 (new voice) |
| E74 2022-04-01 | oppose | -9.4 | 57.5 | E74 Friedberg opposes x2 [w=0.79] |
| E74 2022-04-01 | reinforce | +5.6 | 63.0 | E74 Chamath support x2 [w=0.88] |
| E74 2022-04-01 | oppose | -13.0 | 50.0 | E74 Sacks opposes x2 [w=1.08] |
| E75 2022-04-09 | decay | -2.0 | 48.0 | E75 silent |
| E76 2022-04-16 | decay | -1.9 | 46.1 | E76 silent |
| E77 2022-04-23 | oppose | -6.0 | 40.1 | E77 Brian Armstrong opposes x2 [w=0.50] |
| E78 2022-04-30 | decay | -1.6 | 38.5 | E78 silent |
| E79 2022-05-07 | decay | -1.5 | 37.0 | E79 silent |
| E80 2022-05-13 | reversal | -22.2 | 14.8 | E80 Chamath flips |
| E80 2022-05-13 | oppose | -13.0 | 1.8 | E80 Sacks opposes x2 (marked reversal; no prior support to flip) [w=1.08] |
| E81 2022-05-23 | reinforce | +17.7 | 19.5 | E81 Brad Gerstner support x3 |
| E82 2022-05-24 | decay | -0.8 | 18.7 | E82 silent |