← pool

📈 Founder-CEO public companies outperform any index

Chamath's rebuttal to the bearish Salesforce case: public companies that reached a $10B market cap and are still run by their founder outperform essentially any index you compare them to, so a 'founder portfolio' is a real screen. Applied specifically to Salesforce - the business model risk is real but Benioff is a founder-CEO and should not be counted out.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 29.3 EMBER
DORMANT
band · contested
▲ LONG CRM
expression · bullish equities
PARTIAL
outcome · R +13.9% · α +0.7%
2025-05-31
window closed
⚠ CONFLICTING IDEAS ON THE SAME TICKER — the board is arguing with itself; net it before trading (ticker view →)
META · Tort floodgates open on social media SHORT DORMANT 14.6 ← stronger than this idea (3.8)
NVDA · Nvidia risk: special-purpose silicon + Huawei SHORT DORMANT 10.4 ← stronger than this idea (3.8)
META · Narrow Section 230 carve-out unleashes a tort wave on social platforms SHORT DORMANT 3.7

also touching these tickers, same direction: AI compute capex supercycle has 12-24 months of runway 87 (NVDA) · SaaSpocalypse is overdone for compliance-moat enterprise software 71 (CRM) · Nvidia + Hugging Face makes NVDA the open-source AI champion 58 (NVDA) · Meta becomes America's open-source AI champion 27 (META) · Independent frontier-model labs lose to hyperscaler capital 14 (META) · Meta's AI assistant takes ten points of search share from Google 7 (META)

⚖ Why this verdict

fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2024-05-31 → 2025-05-31 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▲ LONG CRM (primary play). CRM rose 13.9% over the window → direction-adjusted R = +13.9% (the call made money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +13.2%α = +13.9 − (+13.2) = +0.7% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
  4. Rule fired:
    · HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5
    ▶ PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0
    · MISS — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a PARTIAL earn 0.5 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Sacks | opposed: Chamath, Friedberg | proxy-sensitive: META→HIT (+39.2%); NVDA→HIT (+23.3%)

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2024-05-31)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▲ LONG CRMstock PRIMARY the named application - founder-CEO Benioff maneuvers out of the SaaS squeeze
▲ LONG METAstock adjacent largest founder-controlled megacap
▲ LONG NVDAstock adjacent founder-CEO megacap in the same screen

Mention log

Chamath
Chamath equities w=0.84 · n=160 · E181 (2024-05-31) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:17:54 SUPPORT
“the founder public companies that have gone public achieved a $10 billion market cap and are still founder run as the CEO from there, outperform nearly any index you look at.”
Chamath
Chamath equities w=0.84 · n=160 · E195 (2024-09-06) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 10:42 REVERSAL
“These are all just like a handful of examples of people that have just tacked on collectively trillions of dollars of market cap, way more than all founders added together in most companies, but for one or two.”
Sacks
Sacks equities w=0.89 · n=96 · E195 (2024-09-06) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 17:41 SUPPORT
“people figured out that the best-performing companies are indeed the founder-led companies, the ones that keep the founder engaged for a long period of time. They tend to build the most value.”
Friedberg
Friedberg equities w=0.87 · n=120 · E195 (2024-09-06) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 20:19 OPPOSE
“there are some really great leaders that have run organizations that are already scaled and then taken them to an order of magnitude or two orders of magnitude beyond where they were when they step in.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Chamath
Chamath w=0.84
2 scoring events · 58% of moves
+29.3 / -10.3 → net +19.0
Sacks
Sacks w=0.89
1 scoring event · 27% of moves
+18.5 → net +18.5
Friedberg
Friedberg w=0.87
1 scoring event · 15% of moves
+0.0 / -10.4 → net -10.4

⏳ decay drained -23.4 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E181 2024-05-31 init +29.3 29.3 E181 born by Chamath (explicit_prediction x2) [w=0.84]
E182 2024-06-07 decay -1.2 28.1 E182 silent
E183 2024-06-14 decay -1.1 27.0 E183 silent
E184 2024-06-20 decay -1.1 25.9 E184 silent
E185 2024-06-29 decay -1.0 24.9 E185 silent
E186 2024-07-04 decay -1.0 23.9 E186 silent
E187 2024-07-12 decay -1.0 22.9 E187 silent
E188 2024-07-19 decay -0.9 22.0 E188 silent
E189 2024-07-26 decay -0.9 21.1 E189 silent
E190 2024-08-02 decay -0.8 20.3 E190 silent
E191 2024-08-09 decay -0.8 19.5 E191 silent
E192 2024-08-16 decay -0.8 18.7 E192 silent
E193 2024-08-23 decay -0.7 18.0 E193 silent
E194 2024-08-30 decay -0.7 17.2 E194 silent
E195 2024-09-06 reversal -10.3 6.9 E195 Chamath flips
E195 2024-09-06 reinforce +18.5 25.4 E195 Sacks support x2 (new voice) [w=0.89]
E195 2024-09-06 oppose -10.4 15.0 E195 Friedberg opposes x2 [w=0.87]
E196 2024-09-20 decay -0.6 14.4 E196 silent
E197 2024-09-27 decay -0.6 13.9 E197 silent
E198 2024-10-03 decay -0.6 13.3 E198 silent
E199 2024-10-11 decay -0.5 12.8 E199 silent
E200 2024-10-18 decay -0.5 12.3 E200 silent
E201 2024-10-25 decay -0.5 11.8 E201 silent
E202 2024-11-01 decay -0.5 11.3 E202 silent
E203 2024-11-08 decay -0.5 10.9 E203 silent
E204 2024-11-16 decay -0.4 10.4 E204 silent
E205 2024-11-23 decay -0.4 10.0 E205 silent
E206 2024-12-07 decay -0.4 9.6 E206 silent
E207 2024-12-13 decay -0.4 9.2 E207 silent
E208 2024-12-20 decay -0.4 8.8 E208 silent
E209 2025-01-04 decay -0.4 8.5 E209 silent
E210 2025-01-11 decay -0.3 8.2 E210 silent
E211 2025-01-18 decay -0.3 7.8 E211 silent
E212 2025-01-25 decay -0.3 7.5 E212 silent
E213 2025-01-31 decay -0.3 7.2 E213 silent
E214 2025-02-07 decay -0.3 6.9 E214 silent
E215 2025-02-15 decay -0.3 6.6 E215 silent
E216 2025-02-21 decay -0.3 6.4 E216 silent
E217 2025-03-01 decay -0.3 6.1 E217 silent
E218 2025-03-08 decay -0.2 5.9 E218 silent
E219 2025-03-15 decay -0.2 5.6 E219 silent
E220 2025-03-22 decay -0.2 5.4 E220 silent
E221 2025-03-29 decay -0.2 5.2 E221 silent
E222 2025-04-05 decay -0.2 5.0 E222 silent
E223 2025-04-11 decay -0.2 4.8 E223 silent
E224 2025-04-19 decay -0.2 4.6 E224 silent
E225 2025-04-26 decay -0.2 4.4 E225 silent
E226 2025-05-02 decay -0.2 4.2 E226 silent
E227 2025-05-09 decay -0.2 4.1 E227 silent
E228 2025-05-17 decay -0.2 3.9 E228 silent
E229 2025-05-24 decay -0.2 3.8 E229 silent