← pool

📈 Venture's alpha does not clear liquid alternatives — LP money leaves the asset class

The Fed broke the VC model. Run the Instacart-vs-S&P chart at every entry point and venture's excess return over the index is thin (the 2015 Series C generated ~32% alpha over eight years, the 2018 Series F was negative), and that thin alpha now has to beat 5-6% T-bills and 11-13% structured credit that are liquid and far less volatile. So LPs do the arithmetic and cut: fewer managers, smaller commitments, and materially less total capital into venture in aggregate. The listed read-through is the alt-asset managers whose fee streams depend on LP appetite for illiquid alternatives, plus the venture-backed cohort that gets starved of follow-on capital.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 75.0 GREEN
WATCH
band
▼ SHORT BX
expression · bearish equities
WRONG
result · return -46.4% · vs SPY -80.2%
2024-09-22
born 2023-09-22 (E146) → window closed
⚠ CONFLICTING IDEA ON THE SAME TICKER — the board is arguing with itself; net it out (ticker view →)
IPO · 2026 is the year of mega-IPOs LONG EMBER 42.9

other ideas on the same ticker, same direction: Endowment liquidity crunch forces discounted private-equity secondaries 12 (BX) · Endowment liquidity crunch forces discounted private-equity secondaries 12 (KKR)

⚖ Why this result

fully deterministic — computed from daily closes on the scoring date; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2023-09-22 → 2024-09-22 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▼ SHORT BX (primary play). BX rose 46.4% over the window → return (sign flipped for a SHORT) = -46.4% (the call lost money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +33.8% → vs SPY = -46.4 − (+33.8) = -80.2% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the result uses.
    Direction-only read: -12.6% — did BX move the predicted way relative to the market. The two only differ on a SHORT: this call was right about direction relative to the index but still cost money versus holding it.
  4. Rule fired:
    · RIGHT — return ≥ +10% AND beat SPY by 5+
    · HALF — return ≥ +5% OR beat SPY at all
    ▶ WRONG — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a WRONG earn 0 each, opposers the opposite — this feeds the scoreboard. supported: Chamath, Friedberg, Jason, Sacks

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2023-09-22)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▼ SHORT BXstock PRIMARY listed alt manager whose fundraising and fee base ride directly on LP appetite for illiquid alternatives
▼ SHORT IPOetf adjacent the venture-backed cohort on the receiving end of the shrinking capital pool
▼ SHORT KKRstock adjacent same LP-allocation dependency across private funds

Mention log newest first

Chamath
Chamath equities 42% · n=163 · E196 (2024-09-20) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 58:22 SUPPORT
“I do think that we are in a situation where the average returns are going to decay by 50 to 100 percent because of what Sacks said and because of what you said.”
Jason
Jason equities 49% · n=105 · E196 (2024-09-20) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 57:00 SUPPORT
“Instead of a Series A getting you 20% of a company, it got you 10 Instead of a C-check getting you 5%, it got you 1 There's no DPI possible.”
Sacks
Sacks equities 44% · n=96 · E196 (2024-09-20) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 54:25 SUPPORT
“For example, the average venture fund is like a 2X return. But if the entry prices were artificially double, then there goes your return right there. You get 2X becomes 1X.”
Jason
Jason equities 49% · n=105 · E188 (2024-07-19) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:09:04 OPPOSE
“This past week, a lot of chatter about IPOs that are getting filed and that we could be ending the drought. And people were feeling very, very pessimistic about venture as a category. And I think these two things have changed a lot of people's feelings on that.”
Jason
Jason equities 49% · n=105 · E185 (2024-06-29) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:10:26 SUPPORT
“I've been talking to a lot of LPs, and in talking to them, they're looking at corporate credit and P&E deals because they can get a return on those, and then they're looking at venture and they're saying, hey, why is there no M&A occurring? Where's our DPI?”
Chamath
Chamath equities 42% · n=163 · E162 (2024-01-19) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 38:48 SUPPORT
“the only way to win in a world where your exits are not that great is to actually generate money via fees.”
Friedberg
Friedberg equities 43% · n=123 · E159 (2023-12-29) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 27:11 SUPPORT
“not only will that vintage underperform, but it could torpedo as many as 50% of firms that are managing capital today in Silicon Valley. And it could switch the capital allocation model that reduces allocation to venture as an asset class significantly”
Sacks
Sacks equities 44% · n=96 · E158 (2023-12-23) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:09:13 SUPPORT
“It's true that smaller funds do perform better and larger funds become more of an index and achieve more average returns. When you got a multi-billion dollar fund, it's way harder to achieve a outsized return.”
Chamath
Chamath equities 42% · n=163 · E158 (2023-12-23) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 47:37 SUPPORT
“that family office or that endowment who can rip in a check as an LP to a fund can still get five, six, seven percent, can get corporate bond at corporate yields at like eight, nine, 10 percent. ... Why take on 15 year illiquidity for oftentimes funds that return less than the S&P, which is the dirty little secret of Silicon Valley? It makes no sense.”
Jason
Jason equities 49% · n=105 · E156 (2023-12-08) · positioning · strength 3 ▶ 59:46 OPPOSE
“So I think this is going to be the best vintage of venture in our lifetimes. That's my personal belief. I invested in 100 companies this year.”
Sacks
Sacks equities 44% · n=96 · E151 (2023-10-27) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 58:21 SUPPORT
“It's going to be hard to make outsize returns unless and until the entry price is completely correct ... they've partially corrected, but they may not have fully corrected”
Friedberg
Friedberg equities 43% · n=123 · E151 (2023-10-27) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 57:19 SUPPORT
“So instead of being 1.8x, they're all going to return 0.7x or 0.5x, and they're going to lose money”
Jason
Jason equities 49% · n=105 · E151 (2023-10-27) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 56:12 SUPPORT
“I think there's going to be a lot of shutdowns of venture firms. I think a lot of venture firms are going to shut down”
Friedberg
Friedberg equities 43% · n=123 · E146 (2023-09-22) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:21:57 SUPPORT
“On a day-to-day basis, it means there's going to be less companies that are going to get funded, but more importantly, there's going to be less LP money going into venture”
Chamath
Chamath equities 42% · n=163 · E146 (2023-09-22) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 48:29 SUPPORT
“when people do the calculations on what the true alpha of venture capital is, they're going to come back with answers like this, which is it's not that great ... because the alternative universe is more liquid, it's less volatile, and it has roughly the same amount of return”
Jason
Jason equities 49% · n=105 · E146 (2023-09-22) · positioning · strength 2 ▶ 33:44 SUPPORT
“two-thirds of the meetings I'm having, people are saying we're not adding managers, we're cutting managers, and we're cutting commitments to managers”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total push on the score, in conviction points across every mention — supports and opposes · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Jason
Jason 49%
6 scoring events · 37% of moves
+40.2 / -26.4 → net +13.8
Chamath
Chamath 42%
4 scoring events · 36% of moves
+64.9 → net +64.9
Sacks
Sacks 44%
3 scoring events · 15% of moves
+27.3 → net +27.3
Friedberg
Friedberg 43%
3 scoring events · 12% of moves
+21.4 → net +21.4

⏳ decay drained -73.8 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E146 2023-09-22 init +42.0 42.0 E146 born by Chamath (explicit_prediction x3)
E146 2023-09-22 reinforce +13.1 55.0 E146 Jason support x2 (new voice)
E146 2023-09-22 reinforce +10.1 65.2 E146 Friedberg support x2 (new voice)
E147 2023-09-29 decay -2.6 62.6 E147 silent
E148 2023-10-07 decay -2.5 60.1 E148 silent
E149 2023-10-13 decay -2.4 57.7 E149 silent
E150 2023-10-20 decay -2.3 55.3 E150 silent
E151 2023-10-27 reinforce +6.7 62.0 E151 Jason support x2
E151 2023-10-27 reinforce +5.7 67.7 E151 Friedberg support x2
E151 2023-10-27 reinforce +7.3 75.0 E151 Sacks support x2 (new voice)
E152 2023-11-03 decay -3.0 72.0 E152 silent
E156 2023-12-08 oppose -14.4 57.6 E156 Jason opposes x3
E157 2023-12-16 decay -2.3 55.3 E157 silent
E158 2023-12-23 reinforce +8.0 63.3 E158 Chamath support x3
E158 2023-12-23 reinforce +5.5 68.8 E158 Sacks support x2
E159 2023-12-29 reinforce +5.6 74.4 E159 Friedberg support x3
E160 2024-01-06 decay -3.0 71.5 E160 silent
E161 2024-01-13 decay -2.9 68.6 E161 silent
E162 2024-01-19 reinforce +4.7 73.3 E162 Chamath support x2
E163 2024-01-26 decay -2.9 70.4 E163 silent
E164 2024-02-02 decay -2.8 67.6 E164 silent
E165 2024-02-09 decay -2.7 64.9 E165 silent
E166 2024-02-16 decay -2.6 62.3 E166 silent
E167 2024-02-23 decay -2.5 59.8 E167 silent
E168 2024-03-01 decay -2.4 57.4 E168 silent
E169 2024-03-08 decay -2.3 55.1 E169 silent
E170 2024-03-15 decay -2.2 52.9 E170 silent
E171 2024-03-22 decay -2.1 50.8 E171 silent
E172 2024-03-29 decay -2.0 48.7 E172 silent
E173 2024-04-05 decay -1.9 46.8 E173 silent
E174 2024-04-12 decay -1.9 44.9 E174 silent
E175 2024-04-19 decay -1.8 43.1 E175 silent
E176 2024-04-26 decay -1.7 41.4 E176 silent
E177 2024-05-03 decay -1.7 39.7 E177 silent
E178 2024-05-10 decay -1.6 38.2 E178 silent
E179 2024-05-17 decay -1.5 36.6 E179 silent
E180 2024-05-24 decay -1.5 35.2 E180 silent
E181 2024-05-31 decay -1.4 33.8 E181 silent
E182 2024-06-07 decay -1.4 32.4 E182 silent
E183 2024-06-14 decay -1.3 31.1 E183 silent
E184 2024-06-20 decay -1.2 29.9 E184 silent
E185 2024-06-29 reinforce +10.5 40.4 E185 Jason support x2 (flipped from oppose)
E186 2024-07-04 decay -1.6 38.8 E186 silent
E187 2024-07-12 decay -1.6 37.2 E187 silent
E188 2024-07-19 oppose -12.0 25.2 E188 Jason opposes x2
E189 2024-07-26 decay -1.0 24.2 E189 silent
E190 2024-08-02 decay -1.0 23.2 E190 silent
E191 2024-08-09 decay -0.9 22.3 E191 silent
E192 2024-08-16 decay -0.9 21.4 E192 silent
E193 2024-08-23 decay -0.9 20.6 E193 silent
E194 2024-08-30 decay -0.8 19.7 E194 silent
E195 2024-09-06 decay -0.8 19.0 E195 silent
E196 2024-09-20 reinforce +14.6 33.5 E196 Sacks support x3
E196 2024-09-20 reinforce +10.0 43.5 E196 Jason support x2 (flipped from oppose)
E196 2024-09-20 reinforce +10.2 53.7 E196 Chamath support x3