← pool

🤖 Meta's Project 92 takes Twitter's slot by paying creators and handing back data control

Brad's pre-launch read on Meta's leaked text-based social product (Project 92, shipped weeks later as Threads): Meta is courting Oprah and the Dalai Lama, will compensate creators, and Zuckerberg's Lex Fridman comments about Blue Sky suggest the pitch is putting data control and monetization back in the user's hands. If Meta leverages existing platform distribution that way it takes the position Twitter vacated - a cheap, high-leverage option on top of the core ad business that nobody is pricing.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 44.4 EMBER
DORMANT
band · contested
▲ LONG META
expression · bullish tech
RIGHT
result · return +79.8% · vs SPY +55.0%
2024-06-16
born 2023-06-16 (E133) → window closed
⚠ CONFLICTING IDEAS ON THE SAME TICKER — the board is arguing with itself; net it out (ticker view →)
META · Tort floodgates open on social media SHORT EMBER 20.4 ← stronger than this idea (3.7)
META · Narrow Section 230 carve-out unleashes a tort wave on social platforms SHORT DORMANT 3.0

other ideas on the same ticker, same direction: Meta becomes America's open-source AI champion 55 (META) · Personal AI agents put the App Store's 30% take and opaque subscription/retail economics on notice 49 (META) · The AI doomer campaign fails — no FDAI, open source survives 31 (META) · Independent frontier-model labs lose to hyperscaler capital 18 (META) · Meta's AI assistant takes ten points of search share from Google 6 (META)

⚖ Why this result

fully deterministic — computed from daily closes on the scoring date; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2023-06-16 → 2024-06-16 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▲ LONG META (primary play). META rose 79.8% over the window → return (sign flipped for a SHORT) = +79.8% (the call made money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +24.8% → vs SPY = +79.8 − (+24.8) = +55.0% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the result uses.
  4. Rule fired:
    ▶ RIGHT — return ≥ +10% AND beat SPY by 5+ ✓ (return 79.8, vs SPY 55.0)
    · HALF — return ≥ +5% OR beat SPY at all
    · WRONG — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a RIGHT earn 1.0 each, opposers the opposite — this feeds the scoreboard. supported: Brad Gerstner | opposed: Chamath, Sacks

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2023-06-16)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▲ LONG METAstock PRIMARY Project 92 / Threads is a Meta product; the optionality accrues to META equity

Mention log newest first

Sacks
Sacks tech 39% · n=53 · E136 (2023-07-09) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 13:20 OPPOSE
“So I wouldn't just look at the signups here. I think you have to look at the amount of posting and the actual usage before you know that Twitter has a threat.”
Chamath
Chamath tech 45% · n=84 · E136 (2023-07-09) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 12:05 OPPOSE
“So if this instead gets integrated into Instagram, I think it's much more dangerous to Twitter than as a standalone product. As a standalone product, I tend to think it's DOA for the most part.”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) tech 71% · n=17 · E136 (2023-07-09) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 6:23 SUPPORT
“But already, by my estimate, these guys get to 100 million, which looks like they may be able to get to tonight.”
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner (regular guest ×1.0) tech 71% · n=17 · E133 (2023-06-16) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:12:27 SUPPORT
“But I think there's a suggestion here that it may be more about putting the control back in the hands of the user from a data perspective and a monetization perspective. That would be a pretty gangster move”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total push on the score, in conviction points across every mention — supports and opposes · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner 71% regular guest ×1.0
2 scoring events · 66% of moves
+47.2 → net +47.2
Chamath
Chamath 45%
1 scoring event · 17% of moves
+0.0 / -12.0 → net -12.0
Sacks
Sacks 39%
1 scoring event · 17% of moves
+0.0 / -12.0 → net -12.0

⏳ decay drained -19.5 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E133 2023-06-16 init +35.0 35.0 E133 born by Brad Gerstner (explicit_prediction x2)
E134 2023-06-24 decay -1.4 33.6 E134 silent
E135 2023-07-01 decay -1.3 32.3 E135 silent
E136 2023-07-09 reinforce +12.2 44.4 E136 Brad Gerstner support x3
E136 2023-07-09 oppose -12.0 32.4 E136 Chamath opposes x2
E136 2023-07-09 oppose -12.0 20.4 E136 Sacks opposes x2
E137 2023-07-14 decay -0.8 19.6 E137 silent
E139 2023-07-27 decay -0.8 18.8 E139 silent
E140 2023-08-04 decay -0.8 18.1 E140 silent
E141 2023-08-11 decay -0.7 17.4 E141 silent
E142 2023-08-18 decay -0.7 16.7 E142 silent
E143 2023-08-25 decay -0.7 16.0 E143 silent
E144 2023-09-01 decay -0.6 15.4 E144 silent
E146 2023-09-22 decay -0.6 14.8 E146 silent
E147 2023-09-29 decay -0.6 14.2 E147 silent
E148 2023-10-07 decay -0.6 13.6 E148 silent
E149 2023-10-13 decay -0.5 13.1 E149 silent
E150 2023-10-20 decay -0.5 12.5 E150 silent
E151 2023-10-27 decay -0.5 12.0 E151 silent
E152 2023-11-03 decay -0.5 11.5 E152 silent
E156 2023-12-08 decay -0.5 11.1 E156 silent
E157 2023-12-16 decay -0.4 10.6 E157 silent
E158 2023-12-23 decay -0.4 10.2 E158 silent
E159 2023-12-29 decay -0.4 9.8 E159 silent
E160 2024-01-06 decay -0.4 9.4 E160 silent
E161 2024-01-13 decay -0.4 9.0 E161 silent
E162 2024-01-19 decay -0.4 8.7 E162 silent
E163 2024-01-26 decay -0.3 8.3 E163 silent
E164 2024-02-02 decay -0.3 8.0 E164 silent
E165 2024-02-09 decay -0.3 7.7 E165 silent
E166 2024-02-16 decay -0.3 7.4 E166 silent
E167 2024-02-23 decay -0.3 7.1 E167 silent
E168 2024-03-01 decay -0.3 6.8 E168 silent
E169 2024-03-08 decay -0.3 6.5 E169 silent
E170 2024-03-15 decay -0.3 6.3 E170 silent
E171 2024-03-22 decay -0.3 6.0 E171 silent
E172 2024-03-29 decay -0.2 5.8 E172 silent
E173 2024-04-05 decay -0.2 5.5 E173 silent
E174 2024-04-12 decay -0.2 5.3 E174 silent
E175 2024-04-19 decay -0.2 5.1 E175 silent
E176 2024-04-26 decay -0.2 4.9 E176 silent
E177 2024-05-03 decay -0.2 4.7 E177 silent
E178 2024-05-10 decay -0.2 4.5 E178 silent
E179 2024-05-17 decay -0.2 4.3 E179 silent
E180 2024-05-24 decay -0.2 4.2 E180 silent
E181 2024-05-31 decay -0.2 4.0 E181 silent
E182 2024-06-07 decay -0.2 3.8 E182 silent
E183 2024-06-14 decay -0.2 3.7 E183 silent