← pool

🏛️ Atkins SEC loosens accredited-investor gating and retail money reaches private markets

Off a 2007 Paul Atkins speech attacking the accredited-investor premise, Jason and Joe Lonsdale argue the incoming SEC should let ordinary Americans into private funds via a sophistication test rather than a wealth test, and Gavin notes the big private-equity firms are already making a huge effort to reach Main Street. The read-through is a retail distribution channel for alternative managers. Friedberg takes the direct other side — private markets with weaker disclosure would be used to market junk securities to poor people — and Gavin agrees disclosure standards would have to be strengthened first.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 40.3 EMBER
DORMANT
band · contested
▲ LONG BX
expression · bullish politics-market
MISS
outcome · R -15.4% · α -30.1%
2025-12-07
window closed
⚠ CONFLICTING IDEAS ON THE SAME TICKER — the board is arguing with itself; net it before trading (ticker view →)
BX · Private equity model is broken SHORT DORMANT 14.5
KKR · Private equity model is broken SHORT DORMANT 14.5
APO · Private equity model is broken SHORT DORMANT 14.5
BX · Endowment liquidity crunch forces discounted private-equity secondaries SHORT DORMANT 11.8
KKR · Endowment liquidity crunch forces discounted private-equity secondaries SHORT DORMANT 11.8
APO · Endowment liquidity crunch forces discounted private-equity secondaries SHORT DORMANT 11.8

⚖ Why this verdict

fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2024-12-07 → 2025-12-07 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▲ LONG BX (primary play). BX fell 15.4% over the window → direction-adjusted R = -15.4% (the call lost money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +14.8%α = -15.4 − (+14.8) = -30.1% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
  4. Rule fired:
    · HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5
    · PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0
    ▶ MISS — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a MISS earn 0 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Chamath, Jason, Joe Lonsdale | opposed: Friedberg, Gavin Baker

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2024-12-07)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▲ LONG BXstock PRIMARY largest alt manager, most exposed to a retail/wealth distribution unlock
▲ LONG APOstock adjacent same retail-alts distribution build-out
▲ LONG KKRstock adjacent same retail-alts distribution build-out

Mention log

Jason
Jason politics-market w=1.00 · n=62 · E206 (2024-12-07) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 39:08 SUPPORT
“I mean, there's such an easy solution to this. You just do a sophistication test. People take a five-hour course and they answer 50 questions. The end, like a driver's license”
JO
Joe Lonsdale (regular guest ×1.0) politics-market w=1.00 · n=5 · E206 (2024-12-07) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 36:55 SUPPORT
“Imagine if Elon could raise for SpaceX from regular Americans. I'm sure he would have loved to do that if it wasn't crazy risky with the SEC”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market w=0.84 · n=74 · E206 (2024-12-07) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 37:23 OPPOSE
“In fact, I think it's more likely than not that people are going to go market bullsh** securities and private markets and rip poor people off even worse”
Gavin Baker
Gavin Baker (regular guest ×1.0) politics-market w=1.50 · n=5 · E206 (2024-12-07) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 38:17 OPPOSE
“And I do think if you were to allow ordinary Americans to buy private companies that are held to a lower standard of disclosure and reporting to public companies, like something would have to change”
Jason
Jason politics-market w=1.00 · n=62 · E217 (2025-03-01) · sentiment · strength 3 ▶ 1:01:54 SUPPORT
“So all I'm arguing for is more education and a path for those people who want to do it, to show five hours of education, 50 questions, that they have an above average knowledge of how private companies work, just so they have the choice to do that.”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market w=0.84 · n=74 · E217 (2025-03-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:03:27 OPPOSE
“I would want to invest in everything. I'm not disagreeing with the notion. I'm pointing out what will happen, which is predatory a*****s will show up and they'll rip people off. That's what happens in every one of these f*****g markets.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E217 (2025-03-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:05:45 OPPOSE
“I think what's gonna happen is not much of anything. I think the rules are gonna stay exactly where they are.”
PH
Philippe Laffont (guest ×0.5) no politics-market track record · E227 (2025-05-09) · positioning · strength 3 ▶ 1:17:55 SUPPORT
“these interval funds are really interesting because I think the minimum investment is like $50,000 or something like that. And the conditions to qualify for such a fund are much smaller. So there's many more investors that can come. And I look at it a little bit of like, this is the democratization of tech investing.”
Jason
Jason politics-market w=1.00 · n=62 · E227 (2025-05-09) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:10:04 SUPPORT
“Yeah, it's retail investors and sovereign wealth funds outside the US seem to be the answer to that question.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E227 (2025-05-09) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:29:19 SUPPORT
“The optimal basket of the companies you'd want to own for the future, because of these rules and regulatory burdens, are partially public, partially private, and so you need a vehicle that can straddle both if you want to own it.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Jason
Jason w=1.00
3 scoring events · 38% of moves
+52.2 → net +52.2
Friedberg
Friedberg w=0.84
2 scoring events · 17% of moves
+0.0 / -24.1 → net -24.1
Chamath
Chamath w=1.02
2 scoring events · 17% of moves
+10.8 / -12.2 → net -1.5
JO
Joe Lonsdale w=1.00 regular guest ×1.0
1 scoring event · 14% of moves
+20.0 → net +20.0
PH
Philippe Laffont guest ×0.5
1 scoring event · 8% of moves
+11.0 → net +11.0
Gavin Baker
Gavin Baker w=1.50 regular guest ×1.0
1 scoring event · 6% of moves
+0.0 / -7.9 → net -7.9

⏳ decay drained -35.1 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E206 2024-12-07 init +20.0 20.0 E206 born by Joe Lonsdale (sentiment x2)
E206 2024-12-07 oppose -12.1 7.9 E206 Friedberg opposes x3 [w=0.84]
E206 2024-12-07 oppose -7.9 0.0 E206 Gavin Baker opposes x2 [w=1.50]
E206 2024-12-07 reinforce +22.5 22.5 E206 Jason support x2 (new voice)
E207 2024-12-13 decay -0.9 21.6 E207 silent
E208 2024-12-20 decay -0.9 20.7 E208 silent
E209 2025-01-04 decay -0.8 19.9 E209 silent
E210 2025-01-11 decay -0.8 19.1 E210 silent
E211 2025-01-18 decay -0.8 18.3 E211 silent
E212 2025-01-25 decay -0.7 17.6 E212 silent
E213 2025-01-31 decay -0.7 16.9 E213 silent
E214 2025-02-07 decay -0.7 16.2 E214 silent
E215 2025-02-15 decay -0.6 15.6 E215 silent
E216 2025-02-21 decay -0.6 15.0 E216 silent
E217 2025-03-01 reinforce +15.3 30.3 E217 Jason support x3
E217 2025-03-01 oppose -12.1 18.2 E217 Friedberg opposes x3 [w=0.84]
E217 2025-03-01 oppose -12.2 6.0 E217 Chamath opposes x2 [w=1.02]
E218 2025-03-08 decay -0.2 5.7 E218 silent
E219 2025-03-15 decay -0.2 5.5 E219 silent
E220 2025-03-22 decay -0.2 5.3 E220 silent
E221 2025-03-29 decay -0.2 5.1 E221 silent
E222 2025-04-05 decay -0.2 4.9 E222 silent
E223 2025-04-11 decay -0.2 4.7 E223 silent
E224 2025-04-19 decay -0.2 4.5 E224 silent
E225 2025-04-26 decay -0.2 4.3 E225 silent
E226 2025-05-02 decay -0.2 4.1 E226 silent
E227 2025-05-09 reinforce +14.4 18.5 E227 Jason support x2
E227 2025-05-09 reinforce +11.0 29.5 E227 Philippe Laffont support x3 (new voice) [w=0.50]
E227 2025-05-09 reinforce +10.8 40.3 E227 Chamath support x2 (flipped from oppose) [w=1.02]
E228 2025-05-17 decay -1.6 38.7 E228 silent
E229 2025-05-24 decay -1.5 37.1 E229 silent
E231 2025-06-13 decay -1.5 35.7 E231 silent
E232 2025-06-21 decay -1.4 34.2 E232 silent
E233 2025-06-28 decay -1.4 32.9 E233 silent
E234 2025-07-04 decay -1.3 31.5 E234 silent
E235 2025-07-11 decay -1.3 30.3 E235 silent
E236 2025-07-19 decay -1.2 29.1 E236 silent
E237 2025-08-01 decay -1.2 27.9 E237 silent
E238 2025-08-09 decay -1.1 26.8 E238 silent
E239 2025-08-15 decay -1.1 25.7 E239 silent
E240 2025-08-22 decay -1.0 24.7 E240 silent
E241 2025-08-29 decay -1.0 23.7 E241 silent
E242 2025-09-07 decay -0.9 22.8 E242 silent
E243 2025-09-19 decay -0.9 21.8 E243 silent
E244 2025-09-27 decay -0.9 21.0 E244 silent
E245 2025-10-03 decay -0.8 20.1 E245 silent
E246 2025-10-10 decay -0.8 19.3 E246 silent
E247 2025-10-17 decay -0.8 18.6 E247 silent
E248 2025-10-24 decay -0.7 17.8 E248 silent
E249 2025-10-31 decay -0.7 17.1 E249 silent
E250 2025-11-07 decay -0.7 16.4 E250 silent
E251 2025-11-14 decay -0.7 15.8 E251 silent
E252 2025-11-22 decay -0.6 15.1 E252 silent
E253 2025-12-06 decay -0.6 14.5 E253 silent