🏛️ Speculative-competition antitrust blocks chill tech M&A
The UK CMA is killing Adobe/Figma on a novel theory — not that the two compete today, but that Figma might compete with Photoshop some day — after 15 months of process. Sacks and Chamath argue that once a regulator can veto any deal on an unquantifiable future-competition test, and take a year and a half to say so, M&A activity gets a real chilling effect, the only reliable exit for startups narrows, and companies will deliberately avoid creating a nexus in the offending jurisdiction.
⚖ Why this verdict
fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set
- Window: 2023-12-08 → 2024-12-08 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
- The call: ▼ SHORT GS (primary play). GS rose 75.1% over the window → direction-adjusted R = -75.1% (the call lost money).
- Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +33.9%
→ α = -75.1 − (+33.9) = -108.9%
— what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
Stock-selection read: -41.2% — did GS move the predicted way relative to the market. The two only differ on a SHORT: this call was right about direction relative to the index but still cost money versus holding it.
- Rule fired:
· HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5· PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0▶ MISS — everything else
- Credit: supporters of a MISS earn 0 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Friedberg, Jason, Sacks | opposed: Chamath
Conviction timeline
bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15
Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2023-12-08)
Plays
| expression | symbol | kind | relevance | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▼ SHORT | GS | stock | PRIMARY | advisory revenue tracks announced deal volume, the thing they say gets chilled |
| ▼ SHORT | EWU | etf | adjacent | Chamath's claim that companies gate-keep the UK, hurting UK productivity and its listed market |
| ▼ SHORT | IPO | etf | adjacent | if M&A is taken off the table the venture-backed cohort loses the exit path that funds it |
Mention log
“The other one is that antitrust authorities are blocking all of their acquisitions. And so what do you do with all that cash? ... frankly, we're not going to be able to grow through M&A because of antitrust right now anyway”
“I think the Democrats and the Republicans are really well aligned here. They don't like deals. And I don't think you're going to see a big sea change. They hate big tech for different reasons, but they equally want to slow them down.”
“We got to have a better solution for allowing companies to be bought and sold in this or merge in this country... These two things are putting a lot of headwinds on the startup ecosystem and on the venture and the risk taking capital ecosystems.”
“the right approach to antitrust is to stop anti-competitive tactics. Bundling is at the top of the list. Instead, what they've stopped is all M&A, which is actually bad for the ecosystem, because you deny risk capital reward”
“I don't think that she should stop some of these, what I would call R&D acquisitions, from taking place where there's no accretion of market share, but rather starts being bought because they contribute a useful piece of technology. I don't think you want to shut down that part of the market. Lord knows we don't have enough exits as it is”
“her theory is you got to prevent the aggregation of powers, you got to fight every acquisition of note. And the problem, of course, is that actually quells venture capital investment.”
“Then on the M&A side, if all you're doing is waiting for Lina Khan to not be there, to me, I think that that betrays what M&A is supposed to be, which is you're supposed to underwrite some industrial logic from first principles where things are very accretive and very accretive things should not hang by a thread on the emotional regulation or dysregulation of the FTC Commission.”
“I think that we've talked about on previous pods that perhaps there was not as targeted and surgical an approach was used. And as a result of that, it did have a chilling effect on M&A. And so it hurt the small tech environment. And so I think that we need to fix that part of it.”
“So the backroom buzz is that Donnie from Queens is going to make M&A great again. Couple of reasons there, Sacks, the wrath of Lena Cohn's coming to an end, Mag-7 sitting on massive amounts of cash, and that cash is growing as people have laid people off and they're focused on getting fit.”
Who built this conviction
each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement
⏳ decay drained -98.9 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one
Score events
| episode | kind | Δ | after | note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E156 2023-12-08 | init | +42.9 | 42.9 | E156 born by Chamath (explicit_prediction x3) [w=1.02] |
| E156 2023-12-08 | reinforce | +12.9 | 55.7 | E156 Jason support x2 (new voice) |
| E156 2023-12-08 | reinforce | +11.5 | 67.3 | E156 Sacks support x3 (new voice) [w=0.97] |
| E157 2023-12-16 | decay | -2.7 | 64.6 | E157 silent |
| E158 2023-12-23 | decay | -2.6 | 62.0 | E158 silent |
| E159 2023-12-29 | decay | -2.5 | 59.5 | E159 silent |
| E160 2024-01-06 | decay | -2.4 | 57.1 | E160 silent |
| E161 2024-01-13 | decay | -2.3 | 54.9 | E161 silent |
| E162 2024-01-19 | reinforce | +6.9 | 61.8 | E162 Chamath support x2 [w=1.02] |
| E163 2024-01-26 | decay | -2.5 | 59.3 | E163 silent |
| E164 2024-02-02 | reinforce | +5.9 | 65.2 | E164 Sacks support x2 [w=0.97] |
| E165 2024-02-09 | decay | -2.6 | 62.6 | E165 silent |
| E166 2024-02-16 | decay | -2.5 | 60.1 | E166 silent |
| E167 2024-02-23 | reinforce | +7.5 | 67.6 | E167 Friedberg support x2 (new voice) [w=0.84] |
| E168 2024-03-01 | decay | -2.7 | 64.9 | E168 silent |
| E169 2024-03-08 | decay | -2.6 | 62.3 | E169 silent |
| E170 2024-03-15 | decay | -2.5 | 59.8 | E170 silent |
| E171 2024-03-22 | reinforce | +5.8 | 65.6 | E171 Sacks support x2 [w=0.97] |
| E171 2024-03-22 | oppose | -10.1 | 55.6 | E171 Friedberg opposes x2 [w=0.84] |
| E172 2024-03-29 | decay | -2.2 | 53.4 | E172 silent |
| E173 2024-04-05 | reinforce | +6.8 | 60.1 | E173 Sacks support x2 [w=0.97] |
| E173 2024-04-05 | reinforce | +7.3 | 67.4 | E173 Chamath support x3 [w=1.02] |
| E174 2024-04-12 | decay | -2.7 | 64.7 | E174 silent |
| E175 2024-04-19 | reinforce | +5.3 | 70.0 | E175 Jason support x2 |
| E176 2024-04-26 | decay | -2.8 | 67.2 | E176 silent |
| E177 2024-05-03 | decay | -2.7 | 64.5 | E177 silent |
| E178 2024-05-10 | decay | -2.6 | 62.0 | E178 silent |
| E179 2024-05-17 | decay | -2.5 | 59.5 | E179 silent |
| E180 2024-05-24 | decay | -2.4 | 57.1 | E180 silent |
| E181 2024-05-31 | decay | -2.3 | 54.8 | E181 silent |
| E182 2024-06-07 | reinforce | +6.9 | 61.7 | E182 Chamath support x2 [w=1.02] |
| E182 2024-06-07 | reinforce | +6.7 | 68.4 | E182 Sacks support x3 [w=0.97] |
| E183 2024-06-14 | decay | -2.7 | 65.7 | E183 silent |
| E184 2024-06-20 | reinforce | +5.0 | 70.6 | E184 Sacks support x2 [w=0.97] |
| E185 2024-06-29 | reinforce | +4.3 | 74.9 | E185 Sacks support x2 [w=0.97] |
| E185 2024-06-29 | reinforce | +4.5 | 79.4 | E185 Jason support x3 |
| E186 2024-07-04 | decay | -3.2 | 76.2 | E186 silent |
| E187 2024-07-12 | decay | -3.0 | 73.2 | E187 silent |
| E188 2024-07-19 | reinforce | +3.9 | 77.1 | E188 Sacks support x2 [w=0.97] |
| E189 2024-07-26 | reinforce | +3.3 | 80.4 | E189 Sacks support x2 [w=0.97] |
| E189 2024-07-26 | reinforce | +2.5 | 82.9 | E189 Friedberg support x2 (flipped from oppose) [w=0.84] |
| E190 2024-08-02 | decay | -3.3 | 79.5 | E190 silent |
| E191 2024-08-09 | decay | -3.2 | 76.4 | E191 silent |
| E192 2024-08-16 | decay | -3.1 | 73.3 | E192 silent |
| E193 2024-08-23 | decay | -2.9 | 70.4 | E193 silent |
| E194 2024-08-30 | reinforce | +4.4 | 74.8 | E194 Jason support x2 |
| E194 2024-08-30 | reinforce | +3.4 | 78.2 | E194 Reid Hoffman support x3 (new voice) [w=0.50] |
| E194 2024-08-30 | reinforce | +3.2 | 81.4 | E194 Sacks support x2 [w=0.97] |
| E195 2024-09-06 | decay | -3.3 | 78.1 | E195 silent |
| E196 2024-09-20 | decay | -3.1 | 75.0 | E196 silent |
| E197 2024-09-27 | decay | -3.0 | 72.0 | E197 silent |
| E198 2024-10-03 | decay | -2.9 | 69.1 | E198 silent |
| E199 2024-10-11 | decay | -2.8 | 66.3 | E199 silent |
| E200 2024-10-18 | decay | -2.7 | 63.7 | E200 silent |
| E201 2024-10-25 | decay | -2.5 | 61.1 | E201 silent |
| E202 2024-11-01 | decay | -2.4 | 58.7 | E202 silent |
| E203 2024-11-08 | decay | -2.3 | 56.4 | E203 silent |
| E204 2024-11-16 | reinforce | +6.5 | 62.9 | E204 Jason support x2 |
| E204 2024-11-16 | oppose | -12.2 | 50.7 | E204 Chamath opposes x2 [w=1.02] |
| E204 2024-11-16 | reinforce | +7.2 | 57.8 | E204 Sacks support x2 [w=0.97] |
| E205 2024-11-23 | decay | -2.3 | 55.5 | E205 silent |
| E206 2024-12-07 | decay | -2.2 | 53.3 | E206 silent |