← pool

🏛️ Speculative-competition antitrust blocks chill tech M&A

The UK CMA is killing Adobe/Figma on a novel theory — not that the two compete today, but that Figma might compete with Photoshop some day — after 15 months of process. Sacks and Chamath argue that once a regulator can veto any deal on an unquantifiable future-competition test, and take a year and a half to say so, M&A activity gets a real chilling effect, the only reliable exit for startups narrows, and companies will deliberately avoid creating a nexus in the offending jurisdiction.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 83.7 GREEN
WATCH
band · contested
▼ SHORT GS
expression · bearish politics-market
WRONG
result · return -75.1% · vs SPY -108.9%
2024-12-08
born 2023-12-08 (E156) → window closed
⚠ CONFLICTING IDEA ON THE SAME TICKER — the board is arguing with itself; net it out (ticker view →)
IPO · 2026 is the year of mega-IPOs LONG EMBER 42.9

other ideas on the same ticker, same direction: Bond vigilantes hit Western Europe: French OATs to 5.5-6%, UK gilts to 6% 59 (EWU)

⚖ Why this result

fully deterministic — computed from daily closes on the scoring date; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2023-12-08 → 2024-12-08 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▼ SHORT GS (primary play). GS rose 75.1% over the window → return (sign flipped for a SHORT) = -75.1% (the call lost money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +33.9% → vs SPY = -75.1 − (+33.9) = -108.9% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the result uses.
    Direction-only read: -41.2% — did GS move the predicted way relative to the market. The two only differ on a SHORT: this call was right about direction relative to the index but still cost money versus holding it.
  4. Rule fired:
    · RIGHT — return ≥ +10% AND beat SPY by 5+
    · HALF — return ≥ +5% OR beat SPY at all
    ▶ WRONG — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a WRONG earn 0 each, opposers the opposite — this feeds the scoreboard. supported: Friedberg, Jason, Sacks | opposed: Chamath

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2023-12-08)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▼ SHORT GSstock PRIMARY advisory revenue tracks announced deal volume, the thing they say gets chilled
▼ SHORT EWUetf adjacent Chamath's claim that companies gate-keep the UK, hurting UK productivity and its listed market
▼ SHORT IPOetf adjacent if M&A is taken off the table the venture-backed cohort loses the exit path that funds it

Mention log newest first

Sacks
Sacks politics-market 48% · n=87 · E204 (2024-11-16) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 36:11 SUPPORT
“I think that we've talked about on previous pods that perhaps there was not as targeted and surgical an approach was used. And as a result of that, it did have a chilling effect on M&A. And so it hurt the small tech environment. And so I think that we need to fix that part of it.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market 51% · n=95 · E204 (2024-11-16) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 24:19 OPPOSE
“Then on the M&A side, if all you're doing is waiting for Lina Khan to not be there, to me, I think that that betrays what M&A is supposed to be, which is you're supposed to underwrite some industrial logic from first principles where things are very accretive and very accretive things should not hang by a thread on the emotional regulation or dysregulation of the FTC Commission.”
Jason
Jason politics-market 49% · n=61 · E204 (2024-11-16) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 21:39 SUPPORT
“So the backroom buzz is that Donnie from Queens is going to make M&A great again. Couple of reasons there, Sacks, the wrath of Lena Cohn's coming to an end, Mag-7 sitting on massive amounts of cash, and that cash is growing as people have laid people off and they're focused on getting fit.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market 48% · n=87 · E194 (2024-08-30) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 35:18 SUPPORT
“I agree that her approach has been overly broad, and has had a chilling effect on M&A.”
Reid Hoffman
Reid Hoffman (guest ×0.5) no politics-market track record · E194 (2024-08-30) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 32:40 SUPPORT
“her theory is you got to prevent the aggregation of powers, you got to fight every acquisition of note. And the problem, of course, is that actually quells venture capital investment.”
Jason
Jason politics-market 49% · n=61 · E194 (2024-08-30) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 31:07 SUPPORT
“I don't know what happened to the single and double M&A market, but it seems to be completely gone. Everything from Adobe and Figma to other mergers that could be happening are essentially frozen.”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market 42% · n=74 · E189 (2024-07-26) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 9:59 SUPPORT
“Google wants to accelerate beyond AWS. They want to become the leader and they're going to look for other sizable transactions that will pass antitrust muster.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market 48% · n=87 · E189 (2024-07-26) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 7:49 SUPPORT
“On Wiz, I think the most likely explanation is that they just want to keep building this as a standalone company. I think they're probably also worried that they can't get the deal through.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market 48% · n=87 · E188 (2024-07-19) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:09:53 SUPPORT
“I don't think that she should stop some of these, what I would call R&D acquisitions, from taking place where there's no accretion of market share, but rather starts being bought because they contribute a useful piece of technology. I don't think you want to shut down that part of the market. Lord knows we don't have enough exits as it is”
Jason
Jason politics-market 49% · n=61 · E185 (2024-06-29) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:10:26 SUPPORT
“we can't sell them because LinaCon is going to scuttle this M&A, and what that means is in a very real way, we have dollars being taken out of innovation in early stage”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market 48% · n=87 · E185 (2024-06-29) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:09:56 SUPPORT
“the right approach to antitrust is to stop anti-competitive tactics. Bundling is at the top of the list. Instead, what they've stopped is all M&A, which is actually bad for the ecosystem, because you deny risk capital reward”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market 48% · n=87 · E184 (2024-06-20) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:36 SUPPORT
“You got no M&A happening right now in tech, the real estate guys, they can't get loans because the interest rates are through the roof and there's a credit crunch.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market 48% · n=87 · E182 (2024-06-07) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 24:24 SUPPORT
“It's way too early in the development of these markets to say that these are clearly monopolists. There's still a lot of competition going on.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market 51% · n=95 · E182 (2024-06-07) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 19:44 SUPPORT
“I think the DOJ and the FTC are totally way out of their ski tips on this. This is a totally nascent industry.”
Jason
Jason politics-market 49% · n=61 · E175 (2024-04-19) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:09:37 SUPPORT
“We got to have a better solution for allowing companies to be bought and sold in this or merge in this country... These two things are putting a lot of headwinds on the startup ecosystem and on the venture and the risk taking capital ecosystems.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market 51% · n=95 · E173 (2024-04-05) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 45:15 SUPPORT
“I think the Democrats and the Republicans are really well aligned here. They don't like deals. And I don't think you're going to see a big sea change. They hate big tech for different reasons, but they equally want to slow them down.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market 48% · n=87 · E173 (2024-04-05) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 37:57 SUPPORT
“Well, look, it's going to be very hard for any big tech company to do a $50 billion acquisition of anything, just given that Linecom and the FTC are opposed to bigness in and of itself.”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market 42% · n=74 · E171 (2024-03-22) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 48:01 OPPOSE
“I don't think this is some run around anti-trust.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market 48% · n=87 · E171 (2024-03-22) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 46:44 SUPPORT
“It's just as hard for Microsoft to get anything through at this point. So probably they're just like, why even deal with the antitrust? They don't really need the assets.”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market 42% · n=74 · E167 (2024-02-23) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 17:18 SUPPORT
“The other one is that antitrust authorities are blocking all of their acquisitions. And so what do you do with all that cash? ... frankly, we're not going to be able to grow through M&A because of antitrust right now anyway”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market 48% · n=87 · E164 (2024-02-02) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:13:49 SUPPORT
“One is they just can't get it through. We've talked about this before. The M&A window is even more closed than the IPO window, I would say.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market 51% · n=95 · E162 (2024-01-19) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 32:16 SUPPORT
“We are investigating Amazon's purchase of the portable vacuum cleaner Roomba, right?”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market 51% · n=95 · E156 (2023-12-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:19:49 SUPPORT
“I think it's bad for capital markets when deals that are offered up just linger for 15, 18 months. I don't think that that's healthy. It causes a lot of pause amongst investors.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market 48% · n=87 · E156 (2023-12-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:14:27 SUPPORT
“I think this is going to have a very chilling effect on M&A activity for not a good reason, for not a good reason.”
Jason
Jason politics-market 49% · n=61 · E156 (2023-12-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:11:49 SUPPORT
“or just prohibiting the merger entirely. It feels like that's what's going to happen.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total push on the score, in conviction points across every mention — supports and opposes · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Sacks
Sacks 48%
11 scoring events · 47% of moves
+95.4 → net +95.4
Chamath
Chamath 51%
5 scoring events · 22% of moves
+33.0 / -12.0 → net +21.0
Jason
Jason 49%
5 scoring events · 17% of moves
+33.7 → net +33.7
Friedberg
Friedberg 42%
3 scoring events · 12% of moves
+11.9 / -12.0 → net -0.1
Reid Hoffman
Reid Hoffman guest ×0.5
1 scoring event · 2% of moves
+3.3 → net +3.3

⏳ decay drained -99.3 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E156 2023-12-08 init +42.0 42.0 E156 born by Sacks (explicit_prediction x3)
E156 2023-12-08 reinforce +13.1 55.0 E156 Jason support x2 (new voice)
E156 2023-12-08 reinforce +12.1 67.2 E156 Chamath support x3 (new voice)
E157 2023-12-16 decay -2.7 64.5 E157 silent
E158 2023-12-23 decay -2.6 61.9 E158 silent
E159 2023-12-29 decay -2.5 59.4 E159 silent
E160 2024-01-06 decay -2.4 57.1 E160 silent
E161 2024-01-13 decay -2.3 54.8 E161 silent
E162 2024-01-19 reinforce +6.8 61.6 E162 Chamath support x2
E163 2024-01-26 decay -2.5 59.1 E163 silent
E164 2024-02-02 reinforce +6.1 65.2 E164 Sacks support x2
E165 2024-02-09 decay -2.6 62.6 E165 silent
E166 2024-02-16 decay -2.5 60.1 E166 silent
E167 2024-02-23 reinforce +9.0 69.1 E167 Friedberg support x2 (new voice)
E168 2024-03-01 decay -2.8 66.3 E168 silent
E169 2024-03-08 decay -2.7 63.7 E169 silent
E170 2024-03-15 decay -2.5 61.1 E170 silent
E171 2024-03-22 reinforce +5.8 67.0 E171 Sacks support x2
E171 2024-03-22 oppose -12.0 55.0 E171 Friedberg opposes x2
E172 2024-03-29 decay -2.2 52.8 E172 silent
E173 2024-04-05 reinforce +7.1 59.8 E173 Sacks support x2
E173 2024-04-05 reinforce +7.2 67.1 E173 Chamath support x3
E174 2024-04-12 decay -2.7 64.4 E174 silent
E175 2024-04-19 reinforce +5.3 69.7 E175 Jason support x2
E176 2024-04-26 decay -2.8 66.9 E176 silent
E177 2024-05-03 decay -2.7 64.3 E177 silent
E178 2024-05-10 decay -2.6 61.7 E178 silent
E179 2024-05-17 decay -2.5 59.2 E179 silent
E180 2024-05-24 decay -2.4 56.9 E180 silent
E181 2024-05-31 decay -2.3 54.6 E181 silent
E182 2024-06-07 reinforce +6.8 61.4 E182 Chamath support x2
E182 2024-06-07 reinforce +6.9 68.3 E182 Sacks support x3
E183 2024-06-14 decay -2.7 65.6 E183 silent
E184 2024-06-20 reinforce +5.2 70.8 E184 Sacks support x2
E185 2024-06-29 reinforce +4.4 75.2 E185 Sacks support x2
E185 2024-06-29 reinforce +4.5 79.6 E185 Jason support x3
E186 2024-07-04 decay -3.2 76.4 E186 silent
E187 2024-07-12 decay -3.1 73.4 E187 silent
E188 2024-07-19 reinforce +4.0 77.4 E188 Sacks support x2
E189 2024-07-26 reinforce +3.4 80.8 E189 Sacks support x2
E189 2024-07-26 reinforce +2.9 83.7 E189 Friedberg support x2 (flipped from oppose)
E190 2024-08-02 decay -3.3 80.3 E190 silent
E191 2024-08-09 decay -3.2 77.1 E191 silent
E192 2024-08-16 decay -3.1 74.0 E192 silent
E193 2024-08-23 decay -3.0 71.1 E193 silent
E194 2024-08-30 reinforce +4.3 75.4 E194 Jason support x2
E194 2024-08-30 reinforce +3.3 78.7 E194 Reid Hoffman support x3 (new voice) [w=0.50]
E194 2024-08-30 reinforce +3.2 81.9 E194 Sacks support x2
E195 2024-09-06 decay -3.3 78.6 E195 silent
E196 2024-09-20 decay -3.1 75.5 E196 silent
E197 2024-09-27 decay -3.0 72.5 E197 silent
E198 2024-10-03 decay -2.9 69.6 E198 silent
E199 2024-10-11 decay -2.8 66.8 E199 silent
E200 2024-10-18 decay -2.7 64.1 E200 silent
E201 2024-10-25 decay -2.6 61.5 E201 silent
E202 2024-11-01 decay -2.5 59.1 E202 silent
E203 2024-11-08 decay -2.4 56.7 E203 silent
E204 2024-11-16 reinforce +6.5 63.2 E204 Jason support x2
E204 2024-11-16 oppose -12.0 51.2 E204 Chamath opposes x2
E204 2024-11-16 reinforce +7.3 58.5 E204 Sacks support x2
E205 2024-11-23 decay -2.3 56.2 E205 silent
E206 2024-12-07 decay -2.2 53.9 E206 silent