📈 SVB collapse is an extinction-level event that freezes startup funding
Thousands of venture-backed companies have deposits trapped at SVB and cannot make payroll, and the shock freezes deal-making for roughly 60 days: term sheets pulled, capital calls dragged forward, maybe half as many financings, distressed companies left to die, and some funds unable to pay their own staff. Sacks sizes it as 'a Lehman sized event for Silicon Valley' and 'the meteor hitting the dinosaur'; the spillover runs through payroll processors and payment infrastructure into the non-tech economy.
⚖ Why this verdict
fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set
- Window: 2023-03-11 → 2023-05-11 — first mention + 2-month horizon, then the window locks.
- The call: ▼ SHORT IPO (primary play). IPO rose 11.0% over the window → direction-adjusted R = -11.0% (the call lost money).
- Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +7.3%
→ α = -11.0 − (+7.3) = -18.4%
— what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
Stock-selection read: -3.7% — did IPO move the predicted way relative to the market. The two only differ on a SHORT: this call was right about direction relative to the index but still cost money versus holding it.
- Rule fired:
· HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5· PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0▶ MISS — everything else
- Credit: supporters of a MISS earn 0 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Chamath, Friedberg, Jason, Sacks | proxy-sensitive: KRE→HIT (+18.0%)
Conviction timeline
bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15
Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2023-03-11)
Plays
| expression | symbol | kind | relevance | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▼ SHORT | IPO | etf | PRIMARY | Renaissance IPO ETF — the house proxy for the venture-funded cohort. Private venture funding has no listed series, so this is explicitly a PROXY and can diverge from the private-market reality the claim is really about. |
| ▼ SHORT | ARKK | etf | adjacent | long-duration venture-adjacent listed tech — the liquid mirror of the cohort |
| ▼ SHORT | KRE | etf | adjacent | the bank at the centre of the freeze has no series; the regional-bank ETF is the closest listed carrier of the same event |
Mention log
“And so if they start to go down and then payroll doesn't hit the air conditioning company that's using the tool in Arizona, and then the Stripe service isn't able to process e-commerce payments for a small business owner that runs a website, you can start to see how there can be very significant trickling effects.”
Who built this conviction
each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement
⏳ decay drained -22.8 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one
Score events
| episode | kind | Δ | after | note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E119 2023-03-11 | init | +40.8 | 40.8 | E119 born by Jason (explicit_prediction x3) [w=0.97] |
| E119 2023-03-11 | reinforce | +11.2 | 52.0 | E119 Chamath support x2 (new voice) [w=0.84] |
| E119 2023-03-11 | reinforce | +9.4 | 61.3 | E119 Friedberg support x2 (new voice) [w=0.87] |
| E119 2023-03-11 | reinforce | +7.7 | 69.0 | E119 Sacks support x2 (new voice) [w=0.89] |
| E120 2023-03-17 | reinforce | +4.5 | 73.5 | E120 Jason support x2 [w=0.97] |
| E121 2023-03-24 | decay | -5.1 | 68.4 | E121 silent |
| E122 2023-03-31 | decay | -4.8 | 63.6 | E122 silent |
| E123 2023-04-07 | decay | -4.5 | 59.2 | E123 silent |
| E124 2023-04-14 | decay | -4.1 | 55.0 | E124 silent |
| E125 2023-04-21 | reinforce | +6.6 | 61.6 | E125 Jason support x2 [w=0.97] |
| E126 2023-04-28 | decay | -4.3 | 57.3 | E126 silent |