← pool

📈 SVB collapse is an extinction-level event that freezes startup funding

Thousands of venture-backed companies have deposits trapped at SVB and cannot make payroll, and the shock freezes deal-making for roughly 60 days: term sheets pulled, capital calls dragged forward, maybe half as many financings, distressed companies left to die, and some funds unable to pay their own staff. Sacks sizes it as 'a Lehman sized event for Silicon Valley' and 'the meteor hitting the dinosaur'; the spillover runs through payroll processors and payment infrastructure into the non-tech economy.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 77.1 GREEN
WATCH
band
▼ SHORT IPO
expression · bearish equities
WRONG
result · return -11.0% · vs SPY -18.4%
2023-05-11
born 2023-03-11 (E119) → window closed
⚠ CONFLICTING IDEAS ON THE SAME TICKER — the board is arguing with itself; net it out (ticker view →)
ARKK · It's 1997-98, not 1999 — the melt-up has years left LONG GREEN 75.6 ← stronger than this idea (59.5)
IPO · 2026 is the year of mega-IPOs LONG EMBER 42.9

other ideas on the same ticker, same direction: Rate spike impairs bank equity: the October 30 call reports land as a shock 34 (KRE)

⚖ Why this result

fully deterministic — computed from daily closes on the scoring date; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2023-03-11 → 2023-05-11 — first mention + 2-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▼ SHORT IPO (primary play). IPO rose 11.0% over the window → return (sign flipped for a SHORT) = -11.0% (the call lost money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +7.3% → vs SPY = -11.0 − (+7.3) = -18.4% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the result uses.
    Direction-only read: -3.7% — did IPO move the predicted way relative to the market. The two only differ on a SHORT: this call was right about direction relative to the index but still cost money versus holding it.
  4. Rule fired:
    · RIGHT — return ≥ +10% AND beat SPY by 5+
    · HALF — return ≥ +5% OR beat SPY at all
    ▶ WRONG — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a WRONG earn 0 each, opposers the opposite — this feeds the scoreboard. supported: Chamath, Friedberg, Jason, Sacks | proxy-sensitive: KRE→HIT (+18.0%)

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2023-03-11)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▼ SHORT IPOetf PRIMARY Renaissance IPO ETF — the house proxy for the venture-funded cohort. Private venture funding has no listed series, so this is explicitly a PROXY and can diverge from the private-market reality the claim is really about.
▼ SHORT ARKKetf adjacent long-duration venture-adjacent listed tech — the liquid mirror of the cohort
▼ SHORT KREetf adjacent the bank at the centre of the freeze has no series; the regional-bank ETF is the closest listed carrier of the same event

Mention log newest first

Jason
Jason equities 49% · n=105 · E125 (2023-04-21) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:09:02 SUPPORT
“And then I'm going to go out on the road to meet with LPs and Silicon Valley Bank blows up.”
Jason
Jason equities 49% · n=105 · E120 (2023-03-17) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:35 SUPPORT
“was absolutely terrifying up close and personally watching people pulling money out of banks and watching people have to set up loans to hit their payroll.”
Sacks
Sacks equities 44% · n=96 · E119 (2023-03-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:03:01 SUPPORT · horizon 2mo
“Jay, how you tweeted that you think this is going to cause a 60-day freeze in deal-making activity. I think that's more or less right.”
Jason
Jason equities 49% · n=105 · E119 (2023-03-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:00:39 SUPPORT
“I think private markets in BC could seize. I think you're going to see people pull term sheets. Maybe half as many fundings are going to occur as people try to do triage.”
Friedberg
Friedberg equities 43% · n=123 · E119 (2023-03-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 43:54 SUPPORT
“And so if they start to go down and then payroll doesn't hit the air conditioning company that's using the tool in Arizona, and then the Stripe service isn't able to process e-commerce payments for a small business owner that runs a website, you can start to see how there can be very significant trickling effects.”
Chamath
Chamath equities 42% · n=163 · E119 (2023-03-11) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 41:28 SUPPORT
“But it shouldn't fail because we can't get money that is in a deposit. That should not be why we torch hundreds of startups and what they're working on. Maybe thousands.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total push on the score, in conviction points across every mention — supports and opposes · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Jason
Jason 49%
3 scoring events · 63% of moves
+52.4 → net +52.4
Chamath
Chamath 42%
1 scoring event · 16% of moves
+13.1 → net +13.1
Friedberg
Friedberg 43%
1 scoring event · 12% of moves
+10.1 → net +10.1
Sacks
Sacks 44%
1 scoring event · 9% of moves
+7.8 → net +7.8

⏳ decay drained -23.9 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E119 2023-03-11 init +42.0 42.0 E119 born by Jason (explicit_prediction x3)
E119 2023-03-11 reinforce +13.1 55.0 E119 Chamath support x2 (new voice)
E119 2023-03-11 reinforce +10.1 65.2 E119 Friedberg support x2 (new voice)
E119 2023-03-11 reinforce +7.8 73.0 E119 Sacks support x2 (new voice)
E120 2023-03-17 reinforce +4.0 77.1 E120 Jason support x2
E121 2023-03-24 decay -5.4 71.7 E121 silent
E122 2023-03-31 decay -5.0 66.6 E122 silent
E123 2023-04-07 decay -4.7 62.0 E123 silent
E124 2023-04-14 decay -4.3 57.6 E124 silent
E125 2023-04-21 reinforce +6.4 64.0 E125 Jason support x2
E126 2023-04-28 decay -4.5 59.5 E126 silent